 |
|
| Politics Forum Index » British Politics Forum » Who really won WW2... |
|
Page 22 of 43 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 21, 22, 23 ... 41, 42, 43 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Topaz... |
 Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
they were outnumbered. Hitler made Germany great. Of course the Jew
parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately the bad side won the war.
Compare the size of Germany to the size of the Jewish controlled
countries, the USA and the USSR.
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.
It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.
That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.
It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.
Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.
Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.
That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.
The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Topaz... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Here is part of Hitler's speech at Rheinmetall-Borsig Works, Berlin,
on December 10, 1940:
"In this Anglo-French world there exists, as it were, democracy, which
means the rule of the people by the people. Now the people must
possess some means of giving expression to their thoughts or their
wishes. Examining this problem more closely, we see that the people
themselves have originally no convictions of their own. Their
convictions are formed, of course, just as everywhere else. The
decisive question is who enlightens the people, who educates them? In
those countries, it is actually capital that rules; that is, nothing
more than a clique of a few hundred men who possess untold wealth and,
as a consequence of the peculiar structure of their national life, are
more or less independent and free. They say: 'Here we have liberty.'
By this they mean, above all, an uncontrolled economy, and by an
uncontrolled economy, the freedom not only to acquire capital but to
make absolutely free use of it. That means freedom from national
control or control by the people both in the acquisition of capital
and in its employment. This is really what they mean when they speak
of liberty. These capitalists create their own press and then speak of
the 'freedom of the press.'
In reality, every one of the newspapers has a master, and in every
case this master is the capitalist, the owner. This master, not the
editor, is the one who directs the policy of the paper. If the editor
tries to write other than what suits the master, he is ousted the next
day. This press, which is the absolutely submissive and characterless
slave of the owners, molds public opinion. Public opinion thus
mobilized by them is, in its turn, split up into political parties.
The difference between these parties is as small as it formerly was in
Germany. You know them, of course - the old parties. They were always
one and the same. In Britain matters are usually so arranged that
families are divided up, one member being a conservative, another a
liberal, and a third belonging to the labor party. Actually, all three
sit together as members of the family, decide upon their common
attitude and determine it. A further point is that the 'elected
people' actually form a community which operates and controls all
these organizations. For this reason, the opposition in England is
really always the same, for on all essential matters in which the
opposition has to make itself felt, the parties are always in
agreement. They have one and the same conviction and through the
medium of the press mold public opinion along corresponding lines. One
might well believe that in these countries of liberty and riches, the
people must possess an unlimited degree of prosperity. But no! On the
contrary, it is precisely in these countries that the distress of the
masses is greater than anywhere else. Such is the case in 'rich
Britain.'
She controls sixteen million square miles. In India, for example, a
hundred million colonial workers with a wretched standard of living
must labor for her. One might think, perhaps, that at least in England
itself every person must have his share of these riches. By no means!
In that country class distinction is the crassest imaginable. There is
poverty - incredible poverty - on the one side, and equally incredible
wealth on the other. They have not solved a single problem. The
workmen of that country which possesses more than one-sixth of the
globe and of the world's natural resources dwell in misery, and the
masses of the people are poorly clad.. In a country which ought to
have more than enough bread and every sort of fruit, we find millions
of the lower classes who have not even enough to fill their stomachs,
and go about hungry. A nation which could provide work for the whole
world must acknowledge the fact that it cannot even abolish
unemployment at home. For decades this rich Britain has had two and a
half million unemployed; rich America, ten to thirteen millions, year
after year; France, six, seven, and eight hundred thousand. Well, my
fellow-countrymen - what then are we to say about ourselves?
It is self-evident that where this democracy rules, the people as such
are not taken into consideration at all. The only thing that matters
is the existence of a few hundred gigantic capitalists who own all the
factories and their stock and, through them, control the people. The
masses of the people do not interest them in the least. They are
interested in them just as were our bourgeois parties in former times
- only when elections are being held, when they need votes. Otherwise,
the life of the masses is a matter of complete indifference to them.
To this must be added the difference in education. Is it not ludicrous
to hear a member of the British Labor Party - who, of course, as a
member of the Opposition is officially paid by the government - say:
'When the war is over, we will do something in social respects'?
It is the members of Parliament who are the directors of the business
concerns - just as used to be the case with us. But we have abolished
all that. A member of the Reichstag cannot belong to a Board of
Directors, except as a purely honorary member. He is prohibited from
accepting any emolument, financial or otherwise. This is not the case
in other countries.
They reply: 'That is why our form of government is sacred to us.' I
can well believe it, for that form of government certainly pays very
well.. But whether it is sacred to the mass of the people as well is
another matter.
The people as a whole definitely suffer. I do not consider it possible
in the long run for one man to work and toil for a whole year in
return for ridiculous wages, while another jumps into an express train
once a year and pockets enormous sums. Such conditions are a disgrace.
On the other hand, we National Socialists equally oppose the theory
that all men are equals. Today, when a man of genius makes some
astounding invention and enormously benefits his country by his
brains, we pay him his due, for he has really accomplished something
and been of use to his country. However, we hope to make it impossible
for idle drones to inhabit this country.
I could continue to cite examples indefinitely. The fact remains that
two worlds are face to face with one another. Our opponents are quite
right when they say: 'Nothing can reconcile us to the National
Socialist world.' How could a narrow-minded capitalist ever agree to
my principles? It would be easier for the Devil to go to church and
cross himself with holy water than for these people to comprehend the
ideas which are accepted facts to us today. But we have solved our
problems.
