| |
 |
|
| Movies Forum Index » Movie Reviews Forum » Review: Where the Wild Things Are (2009)... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Mark R. Leeper... |
 Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE
(a film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: A boy with emotional problems finds himself
on an island with large fluffy animal people. Spike
Jonze co-writes and directs this adaptation of the
popular 1963 children's book. While the book works
fine for the younger set, the film tries to be too
much an Alice-in-Wonderland-class story for all ages,
but it rarely works for both young and old at the
same time. Rating: high 0 (-4 to +4) or 5/10
The Caldecott Medal Winning children's book WHERE THE WILD THINGS
ARE by Maurice Sendak is thirty-seven pages and only 338 words.
This does not give very material to base a feature-length film
upon. Spike Jonze and Dave Eggers have fleshed it out into a
screenplay for a live action adaptation. That required a lot of
invention on their part and the result does not entirely work.
Max (played by Max Records) is a boy with problems. He seems to
have no friends and has a very short fuse. Only his mother seems
to like him and then not all the time. He is reduced to
threatening fences to support his sense of being someone. When his
older sister's friends destroy his igloo he tracks snow into her
room and jumps on her bed. Finally his anger boils over and he
puts on his animal pajamas and runs away from home. Taking a small
boat and sailing for open water he finds himself swept to a magic
island inhabited by large animal people. He tells them that he is
a king and they believe him and let him rule them.
As their king Max has all sorts of exciting plans for his people
starting with the building of a mighty fortress. Unfortunately, in
the animals he sees many of his own attitudes. Animal people with
his own faults ruin the wonderful kingdom he had planned.
In some ways this film is a throwback to the TV show
"H. R. Pufnstuf". As with that show it was decided that a film or
movie could compete with animation by putting actors in cartoon-
like costumes. It would not surprise me to find out that some
places hand puppets were used, but for the most part the animal
people are people in suits that had mechanical controls to provide
facial expression. The result has gotten a whole lot better since
the days of "H. R. Pufnstuf", but so has the animation competition.
The live-action renderings really capture the images created by
Sendak, and children may well enjoy the visuals created. But the
enchantment wears off. I saw the film in a full Sunday afternoon
crowd. Some of the older children might have been enjoying the
film but the five-year-olds in the crowd were restless. It is not
clear that even the older children would have known what to make of
lines like "happiness is not the best way to be happy." (Come to
think of it, I am not sure I get it.)
In addition, the film has a high level of cartoonish violence.
Nobody is seriously hurt more than a boo-boo. But there is a fair
amount of heavy animal roughhousing. One cannot count on a whole
lot of emotion continuity in this film. Characters who do not like
each other in one scene may be friends in the next sequence. Other
sorts of continuity are missing also. We have the ground covered
with snow in one sequence and without much feel for passage of time
the snow seems to have entirely gone away the next time we look.
There are several familiar voices for characters. The animal-man
closest to Max is Carol (voiced by James Gandolfini). Catherine
O'Hara voices the character of Judith. Chris Cooper does Carol's
best friend, the birdman Douglas. Forest Whitaker takes the role
of Ira. With top-notch actors like that one would expect
characters that the viewer can come away feeling he knows. Sadly
that is not the case here. Human-animals remain cryptic. They
talk like normal people, but not so that one can feel he knows any
of them. Their lead is Carol who seems like a spoiled child. But
we don't know him much better than that. It may have been a
mistake for Jonze to direct his own screenplay. He knows what
emotions he wanted the characters to be conveying, but he probably
is not seeing the result as an outsider and realizing that they are
just not connecting with the viewer.
This is a story that meanders and loses much of its audience, young
and old, but perhaps not in the same places. I rate WHERE THE WILD
THINGS ARE a high 0 on the -4 to +4 scale or 5/10.
Film Credits: <http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/>
What others are saying:
<http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/where_the_wild_things_are/>
Mark R. Leeper
mleeper at (no spam) optonline.net
Copyright 2009 Mark R. Leeper |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:56 am
|
|