KK wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:25:35 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

Celebrities are *innoncent*! They do not know the dangers of the
drugs that doctors give them.

Right. None of them should be expected to know that taking 14,000
pills per month is bad.

What does the KK stand for, Koo Koo? I guess I would be Koo Koo too if I
listen to Howard Stern for 14,000 hours per month!!!!

,/_\,
,/_/ \_\,
/_/ ___ \_\
/_/ |(V)| \_\
| .-. |
| / / \ |
| \ \ / |
| '-' |
'--,-,--'
| |
| |
| |
/\|
\/|
/\
\/

Koo Koo...What time is it, I gotta take my 14,000 pills!

How much water do I have to drink?

I thought Howard Stern was dead? How old is that guy?? Didn't he used to
be on the radio?

Jackson had lost most of his hair, and his haggard face was disfigured
by 13 plastic surgeries, The Sun said.

I feel bad for the family but they can't spin this death. MJ abused
prescription drugs and his health for years. That's why he died.

The Demurol false rumor came from Jackson's family. They are trying to
place blame on the doctor for something that was ultimately MJ's
responsibility.

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:57:43 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

KK wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:25:35 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

Celebrities are *innoncent*! They do not know the dangers of the
drugs that doctors give them.

Right. None of them should be expected to know that taking 14,000
pills per month is bad.

What does the KK stand for, Koo Koo? I guess I would be Koo Koo too if I
listen to Howard Stern for 14,000 hours per month!!!!

Are you retarded?

Do you think that any person would think that the number of pills MJ was
taking was reasonable?

KK wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:57:43 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

KK wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:25:35 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

Celebrities are *innoncent*! They do not know the dangers of the
drugs that doctors give them.

Right. None of them should be expected to know that taking 14,000
pills per month is bad.

What does the KK stand for, Koo Koo? I guess I would be Koo Koo too
if I listen to Howard Stern for 14,000 hours per month!!!!

Are you retarded?

Is that a trick question?

Do you think that any person would think that the number of pills MJ
was taking was reasonable?

I would have to ask his doctors who prescribed him that question. I'm
not one of his doctors, I'm not one of his murders.

You don't see things as they are, you see things as you are. In
otherwords, people see
things as they themselves are, not as "things are".

And don't even come here attacking La Toya Jackson again....I'm not
going to put up with that!

Michael Jackson was murdered, you believe he wasn't...one of us is
wrong.

In the meantime I want these doctor's dead before the truth comes
out...

in the Unitied States you're guilty until proven innoncent.

I don't need proof.

it was "well-known" among the Neverland staff that Jackson had a drug
problem -- "Yes, and people would say, his eyes were rolling in the back
of his head and he wouldn't know what he was talking about."

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:04:59 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

it was "well-known" among the Neverland staff that Jackson had a drug
problem -- "Yes, and people would say, his eyes were rolling in the back
of his head and he wouldn't know what he was talking about."


Okay, here's another question you won't answer:

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted (he
did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided Jackson,
but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew the greater
extent of his drug consumption, then who's more responsible? Jackson?
His staff who didn't call someone? Or the doctor who was personally
prescribing / providing a reasonable amount of pharmaceuticals?

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:04:59 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

it was "well-known" among the Neverland staff that Jackson had a drug
problem -- "Yes, and people would say, his eyes were rolling in the back
of his head and he wouldn't know what he was talking about."


Okay, here's another question you won't answer:

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted (he
did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided Jackson,
but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew the greater
extent of his drug consumption, then who's more responsible? Jackson?
His staff who didn't call someone? Or the doctor who was personally
prescribing / providing a reasonable amount of pharmaceuticals?

KK wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:04:59 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

it was "well-known" among the Neverland staff that Jackson had a drug
problem -- "Yes, and people would say, his eyes were rolling in the
back of his head and he wouldn't know what he was talking about."


Okay, here's another question you won't answer:

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted
(he did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided
Jackson, but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew
the greater extent of his drug consumption, then who's more
responsible? Jackson? His staff who didn't call someone? Or the
doctor who was personally prescribing / providing a reasonable amount
of pharmaceuticals?

