Main Page | Report this Page
Politics Forum Index  »  General Politics Forum  »  THE KNOW IT ALL LIBBYS, Just CANNOT ANSWER THIS...
Page 16 of 24    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17 ... 22, 23, 24  Next

THE KNOW IT ALL LIBBYS, Just CANNOT ANSWER THIS...

Author Message
Iarnrod...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:23 am
Guest
On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
Quote:
The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.

The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
you in the least, Bushshill?

The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
They fell down.

Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:28 am
Guest
On Nov 9, 10:23 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.

The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
you in the least, Bushshill?

And he is a Bushshill how?

Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?
Is he exposing the lies so they can control the oil, pipelines, and
prices?
Go to hell Spook.

Quote:
The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
They fell down.

Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!

Buildings don't "fall down."
There is no such thing as unexplained "global collapse."
You are a lying Spook.
 
Iarnrod...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:29 am
Guest
On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
Quote:
"The president of Tully Construction of Flushing, NY, said he saw pools of "literally
molten steel" at Ground Zero. Bollyn also cites Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled
Demolition Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, MD, as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of
elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack."

Lies, of course.

Ever notice the irony that people who call themselves 9/11 truthers
can only lie? Tully said no such thing. Loizeau said no such thing. No
one says they saw molten steel. Anyone who does is wrong because there
was no molten steel. We know this because none was recovered during
the clean up. No hardened slag. DO you "think" it evaporated maybe?
BWAHAAAHAHAHAHAAA!!
 
Iarnrod...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:31 am
Guest
On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:
Quote:
The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:55 am
Guest
On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The  moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY
 
Iarnrod...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:15 am
Guest
On Nov 9, 11:28 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 9, 10:23 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:> On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.

The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
you in the least, Bushshill?

And he is a Bushshill how?

I already 'splained it to you, rightard KKKook.

He and you provide cover for criminal AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeeney by
posing as legitimate critics of their 9/.11 inaction but by tossing
out the most ludicrous, insane, thoroughly disproven and physically
impossible claims that served only to taint legitimate opposition.
Since the stuff you claim is not only disproven already but is in fact
physically impossible, you serve only to make any Americans on the
fence shy away from associating with Bush critics. You serve his ends.

Quote:
Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?

You've done no such thing, of course. You're just lying about your own
preposterous lies.

Quote:
The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
They fell down.

Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!

Buildings don't "fall down."

What the fuck? Of course they do. Do you think they fall UP? Are you
on drugs, knowsknothing?

Quote:
There is no such thing as unexplained "global collapse."

I know. This collapse is explained -- plane crashes and fires.
Physics. Dynamic loading. Gravity. What is it about normal earth
things that confuses you?

Quote:
You are a lying Spook.

You are. FACT.
 
Iarnrod...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:24 am
Guest
On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The  moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

What one, kkkook rightard?

Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.

Why are you on drugs so early in the day?
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:00 pm
Guest
The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.

The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

http://www.debate.org/debates/9-11-was-an-inside-job-and-the-official-9-11-Commission-Report-does-not-explain-what-really-happened/1/

"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm

Notice that the bushworshipper can't offer any logic, and isn't able to
understand the scientific bases:

"I welcome any logical, cogent arguments that might refute this evidence
and line of reasoning"

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:44:36 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.
Yep.

You're not the subject.

" 1. Means - Dick Cheney and the Secret Service: Dick Cheney was running a completely
separate chain of Command & Control via the Secret Service, assuring the paralysis of Air
Force response on 9/11. The Secret Service has the technology to see the same radar
screens the FAA sees in real time. They also have the legal authority and technological
capability to take supreme command in cases of national emergency. Dick Cheney was the
acting Commander in Chief on 9/11. (Click here for a summary of these points)

2. Motive - Peak Oil: At some point between 2000 and 2007, world oil production reaches
its peak; from that point on, every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more
expensive to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it. Dick Cheney
was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided
the pretext for the series of energy wars that Cheney stated, "will not end in our
lifetime." (Click here for a summary of these points)

3. Opportunity - 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was running multiple war games on the
morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings over the continental United States that included (at
least) one "live-fly" exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips" on FAA
radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events of 9/11 to the point of the
Air Force running drills involving hijacked aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded.
The war games & terror drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter
jocks - who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able to prevent the
attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under Dick Cheney's management. (Click here
for a summary of these points)"

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

The most fervent neocon pawn will merely spew
fallacious invective rather than consider the facts.

