Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Movies Forum Index  »  International Movies Forum  »  misc
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
septimus
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 5:07 am
Guest
.... in a land of zero degree
with neither east nor west
has neither day nor night
which is neither cold nor warm
I learned the feeling of exile

-- Wong Kar-Wai,
_Buenos Aires Zero Degree_


A friend of mine sent me this "making of _Happy Together_" documentary.
It is fascinating to watch, particularly because it focuses on (and is
narrated by) the technical people -- the translator, script girl (the
person in charge of continuity?), etc, instead of the director and
the main cast. And these people all seem like variations of the
characters in the film: solitary, lost, a bit homesick, yet still
filled with wanderlust and strangely enamored of the anonymity that
comes with living in a strange land. In other words, to savor that
bittersweet feeling of being an exile. Wong (when he finally appears)
emphasizes the fact that the stories of the characters have definite
endings and places where they end (even though they have no beginning).
Plenty of excised _Happy Together_ footage gets resurrected. Tony Leung
is supposed to have committed suicide, but that ending was thrown away.
Not one, but two main female characters (Shirley Kwan and a nurse who
cared for Leslie Cheung) were left on the cutting floor. Wong works
like a poet; the assembled has to *feel* right for him; otherwise he
would keep on reshooting. In its raw form, with five main characters
and one death, the film would have resembled _Days of Being Wild_ or
_Fallen Angels_. By making the film sparsely populated, Wong
allowed the place (Buenos Aires) and the film _Happy Together_
to stand out.

_2046_, now 4+ years in the making and have been recast many times,
is going to make _Happy Together_ looks economical by comparison.
Incidentally, that other record holder of waste footage -- Terrence
Malick himself -- is rumored to be making a new film at last.


With _Zero Degree_ fresh on my mind, I saw _Lost in Translation_.
The extended night scenes where Bill Murray and Scarlet Johannson (sp)
are having a really good time are the best part of the film, really
well shot, exhilarating, and authentic. The rest feel fake and
cliched, at least to me. I'm not fond of Japanese culture, but
making fun of Japanese customs and TV shows is so trivial; if only
Coppola had the guts and the insight to juxtapose those scenes with
footage of American clowns like David Letterman and Rush Limbaugh!
Murray is great, but I thought the actress is very limited, and her
character isn't that interesting either. Maybe I don't get Sophia
Coppola, but she doesn't seem to have much depth. Nevertheless she
got a lengthy, glowing write-up in the NYT magazine, and on a per
screen basis _LiT_ is without question the best attended film last
weekend. So what do I know.

My friend also made me a copy of Stanley Kwan's _Yang and Yin: Gender
in Chinese Cinema_. It is interesting that the section on father-son
relationship in Chinese films features _Fallen Angels_, the only
one of Wong's films which has a biological father in it. The section
perhaps highlights the reason I am so fond of Wong while middlebrow
American critics prefer Edward Yang and Ang Lee. Lee and Yang harp
on the tradition Chinese art house theme of modernity vs Confucionism,
father-son conflicts and reconciliation. Wong Kar-Wai, appropriately,
treats such conflict as already over. In his universe, the two
generations have fought to a standstill, come to a truce through sheer
exhaustion, and are acting as though the other doesn't exist. The
absence is subtlely alluded to but deeply felt in his films, and this
is what makes Wong feel authentic to me (and many of my Chinese
acquaintances).

I like Soderbergh's _Solaris_. I like the sequences where one
character speaks off screen and the camera focuses on the other's
reaction. It is the only film of his that I don't intensely dislike.

_Londinium_: (Those who are not shameless Irene Jacob fans can stop
reading
now.) I could have sworn Jacob was once a professional dancer. The way
she
moves her entire upper body, throws it so wholeheartedly behind her
gestures is so distinctive. I don't usually think of her as
exceptionally
beautiful, but director Mike Binder has made her shine in what is really
a
supporting role.
Paul Gallagher
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 5:07 am
Guest
In <3F6967AF.2D55CAD3@millenicom.com> septimus <septimus@millenicom.com> writes:

Quote:
With _Zero Degree_ fresh on my mind, I saw _Lost in Translation_.
The extended night scenes where Bill Murray and Scarlet Johannson (sp)
are having a really good time are the best part of the film, really
well shot, exhilarating, and authentic. The rest feel fake and
cliched, at least to me. I'm not fond of Japanese culture, but
making fun of Japanese customs and TV shows is so trivial; if only
Coppola had the guts and the insight to juxtapose those scenes with
footage of American clowns like David Letterman and Rush Limbaugh!
Murray is great, but I thought the actress is very limited, and her
character isn't that interesting either. Maybe I don't get Sophia
Coppola, but she doesn't seem to have much depth. Nevertheless she
got a lengthy, glowing write-up in the NYT magazine, and on a per
screen basis _LiT_ is without question the best attended film last
weekend. So what do I know.