*All* the doctors have to be held "accountable" for admiminstrating
(shooting up) drugs that resulted in Michael Jackson's death.

Like Murder on the Orential Express...they all killed him. They all
stuck a knife in him. What difference does it make which knife killed
him?

KK wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:04:59 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

it was "well-known" among the Neverland staff that Jackson had a drug
problem -- "Yes, and people would say, his eyes were rolling in the back
of his head and he wouldn't know what he was talking about."


Okay, here's another question you won't answer:

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted (he
did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided Jackson,
but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew the greater
extent of his drug consumption, then who's more responsible? Jackson?
His staff who didn't call someone? Or the doctor who was personally
prescribing / providing a reasonable amount of pharmaceuticals?

*All* the doctors have to be held "accountable" for admiminstrating (shooting up)
drugs that resulted in Michael Jackson's death.

Like Murder on the Orential Express...they all killed him. They all stuck a knife in him.
What difference does it make which knife killed him?

The Starmaker

The Starmaker wrote:

KK wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:04:59 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

it was "well-known" among the Neverland staff that Jackson had a
drug problem -- "Yes, and people would say, his eyes were rolling
in the back of his head and he wouldn't know what he was talking
about."


Okay, here's another question you won't answer:

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted
(he did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided
Jackson, but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew
the greater extent of his drug consumption, then who's more
responsible? Jackson? His staff who didn't call someone? Or the
doctor who was personally prescribing / providing a reasonable amount
of pharmaceuticals?

*All* the doctors have to be held "accountable" for admiminstrating
(shooting up) drugs that resulted in Michael Jackson's death.

Like Murder on the Orential Express...they all killed him. They all
stuck a knife in him. What difference does it make which knife killed
him?

The Starmaker

I think it should be obvious by now to most people that... the law
enforcement people know already what is in the coroner's report

, and
they want to get their man before it is announced to the public.

This is what it is all leading to..

They'll announce it,
they'll get their man, and
that's it.

So there's no reason to ever prescribe medication and all of it should be
outlawed?

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted
(he did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided
Jackson, but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew
the greater extent of his drug consumption, then who's more
responsible?

*All* the doctors have to be held "accountable"

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

KK wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:04:59 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

it was "well-known" among the Neverland staff that Jackson had a
drug problem -- "Yes, and people would say, his eyes were rolling
in the back of his head and he wouldn't know what he was talking
about."


Okay, here's another question you won't answer:

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted
(he did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided
Jackson, but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew
the greater extent of his drug consumption, then who's more
responsible? Jackson? His staff who didn't call someone? Or the
doctor who was personally prescribing / providing a reasonable amount
of pharmaceuticals?

*All* the doctors have to be held "accountable" for admiminstrating
(shooting up) drugs that resulted in Michael Jackson's death.

Like Murder on the Orential Express...they all killed him. They all
stuck a knife in him. What difference does it make which knife killed
him?

The Starmaker

I think it should be obvious by now to most people that... the law
enforcement people know already what is in the coroner's report

... and you don't.

, and
they want to get their man before it is announced to the public.

This is what it is all leading to..

They'll announce it,
they'll get their man, and
that's it.

I like the way you replied to your own post so you could ignore mine.

Here, try these again:

So there's no reason to ever prescribe medication and all of it should be
outlawed?

and

If Jackson used multiple doctors to get the volume of drugs he wanted
(he did), and each doctor was only aware of the drugs (s)he provided
Jackson, but Jackson himself and as well, apparently, his staff, knew
the greater extent of his drug consumption, then who's more
responsible?

You answered

*All* the doctors have to be held "accountable"

... so all the bystanders who *saw* what was going on bear no
responsibility, but the fifteenth doctor, unaware of Jackson's other drug
use, who gave him one prescription which, on its own, wouldn't be
anything to raise eyebrows over, bears all of it?

Like Murder on the Orential Express...they all killed him. They all
stuck a knife in him. What difference does it make which knife killed
him?