THE KNOW IT ALL LIBBYS, Just CANNOT ANSWER THIS...

Main Page | Report this Page

Politics Forum Index » General Politics Forum » THE KNOW IT ALL LIBBYS, Just CANNOT ANSWER THIS...

Page 17 of 24 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 22, 23, 24 Next

THE KNOW IT ALL LIBBYS, Just CANNOT ANSWER THIS...

Author

Message

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:10 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 5:26 pm, "mr.smartypants" <george... at (no spam) toast.net> wrote:

Quote:

In article
420ce6bc-85ba-45d3-9a92-66007d877... at (no spam) r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 9, 3:19 pm, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:24 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a
tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

What one, kkkook rightard?

Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.

You are a blind Spook.

How come I am proven right and you are proven wrong, nutbag?

You're a laugh. Everything you've said is contradicted by FACTS and
PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and every bit of evidence. You're
delusional. It's funny to see you come back and back again with the
same tired disproven bullshit. Keep it up, and please try to find some
NEW shit to make up too because you're repetitiveness is getting
boring; I may have to get off usenet and watch Maury for my trash
entertainment.

Why are you on drugs so early in the day?

Loser smears prove nothing.

But FACTS and PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and so on DO prove
something, and they prove me correct adn you wrong., Kooker Rightard.

Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?

Why do you "think" it was cut, kook? Thermite does not do this; that's
the fundamental problem with your "theory;" Thermite isn't physically
capable of doing this.

Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?

You have that backward, kookshit.

There is no evidence the "sample" is even from the WTC, idiot.

And it doesn't show signs of thermite.

Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.

By being so totally fuckin' ridiculous and insane with your physically
impossible "theories" that it taints legitimate -- reality-based --
criticism of the incompetent AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeney.

We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.

You are the disinfo shill, knowsknothing. That's the FACT.

there's a chance that G.w.Bush was chosen because he is so clue-less
people would easily believe he didn't know what was going down.
Cheney ran the destruction of the 3 buildings to get the sheeple into
paying for his war to control OIL.
--
money; what a concept!

Get off drugs STAT, nitwit. YOU are the sheeple. You swallow any ol'
garbage that comes along.

Bill Benton...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:26 pm

Guest

"* US *" wrote in message:

Quote:

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

"Demartini, who had an office on the 88th floor of the North Tower, has been
missing since the 9/11/01 attack, having remained in the North Tower to
assist in the evacuation."

He was wrong, and it cost him his life.

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:58 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 9:50 pm, * Hates US * wrote:

Quote:

I am a bushfilth who can't deal with this non-reality, either:

"The president of Tully Construction of Flushing, NY, said he saw pools of "literally
molten steel" at Ground Zero. Bollyn also cites Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled
Demolition Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, MD, as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of
elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack."

You'e pretty stupid,I've noticed.

Tully said no such thing. You're lying. he said he said liquid, not
"molten steel." Loizeaux never said it at all.

You're not very good at this lying thing, you Bush counter disinfo
shill, because you keep telling lies that are well-known lies. Try
something not so easily debunked, something that will actually make me
work to prove you wrong. I ain't even working up a sweat over your
stupid lies.

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:00 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 9:50 pm, * US * wrote:

Quote:

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:55:03 -0800 (PST), knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

Great link.

Except it shows a steel beam that as cut with a torch, Bush counter
disinfo shill. I proved it.

Quote:

The bushkultie will have to pretend it doesn't exist, too.

BWAHAHHAHAAAA!!! Doesn't exist??? Are you nuckin' futs? I love that it
exists because it proves you wrong. The videos show the workers using
torches to cut the columns during the cleanup phase. Proves you wrong.
Why would I not want it to exist?

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:01 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 9:50 pm, * US * wrote:

Quote:

The bushworshipper has to deny a lot of reality
to maintain his belief that Bush spoke for God.

Are you talking about yourself again, Bush worshiper?

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:02 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 9:50 pm, * US * wrote:

Quote:

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:31:06 -0800 (PST), knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:22 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
The bushfilth believes that the planes did what
the explosives did in reality.

BWAHAHAHHAAA!! "Explosives" that are silent and invisible!! STOP!
You're making me laugh too hard!!

Tell us, moron, just how do you plan to address the proven fact that
your claims are physically impossible? Hmmmm?

Where's the "boom?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M

Good point.

Open your fuckin' ears and you'll hear it, idiot.

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:04 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 9:50 pm, * US * wrote:

Quote:

I am a bushworshipper who has to ignore the fact that no
witnesses there at the time heard, and felt, explosions.

Yep, no one hears or felt any explosions at collapse initiation,
idiot. THAT is when they would have to be heard if it were a
controlled demolition, which it has been PROVEN it was not. NO
EXPLOSIONS at collapse initiation = NO controlled demolition. FACT.

