Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Movies Forum Index  »  Movie Production (Sound) Forum  »  Input transformers
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Mike Westgate AMPS
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:15 pm
Guest
A good observation Karl.

In theory a well balanced source fed into a well balanced input
should offer good immunity to such induced noise.

So from experience a C460 fed into a Sonosax balanced opamp input was OK
and I found that a C480 fed into the same mike line and mixer was not OK

I've just examined the circuit of the C480 to find that is in fact an
unbalanced feed and not even floating!!

The live phase (pin 2)is fed from a push-pull output driver and
the return phase (pin 3) is connected to ground through a T network (and
an electrolytic capacitor to hold off the 48v phantom on that line)
which I guess is there to stop RF getting back into the mike circuit.
Pin 1 is also earth and case.

Hence the problem with C480 - pretty unfortunate for such a good mike!

Mike
www.mikewestgatesound.webnz.co.nz
Karl Lohninger
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 9:25 am
Guest
Mike, thank you for your explanation and observation.

Do I understand that the Sonosax mixer's inputs do not have transformers and
therefore prefer microphones with output transformers?

I'm using AKG480s constantly (i.e. ith transformer inputs on a 442) without
having any problems at all, except once or twice a year where I might get
some noise introduced and in which case I switch in a 460.

Karl Lohninger
Los Angeles


"Mike Westgate AMPS" <mikewest@soundtq.co.nz> wrote:

Quote:
A good observation Karl.

In theory a well balanced source fed into a well balanced input
should offer good immunity to such induced noise.

So from experience a C460 fed into a Sonosax balanced opamp input was OK
and I found that a C480 fed into the same mike line and mixer was not OK

I've just examined the circuit of the C480 to find that is in fact an
unbalanced feed and not even floating!!

The live phase (pin 2)is fed from a push-pull output driver and
the return phase (pin 3) is connected to ground through a T network (and
an electrolytic capacitor to hold off the 48v phantom on that line)
which I guess is there to stop RF getting back into the mike circuit.
Pin 1 is also earth and case.

Hence the problem with C480 - pretty unfortunate for such a good mike!

Mike
www.mikewestgatesound.webnz.co.nz
Brad Harper
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:44 am
Guest
Correct, the Sonosax is transformer-less.

Brad

"Karl Lohninger" <midoil@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BCB51B08.126F2%midoil@comcast.net...
Quote:
Mike, thank you for your explanation and observation.

Do I understand that the Sonosax mixer's inputs do not have transformers
and
therefore prefer microphones with output transformers?
Karl Lohninger
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 10:10 pm
Guest
I tried to get some more information regarding the AKG C480 being
'unbalanced' and got the following reply from AKG's tech department. Please
note that the reply was written in German and was translated by myself and
not being totally familiar with all the correct technical terms there might
be some somewhat unorthodox English terms used....
Because I almost exclusively use AKG 480s with virtually no problems except
the very rare ones mentioned earlier I became interested in this matter.

Karl Lohninger
Los Angeles

Quote:
Here's the answer to Mike's findings about the innards of a C 480.....:

The C480B is according to our technical data 'transformer-less' and
therefore inherently 'non floating'.

The term 'unbalanced' needs to be seen as more complex than how it is
discussed here (see my original post, K.L.):

a) To power our microphones via phantom power it has to be DC-voltage
balanced, that means it needs identical impedances at both audio access
points (pin 2 and 3) in relation to mass (pin 1)

b) to get regarding to AC a CMR (common mode rejection) of more than 40db
there must also be an AC-wise impedance identical at both audio access
points (pin 2 and 3) regarding to mass (pin 1).

Thus, strictly taken, the term "balanced" is fulfilled - be it AC or
DC-wise.

What is differently solved with our (and also with many of our competitor's
products) is the following:

Instead of a true AC output symmetry we (as well as other manufacturers)
have a phantom symmetry - that means only pin 2 outputs audio and pin 3 does
not have an opposite phase signal, but no signal and is therefore only the
reference for the signal.

We (again like other manufacturers) have been using this variant of a
transformer-less output stage since more than 18 years with the C414 B-ULS
as well as the TL/TL II, and also with the C480 B and many other
transformer-less designed AKG microphones.

From the many thousand microphones used in the field there might be a tiny
percentage that under certain circumstances and in combination with certain
additional peripheral equipment showing some kind of problems. And in these
cases it then needs to be established whether actually our microphone is the
culprit or if the symmetrical transformer only blankets underlying problems
of the peripheral equipment.

beste Grüsse

Horst
AKG hotline





On 4/27/04 10:15 PM, in article
46443791.0404272115.48ae902b@posting.google.com, "Mike Westgate AMPS"
<mikewest@soundtq.co.nz> wrote:

Quote:
A good observation Karl.

In theory a well balanced source fed into a well balanced input
should offer good immunity to such induced noise.

So from experience a C460 fed into a Sonosax balanced opamp input was OK
and I found that a C480 fed into the same mike line and mixer was not OK

I've just examined the circuit of the C480 to find that is in fact an
unbalanced feed and not even floating!!

The live phase (pin 2)is fed from a push-pull output driver and
the return phase (pin 3) is connected to ground through a T network (and
an electrolytic capacitor to hold off the 48v phantom on that line)
which I guess is there to stop RF getting back into the mike circuit.
Pin 1 is also earth and case.

Hence the problem with C480 - pretty unfortunate for such a good mike!

Mike
www.mikewestgatesound.webnz.co.nz
Kurt Albershardt
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 1:49 pm
Guest
Karl Lohninger wrote:
Quote:

What is differently solved with our (and also with many of our competitor's
products) is the following:

Instead of a true AC output symmetry we (as well as other manufacturers)
have a phantom symmetry - that means only pin 2 outputs audio and pin 3 does
not have an opposite phase signal, but no signal and is therefore only the
reference for the signal.

We (again like other manufacturers) have been using this variant of a
transformer-less output stage since more than 18 years with the C414 B-ULS
as well as the TL/TL II, and also with the C480 B and many other
transformer-less designed AKG microphones.

AFAIK the C480B uses an impedance-balanced topology, in which pin 3 is not really the ground but has a resistive ladder arrangement. Jim Williams' C460B modifications are similar in their output topology.

TTBOMK, the Schoeps circuit uses an inverting and a noninverting driver which produce a negative-going voltage at pin 3 (though still not completely floating of course.)
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:22 pm