Main Page | Report this Page
Music Forum Index  »  Al Stewart Forum  »  Crybaby Rob Allen Is Over 50? Seriously?...
Page 1 of 4    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Crybaby Rob Allen Is Over 50? Seriously?...

Author Message
The Sicker Vicar...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:31 am
Guest
It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.
 
robmtsd at (no spam) aol.com...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:41 am
Guest
On Nov 2, 12:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com>
babbled:

Quote:
It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.


hmm, 31 lines...what is that 400+ words? All that spent on the
"loser" Rob Allen.


Rob "it would appear we have a ~winner~!" Allen
 
MD...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:57 am
Guest
On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans. There are a lot of us who used to think of Yes as something
special, and now as merely something else. You don't have to read his
posts, you know.

M "also over 50" D
 
Amy Solame...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:15 pm
Guest
Well, at least Rob's posts beat the doped-up or lobotomized moronic
blathering of Chet or the incomprehensible, hypo-maniacal rantings of
'wereo'.
Depilated apes monkeyin' around with keyboards...

On Nov 2, 12:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, blah, blaugh, babble, bla...
 
beekay...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 pm
Guest
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:31:58 -0500, The Sicker Vicar wrote
(in article
<8f7a1bcd-d5e2-4552-b113-72cd89f3bb3f at (no spam) m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>):

Quote:
It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

You can always put Rob Allen in your kill file. I did it years ago.
The only time I see his posts are when someone I haven't kf'd responds to
him.

Rob is bitter because he covered his body in Jon Anderson/Yes-related
tattoos. Now that Anderson is no longer in YES I guess it's too painful for
him to deal look at all that ink on a daily basis.

Now if he had gotten some Squire tats, he wouldn't have this problem, would
he? ;)

-beekay
 
progea...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:43 pm
Guest
On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

God, don't.

(almost 50 here)
 
Wendell T. Stamps...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:48 pm
Guest
Your fascination with RA can be summed up in one word: Faggocity.
 
paul...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:55 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 5:43 pm, progea <pro... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

God, don't.

(almost 50 here)

Yesfans isn't _that_ devoid of crtitical p.o.v's....really.... it's
just that any good points are buried under a slushy mountain of touchy
feely pussyfooting/back-patting/ and self congratulatory twiffle.
Whilst its a relatively polite forum to retreat to every now and then
I only end up reading comments by the likes of Billy Sherwood, Earl
Grey, Henry, Sully and a handful of others. The trading room is good
though.

p"fifty"
 
MD...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:22 pm
Guest
On Nov 2, 10:55 pm, paul <redmooncreat... at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 3, 5:43 pm, progea <pro... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:

On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

God, don't.

(almost 50 here)

Yesfans isn't _that_ devoid of crtitical p.o.v's....really.... it's
just that any good points are buried under a slushy mountain of touchy
feely pussyfooting/back-patting/ and self congratulatory twiffle.

If Yesfans was a food it would be cotton candy.

I'm not sure what food amy would be, nor whether it would actually be
digestible.

NP: Zep_ Kashmir
M"still over 50"D
 
Steven Sullivan...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:13 pm
Guest
Amy Solame <amysolame at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Well, at least Rob's posts beat the doped-up or lobotomized moronic
blathering of Chet or the incomprehensible, hypo-maniacal rantings of
'wereo'.

I call that setting the bar *way low*.


--
-S
We have it in our power to begin the world over again - Thomas Paine
 
Steven Sullivan...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:19 pm
Guest
paul <redmooncreative at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 3, 5:43?pm, progea <pro... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:57?pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

God, don't.

(almost 50 here)

Yesfans isn't _that_ devoid of crtitical p.o.v's....really.... it's
just that any good points are buried under a slushy mountain of touchy
feely pussyfooting/back-patting/ and self congratulatory twiffle.
Whilst its a relatively polite forum to retreat to every now and then
I only end up reading comments by the likes of Billy Sherwood, Earl
Grey, Henry, Sully and a handful of others. The trading room is good
though.

I'm kind of bored with the Yes fan community -- here, there,
everywhere -- nowadays. So you don't see many posts from me
lately. As Yes-related activitiues go I'd rather spend time learning
the bass part to 'To Be Over' than reading the same old from the same old.

I'll probably see the band itself again if they stagger back here. But
when they can so easily be compared to, say, themselves on tour in 1977
on Youtube, it gets ever more, um , poignant to sit through the latter-day
versions.


--
-S
We have it in our power to begin the world over again - Thomas Paine
 
paul...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:31 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 7:19 pm, Steven Sullivan <ssu... at (no spam) panix.com> wrote:
Quote:
paul <redmooncreat... at (no spam) xtra.co.nz> wrote:
On Nov 3, 5:43?pm, progea <pro... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:57?pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

God, don't.

(almost 50 here)
Yesfans isn't _that_ devoid of crtitical p.o.v's....really.... it's
just that any good points are buried under a slushy mountain of touchy
feely pussyfooting/back-patting/ and self congratulatory twiffle.
Whilst its a relatively polite forum to retreat to every now and then
I only end up reading comments by the likes of Billy Sherwood, Earl
Grey, Henry, Sully and a handful of others. The trading room is good
though.