I enjoyed _LiT_, but I wasn't as impressed as I was with _Virgin
Suicides_. I agree that a lot of the jokes at the expense of the
Japanese were too easy, but they seemed to be done with affection.
Scarlett Johansson's character seemed undefined -- which is
surprising since Coppola says she based the character more or less on
herself.

Paul
Paul Gallagher
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 9:40 pm
Guest
In <21405c39.0309181823.7b3afe89@posting.google.com> monterone@draac.com (monterone) writes:

Quote:
I've been seeing -- I guess we all have -- a tendency to bracket Sofia
Coppola with WKW, which has made me curious about _LIT_ (one review
likened it to _ItMfL_ among other films). I guess I can hold off for
a few weeks at least...

There are some similarities. They both show the loneliness, dislocation,
and aimlessness of city life, as well as its excitement and pleasures,
especially the pleasure of random encounters. Also, Coppola's scenes of
the streets of Tokyo are visually reminiscent of Wong's views of
Hong Kong and Buenos Aires, where movement through the city creates
abstract patterns.

I was also reminded of Claire Denis. I thought _Lit_'s brief encounter
was portrayed more effectively than the one in _ Friday Night _, partly
because we got to know the characters better, and more was at stake:
there was a real possibility Murray and Johansson's characters would
leave their spouses, even not return home, partly because of Bill
Murray's fine performance.

I don't think _LiT_ is nearly as good a film as Wong or Denis'
best films, but there are some moments that are comparable (Murray
singing "More than This," touching Johansson's foot, etc.). Also,
I don't want to underestimate Coppola: it's easy to prejudge her
because she's a fashionable celebrity and the daughter of a
famous director. And I prefer her work to that of a lot of the other
hyped new directors: Spike Jonze, P.T. Anderson, Wes Anderson, etc.


Paul
monterone
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 11:23 pm
Guest
septimus <septimus@millenicom.com> wrote in message news:<3F6967AF.2D55CAD3@millenicom.com>...
Quote:


A friend of mine sent me this "making of _Happy Together_" documentary.


With _Zero Degree_ fresh on my mind, I saw _Lost in Translation_.


My friend also made me a copy of Stanley Kwan's _Yang and Yin: Gender
in Chinese Cinema_. It is interesting that the section on father-son
relationship in Chinese films features _Fallen Angels_, the only
one of Wong's films which has a biological father in it. The section
perhaps highlights the reason I am so fond of Wong while middlebrow
American critics prefer Edward Yang and Ang Lee. Lee and Yang harp
on the tradition Chinese art house theme of modernity vs Confucionism,
father-son conflicts and reconciliation. Wong Kar-Wai, appropriately,
treats such conflict as already over. In his universe, the two
generations have fought to a standstill, come to a truce through sheer
exhaustion, and are acting as though the other doesn't exist.


And then there's Tsai Ming-liang and his _The River_. (Tsai is
interviewed in the Kwan film, right? But that was probably before
_The River_...)

Are _Buenos Aires Zero Degrees_ and _Yang + Yin_ available
commercially anywhere? I guess I had read on wongkarwai.net a while
ago that the first was coming out, but I didn't know about the Kwan.

I've been seeing -- I guess we all have -- a tendency to bracket Sofia
Coppola with WKW, which has made me curious about _LIT_ (one review
likened it to _ItMfL_ among other films). I guess I can hold off for
a few weeks at least...
septimus
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:50 am
Guest
monterone wrote:

Quote:
And then there's Tsai Ming-liang and his _The River_. (Tsai is
interviewed in the Kwan film, right? But that was probably before
_The River_...)