To take another instance where we are condemned: They claim to be
fighting for the maintenance of the gold standard as the currency
basis. That I can well believe, for the gold is in their hands. We,
too, once had gold, but it was stolen and extorted from us. When I
came to power, it was not malice which made me abandon the gold
standard. Germany simply had no gold left. Consequently, quitting the
gold standard presented no difficulties, for it is always easy to part
with what one does not have. We had no gold. We had no foreign
exchange. They had all been stolen and extorted from us during the
previous fifteen years. But, my fellow countrymen, I did not regret
it, for we have constructed our economic system on a wholly different
basis. In our eyes, gold is not of value in itself. It is only an
agent by which nations can be suppressed and dominated.
When I took over the government, I had only one hope on which to
build, namely, the efficiency and ability of the German nation and the
German workingman; the intelligence of our inventors, engineers,
technicians, chemists, and so forth. I built on the strength which
animates our economic system. One simple question faced me: Are we to
perish because we have no gold; am I to believe in a phantom which
spells our destruction? I championed the opposite opinion: Even though
we have no gold, we have capacity for work.
The German capacity for work is our gold and our capital, and with
this gold I can compete successfully with any power in the world. We
want to live in houses which have to be built. Hence, the workers must
build them, and the raw materials required must be procured by work.
My whole economic system has been built up on the conception of work.
We have solved our problems while, amazingly enough, the capitalist
countries and their currencies have suffered bankruptcy.
Sterling can find no market today. Throw it at any one and he will
step aside to avoid being hit. But our Reichsmark, which is backed by
no gold, has remained stable. Why? It has no gold cover; it is backed
by you and by your work. You have helped me to keep the mark stable.
German currency, with no gold coverage, is worth more today than gold
itself. It signifies unceasing production. This we owe to the German
farmer, who has worked from daybreak till nightfall. This we owe to
the German worker, who has given us his whole strength. The whole
problem has been solved in one instant, as if by magic.
My dear friends, if I had stated publicly eight or nine years ago: 'In
seven or eight years the problem of how to provide work for the
unemployed will be solved, and the problem then will be where to find
workers,' I should have harmed my cause. Every one would have
declared: 'The man is mad. It is useless to talk to him, much less to
support him. Nobody should vote for him. He is a fantastic creature.'
Today, however, all this has come true. Today, the only question for
us is where to find workers. That, my fellow countrymen, is the
blessing which work brings.
Work alone can create new work; money cannot create work. Work alone
can create values, values with which to reward those who work. The
work of one man makes it possible for another to live and continue to
work. And when we have mobilized the working capacity of our people to
its utmost, each individual worker will receive more and more of the
world's goods.
We have incorporated seven million unemployed into our economic
system; we have transformed another six millions from part-time into
full-time workers; we are even working overtime. And all this is paid
for in cash in Reichsmarks which maintained their value in peacetime.
In wartime we had to ration its purchasing capacity, not in order to
devalue it, but simply to earmark a portion of our industry for war
production to guide us to victory in the struggle for the future of
Germany...
One thing is certain, my fellow-countrymen: All in all, we have today
a state with a different economic and political orientation from that
of the Western democracies.
Well, it must now be made possible for the British worker to travel.
It is remarkable that they should at last hit upon the idea that
traveling should be something not for millionaires alone, but for the
people too. In this country, the problem was solved some time ago. In
the other countries - as is shown by their whole economic structure -
the selfishness of a relatively small stratum rules under the mask of
democracy. This stratum is neither checked nor controlled by anyone.
It is therefore understandable if an Englishman says: 'We do not want
our world to be subject to any sort of collapse.' Quite so. The
English know full well that their Empire is not menaced by us. But
they say quite truthfully: 'If the ideas that are popular in Germany
are not completely eliminated, they might become popular among our own
people, and that is the danger. We do not want this.' It would do no
harm if they did become popular there, but these people are just as
narrow-minded as many once were in Germany. In this respect they
prefer to remain bound to their conservative methods. They do not wish
to depart from them, and do not conceal the fact.
They say, 'The German methods do not suit us at all.'
And what are these methods? You know, my comrades, that I have
destroyed nothing in Germany. I have always proceeded very carefully,
because I believe - as I have already said - that we cannot afford to
wreck anything. I am proud that the Revolution of 1933 was brought to
pass without breaking a single windowpane. Nevertheless, we have
wrought enormous changes.
I wish to put before you a few basic facts: The first is that in the
capitalistic democratic world the most important principle of economy
is that the people exist for trade and industry, and that these in
turn exist for capital. We have reversed this principle by making
capital exist for trade and industry, and trade and industry exist for
the people. In other words, the people come first. Everything else is
but a means to this end. When an economic system is not capable of
feeding and clothing a people, then it is bad, regardless of whether a
few hundred people say: 'As far as I am concerned it is good,
excellent; my dividends are splendid.'
However, the dividends do not interest me at all. Here we have drawn
the line. They may then retort: 'Well, look here, that is just what we
mean. You jeopardize liberty.'
Yes, certainly, we jeopardize the liberty to profiteer at the expense
of the community, and, if necessary, we even abolish it. British
capitalists, to mention only one instance, can pocket dividends of 76,
80, 95, 140, and even 160 per cent from their armament industry.
Naturally they say: 'If the German methods grow apace and should prove
victorious, this sort of thing will stop.'