I'm kind of bored with the Yes fan community -- here, there,
everywhere -- nowadays. So you don't see many posts from me
lately. As Yes-related activitiues go I'd rather spend time learning
the bass part to 'To Be Over' than reading the same old from the same old..

I'll probably see the band itself again if they stagger back here. But
when they can so easily be compared to, say, themselves on tour in 1977
on Youtube, it gets ever more, um , poignant to sit through the latter-day
versions.

Buy now for $2500

http://www.charityfolks.com/cfauctions/auction_bid.asp?auctionid=17624&catname=Music+%26+Concerts&mcid=8749


p
 
Chet...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Guest
Crybaby Rob Allen Is Over 50? Seriously?

Group: alt.music.yes Date: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 12:31pm From:
convery.kevin at (no spam) gmail.com (The Sicker Vicar)
It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was about
15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few hundred over
the long term? And yet no one can make a comment supportive of the
current Yes "direction" without his immediate, verbose, snot-nosed,
wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days, wouldn't you think he'd
find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day after week after month, he's
here, being the annoying little man at the party who can't let anyone
express their opinion without butting in about how wrong they are. He
claims he doesn't think this is his personal NG, but you'd never tell
that from his posting.
I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone gives
a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible keyboard
diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words on why
Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is drunk, White
can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed the
unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all guilty
of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could roll with
punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man himself, and wants
to spend his time online completely obsessed with people who barely know
he's alive, let alone give a damn about his preferences as to THEIR
career.
So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob
Allen— what a loser.
----

I just hope for the best for YES, and hope they have more new material
within the next year. I feel good just knowing that they haven't given
up yet. Their act is an expression of freedom; that's important to
those who look for fine examples. ...they're free to keep on rockin,
even without the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame including them
 
robmtsd at (no spam) aol.com...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:38 am
Guest
On Nov 2, 3:42 pm, beekay <c... at (no spam) aol.com> babbled:
Quote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:31:58 -0500, The Sicker Vicar wrote
(in article
8f7a1bcd-d5e2-4552-b113-72cd89f3b... at (no spam) m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>):





It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

You can always put Rob Allen in your kill file. I did it years ago.
The only time I see his posts are when someone I haven't kf'd responds to
him.

Rob is bitter because he covered his body in Jon Anderson/Yes-related
tattoos. Now that Anderson is no longer in YES I guess it's too painful for
him to deal look at all that ink on a daily basis.

Now if he had gotten some Squire tats, he wouldn't have this problem, would
he? Wink


<snort>

it might be that so many clear thinkers like this thing are present in
the Yes fanbase, that gives HS the idea that their tribute act can
pass for the real thing.


Rob "*Yesfans* will never know the difference" Allen
 
robmtsd at (no spam) aol.com...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:10 am
Guest
On Nov 3, 9:51 am, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) wrote:
Quote:
Re: Seriously?  

Group: alt.music.yes Date: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 6:38am From:
robm... at (no spam) aol.com
On Nov 2, 3:42 pm, beekay <c... at (no spam) aol.com> babbled:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:31:58 -0500, The Sicker Vicar wrote (in article
8f7a1bcd-d5e2-4552-b113-72cd89f3b... at (no spam) m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>):
It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was about
15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few hundred over
the long term? And yet no one can make a comment supportive of the
current Yes "direction" without his immediate, verbose, snot-nosed,
wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days, wouldn't you think he'd
find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day after week after month, he's
here, being the annoying little man at the party who can't let anyone
express their opinion without butting in about how wrong they are. He
claims he doesn't think this is his personal NG, but you'd never tell
that from his posting.
I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone gives
a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible keyboard
diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words on why
Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is drunk, White
can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed the
unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all guilty
of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could roll with
punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man himself, and wants
to spend his time online completely obsessed with people who barely know
he's alive, let alone give a damn about his preferences as to THEIR
career.
So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob
Allen— what a loser.
You can always put Rob Allen in your kill file. I did it years ago. The
only time I see his posts are when someone I haven't kf'd responds to
him.
Rob is bitter because he covered his body in Jon Anderson/Yes-related
tattoos. Now that Anderson is no longer in YES I guess it's too painful
for him to deal look at all that ink on a daily basis.
Now if he had gotten some Squire tats, he wouldn't have this problem,
would he? ;)

snort
it might be that so many clear thinkers like this thing are present in
the Yes fanbase, that gives HS the idea that their tribute act can pass
for the real thing.
Rob "*Yesfans* will never know the difference" Allen  
---

Real thing?  HA!  Where's their trophy for being sooo special?


in the minds of all those who would view _the real_ Yes as being
special.

But you do have a point, you COSSHF...maybe it's not so much that Yes
was ever special, but more that tribute "Yes" isn't special at all.


Quote:
 ...alot
of good it did  ....the Blue Meanies broadcast network ain't buyin it;
so what the hell you got


one should hope that you'd get over that nonsense, you COSSHF. The
only good music is going to do is of the entertaiment variety...and
maybe that entertainment will sometimes go deep enough for some
people, to be somewhat more than simple entertainment...but, dude,
it's just _not going to change the world_.


Rob Allen
NP: Jon Anderson, "Far Far Cry"
 
 
Page 1 of 4    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:03 am