Main Page | Report this Page
Politics Forum Index  »  Socialism Politics (Mao) Forum  »  "The Chernobyl disaster very probably a sabotage"...
Page 1 of 1    

"The Chernobyl disaster very probably a sabotage"...

Author Message
Rolf Martens...
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:48 am
Guest
At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added today, under
"News with brief comments":


Wednesday, 12 September 2007 (NWBC 311) "The Chernobyl disaster
very probably a sabotage"

2007-09-12, 11:02 GMT:

This the blogger Alain wrote yesterday 11.09.2007 in his
important blog in French, mainly dedicated to the origin of
oil, at http://petrole-abiotique.blogspot.com/, which also
contains articles pointing out that those same powerful
reactionaries in the world who are making the oil price be so
high are also the propelling forces behind the massive
campaign, since many decades back, against nuclear energy. He
motivates what he is saying about Chernobyl above all with a
close look at the technical details of this disaster in 1986,
which cost some 42 people their lives.

Yes, very clearly indeed this was a sabotage. Others have noted
strong suspicions in this direction several years ago. And in
an article published as a leaflet in Swedish on 01.05.2006,
reproduced by me in English translation as "UNITE! Info #258en:
The reigning system's weakness", Stig Ek and I wrote about
this, including also a hypothesis of ours concerning an
important part of the motives behind this sabotage, among
which, as Alain correctly notes, there certainly was not least
that of combating, together with the mass medias'
10,000-folding of the effects of the disaster, peaceful nuclear
energy in the whole world.

We wrote in that article, noting among other things what it had
been possible to ascertain concerning a certain event here in
Sweden two months before that so-called "accident" in the then
social-imperialist Soviet Union, in 1986 already well under way
towards its eventual disintegration five years later,

[QUOTE:]


And when Gorbachov became president in the Soviet Union in 1985
and wanted to pursue another, though likewise extremely
reactionary, policy, one of "green" strangulation of industry
together with the ruling persons in the USA, the then still
powerful military leaders in the Soviet Union tried to force
the Gorbachov group into accepting their own line of massive
threats and perhaps even aggression against West Europe, by
having their intelligence service the GRU assassinate Sweden's
prime minister Palme on 28 February 1986. A scapegoat first got
convicted of that murder but was later acquitted, after some
people within the establishment here on 24 August 1989 had
reported publicly on a certain result of a bugging of a GRU
agent in February 1986.

It's likely, in our judgement, that the largescale sabotage
later, on 26 April 1986, of a nuclear power reactor at
Chernobyl which was part of a certain military complex, among
other things was intended as a counterattack by the Gorbachov
group and/or its US friends, against those Soviet military who
among other things had then recently assassinated Palme. That
it was a sabotage and not an "accident" that killed 42 people
then and caused large material damage is obvious. No less than
6 different safety systems were shut off deliberately in that
reactor, where, incidentally, it was possible to cause an
explosion only because its moderator consisted of graphite, not
of water as in all nuclear power plants in for instance Sweden.
The largest damage in this connection has been caused by a
massive lie propaganda, which has maintained that those very
small extra amounts of radiation which arose in other countries
because of the Chernobyl sabotage were "harmful", and not, as
are such small amounts, actually good for people's health.

[END OF QUOTE]

Since the fact mentioned here concerning such small doses of
ionizing radiation as those mentioned above no doubt still is
unknown to many, and the international mass media since many
decades back very much are trying to scare people of all
radiation, even such at levels with which people in many
regions on earth have always lived, their health in general
being better and by no means worse than those with lower levels
of natural so-called background radiation, it may be suitable
to include here references to two actually scientific websites
on this question:

On low-dose ionizing radiation, a site managed by S. M. Javad
Mortazavi, Ph. D., Iran, and containing articles by scientists
in many countries: http://www.angelfire.com/mo/radioadaptive/

T. D. Luckey (USA) on beneficial effects of low-dose ionizing
radiation: http://www.giriweb.com/luckey.htm



_____________________

Message posted by:
Rolf Martens
Malmö, Sweden
Phone and fax:
+46 - 40 - 124832;
rolf.martens at (no spam) comhem.se
www.rolf-martens.com
______________________
 
nada...
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:13 pm
Guest
On Sep 12, 5:48 am, "Rolf Martens" <rolf.mart... at (no spam) comhem.se> wrote:
Quote:
At my homepagewww.rolf-martens.comI've added today, under
"News with brief comments":

Wednesday, 12 September 2007 (NWBC 311) "The Chernobyl disaster
very probably a sabotage"

2007-09-12, 11:02 GMT:

This the blogger Alain wrote yesterday 11.09.2007 in his
important blog in French, mainly dedicated to the origin of
oil, athttp://petrole-abiotique.blogspot.com/, which also
contains articles pointing out that those same powerful
reactionaries in the world who are making the oil price be so
high are also the propelling forces behind the massive
campaign, since many decades back, against nuclear energy. He
motivates what he is saying about Chernobyl above all with a
close look at the technical details of this disaster in 1986,
which cost some 42 people their lives.