There's also the fact that nobody gained more from 9/11
than Bush and Cheney.

Even the most desperate bushworshipper can't dispute
that PNAC wanted that attack on 9/11.

""Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor..."

http://www.terraknowledge.net/news/terrak040503a.htm

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...Hate... US ...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.

No one had asked about you, though.

"over 50 senior military, intelligence, and government officials and over
100 respected professors who seriously question the 9/11 official story"

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... a dope and a shill for the criminal
Bush

No one had asked about you.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... started crying...

Well, you can't dispute the contents in the "peer-reviewed
"Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal", and you're too
weak to deal with reality.

http://www.911sharethetruth.com/

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... master Cheeeeeeney ...

Cry out for your satanic idol when you have nothing else.

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... we can have more laughs at

You're laughing at the 9/11 victims when you don't
mind at all that the real perpetrators get away with it.

Even the most servile bushworshipper can't dispute it:

In fact, his grandfather helped the Nazis kill Americans,
and his father was involved in Iran-Contra, among many
other things.

There is nothing whatsoever in Bush's personal or
family history that'd make him hesitate to commit
murderous treason against the United States.

http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:00:41 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... a neocon... I ...

You don't seem to understand that your war criminal
idols wouldn't hesitate to murder Americans for their
fun and profit.

See also: "Operation Northwoods".

Notice that even the most desperate neocon pawn
can't dispute what the witnesses reported.

"Witnesses To WTC Explosives"

http://www.rense.com/general68/mreproof.htm


On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... I am afraid of reality.

You'd already made that obvious, but it's not about you.

It's about the victims/survivors of 9/11.

They deserve justice, no matter how much you hate them.

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... the BushCo worshiper. FACT. ... shill for the criminal ...

You do that because you're afraid of reality.

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... the Buch...

The what?

Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.

"A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy
for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in
cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one nation the enmities of
the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter
without justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges
denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy,
ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are
withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens who devote themselves
to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own
country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a
virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable
zeal for public good, the foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread121869/pg1

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... nutbag physically impossible theories...

You've swallowed all those offered you by your
master Cheney.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... playing the useful idiot ...

You sure are.

On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...subservient...

You're doing just what your neocon masters want you to do.

http://www.stewwebb.com/9-11WTCBushCheneyTreason.html

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... rightard...
... delusional rightard fuckwad.
...being the useful idiot ...

No one had asked about you.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... rightard ...

No one had asked for you.

On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:07 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... still can't comprehend ...full of shit.

Of course you have those problems.

You're too weak and fearful to consider reality.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
delusional kkkooker world view.

You can't comprehend that Bush and Cheney are
still profiting from 9/11.

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its
enemies attack it.

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to
have been planned by people for personal reasons..."

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Bush and Cheney certainly have personal reasons for wanting the
crimes of 9/11 to occur. They did all they could to make sure
the crimes would happen, and they're the primary beneficiaries.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... He's admitted it...

You're easily duped by faked video.

There's also the way Bush hustled the bin Ladens out of the USA.

He'd forced the FBI to stop investigating them when he took office.

http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html

Bush also made sure that the pilots were disarmed, in July of 2001.

Bush and Cheney are still making money on 9/11.

They're the primary beneficiaries of the crime PNAC wanted.

Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:00 pm
Guest
The bushworshipper lacks the critical skills to understand
such things as the core structures of the towers.

The bushfilth is so weakminded that all he can do
is whine about the messenger.

He certainly can't dispute the message.

