 |
|
| Linux Forum Index » Linux Development - Applications » Need small programming languages... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Dos-Man 64... |
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hello, I am now finally moving to linux from windows. I am ok with
using Linux, but I do not know much about what programming tools are
available. What I am looking for is some programming tools that meet
a few specific criteria.
1) Easy to download/install/configure on a debian distribution. In
other words, not requiring me to download a bunch of other stuff in
order to get said compiler to work.
2) Standalone executables. I'm just not a big fan of the whole .net/
java thing. I want stand-alone binaries (and preferably small ones.)
3) Not a huge package with millions of files and a full-scale ide and
whatnot. I tried downloading free pascal, but it's just too much of a
monster to download and configure.
I'm looking for something that would be similar to rapiq-q or AutoIt 3
on the windows platform. Just something that is easy to set up and can
be used to create small utilities with.
dos-man |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dos-Man 64... |
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 14, 12:05 pm, Rainer Weikusat <rweiku... at (no spam) mssgmbh.com> wrote:
Quote: Dos-Man 64 <ChairS... at (no spam) mail.com> writes:
[...]
I'm looking for something that would be similar to rapiq-q
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/rq/WiYu/Download.htm
The compiler still works on the current Debian stable and at least
the example mentioned in the README seems to do so, to.
Thanks for responding. I do have Rapid-Q for linux, and have created a
few small xwindows apps with it, but it is very unstable and seems
incomplete. I'm afraid this just never advanced to the level of being
a reliable linux programming tool. I need something similar but in a
more completed state. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rainer Weikusat... |
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:05 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dos-Man 64 <ChairShot at (no spam) mail.com> writes:
[...]
Quote: I'm looking for something that would be similar to rapiq-q
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/rq/WiYu/Download.htm
The compiler still works on the current Debian stable and at least
the example mentioned in the README seems to do so, to. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob Martin... |
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:18 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
in 6978 20090814 175331 Dos-Man 64 <ChairShot at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Quote: 3) Not a huge package with millions of files and a full-scale ide and
whatnot. I tried downloading free pascal, but it's just too much of a
monster to download and configure.
Free Pascal binaries install in seconds and no configuration is necessary. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dos-Man 64... |
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 15, 1:18 am, Bob Martin <bob.mar... at (no spam) excite.com> wrote:
Quote: in 6978 20090814 175331 Dos-Man 64 <ChairS... at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
3) Not a huge package with millions of files and a full-scale ide and
whatnot. I tried downloading free pascal, but it's just too much of a
monster to download and configure.
Free Pascal binaries install in seconds and no configuration is necessary..
I'm using a live distrubtion, meaning it would probably have to be
installed over and over again. Also, I need to download and install
the lazarus IDE, another monster. And the target machine has no
internet connection. I need to download the stuff manually. I'm just
not having any luck with any of them. Usually I can't even figure out
what files to download from these huge lists of downloadable files
with no descriptions. I need something smaller and easier to work
with. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dos-Man 64... |
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 15, 10:33 am, John Hasler <j... at (no spam) dhh.gt.org> wrote:
Quote: Dos-Man 64 writes:
I'm using a live distrubtion...
Why? Those are not intended for anything serious.
Well, that may be true; however, I am finding knoppix live to be
totally sufficient for what I want to do here. I've been using Windows
98 for like 12 years, and this is similar. It's at least as good. All
I need now is a couple of good little compilers, and I'll be set.
Quote:
And the target machine has no internet connection.
Why? Even I can afford a Realtek card.
We have two machines in our household. One is set up for Internet, the
other has always been used for gaming.
Quote: Usually I can't even figure out what files to download from these huge
lists of downloadable files with no descriptions.
Install a real distribution such as Debian and then install one of the
numerous IDE packages it offers (Lazarus for Free Pascal, for example).
The package manager will figure out all the dependencies. All you will
have to do is change CDs when told to (and not even that if you spend
$10 and put the machine on the Net).
--
John Hasler
j... at (no spam) dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
I still have a problem with that. Stuff disappears (kylix for
example.) If I download something, I want to be able to burn it to a
CD so that I will always have it. If something requires too many
dependencies and too much downloading, then it isn't any good and not
worth bothering with. Well, that's the philosophy of the platform I am
coming from anyway. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Hasler... |
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:33 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dos-Man 64 writes:
Quote: I'm using a live distrubtion...