Yes, Tsai was interviewed. Tsai probably belongs to a younger

generation than Lee or Yang, though. I haven't followed his films.
I thought _What Time is it There_ is a masterpiece, one that I
enjoy immensely, but for some reason I never took to his other
works. In _What Time_ the father figure is mute and ghostlike.
I'm amused and intrigued by that "modern" treatment.

Quote:
Are _Buenos Aires Zero Degrees_ and _Yang + Yin_ available
commercially anywhere? I guess I had read on wongkarwai.net a while
ago that the first was coming out, but I didn't know about the Kwan.

Not sure ...
septimus
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 3:05 am
Guest
Paul Gallagher wrote:
Quote:

In <21405c39.0309181823.7b3afe89@posting.google.com> monterone@draac.com (monterone) writes:

I've been seeing -- I guess we all have -- a tendency to bracket Sofia
Coppola with WKW, which has made me curious about _LIT_ (one review
likened it to _ItMfL_ among other films). I guess I can hold off for
a few weeks at least...

There are some similarities. They both show the loneliness, dislocation,
and aimlessness of city life, as well as its excitement and pleasures,
especially the pleasure of random encounters. Also, Coppola's scenes of
the streets of Tokyo are visually reminiscent of Wong's views of
Hong Kong and Buenos Aires, where movement through the city creates
abstract patterns.

Very true.


Quote:
I was also reminded of Claire Denis. I thought _Lit_'s brief encounter
was portrayed more effectively than the one in _ Friday Night _, partly
because we got to know the characters better, and more was at stake:
there was a real possibility Murray and Johansson's characters would
leave their spouses, even not return home, partly because of Bill
Murray's fine performance.

The male lead in _Friday Night_ let the woman pay for the dinner --

I guess that's a giveaway that they'll not be together? Smile I do think
that, in ItMfL, the two leads have more in common than Murray and
Johansson in _Lost in Translation_. Not just in terms of age;
they are intellectually well-matched too.

Quote:
I don't think _LiT_ is nearly as good a film as Wong or Denis'
best films, but there are some moments that are comparable (Murray
singing "More than This," touching Johansson's foot, etc.). Also,
I don't want to underestimate Coppola: it's easy to prejudge her
because she's a fashionable celebrity and the daughter of a
famous director. And I prefer her work to that of a lot of the other
hyped new directors: Spike Jonze, P.T. Anderson, Wes Anderson, etc.

I agree she has potential (though I like Wes Anderson better).
My disappointment with her
films has to do with the fact that they are so strongly hyped.
When I see Wong or Denis' "lost tribe" films, I can identify
with the characters readily. _LiT_ strikes me as a
very privilged man's (woman's) adventure and point-of-view,
infinitely removed from my experience.
That may not be a sufficient reason to rank it lower, but
it is hard for me not to.

I saw the film in your haunts by the way, in NYC where I was
at a conference. It was opening night and *all* the night
shows were sold out. The Saturday morning show was almost
sold out as well. Regardless of how good the film is, it
is a bracing experience. Independent films typically draw
an audience of 10 in my town, and subtitled ones are lucky
to get 4. If I had came one week later I would have been
able to see the much-hyped _Demonlover_, seen some new plays,
*and* attend the Jane Birkin concert! Better not go on in
that vein ...
septimus
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 3:28 am
Guest
Paul Gallagher wrote:

Quote:
I enjoyed _LiT_, but I wasn't as impressed as I was with _Virgin
Suicides_. I agree that a lot of the jokes at the expense of the
Japanese were too easy, but they seemed to be done with affection.
Scarlett Johansson's character seemed undefined -- which is
surprising since Coppola says she based the character more or less on
herself.

I wonder what this says about her marriage! She was on Charlie

Rose last night but I was distracted and didn't pay full attention.
Paul Gallagher
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 1:40 pm
Guest
In <3F6BF39D.C7591E67@millenicom.com> septimus <septimus@millenicom.com> writes:

Quote:
Paul Gallagher wrote:

I enjoyed _LiT_, but I wasn't as impressed as I was with _Virgin
Suicides_. I agree that a lot of the jokes at the expense of the
Japanese were too easy, but they seemed to be done with affection.
Scarlett Johansson's character seemed undefined -- which is
surprising since Coppola says she based the character more or less on
herself.

I wonder what this says about her marriage! She was on Charlie
Rose last night but I was distracted and didn't pay full attention.

The rumor is that her marriage isn't doing well.