They are perfectly right. I should never tolerate such a state of
affairs. In my eyes, a 6 per cent dividend is sufficient. Even from
this 6 per cent we deduct one-half and, as for the rest, we must have
definite proof that it is invested in the interest of the country as a
whole. In other words, no individual has the right to dispose
arbitrarily of money which ought to be invested for the good of the
country. If he disposes of it sensibly, well and good; if not, the
National Socialist state will intervene.
To take another instance, besides dividends there are the so-called
directors' fees. You probably have no idea how appallingly active a
board of directors is. Once a year its members have to make a journey.
They have to go to the station, get into a first-class compartment and
travel to some place or other. They arrive at an appointed office at
about 10 or 11 A.M. There they must listen to a report. When the
report has been read, they must listen to a few comments on it. They
may be kept in their seats until 1 P.M. or even 2. Shortly after 2
o'clock they rise from their chairs and set out on their homeward
journey, again, of course, traveling first class. It is hardly
surprising that they claim 3,000, 4,000, or even 5,000 as compensation
for this: Our directors formerly did the same - for what a lot of time
it costs them! Such effort had to be made worth while! Of course, we
have got rid of all this nonsense, which was merely veiled
profiteering and even bribery.
In Germany, the people, without any doubt, decide their existence.
They determine the principles of their government. In fact it has been
possible in this country to incorporate many of the broad masses into
the National Socialist party, that gigantic organization embracing
millions and having millions of officials drawn from the people
themselves. This principle is extended to the highest ranks.
For the first time in German history, we have a state which has
absolutely abolished all social prejudices in regard to political
appointments as well as in private life. I myself am the best proof of
this. Just imagine: I am not even a lawyer, and yet I am your Leader!
It is not only in ordinary life that we have succeeded in appointing
the best among the people for every position. We have
Reichsstatthalters who were formerly agricultural laborers or
locksmiths. Yes, we have even succeeded in breaking down prejudice in
a place where it was most deep-seated -in the fighting forces.
Thousands of officers are being promoted from the ranks today. We have
done away with prejudice. We have generals who were ordinary soldiers
and noncommissioned officers twenty-two and twenty-three years ago. In
this instance, too, we have overcome all social obstacles. Thus, we
are building up our life for the future.
As you know we have countless schools, national political educational
establishments, Adolf Hitler schools, and so on. To these schools we
send gifted children of the broad masses, children of working men,
farmers' sons whose parents could never have afforded a higher
education for their children. We take them in gradually. They are
educated here, sent to the Ordensburgen, to the Party, later to take
their place in the State where they will some day fill the highest
posts....
Opposed to this there stands a completely different world. In the
world the highest ideal is the struggle for wealth, for capital, for
family possessions, for personal egoism; everything else is merely a
means to such ends. Two worlds confront each other today. We know
perfectly well that if we are defeated in this war it would not only
be the end of our National Socialist work of reconstruction, but the
end of the German people as a whole. For without its powers of
coordination, the German people would starve. Today the masses
dependent on us number 120 or 130 millions, of which 85 millions alone
are our own people. We remain ever aware of this fact.
On the other hand, that other world says: 'If we lose, our world-wide
capitalistic system will collapse. For it is we who save hoarded gold.
It is lying in our cellars and will lose its value. If the idea that
work is the decisive factor spreads abroad, what will happen to us? We
shall have bought our gold in vain. Our whole claim to world dominion
can then no longer be maintained. The people will do away with their
dynasties of high finance. They will present their social claims, and
the whole world system will be overthrown.'
I can well understand that they declare: 'Let us prevent this at all
costs; it must be prevented.' They can see exactly how our nation has
been reconstructed. You see it clearly. For instance, there we see a
state ruled by a numerically small upper class. They send their sons
to their own schools, to Eton. We have Adolf Hitler schools or
national political educational establishments. On the one hand, the
sons of plutocrats, financial magnates; on the other, the children of
the people. Etonians and Harrovians exclusively in leading positions
over there; in this country, men of the people in charge of the State.
These are the two worlds. I grant that one of the two must succumb.
Yes, one or the other. But if we were to succumb, the German people
would succumb with us. If the other were to succumb, I am convinced
that the nations will become free for the first time. We are not
fighting individual Englishmen or Frenchmen. We have nothing against
them. For years I proclaimed this as the aim of my foreign policy. We
demanded nothing of them, nothing at all. When they started the war
they could not say: 'We are doing so because the Germans asked this or
that of us.' They said, on the contrary: 'We are declaring war on you
because the German system of Government does not suit us; because we
fear it might spread to our own people.' For that reason they are
carrying on this war. They wanted to blast the German nation back to
the time of Versailles, to the indescribable misery of those days. But
they have made a great mistake.
If in this war everything points to the fact that gold is fighting
against work, capitalism against peoples, and reaction against the
progress of humanity, then work, the peoples, and progress will be
victorious. Even the support of the Jewish race will not avail the
others.
I have seen all this coming for years. What did I ask of the other
world? Nothing but the right for Germans to reunite and the
restoration of all that had been taken from them - nothing which would
have meant a loss to the other nations. How often have I stretched out
my hand to them? Ever since I came into power. I had not the slightest
wish to rearm.
For what do armaments mean? They absorb so much labor. It was I who
regarded work as being of decisive importance, who wished to employ
the working capacity of Germany for other plans. I think the news is
already out that, after all, I have some fairly important plans in my
mind, vast and splendid plans for my people. It is my ambition to make
the German people rich and to make the German homeland beautiful. I
want the standard of living of the individual raised. I want us to
have the most beautiful and the finest civilization. I should like the
theater - in fact, the whole of German civilization - to benefit all
the people and not to exist only for the upper ten thousand, as is the
case in England.
