 |
|
| Linux Forum Index » Linux - Help » need help with my site . |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| mar |
 Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
i will supply free help as best i can in return for you just visiting my site
i can help with almost any problem youve got so no catch just a visit as im starting out
new and need to get visitors to my site and forum please contact from there with any problems
video hardware net try me and i promise i will do my best to help.
http://www.mdrepairs.com plus use secure if you think im messing https://www.mdrepairs.com
thanks |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| mar |
| Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
her eyes, and an
extraordinary dread of sinning against Him; of which her mother
mentioned the following remarkable instance. Some time in August, the
last year, she went with some bigger children to get some plums in a
neighbor's lot, knowing nothing of any harm in what she did; but when
she brought some of the plums into the house, her mother mildly reproved
her, and told her that she must not get plums without leave, because it
was sin: God had commanded her not to steal. The child seemed greatly
surprised, and burst out in tears, and cried out, I won't have these
plums! and turning to her sister Eunice, very earnestly said to her, Why
did you ask me to go to that plum tree? I should not have gone, if you
had not asked me. The other children did not seem to be much affected or
concerned; but there was no pacifying Phebe. Her mother told her, she
might go and ask leave, and then it would not be sin for her to eat
them; and sent one of the children to that end; and, when she returned,
her mother told her that the owner had given leave, now she might eat
them, and it would not be stealing. This stilled her a little while; but
presently she broke out again into an exceeding fit of crying. Her
mother asked her, What made her cry again? Why sh |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| mar |
| Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
truth of
that point which ought to be our ultimate end.
There is nothing clearer than this; and thus, according to the principles of
reason, the conduct of men is wholly unreasonable, if they do not take
another course.
On this point, therefore, we condemn those who live without thought of the
ultimate end of life, who let themselves be guided by their own inclinations
and their own pleasures without reflection and without concern, and, as if
they could annihilate eternity by turning away their thought from it, think
only of making themselves happy for the moment.
Yet this eternity exists, and death, which must open into it and threatens
them every hour, must in a little time infallibly put them under the
dreadful necessity of being either annihilated or unhappy for ever, without
knowing which of these eternities is for ever prepared for them.
This is a doubt of terrible consequence. They are in peril of eternal woe
and thereupon, as if the matter were not worth the trouble, they neglect to
inquire whether this is one of those opinions which people receive with too
credulous a facility, or one of those which, obscure in themselves, have a
very firm, though hidden, foundation. Thus they know not whether there be
truth or f |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| mar |
| Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
them altogether; that she should say everything or nothing,
that I might see which cause I ought to follow. Whereas in my present state,
ignorant of what I am or of what I ought to do, I know neither my condition
nor my duty. My heart inclines wholly to know where is the true good, in
order to follow it; nothing would be too dear to me for eternity.
I envy those whom I see living in the faith with such carelessness and who
make such a bad use of a gift of which it seems to me I would make such a
different use.
230. It is incomprehensible that God should exist, and it is
incomprehensible that He should not exist; that the soul should be joined to
the body, and that we should have no soul; that the world should be created,
and that it should not be created, etc.; that original sin should be, and
that it should not be.
231. Do you believe it to be impossible that God is infinite, without parts?
Yes. I wish therefore to show you an infinite and indivisible thing. It is a
point moving everywhere with an infinite |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| mar |
| Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
180: Nullus penitus Hebraeorum antiquorum reperitur qui
tradiderit libros periisse et per Esdram esse restitutos, nisi in IV Esdrae.
The story that he changed the letters.
Philo, in Vita Mosis: Illa lingua ac character quo antiquitus scripta est
lex sic permansit usque ad LXX.
Josephus says that the Law was in Hebrew when it was translated by the
Seventy.
Under Antiochus and Vespasian, when they wanted to abolish the books, and
when there was no prophet, they could not do so. And under the Babylonians,
when no persecution had been made, and when there were so many prophets,
would they have let them be burnt?
Josephus laughs at the Greeks who would not hear...
Tertullian: Perinde potuit abolefactam eam violentia cataclysmi in spiritu
rursus reformare, quemadmodum et Hierosolymis Babylonia expugnatione
deletis, omne instrumentum Judaicae literaturae per Esdram constat
restauratum.[113]
He says that Noah could as easily have restored in spirit the book of Enoch,
destroyed by the Deluge, as Esdras could have restored the Scriptures lost
during the Captivity.
(Theos) en te epi Nabouchodonosor aichmalosia tou laou, diaphthareison ton
Graphon... enepneuse 'Esdra to ierei, ek tes phules Leui tous ton
progegonoton propheton pantas anataxasthai logous, kai apokatastesai to lae
ten dia Mouseos nom |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:37 pm
|
|