I'll help you out here, bird brain. Loud noise an hour before collapse
cannot be controlled demotion.

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:06 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 9:50 pm, * Hates US * wrote:

Quote:

"The cores were rectangular pillars with numerous large
columns and girders, measuring 87 feet by 133 feet"

Thereby PROVING that your cartoon magic gravity defying thermite could
not possible have been used to bring them down! Thanks for pulling
your own ripcord, shithead! BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!!

Iarnrod...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:13 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 9:50 pm, * US * wrote:

Quote:

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:28:36 -0800 (PST), knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:23 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.
The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
you in the least, Bushshill?

And he is a Bushshill how?
Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?
Is he exposing the lies so they can control the oil, pipelines, and
prices?
Go to hell Spook.

Exactly. He claims something had been "proven wrong",

I ain't a he.

Quote:

but he has absolutely no proof.

I have all the proof. My claims have been proven conclusively and
beyond doubt.

In the meantime, everything you've said is completely contradicted by
all the facts, witnesses, physics, gravity, videos....

You just can't get around the FACT that your claims are proven to be
physically impossible.

Quote:

The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
They fell down.

Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!

Buildings don't "fall down."
There is no such thing as unexplained "global collapse."
You are a lying Spook.

Indeed.

BWAHHAHAHAAAA!!! You and the other moron "knowsknothing" believe
buildings fall UP?!?!? BWAHAHHAAAAAHHAAAH!!!

Thanks for the laugh, kook!

mr.smartypants...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:26 pm

Guest

In article
<420ce6bc-85ba-45d3-9a92-66007d877af1 at (no spam) r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

On Nov 9, 3:19 pm, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:24 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a
tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

What one, kkkook rightard?

Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.

You are a blind Spook.

How come I am proven right and you are proven wrong, nutbag?

You're a laugh. Everything you've said is contradicted by FACTS and
PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and every bit of evidence. You're
delusional. It's funny to see you come back and back again with the
same tired disproven bullshit. Keep it up, and please try to find some
NEW shit to make up too because you're repetitiveness is getting
boring; I may have to get off usenet and watch Maury for my trash
entertainment.

Why are you on drugs so early in the day?

Loser smears prove nothing.

But FACTS and PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and so on DO prove
something, and they prove me correct adn you wrong., Kooker Rightard.

Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?

Why do you "think" it was cut, kook? Thermite does not do this; that's
the fundamental problem with your "theory;" Thermite isn't physically
capable of doing this.

Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?

You have that backward, kookshit.

There is no evidence the "sample" is even from the WTC, idiot.

And it doesn't show signs of thermite.

Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.

By being so totally fuckin' ridiculous and insane with your physically
impossible "theories" that it taints legitimate -- reality-based --
criticism of the incompetent AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeney.

We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.

You are the disinfo shill, knowsknothing. That's the FACT.

there's a chance that G.w.Bush was chosen because he is so clue-less
people would easily believe he didn't know what was going down.
Cheney ran the destruction of the 3 buildings to get the sheeple into
paying for his war to control OIL.
--
money; what a concept!

...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:40 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 5:10 pm, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

On Nov 9, 5:26 pm, "mr.smartypants" <george... at (no spam) toast.net> wrote:

In article
420ce6bc-85ba-45d3-9a92-66007d877... at (no spam) r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 9, 3:19 pm, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 11:24 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a
tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

What one, kkkook rightard?

Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.

You are a blind Spook.

How come I am proven right and you are proven wrong, nutbag?

You're a laugh. Everything you've said is contradicted by FACTS and
PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and every bit of evidence. You're
delusional. It's funny to see you come back and back again with the
same tired disproven bullshit. Keep it up, and please try to find some
NEW shit to make up too because you're repetitiveness is getting
boring; I may have to get off usenet and watch Maury for my trash
entertainment.

Why are you on drugs so early in the day?

Loser smears prove nothing.

But FACTS and PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and so on DO prove
something, and they prove me correct adn you wrong., Kooker Rightard.

Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?

Why do you "think" it was cut, kook? Thermite does not do this; that's
the fundamental problem with your "theory;" Thermite isn't physically
capable of doing this.

Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?

You have that backward, kookshit.

There is no evidence the "sample" is even from the WTC, idiot.

And it doesn't show signs of thermite.

Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.

By being so totally fuckin' ridiculous and insane with your physically
impossible "theories" that it taints legitimate -- reality-based --
criticism of the incompetent AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeney.

We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.

You are the disinfo shill, knowsknothing. That's the FACT.

there's a chance that G.w.Bush was chosen because he is so clue-less
people would easily believe he didn't know what was going down.
Cheney ran the destruction of the 3 buildings to get the sheeple into
paying for his war to control OIL.
--
money; what a concept!