The plans which we had in mind were tremendous, and I needed workers
in order to realize them. Armament only deprives me of workers. I made
proposals to limit armaments. I was ridiculed. The only answer I
received was 'No.' I proposed the limitation of certain types of
armament. That was refused. I proposed that airplanes should be
altogether eliminated from warfare. That also was refused. I suggested
that bombers should be limited. That was refused. They said: 'That is
just how we wish to force our regime upon you.' ...
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
A Jew named Mohammed
Has Mohammed (Muhammad) ever existed ?
Enquiry on monotheism
Bernard Raquin
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://forms.aweber.com/form/
49/385318849.js"></script>
Presentation
Thanks to archaeological discoveries, to the translations from
sumerian, egyptian and aramaic, each and everyone can at last discover
the origin of the "sacred texts". Far from being the word of " God",
the revealed religions recycled archaic old myths. One will see why
they have provoked so many slaughters, by drawing their followers in
the trap of ignorance and vanity.
This work, very different from the official legends, takes us into one
of the most fabulous human creations, the invention of myths and
prophets. The author invites you to a fascinating inquiry into the
heart of monotheist religions.
You will discover that, as other biblical prophets, Mohammed seems to
be one of the most famous historical hoaxes. You will also learn why,
in which period and in which language the Coran was written and with
which aim.
Indispensable for human beings in quest of spiritual authenticity, and
also for every person wishing to understand current events and defend
the freedom of expression.
Bernard Raquin, psychotherapist and teacher in many seminars, has
published a number of books on spirituality and personal development.
Following the murder of his sister by her son and husband claiming to
be from "Islam", he decided to unveil the falsification and to shed
light on the spiritual path and historical truth.
"The ones who take in broad daylight any new proposition are first
called heretics."
(Montesquieu)
Contents
Chapter 1 : Farewell to a beloved woman
Chapter 2 : How to fabricate a religion
Chapter 3 : Jesus revisited by Islam
Chapter 4 : How heretics invented Islam
Retrospective theology
Allah's origin
The descent into hells : an ancestral myth
The coranic paradise
Allah's fall
Califs are warriors and not rabbis
Chapter 5 : Conquering Jerusalem!
Let us rebuild the Temple!
Mohammedans turn to Jerusalem
Chapter 6 : Divine or human violence?
Sacrifice
Slavery
Theology or superstition?
The hatred for women
Chapter 7 : Who wrote the Coran?
Chronology
The religious contexts in the seventh century
The different redactors of Coran
The fiction of illiteracy
How two fabricate surats
Why Arabic language did not exist at that time
How the Coran was drafted ?
Is Coran anything else than a compilation ?
The superstitions of Coran
Inimitability of Coran ?
A few excerpts of the true Coran
Chapter 8 : Mohammed's legend
Gabriel's theology or laborious elaboration?
The cave
The legend of the Seven asleep
Mohammed's celestial journey
The legend of Mecca
The legend of Medina
The Battle of the Ditch
The charter of Medina
The aggravation of fiction
All religions are polytheist
No trace of Mohammed whatsoever...
How the name of Mohammed was invented
Abu Bakr decrees Mohammed's death
Chapter 9 : the Great Godess of the Kaaba
The pilgrimage
Chapter 10: For the cessation of holocausts
About forgiving
Nostalgia
Let us make a dream
Fatwa
Annex 1 : Those books which were used to write the Coran
Annex 2 : The redactors of the Coran
Annex 3 : How was fabricated the Coran?
Short bibliography
Does monotheism lead preferentially to crime? The question was often
asked by specialists of religions. The nine first Califs of Islam
perished assassinated. Preventing to think never served human
dignity, neither the cause of God. Scholars wondered if certain
religions are not constitutively violent. But more than monotheism,
it is the prophetic neurosis which is so often devil's mouthpiece...p.
23
Unfortunately for the beliefs of Christians, the historian Philo of
Alexandria, who was Jesus' contemporary and wrote several volumes, do
not quote him, and if the Messiah is famous until Syria, should we
believe Matthew, and until Egypt or Babylon since the Mages have come
from there, while is he not quoted anywhere in the chronicles? For the
past 2000 years, billions of Christian have wondered : why are we
still obliged to commit evil and suffer it, and indeed live, as if
Christ had never come?...
[The author put a few paragraphs a little more on the right to
indicate more personal and psychological reflections]
At the beginning was the lie : lies of prophets who forced visions and
voices to serve a political cause. I do not doubt visions, an eternal
and dream perception of the world. But a vision giving even
instructions about food, laws, hygiene and war is an illusion, because
nothing is more fluctuating than the customs and beliefs. Visions are
images drawn from the collective unconscious, teachings of wisdom,
they are allegorical and not ready-made answers to circumstantial
problems.
The three "biblical" religions have in common the destruction of
sources, the disregard for others and their pretension to detain the
revealed truth. Revealed by whom ? Not by a hoary sage full of
wisdom, polished by decades of asceticism and ennobling acts, but by
vociferous prophets. If God exists, it may be doubted that He chose
personality as controversial as Moses, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, David or
Mohammed, such as described by the tradition. The prophetic points to
his victim, the sage shows the path.
