 |
|
| Linux Forum Index » Linux - Slackware Forum » Move from KDE4.2 to xfce or fluxbox - why not?... |
|
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Mike Jones... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:01 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Responding to notbob:
Quote: On 2009-10-01, Mike Jones <Not at (no spam) Arizona.Bay> wrote:
I take your point, but I'm not sure I understand what your problem was
with Xfce? I've found it to be a steady and rational improvement
through its development. No dramatic changes, a few tweaks here and
there, as you'd expect when a better way of doing something is sorted
out, but no real upheavals.
Like I stated, I don't recall exactly which uprev it was, only that it
changed icons, menus, and function locations within menus. IOW, just a
cosmetic thing. This is the same crap M$ has been pulling for years and
I'm sick of it. It didn't slow xfce down at all, but I still had to
relearn what I'd already known previously. I'm not the fastest dog on
the track, so knowledge I acquire is hard won both in time and effort.
I have no tolerance for programs that force me to cover old ground just
to prove what clever programmers they have. Easier to jes toss 'em out
the door and look for a more practical approach to change.
I heard ya, but sometimes there is something that ripples through
everything and we just have to update ourselves accordingly. For example,
I am no great fan of the udev\HAL thingie, and much prefer the "good old
days" when I got a well populated /dev/* dir etc. Because this is not the
way things are done, and because those who do the developing cannot see a
better way of doing things, this is now the default situation, and as I
see things, its up to me to roll with it, or dig in and create an
alternative option that will be just as functional for those who don't
like udev. I can't see that happening, so my best efforts are therefore
required to pull myself out of my 'druthers mode and get with how things
work these days.
Yup. Bah, humbug, grumble grumble, but there ya go. Thats how Linux rolls.
Quote: Also, I've found Xfce to be seductively easy to flick around and get
how I want it on a fresh install. To me it just keeps getting better.
I've never stuck with fluxbox long enough to see its evolution across
slack uprevs. It still looks pretty much like it did the last time I
tried it, but seems to have matured in config flexibility, somewhat.
We'll see. Right now, it appeals to me in sheer speed. Nothing even
comes close.
Looks like you've found your favorite WM. If this is indeed so, then its
likely going to be easier for you to become your own expert in it and
it's development, rather than skipping from one thing to another each
time an upgrade doesn't fit with how you'd have liked things to go.
Quote: Mind you, there is no substitute for just dropping your backed up
configs into IceWM and it all just working (maybe with a quick live
restart).
I'm hoping it will be equally easy to do the same in fluxbox.
Go find out, and feedback for those who are watching with interest. :)
Quote: My only reservation about FB is it lacks many wm level abilities. I got
a bit spoiled with kde3's auto detection and mounting of usb and CDs and
such. I've been doing manual mounting for years, so it's no big deal,
and preferring slack, I'm not afraid to dig in and get my hands dirty.
I don't mind learning what I NEVER knew, before.
Thats a problem with mega-auto "I can't believe its not WinDOHz" clicky
interfaces like KDE, Gnome, etc., that WE get used to all that auto-ness
and don't learn what we need to to manage our own systems. Thats always
going to be a hard habit to break, which is why I stick with my IceWM
\Xfce options. In the same way, I refuse to learn how to operate all the
quikmenu stuff on the various mobbile phones that appear on an almost
daily basis, and stick with memorising phone numbers as we used to before
all this "do it for me" stuff got in the way and actually made things
more complicated due to lack of user-level standardisation.
Looks like you're in a learning curve lately. I hope you find what works
for you and have some fun using it.
--
*===( http://www.400monkeys.com/God/
*===( http://principiadiscordia.com/
*===( http://www.slackware.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| notbob... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 2009-10-02, Mike Jones <Not at (no spam) Arizona.Bay> wrote:
Quote: I heard ya, but sometimes there is something that ripples through
everything and we just have to update ourselves accordingly.