Why? Those are not intended for anything serious.
Quote: And the target machine has no internet connection.
Why? Even I can afford a Realtek card.
Quote: Usually I can't even figure out what files to download from these huge
lists of downloadable files with no descriptions.
Install a real distribution such as Debian and then install one of the
numerous IDE packages it offers (Lazarus for Free Pascal, for example).
The package manager will figure out all the dependencies. All you will
have to do is change CDs when told to (and not even that if you spend
$10 and put the machine on the Net).
--
John Hasler
john at (no spam) dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jasen Betts... |
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 2009-08-14, Dos-Man 64 <ChairShot at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Quote: Hello, I am now finally moving to linux from windows. I am ok with
using Linux, but I do not know much about what programming tools are
available. What I am looking for is some programming tools that meet
a few specific criteria.
1) Easy to download/install/configure on a debian distribution. In
other words, not requiring me to download a bunch of other stuff in
order to get said compiler to work.
you could try NASM (I'm not really sure of your goals here)
Quote: 2) Standalone executables. I'm just not a big fan of the whole .net/
java thing. I want stand-alone binaries (and preferably small ones.)
gcc (and a few extra bits) will compile C,C++, ISO Pascal, Object
Pascal, Fortran-78, Objective C, and probably a few other languages.
it's kind of big but it works well.
Quote: 3) Not a huge package with millions of files and a full-scale ide and
whatnot. I tried downloading free pascal, but it's just too much of a
monster to download and configure.
I'm looking for something that would be similar to rapiq-q or AutoIt 3
on the windows platform. Just something that is easy to set up and can
be used to create small utilities with.
wikipedia says rapiq-q is cross platform, get the linux version!
I usually write small utilities as bash scripts. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dos-Man 64... |
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:18 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 16, 6:08 am, markhob... at (no spam) hotpop.donottypethisbit.com (Mark
Hobley) wrote:
Quote: Dos-Man 64 <ChairS... at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Well, that may be true; however, I am finding knoppix live to be
totally sufficient for what I want to do here. I've been using Windows
98 for like 12 years, and this is similar.
Yeah, but do you run windows from a livecd?
The advice of using a permanent distro for development is good.
No. And that is the problem! Windows has become so bloated, so non-
versatile... it's essentially a software anville composed of binary
digits. The problem is only getting worse and worse. Vista is a
complete resource hog, and also very nosy as to who you are and what
you are doing. These little linux distros are very acrobatic and
versatile. And they don't ask too many questions.
Quote:
I too am a developer coming from another platform (my background is
msdos and assembly language).
It's at least as good. All
I need now is a couple of good little compilers, and I'll be set.
I am doing similar research here. For graphical applications, you might want
to try gambas, which is a bit like visual basic.
I haven't heard of that. I will try it. Thank you for the suggestion.
Quote: We have two machines in our household. One is set up for Internet, the
other has always been used for gaming.
Ok, you have more than one machine. That is a good reason to get hold of
a couple of network cards.
Well, the machine upstairs does a NIC, but it just doesn't have a
line. The NIC was put in so that I can pass files back and forth to
my softmodded xboxes.
Quote:
I still have a problem with that. Stuff disappears (kylix for
example.) If I download something, I want to be able to burn it to a
CD so that I will always have it.
Indeed, distributions do change. Burning to cdrom, or storing stuff on a
local fileserver is a good policy. I do that here.
If something requires too many
dependencies and too much downloading, then it isn't any good and not
worth bothering with. Well, that's the philosophy of the platform I am
coming from anyway.
Microsoft Windows has problems with dependencies too. You must have
experienced this.
Well, it's getting worse with the whole .NET thingy, but I've not
really dealt with that. That is exactly why I have stuck with '98. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dos-Man 64... |
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 16, 4:28 am, Jasen Betts <ja... at (no spam) xnet.co.nz> wrote:
Quote: On 2009-08-14, Dos-Man 64 <ChairS... at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Hello, I am now finally moving to linux from windows. I am ok with
using Linux, but I do not know much about what programming tools are
available. What I am looking for is some programming tools that meet
a few specific criteria.