In what monotheism has served the cause of the unique God, who may
well have done without this wicked homage? Even the Gospels contain
rages. Some claim that the apostles represented a movement of
rebellion... Simon the Zealot, who became later Peter, was, as his
name indicates, an activist. His brother Judah (not Judah the
traitor) was called Iscariot, i.e. holder of the dagger with a bent
edge... Then this group was destroyed and consequently divinized,
according to a mechanism which was well analyzed by René Girard. The
exceptional person becomes a devil, a hero or a saint.
In which way polytheist were pagans ? Pagans, the Sumerians ,
inventors of writing, of laws, of the wheel, of most of the myths
which forged our civilization? They who have created schools and the
very first parliament? Pagans, the Babylonians, inventors of
astronomy, of medicine, of treatises on plants and of the fabrication
of therapeutical drugs?
Ignorant, the Egyptians, where men and women were equals? It is
sufficient to go in any museum to become immediately struck by wonder,
and modest.
Idolatrous, the Zoroastrians, without image of God, inciting to go
beyond oneself through "good thoughts, good words and good actions"?
Pagans, Krishna's devotees, seeking forgiveness and goodness in the
cult of fecundity, intoxicated with the gratitude for the boons from
heaven? Infidels, the worshippers of Vishnu, good ascetics who where
detached from the appearances of the world, who wanted to realize the
Atman, and merge into the deep consciousness of the Whole ?
Pagans, the Amerindians and their prestigious civilization? The
Aztec ?!
Idolatrous, the Celts and their refined conception of the divine, who
have dominated the world during several millennia and which have
elaborated myths taken again by Christianity?
Ignorant, the Buddhist, whose spirit glides above the feelings of
villainy? Idolatrous, the Jains, who do not kill animal and forbid to
themselves any violence ?
How much base feelings this despise, this self-conceit expresses. My
Goodness! Free us from these desert prophets, hellish creatures,
presumptuous, wicked, ignorant, who come out from the dark age heading
hosts of warriors of apocalypse, with foam at the mouth, with erected
sticks, the very servants of Satan!
"The prophets, these goats with a long beard, cannot pretend to any
intellectual or spiritual superiority... Their duplicity is obvious by
their very contradicting each other... As for the Coran, it is only a
bundle of nonsensical fables... The treatises of the Ancients such as
Plato, Aristotle, Euclides or Hippocrat have rendered greater services
to humanity." (Ibn Warraq quoting Abdel Razin Why I am not a Muslim, p.
324)
The soul who is seeking ecstasies against the others, end in the cul-
de-sac of mad anger. And the mystic who is petrified by awe will more
surely meet the "lower astral plane", the universe of those deities
which are evoked in the Tibetan Book of the Dead rather than bliss and
wonder.
The savior god was hardly a new thing when Jesus (whose name means I
save) appeared : Apollo, Adonis, Osiris, Serapis, Tanmuz in Sumer and
Syria, Odin in ancient Germany, Dionysos-Bacchus, Orpheus, Mithra and
Horus were around....(p.55-56)
When monotheism has inevitably lead to wars against the inevitable
heresies, young saplings sprout, a fresh wind from the human spirit,
who rediscovers the psychic functions of the old gods. And for that,
no need of books or ancient idols: the functioning of the brain is
sufficient. Any person is able to rediscover them by listening to his
unconscious. Monotheism, opposed to the functioning of the brain,
does not exist in any religion. Our brain needs, to transform the
thoughts in words, to elaborate representations. This explain, to my
eye, why pure monotheism, which was meant only for rare sages,
produces so many pathologies among ordinary believers, by pushing them
towards schizophrenia.56
Among the other influences on Jesus, the room is lacking to evoke
Apollonius of Tyan, and overall Mithra whose cult has been entirely
copied by the Christians. [Raquin quotes many details and proofs of
this well-known fact]
56
This Manichaeism appears again in the concept of dar-ul-islam
and dar-ul-harb. The land which have been conquered by Islam are
"land (House) of submission". The other countries are "lands of the
war". Intoxicated herds, which have been rendered mad by heinous
preachers, are allowed to plunder, kill, destroy the countries of the
"infidels" - who in fact they are themselves. Just as Mohammed was
put above God by making him speak, one puts Muslims beyond the others,
and the vociferous preacher feels he is superior to the one who is
good. Thus, a stupid person feels authorized to abuse a girl if she
eats during the Ramadan. Any pretentious fellow, because he
prostrates before nothingness, feels that he has the power to judge
the scholar. Here lies undoubtedly the biggest tragedy, and the basis
of every tyranny: to give to mediocre people the power to judge their
neighbors...67
People are summoned not to believe in jinns, but if they believe, they
are punished. Here is a constant feature of the Coran: pretending
everything and its opposite, installing a series of double binds which
prevent reflection, paralyze logic, to force the acceptance of any
theological contortion. These permanent contradictions are strong
evidence that the Coran is a collective work. Every religion has its
own contradictions. But the Coran is false and contradictory on
almost everything. And neither the Bible or the Gospels claim to have
an unique author. Or one should admit that Gabriel had become doting.
The "double bind" means receiving two opposite orders, which provokes
a stupefaction and paralyze intelligence: Allah agrees only to Islam
as a religion - but he says "no coercion in religion". Don't force
your women into prostitution - but if you do it, Allah will console
them. Be stoned to death if you don't believe in Allah - but anyhow
everything comes from Allah. Don't be among those who associate Allah
with other divinities - but anyhow your destiny is already written on
a tablet since your birth. Allah does not like that we divulgate
wicked words - unless one is being victim of them. "We have divided
the earth into communities: among them there are the right ones - and
others which are not" (Co 7, 168 ). There is no other God than God -
and still, there are angels, jinns, ogers; now, coming from Allah,
they incite to disagree with him.