This was in USA Today:
The actress suggests pieces of Sofia are to be found in both her
and Murray's characters: her observant nature, his ironic humor.
The marital discord onscreen may also ring true. Coppola says
she and director husband Spike Jonze (Adaptation) have been
apart for a while, busy on separate projects.

And this was in the New York Post:
"Sofia is fed up with Spike being completely obsessed with his
career," one pal tells us. "And she never sees him anymore. Plus,
he doesn't want kids and she does."

Adding fuel to the fire, after Coppola checked into the Chateau
Marmont recently, rumors swirled that she'd moved out of the
couple's house nearby.

"It's not true at all," insists Coppola's rep, Sylvia Desrochers.
"Sofia's been in New York for most of the summer and Spike has
been working in Europe. She's still at their house when she's in
L.A. She only checked into the Marmont for two days to do press
for her new movie 'Lost in Translation.' Everything's fine."



Paul
Paul Gallagher
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:40 am
Guest
In <3F6BEE1C.3EED7E40@millenicom.com> septimus <septimus@millenicom.com> writes:

Quote:
I saw the film in your haunts by the way, in NYC where I was
at a conference. It was opening night and *all* the night
shows were sold out. The Saturday morning show was almost
sold out as well. Regardless of how good the film is, it
is a bracing experience. Independent films typically draw
an audience of 10 in my town, and subtitled ones are lucky
to get 4. If I had came one week later I would have been
able to see the much-hyped _Demonlover_, seen some new plays,
*and* attend the Jane Birkin concert! Better not go on in
that vein ...

I saw _ Demonlover _. It's worth seeing. It has some striking
images, and the actresses are very good. It's an interesting
experiment, but, though it has lots of ideas, it doesn't seem
to have a clear point.

Paul
Paul Gallagher
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 11:22 pm
Guest
In <3F725F49.D01DC0CC@millenicom.com> septimus <septimus@millenicom.com> writes:

Quote:
Interesting ... have you (or anyone) seen _Cold Water_? Has
it played yet? I am always curious about it because it has
such a high reputation and is never officially released in
the U.S.

I haven't seen it. But it was shown here in New York just last
weekend. In fact Assayas was scheduled to appear at the Museum of
Modern Art last Thursday. I didn't go to that either... I'm not
sure if he showed up, since someone who was at the premiere of
_Demonlover_ told me he didn't see Assayas there.

Paul
septimus
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 12:21 am
Guest
Paul Gallagher wrote:
Quote:

I saw _ Demonlover _. It's worth seeing. It has some striking
images, and the actresses are very good. It's an interesting
experiment, but, though it has lots of ideas, it doesn't seem
to have a clear point.

Paul

Interesting ... have you (or anyone) seen _Cold Water_? Has
it played yet? I am always curious about it because it has
such a high reputation and is never officially released in
the U.S.
monterone
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:15 pm
Guest
septimus <septimus@millenicom.com> wrote in message news:<3F6BEAAD.E47C1B77@millenicom.com>...
Quote:
In _What Time_ the father figure is mute and ghostlike.
I'm amused and intrigued by that "modern" treatment.

Are _Buenos Aires Zero Degrees_ and _Yang + Yin_ available
commercially anywhere?


To answer my own question, I see that _Buenos Aires Zero Degree_ is
available from yesasia.com (as are a lot of other films on both tape &
DVD). _Yang + Yin_, like the others in that _Century of Cinema_
series, is on a BFI PAL tape (but not DVD), which won't do me any
good. Some of Stanley Kwan's features, which are unreleased here, can
be found on video, by the way. His great _Hold You Tight_ is on DVD
(Netflix has it), _Island Tales_ on a less good-looking VCD (New York
Public Library has it), and _Red Rose, White Rose_, which I haven't
seen yet, is also listed by yesasia.com.

Doesn't the Tony Leung character refer to his conflict with his father
in a voiceover in _Happy Together_? Anyway, I gather there was
originally going to be much more about the character's father,
according to a summary of _Zero Degree_. (And an article on the Web
claims that Wong "tricked" Tony Leung into appearing in the film by
telling him it was about a man and his father.)
monterone
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:39 pm
Guest
septimus <septimus@millenicom.com> wrote in message news:<3F6BF39D.C7591E67@millenicom.com>...
Quote:
Paul Gallagher wrote:

I enjoyed _LiT_, but I wasn't as impressed as I was with _Virgin
Suicides_. I agree that a lot of the jokes at the expense of the
Japanese were too easy, but they seemed to be done with affection.
Scarlett Johansson's character seemed undefined -- which is
surprising since Coppola says she based the character more or less on
herself.

