 |
|
| Politics Forum Index » General Politics Forum » President Obama's statement regarding the Nobel prize... |
|
Page 20 of 24 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:32:30 -0500, "CB"
<CB at (no spam) PrayForMe.com> wrote:
Quote: Remember the mushroom cloud nonsense?
The potentual isn't there any longer thanks too President Bush
It NEVER was a threat, you dipshit fuckwit. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:32:30 -0500, "CB"
<CB at (no spam) PrayForMe.com> wrote:
Quote: Pelosi lied people died, the CIA was prevented from telling of Mohammed
Attah's cell in NYC because of Jamie Gorelick and her memo.
You simple witted fuck
Gorelick's "memo" was a reading of the LAW
You want to blame somoene for bad deals---Blame Jesse
Helms and the GOP congress who sided against everything
Clinton attempted to do.
Funding for everything comes from Congress---a
Republican controlled congress
Policy is signed off on by Congress---Jesse Helms in
total control of committees that opposed ALL of
Clintons attempts to deal with N.Korea, China, and t
errorists. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:24:25 -0500, "PC" <PC at (no spam) minneapolis.mn.us> wrote:
Quote:
Niger's economy is based upon two things: subsitance farming and Uranium
deposits.
Iraq sent a "trade delegation" there in 1998. Did they want to buy
turnips?
One thing we know for sure - it wasn't for yellowcake.
"we"? You and your dementia?
--
The Stone Age did not end
because we ran out of stones. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| CB... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<smorgas at (no spam) board.com> wrote in message
news:stlre5t7u33p4i0iurng36k29244bj46vp at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote: On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:29:22 -0500, "CB"
CB at (no spam) PrayForMe.com> wrote:
That was a totally faulty "theory'
The faulty "theory" is that appeasing Evil keeps it at bay.
If that were the case--why did reagan sell arms to
Iran, Aid Saddam, Aid Bin laden for years?
Ever read "The Zen of War?" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:41:54 -0500, "PLMerite"
<stockade at (no spam) smokebombhill.com> wrote:
Quote: Supposedly "permists are issued to UN-approved consortiums" (if this is even
true), just like the oil contracts manipulated by Saddam to bribe western
politicians were under the control of the UN.
Yeah, I put a lot of faith in the UN, IAEA, etc.
Saddam is dead now, the left can stop shilling for him. Likewise, Bush
hasn't been president for nine months so everything belongs to Barack
Hussein Mohammed Obama II now.
Regards, PLMerite
"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in
1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a
warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those
trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of
2003
"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass
destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them
against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998
They can't let go of it because they think they have nothing else to
live for: their peckers will fall off if they admit they were wrong
or something. They're the most pathetic low-lifes of USENET and
they're not worth abusing electrons over.
--
The Stone Age did not end
because we ran out of stones. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:39:34 -0500, "CB" <CB at (no spam) PrayForMe.com> wrote:
Quote:
"PC" <PC at (no spam) minneapolis.mn.us> wrote in message
news:hchnf4$bj6$1 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org...
orionca at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:nqmoe5h3rupe5h039udtctf2tksao1ncs9 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:02:09 -0600, smorgas at (no spam) board.com wrote:
You stupid fuck
Bush claimed the UN was NOT the reason he attacked---
Bush said he attacked because Saddam was a "Clear and
present danger"---threat to America
Got a cite for that?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/02/opinion/02weds1.html
The only quote in that article is from then "CIA director Tenet, then the
director of central intelligence, famously called "a slam-dunk" case?"
A poor try, liar
That's a NY Times editorial, anyway. It repeated unsourced claims
against the Bush Administration - even the old canard about Cheney
saying Hussein was linked to 9/11. There is a REASON that paper has
lost over a million subscribers in the last 10 years, more than almost
any other newspaper in the country.
--
The Stone Age did not end
because we ran out of stones. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Clairbear... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
smorgas at (no spam) board.com wrote in news:6klre5p4replcd2mvvrgb6lkfg8ob5booc at (no spam) 4ax.com:
Quote: On 01 Nov 2009 15:48:02 GMT, Clairbear
clair at (no spam) Verizon.net> wrote:
You just can't help spewing your wrongheaded diatribes can you?
How about you tell us what exact "wrongheaded" was
contained in that truth about Bush.
When was he proven a liar?
When was he proven incompetent?
We could say the same thing ABOUT HIS SUCCESSOR, your messiah
He has yet to fulfill any of his promises and his porkulus did not stem the
tide on job losses.
But far be for me to run off like your ilk and call him a liar(like Wilson
did) or call him incopetent although his only success so far was getting an
undeserved Peace Prize |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 15:49:17 -0500, "CB"
<CB at (no spam) PrayForMe.com> wrote:
Quote: If that were the case--why did reagan sell arms to
Iran, Aid Saddam, Aid Bin laden for years?
Ever read "The Zen of War?"