I very much agree. In fact, I hadda update my box cuz it jes WOULDN'T
roll no mo. It was so old and slow, I couldn't even watch youtube or
news vids, online. So, I went out and bought a perfectly good used
sony vaio. Smokin'! ...at least until I loaded kde4.
Quote: it's development, rather than skipping from one thing to another each
time an upgrade doesn't fit with how you'd have liked things to go.
Precisely what I plan. At this point, I'm pretty contented using fb
while having kde loaded. I have nothing against most of kde's apps,
just their resource killing desktop. So, I have fb's speed and kde's
apps. Brilliant!
Quote: Go find out, and feedback for those who are watching with interest.
Yeah. I try and get my discoveries back to aols, no matter how
amateurish. Some other newb may find them handy.
Right now I'm trying to learn more about automounting usb stuff, as
that's one of the things I lost with fb. No problem. I can still
manually mount till I figure it out and it's a good brain exercise. I
started trying to figure out hal/udev, before, but kde 3.5 came along
with automount and I said, why bother. Sometimes, someone else's
progress can kill your own progress. ;)
nb |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Chant... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
notbob wrote:
Quote: On 2009-10-01, Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide at (no spam) sacrideo.us> wrote:
the Kickoff menu on KDE, the Kickoff menu has the nice search bar at the
top, which I like
I'm so glad someone likes it. I think it's utter crap. Whyingodsname
should I even need a search function to find applications I've been
using for several years, other than the fact they moved everything
from where I knew it to be, before? After that, why would I need it
more than once, having then learned an app's new location? Crap for
crap's sake.
But, if like most people you have a gazillion aps installed, in case one
might be useful, it is excellent. It even picks up apps that arn't on the
menu system.
Pete
--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mike Jones... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Responding to Peter Chant:
Quote: notbob wrote:
On 2009-10-01, Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide at (no spam) sacrideo.us> wrote:
the Kickoff menu on KDE, the Kickoff menu has the nice search bar at
the top, which I like
I'm so glad someone likes it. I think it's utter crap. Whyingodsname
should I even need a search function to find applications I've been
using for several years, other than the fact they moved everything from
where I knew it to be, before? After that, why would I need it more
than once, having then learned an app's new location? Crap for crap's
sake.
But, if like most people you have a gazillion aps installed, in case one
might be useful, it is excellent. It even picks up apps that arn't on
the menu system.
Pete
Hmmm. Xfce has a similar function. I can see how it might be useful,
though I've not found a use for it yet.
--
*===( http://www.400monkeys.com/God/
*===( http://principiadiscordia.com/
*===( http://www.slackware.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mike Jones... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Responding to notbob:
[...]
Quote: Go find out, and feedback for those who are watching with interest. :)
Yeah. I try and get my discoveries back to aols, no matter how
amateurish. Some other newb may find them handy.
Newbies ask questions many can benefit from the answers to.
Those more than familiar with X, Y, and Z may never think to mention them.
Quote: Right now I'm trying to learn more about automounting usb stuff, as
that's one of the things I lost with fb. No problem. I can still
manually mount till I figure it out and it's a good brain exercise. I
started trying to figure out hal/udev, before, but kde 3.5 came along
with automount and I said, why bother. Sometimes, someone else's
progress can kill your own progress.
The luxury of "Do it for me" stuff is a trap where the mind stagnates.
Not a habit I'd recommend.
Nothing wrong with optimised automation, until\unless it turns it's users
into button pecking automated robot chickens.
--
*===( http://www.400monkeys.com/God/
*===( http://principiadiscordia.com/
*===( http://www.slackware.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Loki Harfagr... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:51:53 +0100, Peter Chant did cat :
Quote: notbob wrote:
On 2009-10-01, Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide at (no spam) sacrideo.us> wrote:
the Kickoff menu on KDE, the Kickoff menu has the nice search bar at
the top, which I like
I'm so glad someone likes it. I think it's utter crap. Whyingodsname
should I even need a search function to find applications I've been
using for several years, other than the fact they moved everything from
where I knew it to be, before? After that, why would I need it more
than once, having then learned an app's new location? Crap for crap's
sake.
