On Nov 5, 3:16�am, "robm... at (no spam) aol.com" <robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:


On Nov 3, 10:32 pm, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) wrote:

Re: Seriously?

Group: alt.music.yes Date: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 3:20pm From:
robm... at (no spam) aol.com
On Nov 3, 2:36 pm, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) slobbered:
Re: Seriously?
Group: alt.music.yes Date: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 1:00pm From:
robm... at (no spam) aol.com
On Nov 3, 12:42 pm, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) mumbled: lol. You
love being a trash picker.
apparently you love being detached from reality. Rob "WDYHSMFUF?" Allen
---
You're the one who can't live without Jon the Babb...tist.

I suggest that you love being detached from reality and you offer
further demonstration of that fact.
Nicely done, you COSSHF.
Rob Allen
NP: Widespread Panic, "Time Zones"
---

I wouldn't call hating the current YES, any reality to be proud of.

the reality is that there is no current Yes, you COSSHF.

Far be it for me to imply that Chet is operating with any form of
Lucidity.... but he's right and you're wrong

On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:





It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:





On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

*Some* critical points of view are aired there, which are tolerated by
a small percentage of inhabitants, but the larger percentage seemed to
feel mortally threatened and then behave like cornered animals,
attacking. The sad part is that over time, it looks like the bulk of
the populace just keep opposing opinion to themselves rather than
brave being ostracized.

Pussies, grow a pair.

Then you also have the sycophants, and since Squire and Squirette will
occasionally read and or post there, they behave as if every post is
meticulously studied by the royal couple. Squirette herself recently
went into cornered animal mode and went off on anyone in earshot that
wasn't properly genuflecting. It was the single most embarrassing
moment I have ever witness on any Yes site.

On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:





On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

*Some* critical points of view are aired there, which are tolerated by
a small percentage of inhabitants, but the larger percentage seemed to
feel mortally threatened and then behave like cornered animals,
attacking. The sad part is that over time, it looks like the bulk of
the populace just keep opposing opinion to themselves rather than
brave being ostracized.

Pussies, grow a pair.

Then you also have the sycophants, and since Squire and Squirette will
occasionally read and or post there, they behave as if every post is
meticulously studied by the royal couple. Squirette herself recently
went into cornered animal mode and went off on anyone in earshot that
wasn't properly genuflecting. It was the single most embarrassing
moment I have ever witness on any Yes site.

On Nov 6, 7:09 pm, rojon <Rojont... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:





On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

*Some* critical points of view are aired there, which are tolerated by
a small percentage of inhabitants, but the larger percentage seemed to
feel mortally threatened and then behave like cornered animals,
attacking. The sad part is that over time, it looks like the bulk of
the populace just keep opposing opinion to themselves rather than
brave being ostracized.

Pussies, grow a pair.

Then you also have the sycophants, and since Squire and Squirette will
occasionally read and or post there, they behave as if every post is
meticulously studied by the royal couple. Squirette herself recently
went into cornered animal mode and went off on anyone in earshot that
wasn't properly genuflecting. It was the single most embarrassing
moment I have ever witness on any Yes site.


I suppose it's a good thing that I wouldn't even think of visiting
there, let alone post.

OTOH, it might have been some fun to point and laugh at the buffoon's
latest wife.


Rob Allen
NP: Talk Talk, _Laughing Stock_

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:02:35 -0800 (PST), "robmtsd at (no spam) aol.com"
robmtsd at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:

On Nov 6, 7:09 pm, rojon <Rojont... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:





On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

*Some* critical points of view are aired there, which are tolerated by
a small percentage of inhabitants, but the larger percentage seemed to
feel mortally threatened and then behave like cornered animals,
attacking. The sad part is that over time, it looks like the bulk of
the populace just keep opposing opinion to themselves rather than
brave being ostracized.

Pussies, grow a pair.

Then you also have the sycophants, and since Squire and Squirette will
occasionally read and or post there, they behave as if every post is
meticulously studied by the royal couple. Squirette herself recently
went into cornered animal mode and went off on anyone in earshot that
wasn't properly genuflecting. It was the single most embarrassing
moment I have ever witness on any Yes site.


I suppose it's a good thing that I wouldn't even think of visiting
there, let alone post.