Get off drugs STAT, nitwit.

Smears lose.
Name calling loses.

Quote:

YOU are the sheeple.

Backwards name calling (Orwellian Doublespeak) loses.

Quote:

You swallow any ol'
garbage that comes along.- Hide quoted text -

That would be except your Spook Garbage(R).

> - Show quoted text -

...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:42 pm

Guest

On Nov 9, 2:45 pm, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

On Nov 9, 3:19 pm, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:24 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

What one, kkkook rightard?

Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.

You are a blind Spook.

How come I am proven right and you are proven wrong, nutbag?

You're a laugh. Everything you've said is contradicted by FACTS and
PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and every bit of evidence. You're
delusional. It's funny to see you come back and back again with the
same tired disproven bullshit. Keep it up, and please try to find some
NEW shit to make up too because you're repetitiveness is getting
boring; I may have to get off usenet and watch Maury for my trash
entertainment.

Why are you on drugs so early in the day?

Loser smears prove nothing.

But FACTS and PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and so on DO prove
something, and they prove me correct adn you wrong., Kooker Rightard.

Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?

Why do you "think" it was cut, kook? Thermite does not do this; that's
the fundamental problem with your "theory;" Thermite isn't physically
capable of doing this.

Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?

You have that backward, kookshit.

There is no evidence the "sample" is even from the WTC, idiot.

And it doesn't show signs of thermite.

Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.

By being so totally fuckin' ridiculous and insane with your physically
impossible "theories" that it taints legitimate -- reality-based --
criticism of the incompetent AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeney.

We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.

You are the disinfo shill, knowsknothing. That's the FACT.- Hide quoted text -

Thanks Spook for you response as requested.

Doublespeak it is...

> - Show quoted text -

...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:50 pm

Guest

The bushworshipper has to ignore the fact that the
witnesses there at the time heard, and felt, explosions.

The bushfilth believes that the planes did what
the explosives did in reality.

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:30:13 -0800 (PST), knews4u2chew at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

Quote:

On Nov 7, 4:52 pm, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 7, 5:29 pm, * US * wrote:
"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"

So why do you deny the facts, rightard Bush-serving shill? Why do you
continue to promote physically impossible fantasies that help Bush?

How is it someone exposing the 9-11 lies is supporting Bush?

Because you are a lost and twisted agent of lies and distraction.
You are the one denying facts.
You are blind to the truth or do not want it known.
No one could possibly twist what other people say unless you are lost
or are doing it on purpose.

Exactly.

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

http://www.debate.org/debates/9-11-was-an-inside-job-and-the-official-9-11-Commission-Report-does-not-explain-what-really-happened/1/

"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm

Notice that the bushworshipper can't offer any logic, and isn't able to
understand the scientific bases:

"I welcome any logical, cogent arguments that might refute this evidence
and line of reasoning"

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:44:36 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.
Yep.

You're not the subject.

" 1. Means - Dick Cheney and the Secret Service: Dick Cheney was running a completely
separate chain of Command & Control via the Secret Service, assuring the paralysis of Air
Force response on 9/11. The Secret Service has the technology to see the same radar
screens the FAA sees in real time. They also have the legal authority and technological
capability to take supreme command in cases of national emergency. Dick Cheney was the
acting Commander in Chief on 9/11. (Click here for a summary of these points)

2. Motive - Peak Oil: At some point between 2000 and 2007, world oil production reaches
its peak; from that point on, every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more
expensive to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it. Dick Cheney
was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided
the pretext for the series of energy wars that Cheney stated, "will not end in our
lifetime." (Click here for a summary of these points)

3. Opportunity - 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was running multiple war games on the
morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings over the continental United States that included (at
least) one "live-fly" exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips" on FAA
radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events of 9/11 to the point of the
Air Force running drills involving hijacked aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded.
The war games & terror drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter
jocks - who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able to prevent the
attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under Dick Cheney's management. (Click here
for a summary of these points)"

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

The most fervent neocon pawn will merely spew
fallacious invective rather than consider the facts.

There's also the fact that nobody gained more from 9/11
than Bush and Cheney.

Even the most desperate bushworshipper can't dispute
that PNAC wanted that attack on 9/11.

""Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor..."

http://www.terraknowledge.net/news/terrak040503a.htm

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

...Hate... US ...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.

No one had asked about you, though.

"over 50 senior military, intelligence, and government officials and over
100 respected professors who seriously question the 9/11 official story"

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... a dope and a shill for the criminal
Bush

No one had asked about you.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... started crying...

Well, you can't dispute the contents in the "peer-reviewed
"Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal", and you're too
weak to deal with reality.

http://www.911sharethetruth.com/

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... master Cheeeeeeney ...