But, if like most people you have a gazillion aps installed,
quite a curious idea indeed! This is not the redmond league users
group you know? most people here does have a shortillion apps
installed, usually a dozenium usuals apps, the one they really use.
Quote: in case one
might be useful,
Ah, yes, "in case one might (may) be useful", but wouldn't a
better place for those be on sourceforge (or even /.)?
Quote: it is excellent. It even picks up apps that arn't on
the menu system.
If some apps aren't on my 'menu system' why would I need them to
take some resources and/or places in a select plate while I'm
just trying and use what I needed/liked/wanted to?
It is a depressing idea to my mind, when I read your post
the visions come up, and too close, of giant blue swinging
staples and trombones mating and barfing on brown fluffy spaniels.
Really depressing, where did I put my BFG9K again?-> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| notbob... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 2009-10-02, Dan C <youmustbejoking at (no spam) lan.invalid> wrote:
Quote: Jeezuz, I'm starting to agree more and more with Loki. Am I losing my
mind?
I guess it jes depends on how you feel about trombones and fluffy
spaniels. Makes sense to me.
nb |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dan C... |
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:57:28 +0000, notbob wrote:
Quote: On 2009-10-02, Dan C <youmustbejoking at (no spam) lan.invalid> wrote:
Jeezuz, I'm starting to agree more and more with Loki. Am I losing my
mind?
I guess it jes depends on how you feel about trombones and fluffy
spaniels. Makes sense to me.
Yeah. Never had any thoughts, really, about trombones. I don't really
care much for fluffy spaniels, though. Just that word "fluffy" reminds
me of the ANC troll who used to offer up his spewage in here, but seems
to have dried up and blown away in the wind.
--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he garotted another passing Liberal.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ron Gibson... |
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:00:20 +0000, rm at (no spam) realto.margarino.ca wrote:
Quote: cordially, as always,
rm
Cordial on up to this eunuch...
8====================================>
So hello, gobbler, to Mr. Blinky
--
Email - rsgibson at (no spam) tampabay.rr.borg
Replace borg with com
"Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dan C... |
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:41:00 -0500, Ron Gibson wrote:
Quote: There can be no doubt KDE has some very good programs. I live in
konsole and consider k3b brilliant. The desktop, OTOH, is quite another
thing. I'll definitely be looking for app replacements if I have to
suffer that trainwreck.
I've got to figure out how to run both XFCE and KDE I reckon.
Just run Xfce, and all (most, anyway) of the KDE apps should be in the
menus.
man xwmconfig
--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he garotted another passing Liberal.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ron Gibson... |
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 07 Oct 2009 21:13:39 GMT, Dan C <youmustbejoking at (no spam) lan.invalid>
wrote:
Quote: I've got to figure out how to run both XFCE and KDE I reckon.
Just run Xfce, and all (most, anyway) of the KDE apps should be in the
menus.
man xwmconfig
Yeah, I know how to set it up. What I should have said is try to
remember what I did in the past to be able to select which desktop
from the CLI. I don't like using gdm or kdm or whatever those things
are.
I'm also going to try my best to change this KDE from an ugly clumsy
beast into a more nimble desktop GUI.
--
Email - rsgibson at (no spam) tampabay.rr.borg
Replace borg with com
"Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ron Gibson... |
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:16:39 -0400, "Aaron W. Hsu"
<arcfide at (no spam) sacrideo.us> wrote:
Quote: technical sense, flawed? You could argue that the new system is
fundamentally less efficient, but I don't think you can, since the new
system is more efficient in cases, and also tracks better with current
Desktop practices on other systems. Whether you consider this a good thing
or something that you like is up to you, but it doesn't mean that KDE is
somehow bad.