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

http://www.debate.org/debates/9-11-was-an-inside-job-and-the-official-9-11-Commission-Report-does-not-explain-what-really-happened/1/

"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm

Notice that the bushworshipper can't offer any logic, and isn't able to
understand the scientific bases:

"I welcome any logical, cogent arguments that might refute this evidence
and line of reasoning"

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:44:36 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.
Yep.

You're not the subject.

" 1. Means - Dick Cheney and the Secret Service: Dick Cheney was running a completely
separate chain of Command & Control via the Secret Service, assuring the paralysis of Air
Force response on 9/11. The Secret Service has the technology to see the same radar
screens the FAA sees in real time. They also have the legal authority and technological
capability to take supreme command in cases of national emergency. Dick Cheney was the
acting Commander in Chief on 9/11. (Click here for a summary of these points)

2. Motive - Peak Oil: At some point between 2000 and 2007, world oil production reaches
its peak; from that point on, every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more
expensive to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it. Dick Cheney
was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided
the pretext for the series of energy wars that Cheney stated, "will not end in our
lifetime." (Click here for a summary of these points)

3. Opportunity - 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was running multiple war games on the
morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings over the continental United States that included (at
least) one "live-fly" exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips" on FAA
radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events of 9/11 to the point of the
Air Force running drills involving hijacked aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded.
The war games & terror drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter
jocks - who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able to prevent the
attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under Dick Cheney's management. (Click here
for a summary of these points)"

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

The most fervent neocon pawn will merely spew
fallacious invective rather than consider the facts.

There's also the fact that nobody gained more from 9/11
than Bush and Cheney.

Even the most desperate bushworshipper can't dispute
that PNAC wanted that attack on 9/11.

""Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor..."

http://www.terraknowledge.net/news/terrak040503a.htm

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...Hate... US ...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.

No one had asked about you, though.

"over 50 senior military, intelligence, and government officials and over
100 respected professors who seriously question the 9/11 official story"

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... a dope and a shill for the criminal
Bush

No one had asked about you.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... started crying...

Well, you can't dispute the contents in the "peer-reviewed
"Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal", and you're too
weak to deal with reality.

http://www.911sharethetruth.com/

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... master Cheeeeeeney ...

Cry out for your satanic idol when you have nothing else.

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... we can have more laughs at

You're laughing at the 9/11 victims when you don't
mind at all that the real perpetrators get away with it.

Even the most servile bushworshipper can't dispute it:

In fact, his grandfather helped the Nazis kill Americans,
and his father was involved in Iran-Contra, among many
other things.

There is nothing whatsoever in Bush's personal or
family history that'd make him hesitate to commit
murderous treason against the United States.

http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:00:41 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... a neocon... I ...

You don't seem to understand that your war criminal
idols wouldn't hesitate to murder Americans for their
fun and profit.

See also: "Operation Northwoods".

Notice that even the most desperate neocon pawn
can't dispute what the witnesses reported.

"Witnesses To WTC Explosives"

http://www.rense.com/general68/mreproof.htm


On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... I am afraid of reality.

You'd already made that obvious, but it's not about you.

It's about the victims/survivors of 9/11.

They deserve justice, no matter how much you hate them.

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... the BushCo worshiper. FACT. ... shill for the criminal ...

You do that because you're afraid of reality.

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... the Buch...

The what?

Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.

"A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy
for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in
cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one nation the enmities of
the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter
without justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges
denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy,
ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are
withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens who devote themselves
to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own
country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a
virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable
zeal for public good, the foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread121869/pg1

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... nutbag physically impossible theories...

You've swallowed all those offered you by your
master Cheney.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... playing the useful idiot ...

You sure are.

On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...subservient...

You're doing just what your neocon masters want you to do.

http://www.stewwebb.com/9-11WTCBushCheneyTreason.html

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... rightard...
... delusional rightard fuckwad.
...being the useful idiot ...

No one had asked about you.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... rightard ...

No one had asked for you.

On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:07 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... still can't comprehend ...full of shit.

Of course you have those problems.

