Main Page | Report this Page
Linux Forum Index  »  Linux - Suse Forum  »  Swap a Video Card. Linux drools and Windows XP Rulez.
Page 1 of 6    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Swap a Video Card. Linux drools and Windows XP Rulez.

Author Message
Richie Spano
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:55 pm
Guest
Suse 10.0 with all patches to date, and that's a lot of patches.

The object:

Remove an Nvidia MX4000 PCI card and install an Nvidia FX5500 AGP card.
Both the Linux system and the Windows system are running the Nvidia
drivers, for Linux this is "nvidia not nv".

Windows:

Power down, remove old card, install new card.
Power up and system comes up at 800x500 @60hz. (yikes!)
Right click on desktop, select porperties-> 1280x1024 and 85 hz.
Done....
It all works perfectly.



Linux Suse 10.0:
Power down, remove old card, install new card.
Power up and system dumps me at a text login prompt.
Now what?

First thing I try is booting the install DVD and trying to rescue the
system.
It tells me all is well.

Ok, so *I* know a little about Suse so I login, su to root and start yast.
However, clicking on "graphics card" produces a screen flash and nothing
more.

I try some other selections and they all seem to work, so yast is working
AFAIKT.

So now what?

Ok... I know a little about SuSE so I try and start SaX.. Doesn't work.

I do a find and figure out they changed the name to Sax2, silly me.

Try to start Sax2 but it complains and says I have to be at runlevel 3 in
order to run Sax2.

Hmm Runlevel 3?

Ok, so like I said, I know enough about Suse / linux to know I need to do
an init 3 to get there and I do it.

Now I start sax2 and it finds the card, configures it and all works well,
finally.


Now you tell me, how in the hell is any new user of Suse or any other
Linux for that matter, going to figure this out?
Upgrading video cards is quite common.

Again, Windows handles this in a simple, logical manner.

Linux?

A new user wouldn't stand a chance getting this working.


So now you can return back to denial, call me names, ignore the truth
and go back to living in your caves until the next truth about the
sloppiness of Linux gets posted.

mwk
 
B Gruff
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:05 pm
Guest
On Friday 10 March 2006 00:55 Richie Spano wrote:

Quote:
Hmm Runlevel 3?

Ok, so like I said, I know enough about Suse / linux to know I need to do
an init 3 to get there and I do it.

Now I start sax2 and it finds the card, configures it and all works well,
finally.

Sorry - you obviously know a lot more about this than I do - just refresh my
memory....

Is that the same as typing "3" in the boot prompt options or something?
I seem to recall doing it once when 3D went bananas.... I thought I typed
the "3", then started sax2 .... would that be about right?
 
Richie Spano
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:15 pm
Guest
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:05:01 +0000, B Gruff wrote:

Quote:
On Friday 10 March 2006 00:55 Richie Spano wrote:

Hmm Runlevel 3?

Ok, so like I said, I know enough about Suse / linux to know I need to do
an init 3 to get there and I do it.

Now I start sax2 and it finds the card, configures it and all works well,
finally.

Sorry - you obviously know a lot more about this than I do - just refresh my
memory....

Is that the same as typing "3" in the boot prompt options or something?
I seem to recall doing it once when 3D went bananas.... I thought I typed
the "3", then started sax2 .... would that be about right?

Nice snip job, and why not leave the sarcasm home ok?
Again how does Joe know how to do this?
Again...Windows, install hardware boot and it works. Set your preferences if you
wish or just leave it at default 800x600.

Linux?

Good luck...
You'll need it...

There is no way, you or any of your psycho Linux gang can justify the need
for the end user to go through what Suse Linux requires to simply swap a
video card.

Poor Joe will be left at a CLI and at this point he can't even get on the
net to find the answers, unless he knows a text based browser, lynxx,
which is highly unlikely.

Linux tanks on a simple video card, even within the same brand.

I wouldn't even want to know what happens if I installed an ATI card after
having an Nvidia or Matrox card in the system.
 
ray
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:50 pm
Guest
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:55:34 -0500, Richie Spano wrote:

Quote:
Suse 10.0 with all patches to date, and that's a lot of patches.

The object:

Remove an Nvidia MX4000 PCI card and install an Nvidia FX5500 AGP card.
Both the Linux system and the Windows system are running the Nvidia
drivers, for Linux this is "nvidia not nv".