But other assertions are still worse : "There is refuge against
Allah only in Him" (Co 9, 118) or "Who defends you day and night
against the Benefactor?" (Co 21, 42) or "I am seeking the protection
of the Lord of the Dawn against the evil he has created..." (113)
This reminds of the child beaten by his or her mother, and who, having
only her, goes and seek refuge near her. Neurosis and despair are
guaranteed. Take refuge against Allah in Allah ? Defend oneself
against the Benefactor? Ask from the creator of evil for protection?
p. 68-69
At the beginning Islam had no vocation to universality. Every prophet
addressed his own community: "... When we have sent a witness to every
community, and we have made you a witness for those people." (4, 41)
The religious leaders of primitive Islam which indeed were Samaritan
or Ismaelian rabbis, forbade the conversions to the new sect of non-
Arabs for two centuries, since one cannot convert to become the
descendant of Ismael, just as one could not become the children of
Israel. Then, the conversion system became exploited to dominate,
when the Caliphs understood the interest to make people’s mind
submissive to the Arabic domination disguised in Allah, when 600,000
words, hadîs, came out to justify their political agenda, when
Mohamed’s life was invented. (p.71)
Allah's origin :
Allah has got about one hundred "beautiful names". A poem from the
12th century B.C. grants to the Babylonian God Marduk about 50 names,
coming from the defeated and assimilated deities. Most of these will
qualify Allah.
The word Allah comes from the Sumerian divinity Lilitu, evolving
in Lilith (the Mother-Goddess of the Hebrew), and then in Al-ilat
(that of the Arabs), but also in El, God, in akkadian. One finds also
in Arabic Ala, 'to be terrified'. The name Allah has certainly been
the masculine form that the original name Al-ilat has taken.(p.71)
Devil's fall in the Coran
Later, Mohammed will get the authorization from Allah to use deceit,
lie and dissimulation (taquyya). "Hide what you have in the heart."
A verse (16, 91) asks not to break one’s oath, but another (5, 89)
allows perjury or incites to commit it (96). The development of this
devastating doctrine comes still more from the hadîs....
All this has its origin in the Bible : Michea has the vision that
Yahve holds a counsel with the heavenly hosts, allowing the Spirit to
become the spirit of lying against the adversaries of Israel. God
asks from his angels to help him to seduce the king Achab. "Then, one
of them appeared before the Lord to tell Him : 'I am the one who will
seduce him. And the Lord told him : 'In which way'? He answered: 'I
will go and be a spirit of lie in the mouths of all his prophets. The
Lord agreed : 'You will seduce him, since indeed you have this power.
Go and do in this wise." (1 Kings 22 19)
Yahve agrees to seduction, which is nonetheless the characteristic of
Satan. The CoTran will take again this theme, which is a blaspheme but
still natural for the superstitions of that time. The more one
invokes, the less one respects...
These intrigues provoke serious spiritual disorders. For sin is
Allah's work, while Satan is there only to fix the practical
details... Fanatics are basically victims of an individual neurosis,
but when they come together to intoxicate themselves and share their
hatred, they fall into psychosis, prisoners of themselves, rendering
themselves mutually mad. (p.76)
Allah's fall
Never spiritual discussions are to be found in the Coran or Mohammed's
life, except boring slogans. Never mystical preoccupations are
present, which would enable one to accord himself with a superior
moral code. Never renunciation to illusions and passions is hinted
at. Never the ultimatum aim of humanity is the object of
questioning. Forgiving is granted according to Allah's whims; the
absolution of sins does not come from an inner transmutation, but from
a mechanical profession of faith, all the more claimed and shown that
it is not put into practice by good actions in life. One finds only
the crazy frailty of an anxious Allah, because his subjects could
start venerating a secondary divinity, whom still He has created. In
the text one can only find the proclamation of the tragic despair of a
unique God, killing his own creatures after sending Satan to them to
have them doubt; obliged to slaughter people to force survivors to
prostrate before Himself. One sees in this book only Allah's
vertiginous fall into absolute nothingness, at war against its own
creation, having for satisfaction only servile people, robots devoid
of consciousness and without freedom. One reads only devilish
pleasures, threats and revenges.
The rights of the human creatures are threaded upon, betrayal is
sanctified; deceit is recommended; cruelty, baseness, possessiveness,
cupidity are encouraged; lie and dissimulation are favored.
Psalmody is there in lieu of piety. Recitations take the place of
reflection, litanies that of elevation. And all that is chanted until
entrancement, to forget, if only for one hour, the tragic condemnation
for the sin, not Adam's one, but still worse, for the sin of living,
because the very life of a human being is unbearable to Allah, indeed
jealous not to exist himself.
A human being will not be allowed the temptation to show love, on the
contrary, he will have to reject his own family : "Don't take for
friends your fathers or your brothers, if they prefer incredulity to
faith." (9, 23) "It is not befitting to the prophet or the believers
to implore God's forgiving for polytheists, be they their near and
dear, while they know that these people will be inmates of the
Furnace." (9, 113) "You will not find people believing in God and in
the Last Day, and showing love to those who oppose God and his
prophet, be they their fathers, their sons, their brothers, or members
of their clan." (83, 22). And woe to music, dance and joy! Woe to
love and long life to death! That is the war cry of those sects which
court death.