1) Easy to download/install/configure on a debian distribution. In
other words, not requiring me to download a bunch of other stuff in
order to get said compiler to work.
you could try NASM (I'm not really sure of your goals here)
Well, my goal is to get more comfortable using and programming linux.
I know C very well, and so I'm ok on the command line application
front. I just need something small for writing GUI apps. As mentioned,
I do not like java. I have used linux on and off over the years, so
I'm not in the position of having no linux experience at all (Thank
God.) But then again, there's a lot that I don't know, so I have to
continue to learn.
Quote: 2) Standalone executables. I'm just not a big fan of the whole .net/
java thing. I want stand-alone binaries (and preferably small ones.)
gcc (and a few extra bits) will compile C,C++, ISO Pascal, Object
Pascal, Fortran-78, Objective C, and probably a few other languages.
it's kind of big but it works well.
3) Not a huge package with millions of files and a full-scale ide and
whatnot. I tried downloading free pascal, but it's just too much of a
monster to download and configure.
I'm looking for something that would be similar to rapiq-q or AutoIt 3
on the windows platform. Just something that is easy to set up and can
be used to create small utilities with.
wikipedia says rapiq-q is cross platform, get the linux version!
Honestly, I have tried it. It doesn't work well. It isn't reliable.
Quote: I usually write small utilities as bash scripts.
My own scripting language seems to work pretty well running under WINE
(or at least for scripts that don't perform console I/O.) However,
this is kind of a bizarre experience running this (to say the least.)
http://www.savefile.com/client/files.php?pid=808766665 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mark Hobley... |
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dos-Man 64 <ChairShot at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Quote: Well, that may be true; however, I am finding knoppix live to be
totally sufficient for what I want to do here. I've been using Windows
98 for like 12 years, and this is similar.
Yeah, but do you run windows from a livecd?
The advice of using a permanent distro for development is good.
I too am a developer coming from another platform (my background is
msdos and assembly language).
Quote: It's at least as good. All
I need now is a couple of good little compilers, and I'll be set.
I am doing similar research here. For graphical applications, you might want
to try gambas, which is a bit like visual basic.
Quote: We have two machines in our household. One is set up for Internet, the
other has always been used for gaming.
Ok, you have more than one machine. That is a good reason to get hold of
a couple of network cards.
Quote: I still have a problem with that. Stuff disappears (kylix for
example.) If I download something, I want to be able to burn it to a
CD so that I will always have it.
Indeed, distributions do change. Burning to cdrom, or storing stuff on a
local fileserver is a good policy. I do that here.
Quote: If something requires too many
dependencies and too much downloading, then it isn't any good and not
worth bothering with. Well, that's the philosophy of the platform I am
coming from anyway.
Microsoft Windows has problems with dependencies too. You must have
experienced this.
FWIW, I am working on a distribution that will build entirely from an archive of
source tarballs, senabling the software to be kept under local control.
(Apparently openbsd has better support for this). Unfortunately on Linux, the
GNU toolchain is currently required, but this is broken at this time, so I
have not yet been able to get a similar system operational.
Mark.
--
Mark Hobley
Linux User: #370818 http://markhobley.yi.org/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dos-Man 64... |
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 26, 11:19 am, "JosephKK"<quiettechb... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:25:37 -0700 (PDT), Dos-Man 64
ChairS... at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 4:28 am, Jasen Betts <ja... at (no spam) xnet.co.nz> wrote:
On 2009-08-14, Dos-Man 64 <ChairS... at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Hello, I am now finally moving to linux from windows. I am ok with
using Linux, but I do not know much about what programming tools are
available. What I am looking for is some programming tools that meet
a few specific criteria.
1) Easy to download/install/configure on a debian distribution. In
other words, not requiring me to download a bunch of other stuff in
order to get said compiler to work.
you could try NASM (I'm not really sure of your goals here)
Well, my goal is to get more comfortable using and programming linux.