You're too weak and fearful to consider reality.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
delusional kkkooker world view.

You can't comprehend that Bush and Cheney are
still profiting from 9/11.

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its
enemies attack it.

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to
have been planned by people for personal reasons..."

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Bush and Cheney certainly have personal reasons for wanting the
crimes of 9/11 to occur. They did all they could to make sure
the crimes would happen, and they're the primary beneficiaries.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... He's admitted it...

You're easily duped by faked video.

There's also the way Bush hustled the bin Ladens out of the USA.

He'd forced the FBI to stop investigating them when he took office.

http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html

Bush also made sure that the pilots were disarmed, in July of 2001.

Bush and Cheney are still making money on 9/11.

They're the primary beneficiaries of the crime PNAC wanted.

Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:00 pm
Guest
"The president of Tully Construction of Flushing, NY, said he saw pools of "literally
molten steel" at Ground Zero. Bollyn also cites Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled
Demolition Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, MD, as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of
elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack."

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html

The poor bushfilth can't dispute that, either, of course.

Notice that all the bushfilth has is his asinine ad hominem fallacies.

Meanwhile:

"one of the three buildings which fell down at free-fall speed was not even hit by a
plane, yet still had the molten metal"

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

Yet another undisputed fact ...

The bushworshipper substitutes his hallucinations for facts.

On 7 Nov 2009 07:46:34 -0500, adykes at (no spam) panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:

Quote:
Those cuts were made by the clean-up crew.

Why would anyone believe that?

The photo was taken during the rescue effort,
which preceded the hasty removal of all of the
evidence, in fact.

The bushworshipper isn't permitted to see.

"Do you see the 45 degree angle cut on the steel column, and do you see the sulfidised
residue around that straight cut. OK, now we must take that information and by necessity
draw some very important and inevitable conclusions. These conclusions are binding, you
don't get to agree with each successive point and then refute the eventuality, no matter
how uncomfortable it may be. That would be like saying ok, I see the straight cut, but now
I'm going to tell you I want to pretend it's not there."

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:14:16 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
Notice how I am a bushworshipper who has no facts.

Nobody had asked about you.

Notice how the bushworshipper can't dispute the facts:

"When 9/11 occurred, the legal framework was in place to allow the Secret Service to take
supreme command over any and all American agencies, including the Air Force."

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:16:25 -0800 (PST), Iarmdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...I appear to be as insane as possible ...
... me to be the useful idiot to them.
That's what I've been ...kkkooker!

No one had asked about you.

On 1 Nov 2009 02:20:50 -0500, adykes at (no spam) panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:

Quote:
... a k00k that claims ...

You claim that Bush and Cheney are totally innocent!

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:44:35 -0700 (PDT), "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<betaxxx at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:

Quote:
Of course it was an inside job. The collapse of 7 proved that. Every
member of congress and every talking head on TV knows it was an IJ and
has known it for 8 years.

Only the truly gullible doesn't understand the concept
of the Reichstag Fire.
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:12 pm
Guest
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:02:02 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... being a clueless moron.

Of course you are.

The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:

""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

http://www.debate.org/debates/9-11-was-an-inside-job-and-the-official-9-11-Commission-Report-does-not-explain-what-really-happened/1/

"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm

Notice that the bushworshipper can't offer any logic, and isn't able to
understand the scientific bases:

"I welcome any logical, cogent arguments that might refute this evidence
and line of reasoning"

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:44:36 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.
Yep.

You're not the subject.