Windows:

Power down, remove old card, install new card.
Power up and system comes up at 800x500 @60hz. (yikes!)
Right click on desktop, select porperties-> 1280x1024 and 85 hz.
Done....
It all works perfectly.



Linux Suse 10.0:
Power down, remove old card, install new card.
Power up and system dumps me at a text login prompt.
Now what?

First thing I try is booting the install DVD and trying to rescue the
system.
It tells me all is well.

Ok, so *I* know a little about Suse so I login, su to root and start yast.
However, clicking on "graphics card" produces a screen flash and nothing
more.

I try some other selections and they all seem to work, so yast is working
AFAIKT.

So now what?

Ok... I know a little about SuSE so I try and start SaX.. Doesn't work.

I do a find and figure out they changed the name to Sax2, silly me.

Try to start Sax2 but it complains and says I have to be at runlevel 3 in
order to run Sax2.

Hmm Runlevel 3?

Ok, so like I said, I know enough about Suse / linux to know I need to do
an init 3 to get there and I do it.

Now I start sax2 and it finds the card, configures it and all works well,
finally.


Now you tell me, how in the hell is any new user of Suse or any other
Linux for that matter, going to figure this out?
Upgrading video cards is quite common.

Again, Windows handles this in a simple, logical manner.

Linux?

A new user wouldn't stand a chance getting this working.


So now you can return back to denial, call me names, ignore the truth
and go back to living in your caves until the next truth about the
sloppiness of Linux gets posted.

mwk

Very interesting. My experiences have been pretty much the opposite. MS
usually requires to install new drivers whenever ANYthing changes whereas
Linux is usually quite happy using an nvidia driver on any nvidia card.
 
Richie Spano
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:55 pm
Guest
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:50:58 -0700, ray wrote:


Quote:
Very interesting. My experiences have been pretty much the opposite. MS
usually requires to install new drivers whenever ANYthing changes whereas
Linux is usually quite happy using an nvidia driver on any nvidia card.

One major difference....
Original card was a PCI card.
New card is an AGP card.
Looking at boot message log shows all kinds of "can't find pci card" type
messages for Linux.

However, again Windows dealt with it fine.

FWIW, I have swapped motherboards under Linux and had no troubles.
Windows?
A complete disaster usually involving a complete re-install.
So go figure.....
 
Bobbie
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:30 pm
Guest
While dancing and signing to Enya's Carribean Blue, Richie Spano
exclaimed:

Quote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:50:58 -0700, ray wrote:


Very interesting. My experiences have been pretty much the opposite. MS
usually requires to install new drivers whenever ANYthing changes whereas
Linux is usually quite happy using an nvidia driver on any nvidia card.

One major difference....
Original card was a PCI card.
New card is an AGP card.

So if you had a motherboard with an AGP slot, why would you start off by
installing a PCI video card? Especially when the MX4000 is available in
both forms.


Quote:
Looking at boot message log shows all kinds of "can't find pci card" type
messages for Linux.

However, again Windows dealt with it fine.

FWIW, I have swapped motherboards under Linux and had no troubles.
Windows?
A complete disaster usually involving a complete re-install.
So go figure.....

You're like a little puppy, just running around in circles for no reason
other than to chase your tail. First Linux is sub-par, then it blows
Windows away? Which is it?

--
Bobbie the Triple Killer is at http://members.shaw.ca/bobbie4/index.htm
Today's posting comes via the numbers 0 & 1, Suse 10.0 and Pan Newsreader.
http://www.opensuse.org/Download
 
Richie Spano
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:52 pm
Guest
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:30:57 +0000, Bobbie wrote:


Quote:
So if you had a motherboard with an AGP slot, why would you start off by
installing a PCI video card? Especially when the MX4000 is available in
both forms.


Linux advocate technique #1: Attack the user.....

Answer: Because the card was free.............



Quote:
You're like a little puppy, just running around in circles for no reason
other than to chase your tail. First Linux is sub-par, then it blows
Windows away? Which is it?

Linux advocate technique #2: Never address the points....

So "triple killer (aka Terry Porter) do you actually have something to say?
Can you address the points?
Can you refute them?
Can you provide proof?

etc....
 