I only need to read what Bush said about Why we had to
attack Iraq
His lies killed thousands |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:48:48 -0800,
orionca at (no spam) earthlink.net wrote:
Quote: On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:24:25 -0500, "PC" <PC at (no spam) minneapolis.mn.us> wrote:
Niger's economy is based upon two things: subsitance farming and Uranium
deposits.
Iraq sent a "trade delegation" there in 1998. Did they want to buy
turnips?
One thing we know for sure - it wasn't for yellowcake.
"we"? You and your dementia?
No, "we" as in the entire world
Niger had no yellow cake to sell |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:52:31 -0800,
orionca at (no spam) earthlink.net wrote:
Quote: They can't let go of it because they think they have nothing else to
live for:
Bad news for you
"we" ain't living a lie that Saddam had WMD in March
2003 pushed by your lying, deserting sack of shit bush |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:58:26 -0800,
orionca at (no spam) earthlink.net wrote:
Quote: The only quote in that article is from then "CIA director Tenet, then the
director of central intelligence, famously called "a slam-dunk" case?"
A poor try, liar
That's a NY Times editorial, anyway. It repeated unsourced claims
against the Bush Administration - even the old canard about Cheney
saying Hussein was linked to 9/11. There is a REASON that paper has
lost over a million subscribers in the last 10 years, more than almost
any other newspaper in the country.
Has nothing to do with the Yellow cake story, the lies
Bush told, or anything related to government
Every claim against the Bush administration was
eventually a proven fact
Worse was it was proven before the attack and neither
Bush nor the GOP congress would rescind the order of an
invasion. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bert Byfield... |
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: How about you tell us what exact "wrongheaded" was
contained in that truth about Bush.
Bush murdered 1,000,000 people. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Clairbear... |
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Bert Byfield <bertbyfield at (no spam) nospam.not> wrote in
news:Xns9CB6F40068F30bbyfield34caravelaxy at (no spam) 216.196.97.131:
Quote: How about you tell us what exact "wrongheaded" was
contained in that truth about Bush.
Bush murdered 1,000,000 people.
Gees and I though post WW1 Germany had a bad case of inflation
...............................
> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Harold Burton... |
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4AEA8031.ABC5EE90 at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com>,
RichTravsky <traRvEsky at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Quote: Harold Burton wrote:
In article <4AE7CB11.16C40B9F at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com>,
RichTravsky <traRvEsky at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Harold Burton wrote:
RichTravsky <traRvEsky at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Harold Burton wrote:
RichTravsky <traRvEsky at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Harold Burton wrote:
RichTravsky <traRvEsky at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Harold Burton wrote:
In article <35tgd5dhnqag8v2h8d7drrr6bivpkmoq06 at (no spam) 4ax.com>,
Laff at (no spam) alot.com
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:13:09 -0400, Harold Burton
hal.i.burton at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
There was no threat from Saddam or Iraq.
So why does BO keep us engaged there?
To salvage what Bush...
....and the Democrat Congress...
... Broke.
snicker.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/108th_United_States_Congress
The One Hundred Eighth United States Congress was the
legislative
branch
of
the
United States federal government, composed of the United
States
Senate
and
the
United States House of Representatives from January 3, 2003
to
January
3,
2005...
...
House, 229 republicons, 205 dems; Senate, 51 republicons, 48
dems.
Care to tell us how those 205 democRATs voted?
Snicker.
Admitting there wasn't a dem Congress?
Nope, just asking how those 205 democRATs (including John "I voted
for
Spurton still thinks...
...the DumbocRATs in Congress voted for the war.
And he's right.
Snicker.
"the Democrat Congress" . . .
. . . has been voting for the war for almost three years now.
Wrong again!
snicker.
Harold's poor dodge for making a fool of himself again. Heh
You actually trying to claim the DemocRAT Congress hasn't been voting
for the war for almost three years now?
snicker. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Harold Burton... |
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4AEA8198.4E6FB471 at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com>,
RichTravsky <traRvEsky at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Quote: Harold Burton wrote:
RichTravsky <traRvEsky at (no spam) hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Harold Burton wrote:
In article <4ae4b233$0$4978$9a6e19ea at (no spam) unlimited.newshosting.com>,
"CB" <CB at (no spam) PrayForMe.com> wrote:
Pelosi lied people died, the CIA was prevented from telling of
Mohammed
Attah's cell in NYC because of Jamie Gorelick and her memo. The CIA
team
called Able Danger could have foiled Attah's plot except for the
Clintonian
policy of NOT allowing communications between the CIA and the FBI.
Pelosi lied, Gorelick denied, Sandy Burger covered up and people
died.
I like it, OK if I use it?
If you want to be a fool like...
... Dickless Travesty.
Snicker.
Poor Harold. Reduced to...
....the leftard practice of...
Quote: ...creative snipping.
Snicker. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:37 am
|
|