" 1. Means - Dick Cheney and the Secret Service: Dick Cheney was running a completely
separate chain of Command & Control via the Secret Service, assuring the paralysis of Air
Force response on 9/11. The Secret Service has the technology to see the same radar
screens the FAA sees in real time. They also have the legal authority and technological
capability to take supreme command in cases of national emergency. Dick Cheney was the
acting Commander in Chief on 9/11. (Click here for a summary of these points)

2. Motive - Peak Oil: At some point between 2000 and 2007, world oil production reaches
its peak; from that point on, every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more
expensive to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it. Dick Cheney
was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided
the pretext for the series of energy wars that Cheney stated, "will not end in our
lifetime." (Click here for a summary of these points)

3. Opportunity - 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was running multiple war games on the
morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings over the continental United States that included (at
least) one "live-fly" exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips" on FAA
radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events of 9/11 to the point of the
Air Force running drills involving hijacked aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded.
The war games & terror drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter
jocks - who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able to prevent the
attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under Dick Cheney's management. (Click here
for a summary of these points)"

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

The most fervent neocon pawn will merely spew
fallacious invective rather than consider the facts.

There's also the fact that nobody gained more from 9/11
than Bush and Cheney.

Even the most desperate bushworshipper can't dispute
that PNAC wanted that attack on 9/11.

""Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor..."

http://www.terraknowledge.net/news/terrak040503a.htm

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...Hate... US ...I'm too
weak to deal with reality.
I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.

No one had asked about you, though.

"over 50 senior military, intelligence, and government officials and over
100 respected professors who seriously question the 9/11 official story"

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... a dope and a shill for the criminal
Bush

No one had asked about you.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... started crying...

Well, you can't dispute the contents in the "peer-reviewed
"Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal", and you're too
weak to deal with reality.

http://www.911sharethetruth.com/

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... master Cheeeeeeney ...

Cry out for your satanic idol when you have nothing else.

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:02:58 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... we can have more laughs at

You're laughing at the 9/11 victims when you don't
mind at all that the real perpetrators get away with it.

Even the most servile bushworshipper can't dispute it:

In fact, his grandfather helped the Nazis kill Americans,
and his father was involved in Iran-Contra, among many
other things.

There is nothing whatsoever in Bush's personal or
family history that'd make him hesitate to commit
murderous treason against the United States.

http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:00:41 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... a neocon... I ...

You don't seem to understand that your war criminal
idols wouldn't hesitate to murder Americans for their
fun and profit.

See also: "Operation Northwoods".

Notice that even the most desperate neocon pawn
can't dispute what the witnesses reported.

"Witnesses To WTC Explosives"

http://www.rense.com/general68/mreproof.htm


On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... I am afraid of reality.

You'd already made that obvious, but it's not about you.

It's about the victims/survivors of 9/11.

They deserve justice, no matter how much you hate them.

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... the BushCo worshiper. FACT. ... shill for the criminal ...

You do that because you're afraid of reality.

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... the Buch...

The what?

Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.

"A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy
for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in
cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one nation the enmities of
the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter
without justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges
denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy,
ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are
withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens who devote themselves
to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own
country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a
virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable
zeal for public good, the foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread121869/pg1

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... nutbag physically impossible theories...

You've swallowed all those offered you by your
master Cheney.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... playing the useful idiot ...

You sure are.

On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...subservient...

You're doing just what your neocon masters want you to do.

http://www.stewwebb.com/9-11WTCBushCheneyTreason.html

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... rightard...
... delusional rightard fuckwad.
...being the useful idiot ...

No one had asked about you.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... rightard ...

No one had asked for you.

On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:07 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... still can't comprehend ...full of shit.

Of course you have those problems.

You're too weak and fearful to consider reality.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
delusional kkkooker world view.

You can't comprehend that Bush and Cheney are
still profiting from 9/11.

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its
enemies attack it.

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to
have been planned by people for personal reasons..."

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Bush and Cheney certainly have personal reasons for wanting the
crimes of 9/11 to occur. They did all they could to make sure
the crimes would happen, and they're the primary beneficiaries.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
... He's admitted it...

You're easily duped by faked video.

There's also the way Bush hustled the bin Ladens out of the USA.

He'd forced the FBI to stop investigating them when he took office.

http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html

Bush also made sure that the pilots were disarmed, in July of 2001.

Bush and Cheney are still making money on 9/11.

They're the primary beneficiaries of the crime PNAC wanted.

Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:12 pm
Guest
The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The dust hasn't even settled yet.