Cry out for your satanic idol when you have nothing else.

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... we can have more laughs at

You're laughing at the 9/11 victims when you don't
mind at all that the real perpetrators get away with it.

Even the most servile bushworshipper can't dispute it:

In fact, his grandfather helped the Nazis kill Americans,
and his father was involved in Iran-Contra, among many
other things.

There is nothing whatsoever in Bush's personal or
family history that'd make him hesitate to commit
murderous treason against the United States.

http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:00:41 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... a neocon... I ...

You don't seem to understand that your war criminal
idols wouldn't hesitate to murder Americans for their
fun and profit.

See also: "Operation Northwoods".

Notice that even the most desperate neocon pawn
can't dispute what the witnesses reported.

"Witnesses To WTC Explosives"

http://www.rense.com/general68/mreproof.htm

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... I am afraid of reality.

You'd already made that obvious, but it's not about you.

It's about the victims/survivors of 9/11.

They deserve justice, no matter how much you hate them.

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... the BushCo worshiper. FACT. ... shill for the criminal ...

You do that because you're afraid of reality.

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... the Buch...

The what?

Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.

"A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy
for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in
cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one nation the enmities of
the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter
without justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges
denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy,
ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are
withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens who devote themselves
to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own
country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a
virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable
zeal for public good, the foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread121869/pg1

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... nutbag physically impossible theories...

You've swallowed all those offered you by your
master Cheney.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... playing the useful idiot ...

You sure are.

On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

...subservient...

You're doing just what your neocon masters want you to do.

http://www.stewwebb.com/9-11WTCBushCheneyTreason.html

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... rightard...
... delusional rightard fuckwad.
...being the useful idiot ...

No one had asked about you.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... rightard ...

No one had asked for you.

On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:07 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... still can't comprehend ...full of shit.

Of course you have those problems.

You're too weak and fearful to consider reality.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

delusional kkkooker world view.

You can't comprehend that Bush and Cheney are
still profiting from 9/11.

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its
enemies attack it.

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to
have been planned by people for personal reasons..."

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Bush and Cheney certainly have personal reasons for wanting the
crimes of 9/11 to occur. They did all they could to make sure
the crimes would happen, and they're the primary beneficiaries.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... He's admitted it...

You're easily duped by faked video.

There's also the way Bush hustled the bin Ladens out of the USA.

He'd forced the FBI to stop investigating them when he took office.

http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html

Bush also made sure that the pilots were disarmed, in July of 2001.

Bush and Cheney are still making money on 9/11.

They're the primary beneficiaries of the crime PNAC wanted.

Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.

...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:50 pm

Guest

"The cores were rectangular pillars with numerous large
columns and girders, measuring 87 feet by 133 feet"

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html

The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.

The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

http://www.debate.org/debates/9-11-was-an-inside-job-and-the-official-9-11-Commission-Report-does-not-explain-what-really-happened/1/

"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm

Notice that the bushworshipper can't offer any logic, and isn't able to
understand the scientific bases:

"I welcome any logical, cogent arguments that might refute this evidence
and line of reasoning"

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:44:36 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.
Yep.

Quote:

...Hate... US ...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.

Quote:

... a dope and a shill for the criminal
Bush

No one had asked about you.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... started crying...

Quote:

... master Cheeeeeeney ...

Cry out for your satanic idol when you have nothing else.

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... we can have more laughs at

Quote:

... a neocon... I ...

Quote:

... I am afraid of reality.

Quote:

... the BushCo worshiper. FACT. ... shill for the criminal ...

You do that because you're afraid of reality.

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... the Buch...

Quote:

... nutbag physically impossible theories...

You've swallowed all those offered you by your
master Cheney.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... playing the useful idiot ...

You sure are.

On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

...subservient...

Quote:

... rightard...
... delusional rightard fuckwad.
...being the useful idiot ...

No one had asked about you.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... rightard ...

No one had asked for you.

On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:07 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

... still can't comprehend ...full of shit.

Of course you have those problems.

You're too weak and fearful to consider reality.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:

delusional kkkooker world view.

Quote:

... He's admitted it...

...

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:50 pm

Guest

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:28:36 -0800 (PST), knews4u2chew at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

Quote:

On Nov 9, 10:23 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.
The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
you in the least, Bushshill?

And he is a Bushshill how?
Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?
Is he exposing the lies so they can control the oil, pipelines, and
prices?
Go to hell Spook.

Exactly. He claims something had been "proven wrong",
but he has absolutely no proof.

Quote:

Indeed.

Page 17 of 24 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 22, 23, 24 Next

All times are GMT - 5 Hours The time now is Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:58 pm Politics Forum Index