Those verses are only a remake of the Deuteronomy : "If your
brother, nephew, niece, your wife who rests on your chest, or the
friend who is as yourself, incite you to serve other gods and not me,
you must kill him; let your hand be the first to put him to death.
Lapidate him, let him die... If iniquitous people serve other gods
than Me, you will exterminate their town and you will slaughter all
its inhabitants by your sword." (Dt, 13)
Forced into a destiny "attached to its neck" whose aim he ignores,
the human being is now under surveillance to accomplish rituals which
are empty of meaning, to cry out of rage and bitterness before this
scorn of divine creation and this ontological incomprehension of the
world. Let it be submissive, this bunch of scoundrels ever ready to
rebel against Allah so that He " may send a messenger to warn them"
and feel the pleasure to destroy them: "There is no city that we will
not destroy and torment with the strongest torture before the Day of
Resurrection. That was fixed in the Scriptures." (Co 17, 5
The human being believed to be free: he is only an alien on this
earth, a prostrated slave. But in his curse, he will have also to be
wary of his best friend, who may be inhabited by a djinn; or of his
son who will judge him not believer enough and who will send him to
hell. He will have to see his mother and sister humiliated and
struck, this sister which is soft, beautiful, loving, consoling, the
only one which in fact deserves Allah's beautiful names. How difficult
it is, the coranic demand which teaches to despise woman; to transform
the mother, deity of our childhood, into an inferior creature, just
waiting to people the hell...
And to crown all that, the very foundation of spirituality -
compassion - is absent from Coran. Mercy, love, the thrust of the
heart towards the one who suffers, the care towards the soul who is
searching, are substituted by sinister vociferations. Ceaselessly,
Allah is called merciful; but he never demonstrates mercy. In the
description of ignorant redactors, he has become a conceited and cruel
being. The most he can do is to accept servility as a proof of
submissiveness; and his forgiving is only for doubts about his
existence, since acts are secondary. At last, intoxicated with
Himself, Allah falls in the supreme sin of pride, without any feeling
for His own tragic destiny of a burning king. Thus blinded by his own
glory, Allah takes the place of Lucifer. He went beyond is likes,
such as Odon, Kali, Shiva, Nergal, Yahve, Satan, and ends up alone in
the world.
Under the pretense of absolute submission, the Coran represents
eventually God's murder, by rejecting Him outside humanity. So, these
legend-makers who wrote it have been the root cause of innumerable
crimes against the true Allah. That is why the Coran is received by
the technique of overfeeding and stuffing memory; faith is not
necessary because faith is a choice, whereas there, only submission is
expected. We can notice that the end of the theological debate in
Islam, in the 14th century, triggered a long lasting regression of
this culture which had been able, by translating Greek and Persian
authors, to reach the summits of civilization.
Reconquering Jerusalem!
[In 614, the last Persian emperor of the dynasty of Sassanides,
Chosroes II, takes Jerusalem from the ruler of Byzance. He hands its
administration onto the Jew, but they are so violent towards
Christians that he has to remove it from their hands. In 630, the
capital is taken again by Heraklios, the ruler of Byzance, to be lost
a second time in 638. Meanwhile, the Jews had enrolled more and more
Arabic tribes of mercenary and taken them on their side by having them
believe the myth that they were descendant of Ishmael and thus that it
was then their duty to reconquer Jerusalem, which had become in their
new understanding their own holy land. Before, the Arabic tribes had
nothing to do with this city. There were two groups, Ishmaelians and
Agarenes, the latter were supposed to descend from Ishmael’s mother
and Abraham second wife, Agar. According to the historians
specialists of this period, there has been a confusion of words,
between hegirian, that is the migrants, and agarenes, Agar’s
descendants. These “migration” which was in fact of Arabic tribes into
Syria and the West of Persia was interpreted much later as the one
from Mecca to Medina, two towns which just did not exist in the 7h or
8th century according to historians. The group of Agarenes gave birth
to the Shiites, while the Ishmaelians gave birth to the Sunnis
Muslims : Ismaelian and Mussalman have indeed the same etymology.]
They had been distinct right from the beginning, so the story of the
early schism between the two is again another myth.
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://forms.aweber.com/form/
49/385318849.js"></script>
Publishers : translate Un Juif nommé Mahomet it worth it !
And the other books of Bernard Raquin
Write to : bernard.raquin at (no spam) gmail.com
Bernard Raquin
This page "A Jew named Muhammad" and all the pages of Bernard's
Raquin site are copyrighted Bernard Raquin - french and international
laws, convention de Berne, etc. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| SPierce... |
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1a012dc4-18ed-4d7a-980d-dd360d4cb6b4 at (no spam) a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
(snipped)
Quote: Watch it, you'll be saying hail BNP next.
We might have to ally with them to deal with the sand Nazi menace,
just like we allied with Communists to deal with the Nazi menace.
Michael
# Well, one day it will occur to you to analyse the words ' Nazi menace'
and think just what it was about them that was a menace to Britain.
Why ally with Communists when the Communists had already stated they were
going to take over the world...and indeed had already tried taking over
Germany. We should have helped the Germans eliminate them.
Someone was short-sighted. Britain would still be a civilised country, not
a third world dump for third world trash...and created that way by the very
same people who were Communist believers...Attlee and his followers. Now
Britain is part of the Communist European Union of Socialist Republics...or
haven't you noticed yet. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Topaz" <mars1933 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:rm93f5tij464qe5kgje4j90sisdsb82lt4 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
Democracy is a cruel joke when
idiots like you blame others for your own failures....
