 |
|
| Music Forum Index » Al Stewart Forum » Wakeman and Anderson's view of the tour... |
|
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Mark Scalise... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:18 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 9, 10:38 am, Henry Potts <use... at (no spam) bondegezou.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 9, 3:05 pm, Bill <video... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:48 pm, DT <dtyle... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Henry, I certainly want to hear your impressions. But boots, reviews,
and YouTube videos are a poor predictor of the live "Yes" experience.
I do hope your mileage varies from mine, but I am highly doubtful.
I did like the show, highlights (new songs) and weaknesses alike.
Thrilled to meet the band.
The only "weak" Yes Shows I have experienced were the Big Generator
tour (it seemed kind of flat... maybe the sound and my seats) and one
Open Your Eyes show in Connecticut (again, perhaps seating - because I
saw the same tour in New Brunswick and loved it).
I've loved most Yes shows I've seen, with Masterworks a personal high.
After Gates of Delirium, we were bowing down to the band: "We're not
worthy! We're not worthy!" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| paul... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 9, 4:23 am, "robm... at (no spam) aol.com" <robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 7, 7:27 pm, paul <redmooncreat... at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
And if Jon dosn't want to do it or will
only do it for a disproportionate share of the payday or is too sick
to do it ....no Yes?
right...but just because there's no Yes, doesn't mean there can't be a
HSW...and it doesn't mean that any number of people who have been in
Yes can't perform Yes music in a live setting.
Clearly you and I differ on one key point, I think it important to
market accurately any and all products and services and for those
products or services to maintain quality consistent with how they've
been represented in that marketing. You find it acceptable for people
to operate "well within their rights", while engaging in quietly
deceptive marketing and providing sub-quality product and services.
Preposterous. You seem very fond of re-writing things to suit your own
prejudice don't you Rob.
IF you can't accept that HSW, as 60% of Classic Yes, are "well within
their rights" to hire whoever THEY wish for two vacant roles within
the band then you are delusional in your thinking. Oh sorry...they
didn't ask your opinion. Boo hoo. Big "mistake".
All i've ever said is that If this is what they want to do then fine.
You persist in this rubbish about them damaging a brand. Maybe you're
so lost in the glory of the past that you can't see any other
possibilities other than the endless recycling of that past glory.
Look where THAT got them.
To me, what HSW are doing is writing another strand in Yes' history.
Its different, its unexpected and its provoked debate. Thats a pretty
good start. If you don't like it who gives a poo? I'd suggest that you
"shut your gob" too but I know that's not likely to happen
p
*iajj2* |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| paul... |
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 11, 2:39 am, "robm... at (no spam) aol.com" <robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 9, 6:10 pm, paul <redmooncreat... at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
On Oct 9, 4:23 am, "robm... at (no spam) aol.com" <robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Oct 7, 7:27 pm, paul <redmooncreat... at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
And if Jon dosn't want to do it or will
only do it for a disproportionate share of the payday or is too sick
to do it ....no Yes?
right...but just because there's no Yes, doesn't mean there can't be a
HSW...and it doesn't mean that any number of people who have been in
Yes can't perform Yes music in a live setting.
Clearly you and I differ on one key point, I think it important to
market accurately any and all products and services and for those
products or services to maintain quality consistent with how they've
been represented in that marketing. You find it acceptable for people
to operate "well within their rights", while engaging in quietly
deceptive marketing and providing sub-quality product and services.
Preposterous. You seem very fond of re-writing things to suit your own
prejudice don't you Rob.
on the contrary, I'm fond of making accurate observations and accept
well when _facts_ stack up against my preferences.
ahem...for example,
1. you quote Yes as having played to mostly "empty" rooms on the
recent tour when that was clearly not true (ref the number of sold out
rooms or near sold-outs that are listed on Henrys site).
2. contrary to your opinion, quite a few Yesfans seem pleased with
Benoits performance within Yes (ref the multitude of positive reviews
on Yesworld, Forgotten Yesterdays and Yesfans.com). More so than
Oliver Wakemans.
