"tom_w_b at (no spam) juno.com" <tom.madman2 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:034ef22d-c92b-455d-9dc1-f5967b20c58f at (no spam) j4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
Yeah....but your list would have a right crock of old shit in it ;-)

I was about 8 pints of beer gone when I made the "snobs" statement and
was
almost certainly fishing for a retort. But certainly RtL and MoP would
make
my top 10 of all time list.

Tolerance and all, how can you even think with 8 pints onboard?

I`m not so good at thinking when sober so it doesn`t make much difference.

I like RTL better than SNM, but only by a hair. The others shit on
Metallica from orbit.

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:18:32 -0700 (PDT), audiophile

audiophi... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
There are some types of music I prefer to have recorded digitally (the
obvious: industrial, darkwave, synth pop, etc), but for the most part
I *strongly* agree with this post.

e.

Yet, Joy Division did it better than anyone without a sequencer in
sight.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:45:57 +0100, "Soze"



I... at (no spam) salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

"tom_... at (no spam) juno.com" <tom.madm... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:034ef22d-c92b-455d-9dc1-f5967b20c58f at (no spam) j4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
Yeah....but your list would have a right crock of old shit in it ;-)

I was about 8 pints of beer gone when I made the "snobs" statement and
was
almost certainly fishing for a retort. But certainly RtL and MoP would
make
my top 10 of all time list.

 Tolerance and all, how can you even think with 8 pints onboard?

I`m not so good at thinking when sober so it doesn`t make much difference.

Ha! I was about to say some of us don't start thinking until we are 8
pints in...

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:22:14 -0700 (PDT), audiophile

audiophi... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I like RTL better than SNM, but only by a hair. The others shit on
Metallica from orbit.

Hehehe.  That may be the greatest height from which one has defecated
yet!

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:35:29 -0700 (PDT), Wyrd <Wyr... at (no spam) hotmail.co.uk
wrote:



On Oct 5, 3:04 pm, TJ Xenos <talvi... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 7:10 am, Wyrd <Wyr... at (no spam) hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On Oct 4, 2:03 am, "nodeerforamonth" <no... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:

Any band where you have to be stoned out of your mind to tolerate them can't
be any good at all.

Have you not noticed you out on your own here.  That's always a
problem, especially when your head is stuck so far up your arse.

They're TOTALLY "easy listening".  I get them mixed up with the Alan Parsons
Project all the time!  "Eye In The Sky" sounds like any run of the mill
Floyd song to me!  Then again, I don't smoke pot.

They have always been rock, from psychedelic ROCK to prog ROCK.  I
don't smoke pot either, but nor am a clueless idiot.  Unlike some.

E.
--
Hmm a Floyd day?

Rock sucks.  The day rock & roll got turned into rock and lost its
soul and became about hirsuit white guys trying to be artistic through
drugs and guitars instead of trying to make people move their asses
was really the days the music died, not when buddy holly crashed in
the plane.

I'll take rock over rock'n'roll every single day of the week.

E.

What the fuck are you two talking about?

On 11 Oct, 04:03, cailinsdad <dobrien51... at (no spam) nospam.com> wrote:

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:18:32 -0700 (PDT), audiophile

audiophi... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
There are some types of music I prefer to have recorded digitally (the
obvious: industrial, darkwave, synth pop, etc), but for the most part
I *strongly* agree with this post.

e.

Yet, Joy Division did it better than anyone without a sequencer in
sight.

Actually that's spot on, there is no better music in that field than
Joy Division.

"audiophile" <audiophi... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message

news:48056686-2a2e-4e8d-b109-39f8834c220d at (no spam) h13g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 11, 5:46 am, dclizardking <dclizardk... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:





On 11 Oct, 04:03, cailinsdad <dobrien51... at (no spam) nospam.com> wrote:

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:18:32 -0700 (PDT), audiophile

audiophi... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
There are some types of music I prefer to have recorded digitally (the
obvious: industrial, darkwave, synth pop, etc), but for the most part
I *strongly* agree with this post.

e.

Yet, Joy Division did it better than anyone without a sequencer in
sight.

Actually that's spot on, there is no better music in that field than
Joy Division.
True, but they were special.
e.
--
RIP ian curtis

Did you see the film about him...`Control`? A pretty bleak watch but I
really enjoyed it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On 11 Oct, 04:03, cailinsdad <dobrien51... at (no spam) nospam.com> wrote:

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:18:32 -0700 (PDT), audiophile

audiophi... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
There are some types of music I prefer to have recorded digitally (the
obvious: industrial, darkwave, synth pop, etc), but for the most part
I *strongly* agree with this post.

e.

Yet, Joy Division did it better than anyone without a sequencer in
sight.

Actually that's spot on, there is no better music in that field than
Joy Division.

True, but they were special.

e.
--
RIP ian curtis