OTOH, it might have been some fun to point and laugh at the buffoon's
latest wife.


Rob Allen
NP: Talk Talk, _Laughing Stock_

Why don't you post a link to a nice clear picture of yourself so we
can look for you at a future show and "say hello"? Or should we just
look for someone with a tattoo of Jon's cock to know it's you?

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:02:35 -0800 (PST), "robm... at (no spam) aol.com"


robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Nov 6, 7:09 pm, rojon <Rojont... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

*Some* critical points of view are aired there, which are tolerated by
a small percentage of inhabitants, but the larger percentage seemed to
feel mortally threatened and then behave like cornered animals,
attacking. The sad part is that over time, it looks like the bulk of
the populace just keep opposing opinion to themselves rather than
brave being ostracized.

Pussies, grow a pair.

Then you also have the sycophants, and since Squire and Squirette will
occasionally read and or post there, they behave as if every post is
meticulously studied by the royal couple. Squirette herself recently
went into cornered animal mode and went off on anyone in earshot that
wasn't properly genuflecting. It was the single most embarrassing
moment I have ever witness on any Yes site.

I suppose it's a good thing that I wouldn't even think of visiting
there, let alone post.

OTOH, it might have been some fun to point and laugh at the buffoon's
latest wife.

Rob Allen
NP:  Talk Talk, _Laughing Stock_

 Why don't you post a link to a nice clear picture of yourself so we
can look for you at a future show and "say hello"?

Or should we just
look for someone with a tattoo of Jon's cock to know it's you?

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:34:56 -0500, ABHSW at (no spam) ease wrote
(in article <gkkef55k4cifeivdnt4bdbm1745qgfj... at (no spam) 4ax.com>):





On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:02:35 -0800 (PST), "robm... at (no spam) aol.com"
robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:

On Nov 6, 7:09 pm, rojon <Rojont... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:57 pm, MD <sonofol... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:

On Nov 2, 2:31 pm, The Sicker Vicar <convery.ke... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

It is amazing to me that Rob Allen at least claims to be over 50 years
old. From his obsession with Chris Squire, one might think he was
about 15. This NG has a readership of, what would you say, a few
hundred over the long term? And yet no one can make a comment
supportive of the current Yes "direction" without his immediate,
verbose, snot-nosed, wiseass reply. If Yes is such crap these days,
wouldn't you think he'd find a new place to cyber-hang? But no, day
after week after month, he's here, being the annoying little man at
the party who can't let anyone express their opinion without butting
in about how wrong they are. He claims he doesn't think this is his
personal NG, but you'd never tell that from his posting.

I wish he would express his obsession with Chris Squire in more
traditional stalker ways: waiting outside Squire's house, sending him
scented love poems with hearts and flowers, killing Squire's dog and
putting the head in his bass case. Anything other than the endless
repetition of the same pissy little point: "I don't like this, so it
sucks, and I'm going to stay here all day and talk about how much it
sucks." Well, OK, as long as he isn't deluded into thinking anyone
gives a damn. The only reason I know his name is his incredible
keyboard diarrhea, which won't let him spend a day without 5,000 words
on why Steve Howe is grumpy (with "fans" like Allen?), Squire is
drunk, White can't play, and the dastardly Benoit David has committed
the unpardonable sin of accepting a gig he was offered. They are all
guilty of Not Being Jon Anderson. Of course, a man in his 50s could
roll with punches like these. I guess Allen is a cranky old man
himself, and wants to spend his time online completely obsessed with
people who barely know he's alive, let alone give a damn about his
preferences as to THEIR career.

So why not create a Jon Anderson newsgroup? Then he couldn't reassure
himself by thinking about how "superior" he is to Chet! This Rob Allen—
what a loser.

If you want a site nearly void of critical points of view, hang out at
Yesfans.

*Some* critical points of view are aired there, which are tolerated by
a small percentage of inhabitants, but the larger percentage seemed to
feel mortally threatened and then behave like cornered animals,
attacking. The sad part is that over time, it looks like the bulk of
the populace just keep opposing opinion to themselves rather than
brave being ostracized.

Pussies, grow a pair.

Then you also have the sycophants, and since Squire and Squirette will
occasionally read and or post there, they behave as if every post is
meticulously studied by the royal couple. Squirette herself recently
went into cornered animal mode and went off on anyone in earshot that
wasn't properly genuflecting. It was the single most embarrassing
moment I have ever witness on any Yes site.

