| |
 |
|
|
Linux Forum Index » Linux Networking » Cat 6 cable - Home made problem...
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| goarilla... |
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:08:28 +0000, Unruh wrote:
Quote: "h.stroph" <me at (no spam) privacy.net> writes:
In news:bILtk.10382$nu6.3995 at (no spam) edtnps83, Unruh <unruh-spam at (no spam) physics.ubc.ca
typed:
A cat 5e cable is GigE capable. Cat 6 certainly should be.
5e most certainly is not; 6 most certainly is. You have a very
consistently-observed habit in Usenet of shooting your mouth off about
things of which you know very little, if anything.
Lets see, I have about 20m of cat 5e cable connecting my machine to the
main switch and then 20m m connecting the main switch to another
computers both with Gigabit ethernet cards. I get 80MB/s between the two
(dominated by disk time) ( which is about 600Mb/s) I would say cat 5e is
capable. And the user had Cat 6 wired directly
If I go to Wikipedia on the Gigabit Ethernet page, we get
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet)
"1000BASE-T (also known as IEEE 802.3ab) is a standard for gigabit
Ethernet over copper wiring. It requires, at a minimum, Category 5 cable
(the same as 100BASE-TX), but Category 5e ("Category 5 enhanced") and
Category 6 cable may also be used and are often recommended. 1000BASE-T
requires all four pairs to be present and is far less tolerant of poorly
installed wiring than 100BASE-TX."
Now, do you have any other comments to enlighten us with?
isn't there a limit on how long the cable can be (in the case of cat5e) ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| goarilla... |
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:04:17 +0000, goarilla wrote:
Quote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:08:28 +0000, Unruh wrote:
"h.stroph" <me at (no spam) privacy.net> writes:
In news:bILtk.10382$nu6.3995 at (no spam) edtnps83, Unruh
unruh-spam at (no spam) physics.ubc.ca> typed:
A cat 5e cable is GigE capable. Cat 6 certainly should be.
5e most certainly is not; 6 most certainly is. You have a very
consistently-observed habit in Usenet of shooting your mouth off about
things of which you know very little, if anything.
Lets see, I have about 20m of cat 5e cable connecting my machine to the
main switch and then 20m m connecting the main switch to another
computers both with Gigabit ethernet cards. I get 80MB/s between the
two (dominated by disk time) ( which is about 600Mb/s) I would say cat
5e is capable. And the user had Cat 6 wired directly
If I go to Wikipedia on the Gigabit Ethernet page, we get
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet)
"1000BASE-T (also known as IEEE 802.3ab) is a standard for gigabit
Ethernet over copper wiring. It requires, at a minimum, Category 5
cable (the same as 100BASE-TX), but Category 5e ("Category 5 enhanced")
and Category 6 cable may also be used and are often recommended.
1000BASE-T requires all four pairs to be present and is far less
tolerant of poorly installed wiring than 100BASE-TX."
Now, do you have any other comments to enlighten us with?
isn't there a limit on how long the cable can be (in the case of cat5e)
?
nevermind it's the same limit as any other ethernet cable according to
this resource
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_5_cable#Category_5e
100 meters  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:45 am
|
|