How could they pay their bills if they quit performing? �

Will you hire the remains of the band to help you pick up trash?

Paul (Plonk) Goodwin is the ostrich. �

Dhoooooh, Rob.

You're bitter!

..When you come across another Gandolf, ask him for a puff

A YES divorce can be a real bitch.  Don't do it.  Be thankful for
thatwhichis.

In a recent UK radio interview with Chris Squire, he indicated that
the fans seemed to just love both the new additions (BD and OW) and
that there were no complaints at all from anyone he could see.

He
also slurred something about waiting a respectful period of time
before calling this band Yes.

Holy 'if I hide my eyes, it's not there', Batman.  This guy is a
bigger buffoon than I ever could have suspected.  Well at least he
pulled his head out long enough to get on the radio to let some
potential concerts goers know who is in the band.

Maybe he's learned a trick from the internets and just blocked those
things of reality that he doesn't have the stones to deal with.  Or
maybe he *is* the Ostrich!

Rob "that would kind of explain his..er..._appearance_" Allen

On Oct 20, 4:12�am, "robm... at (no spam) aol.com" <robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:

In a recent UK radio interview with Chris Squire, he indicated that
the fans seemed to just love both the new additions (BD and OW) and
that there were no complaints at all from anyone he could see.

So, the fans who knew what lineup was touring and didn't like the idea
(like yourself) didn't go...and missed the opportunity to
complain...duh.

He
also slurred something about waiting a respectful period of time
before calling this band Yes.

Well that seems like a good idea seeing as they were trying out a new
singer. Your point is?

Holy 'if I hide my eyes, it's not there', Batman. �This guy is a
bigger buffoon than I ever could have suspected. �Well at least he
pulled his head out long enough to get on the radio to let some
potential concerts goers know who is in the band.

Yup, there's more of that non-existant touring lineup info that you
keep tripping up over.

Maybe he's learned a trick from the internets and just blocked those
things of reality that he doesn't have the stones to deal with. �Or
maybe he *is* the Ostrich!

Rob "that would kind of explain his..er..._appearance_" Allen

Now you're flaming him for his looks?

I would have thought his bulk was something you could relate to.

no, Chris Squire is the Ostrich, you COSSHF...that is when he's not
busy being Sousy Spice.

In a recent UK radio interview with Chris Squire, he indicated that
the fans seemed to just love both the new additions (BD and OW) and
that there were no complaints at all from anyone he could see. �He
also slurred something about waiting a respectful period of time
before calling this band Yes.

Holy 'if I hide my eyes, it's not there', Batman. �This guy is a
bigger buffoon than I ever could have suspected. �Well at least he
pulled his head out long enough to get on the radio to let some
potential concerts goers know who is in the band.

Maybe he's learned a trick from the internets and just blocked those
things of reality that he doesn't have the stones to deal with. �Or
maybe he *is* the Ostrich!

Rob "that would kind of explain his..er..._appearance_" Allen

On Oct 19, 10:12 am, "robm... at (no spam) aol.com" <robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:





In a recent UK radio interview with Chris Squire, he indicated that
the fans seemed to just love both the new additions (BD and OW) and
that there were no complaints at all from anyone he could see. He
also slurred something about waiting a respectful period of time
before calling this band Yes.

Holy 'if I hide my eyes, it's not there', Batman. This guy is a
bigger buffoon than I ever could have suspected. Well at least he
pulled his head out long enough to get on the radio to let some
potential concerts goers know who is in the band.

Maybe he's learned a trick from the internets and just blocked those
things of reality that he doesn't have the stones to deal with. Or
maybe he *is* the Ostrich!

Rob "that would kind of explain his..er..._appearance_" Allen

What is puzzling is how the ownership of the name Yes seems to bounce
around so much. One day, a member owns the name, the next day, they
don't. Does Anderson still have a stake in the name? Then he would be
receiving compensation for this tour, if not, did he just sell it to
the others because he was short on money?

On Oct 19, 10:12 am, "robm... at (no spam) aol.com" <robm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:





In a recent UK radio interview with Chris Squire, he indicated that
the fans seemed to just love both the new additions (BD and OW) and
that there were no complaints at all from anyone he could see. He
also slurred something about waiting a respectful period of time
before calling this band Yes.

Holy 'if I hide my eyes, it's not there', Batman. This guy is a
bigger buffoon than I ever could have suspected. Well at least he
pulled his head out long enough to get on the radio to let some
potential concerts goers know who is in the band.

Maybe he's learned a trick from the internets and just blocked those
things of reality that he doesn't have the stones to deal with. Or
maybe he *is* the Ostrich!

Rob "that would kind of explain his..er..._appearance_" Allen

What is puzzling is how the ownership of the name Yes seems to bounce
around so much. One day, a member owns the name, the next day, they
don't. Does Anderson still have a stake in the name? Then he would be
receiving compensation for this tour, if not, did he just sell it to
the others because he was short on money?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Note that they all have said Jon is still a member of Yes, no matter who is singing.-

What is puzzling is how the ownership of the name Yes seems to bounce
around so much. One day, a member owns the name, the next day, they
don't. Does Anderson still have a stake in the name? Then he would be
receiving compensation for this tour, if not, did he just sell it to
the others because he was short on money?