I suppose it's a good thing that I wouldn't even think of visiting
there, let alone post.

OTOH, it might have been some fun to point and laugh at the buffoon's
latest wife.

Rob Allen
NP:  Talk Talk, _Laughing Stock_

 Why don't you post a link to a nice clear picture of yourself so we
can look for you at a future show and "say hello"? Or should we just
look for someone with a tattoo of Jon's cock to know it's you?

Ahahahahahaha!

NQ!

-beekay

Re: Crybaby Rob Allen Is Over 50? Seriously? �

Group: alt.music.yes Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 2:28pm From:
ShorThi... at (no spam) aol.com (Chuck)
Not too long ago, someone predicted whom would be the last posters on
AMY. That was a very sad but accurate/prophetic observation. Unless Jon
comes back into the fold, I'm over and out (of AMY). Thank you to those
who carry love and support in their lives, and thus to others. I
continue to be inspired by Yes recordings to do just that.
CB
"Soon, oh soon the light"
---

OK, but, hang on to those keys to ascension

Not too long ago, someone predicted whom would be the last posters on
AMY. That was a very sad but accurate/prophetic observation. Unless
Jon comes back into the fold, I'm over and out (of AMY). Thank you to
those who carry love and support in their lives, and thus to others. I
continue to be inspired by Yes recordings to do just that.

On Nov 9, 9:05 pm, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) wrote:

Re: Crybaby Rob Allen Is Over 50? Seriously?

Group: alt.music.yes Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 2:28pm From:
ShorThi... at (no spam) aol.com (Chuck)
Not too long ago, someone predicted whom would be the last posters on
AMY. That was a very sad but accurate/prophetic observation. Unless Jon
comes back into the fold, I'm over and out (of AMY). Thank you to those
who carry love and support in their lives, and thus to others. I
continue to be inspired by Yes recordings to do just that.
CB
"Soon, oh soon the light"
---

OK, but, hang on to those keys to ascension

You take care Chet. Quite obscure you are, but you did make me laugh a
few times over the years. Be well.

Re: Crybaby Rob Allen Is Over 50? Seriously?  

Group: alt.music.yes Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 2:28pm From:
ShorThi... at (no spam) aol.com (Chuck)
Not too long ago, someone predicted whom would be the last posters on
AMY. That was a very sad but accurate/prophetic observation. Unless Jon
comes back into the fold, I'm over and out (of AMY). Thank you to those
who carry love and support in their lives, and thus to others. I
continue to be inspired by Yes recordings to do just that.
CB
"Soon, oh soon the light"
---

OK, but, hang on to those keys to ascension

...only one band in the history of mankind offered those

No one's stoppng you from posting your opinions of Jon.  Since Jon
didn't invent new YES lyrics, Sullivan's work is done.  You don't see
him no more. It was his job to condemn any and all new YES songs....from
J.  Most of the people who come to amy to give opinions probably don't
really give YES any thought.  If the media wanted YES to be a spectacle,
they could have been, long ago.  I know they're unique.  ....the media
must think that Sound Chaser sucked.  Fools!  ...or, To Be Over.  Fools!

...And so you see what good the media does this *Fragile* planet.
What's up with that???  Coincidence???

Chuck wrote:
On Nov 9, 9:05 pm, TheTimeTrave... at (no spam) webtv.net (Chet) wrote:
Re: Crybaby Rob Allen Is Over 50? Seriously?

Group: alt.music.yes Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 2:28pm From:
ShorThi... at (no spam) aol.com (Chuck)
Not too long ago, someone predicted whom would be the last posters on
AMY. That was a very sad but accurate/prophetic observation. Unless Jon
comes back into the fold, I'm over and out (of AMY). Thank you to those
who carry love and support in their lives, and thus to others. I
continue to be inspired by Yes recordings to do just that.
CB
"Soon, oh soon the light"
---

OK, but, hang on to those keys to ascension

You take care Chet. Quite obscure you are, but you did make me laugh a
few times over the years. Be well.

Heh. �Chet's been over and out for some of us for quite some time.. �If
only other folks would quit replying to his insane, demented,
drug-addled moronicalness...