Emulation is not innovation.
Quote: addressable merits in Desktop environments. I don't think people want a
Desktop that never changes. If that's what you want, you can always use
TWM. 3.5 is still there, too, if you really can't learn a new workflow.
Sensible people don't install a new desktop in order to have some new
really kewl screensavers.
Quote: So, try KDE again, but this time go into the Advanced Tab and select the
Desktop search icon. From there, uncheck the Desktop indexer, and you
should be alright.
Immediately will be done. As far as searching mc works just fine for
me and is one hell of a lot faster.
--
Email - rsgibson at (no spam) tampabay.rr.borg
Replace borg with com
"Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Grant... |
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:35:14 GMT, notbob <notbob at (no spam) nothome.com> wrote:
Quote: On 2009-10-08, notbob <notbob at (no spam) nothome.com> wrote:
On 2009-10-08, Ron Gibson <rsgibson at (no spam) tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Yeah, I know how to set it up. What I should have said is try to
remember what I did in the past to be able to select which desktop
from the CLI. I don't like using gdm or kdm or whatever those things
are.
After login:
$ startx /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.fluxbox
....or whatever desktops you have in installed in the above dir.
Hah!! I've wanted to do this forever.
Now that I've been studying some basic scripting, I've learned enough
to be dangerous. Steal a little here, copy a little there, snip, add,
subtract, bwahahahah....
Here is my bash menu script to choose a wm/desktop from the login
prompt for the default choices in a full slack install. Naturally, I
make no guarantees and am not responsible if your dell laptop melts
down to a puddle of day-glo pink. I will say it works fine on my
slack 13 desktop and only if you don't have an x session already
running. It could no doubt use some refinement and added
functionality (like a 2nd x session), but I'll do that when I get
there. Enjoy:
----------------------
#!/bin/bash
while :
....
done
Perhaps:
#!/bin/bash
wmpath="/etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc"
default="blackbox"
while :
do
clear
echo " -== CHOOSE A DESKTOP ==-
1. blackbox
2. fluxbox
3. fvwm2
4. xfce
5. twm
6. wmaker
7. kde
"
printf " %s" "Enter number of desktop [1-7]: "
read opt
case $opt in
1) startx $wmpath.blackbox;;
2) startx $wmpath.fluxbox;;
3) startx $wmpath.fvwm2;;
4) startx $wmpath.xfce;;
5) startx $wmpath.twm;;
6) startx $wmpath.wmaker;;
7) startx $wmpath.kde;;
*) startx $wmpath.$default;;
esac
done
If you must use a menu, try to keep one set of options, a single
array for the desktop type would be better -- I'll let you discover
how 'echo -n' is frowned upon, use printf instead (much more
versatile for print formatting).
Grant.
--
http://bugsplatter.id.au |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Aaron W. Hsu... |
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:42:55 -0400, Ron Gibson <rsgibson at (no spam) tampabay.rr.com>
wrote:
Quote: It's much more sensible to simply share a tip if you have it rather
than to suggest reinventing the wheel. And BTW, I was using Slackware
before there even was a KDE desktop.
Here's a tip to improve Slackware's KDE 4.2 speed. Disable the File
Indexer in the Desktop Search Preferences in the System Settings. Doing so
will probably get you back another 500MB in usable RAM and actually give
your CPU the time to do real work. My KDE Desktop is very fast with that
one simple thing disabled, even given the Compiz and other graphics and
effects I have enabled. With File Indexing enabled, I could not get decent
performance from KDE: the indexer would constantly try to thrash the hard
drive and use lots of CPU cycles, while consuming way more RAM than it
needed.
Aaron W. Hsu
--
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bud... |
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
notbob wrote:
Quote: Like the fact Slackware doesn't even have Gnome? ;)
nb
Well, like that too.
--
Bud |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:15 am
|
|