Yes, very clearly indeed this was a sabotage. Others have noted
strong suspicions in this direction several years ago. And in
an article published as a leaflet in Swedish on 01.05.2006,
reproduced by me in English translation as "UNITE! Info #258en:
The reigning system's weakness", Stig Ek and I wrote about
this, including also a hypothesis of ours concerning an
important part of the motives behind this sabotage, among
which, as Alain correctly notes, there certainly was not least
that of combating, together with the mass medias'
10,000-folding of the effects of the disaster, peaceful nuclear
energy in the whole world.

We wrote in that article, noting among other things what it had
been possible to ascertain concerning a certain event here in
Sweden two months before that so-called "accident" in the then
social-imperialist Soviet Union, in 1986 already well under way
towards its eventual disintegration five years later,

[QUOTE:]

And when Gorbachov became president in the Soviet Union in 1985
and wanted to pursue another, though likewise extremely
reactionary, policy, one of "green" strangulation of industry
together with the ruling persons in the USA, the then still
powerful military leaders in the Soviet Union tried to force
the Gorbachov group into accepting their own line of massive
threats and perhaps even aggression against West Europe, by
having their intelligence service the GRU assassinate Sweden's
prime minister Palme on 28 February 1986. A scapegoat first got
convicted of that murder but was later acquitted, after some
people within the establishment here on 24 August 1989 had
reported publicly on a certain result of a bugging of a GRU
agent in February 1986.

It's likely, in our judgement, that the largescale sabotage
later, on 26 April 1986, of a nuclear power reactor at
Chernobyl which was part of a certain military complex, among
other things was intended as a counterattack by the Gorbachov
group and/or its US friends, against those Soviet military who
among other things had then recently assassinated Palme. That
it was a sabotage and not an "accident" that killed 42 people
then and caused large material damage is obvious. No less than
6 different safety systems were shut off deliberately in that
reactor, where, incidentally, it was possible to cause an
explosion only because its moderator consisted of graphite, not
of water as in all nuclear power plants in for instance Sweden.
The largest damage in this connection has been caused by a
massive lie propaganda, which has maintained that those very
small extra amounts of radiation which arose in other countries
because of the Chernobyl sabotage were "harmful", and not, as
are such small amounts, actually good for people's health.

[END OF QUOTE]

Since the fact mentioned here concerning such small doses of
ionizing radiation as those mentioned above no doubt still is
unknown to many, and the international mass media since many
decades back very much are trying to scare people of all
radiation, even such at levels with which people in many
regions on earth have always lived, their health in general
being better and by no means worse than those with lower levels
of natural so-called background radiation, it may be suitable
to include here references to two actually scientific websites
on this question:

On low-dose ionizing radiation, a site managed by S. M. Javad
Mortazavi, Ph. D., Iran, and containing articles by scientists
in many countries:http://www.angelfire.com/mo/radioadaptive/

T. D. Luckey (USA) on beneficial effects of low-dose ionizing
radiation:http://www.giriweb.com/luckey.htm

_____________________

Message posted by:
Rolf Martens
Malmö, Sweden
Phone and fax:
+46 - 40 - 124832;
rolf.mart... at (no spam) comhem.sewww.rolf-martens.com
______________________

Rolf...the description of the cutting out of safety items is totally
bogus. Not that it didn't happen, but that it was somehow "unique"
implying (and certainly not proving) sabotage. Not only would you have
to get the OK from the operating crew to do this, who, subsequently
DIED in the same sabotage, but you'd have to prove this wasn't done at
OTHER RMBK reactors, which it was, which is why they redesigned the
safety protocols make it impossible to do this. Lastly, Russia is not
building 2 reactors a year, to start, and expects many more. What
changed?

To state "Clearly there was sabotage" take the accuser compeletly out
of the realm of serious discussion. There is nothign "clear" about it
which is why most people don't think there was any sabotage at all.
This is simply a poor method of discussing this event.

David
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:04 am