The photo was taken shortly after the collapse, which
the bushworshipper is too brainwashed to consider.

The bushworshipper isn't permitted to see.

"Do you see the 45 degree angle cut on the steel column, and do you see the sulfidised
residue around that straight cut. OK, now we must take that information and by necessity
draw some very important and inevitable conclusions. These conclusions are binding, you
don't get to agree with each successive point and then refute the eventuality, no matter
how uncomfortable it may be. That would be like saying ok, I see the straight cut, but now
I'm going to tell you I want to pretend it's not there."

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6988

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:14:16 -0800 (PST), Iamdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
Notice how I am a bushworshipper who has no facts.

Nobody had asked about you.

Notice how the bushworshipper can't dispute the facts:

"When 9/11 occurred, the legal framework was in place to allow the Secret Service to take
supreme command over any and all American agencies, including the Air Force."

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:16:25 -0800 (PST), Iarmdud <iarnrod at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
...I appear to be as insane as possible ...
... me to be the useful idiot to them.
That's what I've been ...kkkooker!

No one had asked about you.

On 1 Nov 2009 02:20:50 -0500, adykes at (no spam) panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:

Quote:
... a k00k that claims ...

You claim that Bush and Cheney are totally innocent!

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:44:35 -0700 (PDT), "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<betaxxx at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:

Quote:
Of course it was an inside job. The collapse of 7 proved that. Every
member of congress and every talking head on TV knows it was an IJ and
has known it for 8 years.

Only the truly gullible doesn't understand the concept
of the Reichstag Fire.
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:19 pm
Guest
On Nov 9, 11:24 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:





On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The  moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

What one, kkkook rightard?

Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.

You are a blind Spook.



Quote:
Why are you on drugs so early in the day?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Loser smears prove nothing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY
Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?
Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?
Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.
We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.
 
...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:40 pm
Guest
On Nov 9, 2:26 pm, "Bill Benton" <m... at (no spam) privacy.net> wrote:
Quote:
"* US *" wrote in message:
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."

"Demartini, who had an office on the 88th floor of the North Tower, has been
missing since the 9/11/01 attack, having remained in the North Tower to
assist in the evacuation."

He was wrong, and it cost him his life.

No, he knew the buildings would be fine. He knew they would not fail
from the jet hits.
The fires were minimal as the fire department recordings prove.
What he didn't know was that Bush and his cabal had set up the
buildings to be destroyed and to be "the new Pearl Harbor" with his
cousin Marvin at the head of Securicom allowing the building to be
laced with demolition incendiaries.
 
Iarnrod...
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:45 pm
Guest
On Nov 9, 3:19 pm, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 9, 11:24 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:

The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
has never actually used a cutting torch.

The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.

The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.

The  moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!

This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

What one, kkkook rightard?

Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.

You are a blind Spook.

How come I am proven right and you are proven wrong, nutbag?

You're a laugh. Everything you've said is contradicted by FACTS and
PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and every bit of evidence. You're
delusional. It's funny to see you come back and back again with the
same tired disproven bullshit. Keep it up, and please try to find some
NEW shit to make up too because you're repetitiveness is getting
boring; I may have to get off usenet and watch Maury for my trash
entertainment.

Quote:
Why are you on drugs so early in the day?

Loser smears prove nothing.

But FACTS and PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and so on DO prove
something, and they prove me correct adn you wrong., Kooker Rightard.

Quote:
Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?

Why do you "think" it was cut, kook? Thermite does not do this; that's
the fundamental problem with your "theory;" Thermite isn't physically
capable of doing this.

Quote:
Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?

You have that backward, kookshit.

There is no evidence the "sample" is even from the WTC, idiot.

And it doesn't show signs of thermite.

Quote:
Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.

By being so totally fuckin' ridiculous and insane with your physically
impossible "theories" that it taints legitimate -- reality-based --
criticism of the incompetent AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeney.

Quote:
We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.

You are the disinfo shill, knowsknothing. That's the FACT.
 
 
Page 16 of 24    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:09 am