I know C very well, and so I'm ok on the command line application
front. I just need something small for writing GUI apps. As mentioned,
I do not like java. I have used linux on and off over the years, so
I'm not in the position of having no linux experience at all (Thank
God.) But then again, there's a lot that I don't know, so I have to
continue to learn.
2) Standalone executables. I'm just not a big fan of the whole .net/
java thing. I want stand-alone binaries (and preferably small ones.)
gcc (and a few extra bits) will compile C,C++, ISO Pascal, Object
Pascal, Fortran-78, Objective C, and probably a few other languages.
it's kind of big but it works well.
3) Not a huge package with millions of files and a full-scale ide and
whatnot. I tried downloading free pascal, but it's just too much of a
monster to download and configure.
I'm looking for something that would be similar to rapiq-q or AutoIt 3
on the windows platform. Just something that is easy to set up and can
be used to create small utilities with.
wikipedia says rapiq-q is cross platform, get the linux version!
Honestly, I have tried it. It doesn't work well. It isn't reliable..
I usually write small utilities as bash scripts.
My own scripting language seems to work pretty well running under WINE
(or at least for scripts that don't perform console I/O.) However,
this is kind of a bizarre experience running this (to say the least.)
http://www.savefile.com/client/files.php?pid=808766665
Late to the chase here, but two suggestions:
Build your own live DVD with Kdevelop (it may even be on the Knoppix
DVD)
Search Internet for a live DVD with development tools on it already.
Actually, I'm doing OK right now. I ordered some knoppix DVDs and
there are some good options here including Free Pascal and GTK+. I
just finished my first utility.
http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup/browse_thread/thread/a6b8ca1271124a26?hl=en
I've had some trouble with QT. I haven't been able to get any of the
programs in any of the books I bought to compile. I don't think the
QT library is installed, but the weird thing that is I got a KDE
application to compile from kdevelop. Right now I am trying to stay
away from IDEs, make files, projects, etc. I just want to keep things
simple. Just me, gedit, and a source code file. That's the best way
to learn. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JosephKK... |
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:19 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:25:37 -0700 (PDT), Dos-Man 64
<ChairShot at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Aug 16, 4:28 am, Jasen Betts <ja... at (no spam) xnet.co.nz> wrote:
On 2009-08-14, Dos-Man 64 <ChairS... at (no spam) mail.com> wrote:
Hello, I am now finally moving to linux from windows. I am ok with
using Linux, but I do not know much about what programming tools are
available. What I am looking for is some programming tools that meet
a few specific criteria.
1) Easy to download/install/configure on a debian distribution. In
other words, not requiring me to download a bunch of other stuff in
order to get said compiler to work.
you could try NASM (I'm not really sure of your goals here)
Well, my goal is to get more comfortable using and programming linux.
I know C very well, and so I'm ok on the command line application
front. I just need something small for writing GUI apps. As mentioned,
I do not like java. I have used linux on and off over the years, so
I'm not in the position of having no linux experience at all (Thank
God.) But then again, there's a lot that I don't know, so I have to
continue to learn.
2) Standalone executables. I'm just not a big fan of the whole .net/
java thing. I want stand-alone binaries (and preferably small ones.)
gcc (and a few extra bits) will compile C,C++, ISO Pascal, Object
Pascal, Fortran-78, Objective C, and probably a few other languages.
it's kind of big but it works well.
3) Not a huge package with millions of files and a full-scale ide and
whatnot. I tried downloading free pascal, but it's just too much of a
monster to download and configure.
I'm looking for something that would be similar to rapiq-q or AutoIt 3
on the windows platform. Just something that is easy to set up and can
be used to create small utilities with.
wikipedia says rapiq-q is cross platform, get the linux version!
Honestly, I have tried it. It doesn't work well. It isn't reliable.
I usually write small utilities as bash scripts.
My own scripting language seems to work pretty well running under WINE
(or at least for scripts that don't perform console I/O.) However,
this is kind of a bizarre experience running this (to say the least.)
http://www.savefile.com/client/files.php?pid=808766665
Late to the chase here, but two suggestions:
Build your own live DVD with Kdevelop (it may even be on the Knoppix
DVD)
Search Internet for a live DVD with development tools on it already. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Dec 09, 2009 6:04 am
|
|