3. From the advertising for the European tour I've seen online, a lot
of venues and ticketing agencies _are_ naming the lineup. Of the few
that arn't mentioning who's in the band some have a link to Yesworld
where it is clearly stated who the touring lineup is. So for Wakeman
to claim that the tour advertising is deceptive is only true in a
minority of instances...so that Wakeman is exagerating seems quite a
logical conclusion to me. If Wakeman hasn't gotten the message to
*his* fans taht he isn't involved with the tour then I don't see that
as being Yes' problem. Surely its his?
Quote: IF you can't accept that HSW, as 60% of Classic Yes, are "well within
their rights" to hire whoever THEY wish for two vacant roles within
the band then you are delusional in your thinking.
again, I find that assertion funny *every* time.
anything for a laugh Rob
Quote: _Of course_ they are
"WWTR", which as I point up above, is sufficient for _you_. For me,
that they have the right to do something despicable, discourteous and
dishonest, doesn't make it suddenly acceptable. That they have the
right to trash the brand and show themselves as desperate and
pathetic, is certainly interesting enough, but not I could supprt. I
think they should hold themselves to higher standard...but if they
won't, they can't expect to have the support of at least this long-
time customer.
Which is why we are having this discussion isn't it? I consider myself
a long time customer of the band too and I've followed them through
numerous lineup changes including times like the 'Talk' period where,
post Union, Howe and Bruford where unceremoneously and disrespectfully
dumped in favour of Carsons return of the 90125 lineup (and yeah it
was a shame that Wakeman couldn't be part of that picture). Despite
the negative aspects of all that I enjoyed (and still enjoy) the album
and subsequent tour (btw Live in Chile 94 now appears to be getting
released...for those who never had the broadcast as a boot).
In 1999 I voted on the Yesworld poll for (and we got ) GoD and Ritual.
The next year I voted against the Orchestra idea and even though a
majority of fans voted against it the band decided that was what they
wanted to do anyway. Why bother conducting that later poll if you're
not going to heed the results? As a fan I felt that that was the
moment (for me) that the band went from "listening to the fans" to
"not listening to the fans". Post Orchestra, the return of Wakeman was
as predictable as no new material.....once again. Dissapointing.
So yeah, my interest in the band has waned somewhat since last seeing
them in 2000 and 2003 (blame the bands actions and my growing interest
in Dream Theater for that) but I'm always keen to see what they do
next and the current situation is no exception... primarily because
they are doing something different
Quote: I know...who gives a fuck.
Oh sorry...they didn't ask your opinion. Boo hoo. Big "mistake".
you are easily one of the more passionate fence-sitters I've ever
encountered. It's almost as if you aren't fence-sitting at all.
Why can't a fence sitter be passionate?
Quote: You persist in this rubbish about them damaging a brand.
see, what I mean? I know where I stand on this and feel quite
comfortable in that position. You like to call yourself a fence-
sitter, but show yourself otherwise.
I suppose one could draw a parallel between that behavior and this
tribute "Yes". Say one thing and then do quite a lot different. What
"Yes" is doing fits squarely within your value system, indeed it's
what you would do in a similar situation.
spoken like someone sitting in a lonely, dark, bitter hole surrounded
by all of their meaningless memorabelia. Oh, forgive me...I didn't
realisze you were Larping. (insert emoticon just in case that went
over your head)
Quote: Maybe you're so lost in the glory of the past that you can't see any other
possibilities other than the endless recycling of that past glory.
Look where THAT got them.
this is becoming surreal, Paul. I've stated clearly that I want new
music.
same. That Anderson, Wakeman (and the others) wern't willing to go
that route in 2002-2004 was a complete waste. From most reports I've
read that was Anderson holding out due to his dissapointment over the
low sales of 'Magnificartion'...and other issues. I take it you
believe Squire was equally culpable?
Quote: They've already done a few too many nostaglia tours for my
money,
you can say that again
Quote: and now they're doing another with, cheap imitators in key
spots. WTF, "you're so lost"...certainly you didn't manage a straight
face, while writing that bit.
;p
however... with key roadblocks to new music removed (Jon "veto"
Anderson and Rick "expensive sideman" Wakeman) we're a lot closer to
new Yes music than we have been in a really long time. Have they got
any new music? I bloody well hope so.