Quote:
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation
with the average voter."
Winston Churchill
got news for you sunshine, he was referring to imbeciles like you...  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Topaz" <mars1933 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ttb3f5pc5tq318n97skj3r3o3n906ul6rc at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"Hence all inventions are the result of the creative faculty of
the individual.
which is why he was so filled with hatred and envy after being rejected from
the school of art he wanted to attend.... he couldn't make the cut....
bwahahahaha.... 8-D |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:46 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Topaz" <mars1933 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mvb3f59vqh6fpn49mqj1bocamn34uitfp9 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
Polish Atrocities
Against the German Minority in Poland
Edited and published by order of the Foreign Office,
Volk und Reich Verlag Berlin, 2nd. revised ed., 1940, 311 pp.
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm
Volk und Reich Verlag logo
GERMANS: ABUSED MINORITies!
because they had to blame someone other than themselves for their
failures.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Topaz" <mars1933 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v0c3f55bt233jgri8dbbbteq7sq8bdjiu5 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
The Riddle of the Jew's Success
F. Roderich-Stoltheim (T. Fritsch)
This rare and valuable book provides a detailed analysis of Jewish
behavior and thinking. A reprint of the English-language edition of
1927. After Germany's defeat in 1945, this book was banned by the
Allied occupation authorities, and nearly all copies were destroyed.
Written by the influential German publicist Theodor Fritsch, it
appeared under a pen name. This book helps in understanding the scope
and intensity of anti-Jewish feeling in Germany during the 1920s and
1930s.
Here are some quotes:
"When in the year 1890, a petition was sent from the anti-Jewish camp
to a number of Imperial and local authorities, containing the request
that a commission of independent savants should be appointed, whose
duty would be to examine carefully the passages in dispute, in not a
single instance was the request granted. The Prussian Ministry of
Culture dismissed any such step as 'impracticable'. If one compares
the thoroughness with which the morality of the Jesuits has been and
is still discussed in public, one if forced to accept the view, that
the zealous friends of truth and opponents of those, who work in an
obscure and devious manner, know how to restrain their zeal for
enlightenment in a truly remarkable way so far as the Jews are
concerned.
The position is thus a very peculiar one. This much is established:
The German national representative bodies and governments have given
the Jews equal civic rights, and have recognized them as a separate
religious community, without making any inquiry whether the moral
instruction of the Jews is compatible with the welfare of the state."
because in a democracy where individual rights and freedoms are respected,
they are... claiming otherwise is nothing more than hate-mongering and the
most cowardly form of evil..... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:50 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Topaz" <mars1933 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:kbc3f59jh15jgrvsk3hkqq5s3q4ki8vieg at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
they were weak and stupid.... like you.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Topaz" <mars1933 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mcc3f59k1bmns4djp9dp58f9dbj5cvn4lr at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
Here is part of Hitler's speech at Rheinmetall-Borsig Works, Berlin,
on December 10, 1940:
"In this Anglo-French world there exists, as it were, democracy, which
means the rule of the people by the people. Now the people must
possess some means of giving expression to their thoughts or their
wishes. Examining this problem more closely, we see that
those who think this a problem are weak and evil imbeciles who turn to
oppression and fascism as a means of mitigating their insecurities.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"SPierce" <ecreipt at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:jLkIm.52149$ze1.4741 at (no spam) news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Quote:
"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1a012dc4-18ed-4d7a-980d-dd360d4cb6b4 at (no spam) a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
(snipped)
Watch it, you'll be saying hail BNP next.
We might have to ally with them to deal with the sand Nazi menace,
just like we allied with Communists to deal with the Nazi menace.
Michael
# Well, one day it will occur to you to analyse the words ' Nazi menace'
and think just what it was about them that was a menace to Britain.
Why ally with Communists when the Communists had already stated they were
going to take over the world...and indeed had already tried taking over
Germany. We should have helped the Germans eliminate them.
Someone was short-sighted. Britain would still be a civilised country,
not a third world dump for third world trash...and created that way by the
very same people who were Communist believers...Attlee and his followers.
Now Britain is part of the Communist European Union of Socialist
Republics...or haven't you noticed yet.
communism failed... didn't you get the memo....?.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| klunk... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Topaz" <mars1933 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8i93f5h2gv6tvacvfq3gbqjdvhg8dq7o46 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only
gave imbeciles like you a limited run of articles to post before repeating
your stupidity all over again... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Michael Ejercito... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 4, 11:38 am, "SPierce" <ecre... at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote:
Quote: "Michael Ejercito" <mejer... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1a012dc4-18ed-4d7a-980d-dd360d4cb6b4 at (no spam) a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
(snipped)> Watch it, you'll be saying hail BNP next.
We might have to ally with them to deal with the sand Nazi menace,
just like we allied with Communists to deal with the Nazi menace.
Michael
# Well, one day it will occur to you to analyse the words ' Nazi menace'
and think just what it was about them that was a menace to Britain.
Why ally with Communists when the Communists had already stated they were
going to take over the world...and indeed had already tried taking over
Germany. We should have helped the Germans eliminate them.
Germany took over Poland and Czechoslovakia, and sent the Luftwaffe
to do the Blitz.
Michael |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Roy... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Topaz... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The West is the White race.
The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.
And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.
Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.
Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan
"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:23 am
|
|