Mike
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:10 am
Guest
"There is no way, you or any of your psycho Linux gang can justify the
need
for the end user to go through what Suse Linux requires to simply swap
a
video card. "

You have a very interesting way of making friends. You also seem to be
confusing some terms and losing site of the big picture here. SuSE is
just one distribution. No distro can be seen as the model of all
things Linux. There are thousands of distributions, each focusing on
specific goals. Don't let a failing in SuSE discourage you. The Linux
kernel project does not answer to SuSE, it's more of a mutual
arrangement to cooperate. Have you attempted the switch in Ubuntu?
Fedora, perhaps? I'd suggest you try another distro before you blast
the entire community.
 
Roy L. Fuchs
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:17 am
Guest
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:55:02 -0500, Richie Spano
<mr.whitekeys@yahoo.com> Gave us:

Quote:
FWIW, I have swapped motherboards under Linux and had no troubles.
Windows?
A complete disaster usually involving a complete re-install.
So go figure.....

Absolutely true! Also, if it is XP, one has to get on the phone with
big brother to get it activated again.
 
Richie Spano
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:40 am
Guest
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:10:10 -0800, Mike wrote:

Quote:
"There is no way, you or any of your psycho Linux gang can justify the
need
for the end user to go through what Suse Linux requires to simply swap
a
video card. "

You have a very interesting way of making friends. You also seem to be
confusing some terms and losing site of the big picture here. SuSE is
just one distribution. No distro can be seen as the model of all
things Linux. There are thousands of distributions, each focusing on
specific goals. Don't let a failing in SuSE discourage you. The Linux
kernel project does not answer to SuSE, it's more of a mutual
arrangement to cooperate. Have you attempted the switch in Ubuntu?
Fedora, perhaps? I'd suggest you try another distro before you blast
the entire community.


Yawwn.......

A perfect example of the distro switcherooo..............

It's like telling a person who just spent 20k on a Ford Mustang that they
should have bought a Toyota......
 
Bobbie
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:44 am
Guest
While dancing and signing to Enya's Carribean Blue, Richie Spano
exclaimed:

Quote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:13:04 +0000, Bobbie wrote:

While dancing and signing to Enya's Carribean Blue, Richie Spano
exclaimed:




Yawwn...
You can't address the points.

What points?

Quote:
Can't provide any reasonable rebuttle.

Bebuttle to what?

Quote:
So why should I waste time with you?

Because you're lonely and you need friends.

--
Bobbie the Triple Killer is at http://members.shaw.ca/bobbie4/index.htm
Today's posting comes via the numbers 0 & 1, Suse 10.0 and Pan Newsreader.
http://www.opensuse.org/Download
 
Robert Hull
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:20 am
Guest
In alt.os.linux.suse, on Fri 10 March 2006 05:10, Mike
<mike.schoon@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
I'd suggest you try another distro before you blast
the entire community

Please do not feed the trolls
--
Robert HULL

Archival or publication of this article on any part of thisishull.net
is without consent and is in direct breach of the Data Protection Act
 
Tim Smith
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:49 am
Guest
In article <os22121n4u25ipu1s3bs6p6e38rdjl73kn@4ax.com>,
Roy L. Fuchs <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
Quote:
FWIW, I have swapped motherboards under Linux and had no troubles.
Windows?
A complete disaster usually involving a complete re-install.
So go figure.....

Absolutely true! Also, if it is XP, one has to get on the phone with
big brother to get it activated again.

Most people won't need to get on the phone to get activated after a
motherboard swap. It will activate fine over the internet for them.


--
--Tim Smith
 
Limestone-Cowboy
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:53 am
Guest
My last experience involved Suse 9.3 and winXP. The former simply
installed the driver for me and XP asked for the driver which I loaded
from CD. What is so difficult about either.
 
Roy L. Fuchs
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:09 am
Guest
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:42:15 -0500, Richie Spano
<mr.whitekeys@yahoo.com> Gave us:

Quote:

Linux advocate technique #1: Call the person an idiot.....

You are not an idiot because you are "the person". You are an idiot
by virtue of the attitude you displayed while making your post.
Quote:

You dorks get sucked in every single time....

Sucked in? So your entire post was really a troll?

Quote:
You make yourselves look like fools with every message you post....

Funny, I was just thinking that very thought about you, FlatFish.

Quote:
It's like shooting fish in a barrel...

You couldn't shoot a turd into the toilet. The reason: You ARE a
turd.
 
 
Page 1 of 6    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:12 am