Quote: To me, what HSW are doing is writing another strand in Yes' history.
lol...well they are doing that, aren't they.
Its different, its unexpected and its provoked debate. Thats a pretty
good start. If you don't like it who gives a poo?
I like how you wonder about "who gives". Who gives a fuck about what
Wakeman thinks, who gives a poo about what I like...WTF, who gives a
poo about who gives a poo? I don't know, but judging by reaction at
hand, it seems likely that a fence-sitter might "give a poo"...or a
least a lengthy, passionate lot of pissing and spitting.
passionate yes. pissing no... haha. And no spitting either.
Quote: I'd suggest that you "shut your gob" too but I know that's not likely to happen
given that I'm "well within my rights" to run an open gob, one should
think I'd have your enthusiastic support, even if offered from
somewhere atop a fence.
yeah so how is it down there in that hole you've dug for yourself?
p |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| robmtsd at (no spam) aol.com... |
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 19, 12:46�pm, Vocalize <Vocal... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote: We are each entitled to our opinions. . One of the purposes of a newsgroup
such as this, right?
I'm not sure that a newsgroup has anything to do with each of us being
entitled to our opinions...but everyone is free to post what they'd
like here.
Quote: Given that Magnification was their last release and Yes in concert has since
been relegated to repeatedly mixing up their back catalogue of material, my
interest in seeing more of the same was already on the wane.
mine was gone...I wasn't going when they were coming back out with JA
and I'm not going still. They couldn't sell me a ticket when they
were bonafide nostalgia, how in the devil could I justify going to see
tribute nostalgia?
Quote: Certain performers are intrinsic; they define a group and forever change the
dynamic when they're absent. Much like the thought of the Who without either
Daltry or Townsend �or �The Stones minus either Mick or Keith, for instance
- - for ME - - it's not Yes without Jon. He's the heart and soul of Yes and
I couldn't ignore his exclusion.
just so you know...Chris Squire can't see you.
Quote: Were I much younger and had I not already seen Yes in concert many, many
times over the breadth of their career I might feel quite differently than I
do now.
you maybe would be like the obsessive gossip page kid in England, he's
going no matter who might be in the band.
Quote: I'm sure the current lineup sounds fine, but it has to be more than
competency for me to stay involved.
I've heard a lot of it and "fine" isn't a word I'd use to describe it.
Quote: 'd rather listen to the CD versions
than pretend it doesn't matter whether or not Anderson is present.
me too.
Rob Allen
NP: Scritti Politti, "Perfect Way" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Vocalize... |
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
We are each entitled to our opinions. . One of the purposes of a newsgroup
such as this, right?
Given that Magnification was their last release and Yes in concert has since
been relegated to repeatedly mixing up their back catalogue of material, my
interest in seeing more of the same was already on the wane.
Certain performers are intrinsic; they define a group and forever change the
dynamic when they're absent. Much like the thought of the Who without either
Daltry or Townsend or The Stones minus either Mick or Keith, for instance
- - for ME - - it's not Yes without Jon. He's the heart and soul of Yes and
I couldn't ignore his exclusion.
Were I much younger and had I not already seen Yes in concert many, many
times over the breadth of their career I might feel quite differently than I
do now. I'm sure the current lineup sounds fine, but it has to be more than
competency for me to stay involved. I'd rather listen to the CD versions
than pretend it doesn't matter whether or not Anderson is present. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jeff Blanks... |
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
bubba <amy.lynn1986 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 5, 1:46 pm, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) wrote:
DROP DEAD YOU GODDAMNED SON OF A BITCH. GO EAT YOUR GODDAMNED POISON
MUSHROOMS WHY DON'T YA YOU FILTHY MINDED FUCKED UP MORON.
*Peace will reign*! :-/
--
"When someone serves you coffee, don't go looking for beer in it."
--Anton Chekhov |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jeff Blanks... |
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: On Oct 6, 10:50?am, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) wrote:
What kind of moron would walk out on the current show after paying for a
ticket? ?
Someone who didn't want to waste his time as well as his money, maybe?
--
"When someone serves you coffee, don't go looking for beer in it."
--Anton Chekhov |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:22 pm
|
|