I wonder what this says about her marriage! She was on Charlie
Rose last night but I was distracted and didn't pay full attention.


I caught the tail end of that Charlie Rose interview -- too late to
see the film clips (if there were any). I thought she came off as
something of a bubblehead. That's probably my generation gap showing,
as well as a few other things! But Haley Joel Osment, age 15, of the
unbearable-looking _Secondhand Lions_, seemed like a mental giant by
comparison, for example, and I'll bet he'd at least have been able to
tell Charlie Rose what book he was reading! Coppola's flabbergasted
response to that question ("Book?!") was almost George Bush-like. But
I'm sure she probably just didn't want to let on that she was carrying
Derrida in her back pocket.

I didn't even have any idea which "Spike" Charlie Rose was referring
to; that should give some idea of how far out of it I am. Anyway, I
see that _Virgin Suicides_ is being revived here tom'w (at Two Boots
Pioneer) and I'm hoping to catch up with that first.
septimus
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 12:54 am
Guest
monterone wrote:
Quote:

His great _Hold You Tight_ is on DVD
(Netflix has it), _Island Tales_ on a less good-looking VCD (New York
Public Library has it), and _Red Rose, White Rose_, which I haven't
seen yet, is also listed by yesasia.com.

I wandered over to China Town in NYC and bought a DVD of _Hold Me

Tight_.
The store has a bunch of neat stuff, but I can't remember where it is
now ... Still haven't seen the DVD myself.

Quote:
Doesn't the Tony Leung character refer to his conflict with his father
in a voiceover in _Happy Together_? Anyway, I gather there was
originally going to be much more about the character's father,
according to a summary of _Zero Degree_.

You're right. Maybe the father wasinitially supposed to be
in the film, but it got cut down to him hanging up on Leung's long
distance call. In the same vein, in _As Tears Goes By_, Jackie Cheung
called up his parents to bring them an air conditioner, but they
rejected him and he threw the thing down the hill. In _Days of
Being Wild_, Leslie Cheung went to see his birth mother in the
Philipines
(or Thailand?), but she wouldn't admit him and we only see her backside.
Maggie Cheung actually has a mother in _ItMfL_, but she is always
off-screen. (In _Ashes of Time_, the twist is that Maggie Cheung's
child is only shown from the rear; he wouldn't turn to face her.)
So I think Wong definitely (a) likes to portray the *absence* of
parents (except in _FA_); (b) is obsessed with
parent's rejection of their children. This is at least partly a
political
metaphor;
those who grew up in the 80s, through the period of Sino-British
negotiations about returning HK to China, no doubt feel it very deeply.

(And an article on the Web
Quote:
claims that Wong "tricked" Tony Leung into appearing in the film by
telling him it was about a man and his father.)

That's interesting! Haven't heard that.

In _Zero Degrees_ Leslie Cheung lamented that
he wish the film was about two characters, but because of concert
schedule he had to leave early, so he knew it would be a film
about Tony Leung's character, primarily.
septimus
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:04 am
Guest
monterone wrote:
Quote:


I caught the tail end of that Charlie Rose interview -- too late to
see the film clips (if there were any). I thought she came off as
something of a bubblehead. That's probably my generation gap showing,
as well as a few other things! But Haley Joel Osment, age 15, of the
unbearable-looking _Secondhand Lions_, seemed like a mental giant by
comparison, for example, and I'll bet he'd at least have been able to
tell Charlie Rose what book he was reading! Coppola's flabbergasted
response to that question ("Book?!") was almost George Bush-like. But
I'm sure she probably just didn't want to let on that she was carrying
Derrida in her back pocket.

She seems rather inarticulate. (I didn't the book part.)
Neil Jordan himself, who has written at least 4 novels, also
comes off as strangely inarticulate in interviews, so I guess
that may not be such a good yardstick. But this actually
pinpoints one of the problems I have with the *characters* in
_LiT_, especially the Johannson's character. She seems to have
little inner life and we certainly don't see her reading,
either (unless I forgot).
 
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:13 pm