begin oe_protect.scr
Sinister Midget <sinister@stinkfoot.biz> espoused:
begin KillFileMe.vbs

On 2005-03-14, quoth Mark Kent <mark.kent@demon.co.uk>:
begin doom.scr
Steve Carroll <noone@nowhere.com> espoused:

Compare your experience to just *some* of Sn*t's:

http://tinyurl.com/3ptfj

The better part of 20,000... that's twenty **THOUSAND** posts in an 18
month time period... in *one* NG... and that's just using the name Sn!t;
as Elizabot has already shown cola, he's used plenty of others... as
well as his sockpuppets and outright stealing of identities.

25,900 I saw. Over 18 months, that's almost 50 posts a day, *every day*
for 18 months. Is sn?t more than one person?

Flatbrain has been known to do that, as Flatso only. Add in the
puppets.....

SCOoke was near or over that number a couple of times.

Several other trolls, most of whom I killfiled before they ever got
that obnoxious (Hello DooFu$, Bailo!), have aimed for numbers like
that.

AFAIK none have ever achieved that many for that long, excepting
possibly Krabs Itches, Man and s/h/it's multitude of socks.


That's the thing I think is most amazing - the total persistency.
What kind of lifestyle permits such a continuous stream of posting?

Did you see my post about Snit feigning to be a new user with a problem,
and then being first to answer? I wouldn't mind if someone would respond
so that Kier can see the Google evidence, as he says he killfiled me.

Snit has admitted to winding people up sometimes. It's a silly habit, but
he is after all, only human. Some people do that, here and in RL. It only
works if you rise to it. Rick seems to rise to it constantly.

Personally, I don't much care what he does in his own back yard. While he
continues to discuss Linux reasonably with me, I will do him the same
courtesy. When he stops being reasonable with me, I will stop talking to
to him. End of story.

Again, CSMA and COLA is not Snit's back yard.

begin oe_protect.scr
Sinister Midget <sinister@stinkfoot.biz> espoused:


On this occasion, I would suggest that the silence speaks volumes.
One would hope that people can change their behaviour over time -
perhaps
Ben/Sn*t will make an effort, although looking at 50 posts/day for 18
months, there can't be that much time to consider one's own
behaviour.

Still, let's see...

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:23:35 -0700, Snxt wrote:

Look at my posts where I have asked to end the silliness. Look at
the
responses.

http://snipurl.com/dgrq

That is merely the most recent. Even with a poster who made
threats to call
the police with false allegations and to send lies to my employer,
I
repeatedly tried to make peace:

http://snipurl.com/arg7
http://snipurl.com/arg8
http://snipurl.com/arga
http://snipurl.com/argc

I didn't do that. Statistically, no one did that, yet you want to
harassing everyone for 1 or 2 people's actions.

Kier wrote:
(snip)
Snit has admitted to winding people up sometimes. It's a silly habit, but
he is after all, only human. Some people do that, here and in RL. It only
works if you rise to it. Rick seems to rise to it constantly.

So, you approve of doing things just to piss people off?

(snip)

Personally, I don't much care what he does in his own back yard. While he
continues to discuss Linux reasonably with me, I will do him the same
courtesy. When he stops being reasonable with me, I will stop talking to
to him. End of story.

Again, CSMA and COLA is not Snit's back yard.
And, again, your words eem to say that you don't care what others
do unless they impact you. Nice.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:26:43 -0500, Rick wrote:

Kier wrote:
(snip)
Snit has admitted to winding people up sometimes. It's a silly habit, but
he is after all, only human. Some people do that, here and in RL. It only
works if you rise to it. Rick seems to rise to it constantly.

So, you approve of doing things just to piss people off?

(snip)

Personally, I don't much care what he does in his own back yard. While he
continues to discuss Linux reasonably with me, I will do him the same
courtesy. When he stops being reasonable with me, I will stop talking to
to him. End of story.

Again, CSMA and COLA is not Snit's back yard.
And, again, your words eem to say that you don't care what others
do unless they impact you. Nice.

Tell me something, Rick - why are you responding to this, which is a
repost I have absolutely nothing to do with?

Elizabot v2.0.2 wrote:
(snip)
Did you see my post about Snit feigning to be a new user with a problem,
and then being first to answer? I wouldn't mind if someone would respond
so that Kier can see the Google evidence, as he says he killfiled me.

I dont't think it will do any good. It seems Kier is happy to let
Snit do anything he wants as long as it doesn't impact Kier.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:20:03 -0500, Rick wrote:

Elizabot v2.0.2 wrote:
(snip)
Did you see my post about Snit feigning to be a new user with a problem,
and then being first to answer? I wouldn't mind if someone would respond
so that Kier can see the Google evidence, as he says he killfiled me.

I dont't think it will do any good. It seems Kier is happy to let
Snit do anything he wants as long as it doesn't impact Kier.

You want to speak to me, Rick? Do it directly. And do not ever put words
in my mouth.

Maybe you'd like to ask your friend Elizabot why she nymshifted?

Elizabot v2.0.2 wrote:
(snip)
Did you see my post about Snit feigning to be a new user with a
problem,
and then being first to answer? I wouldn't mind if someone would
respond
so that Kier can see the Google evidence, as he says he killfiled
me.

I dont't think it will do any good. It seems Kier is happy to let
Snit do anything he wants as long as it doesn't impact Kier.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:20:03 -0500, Rick wrote:

Elizabot v2.0.2 wrote:
(snip)
Did you see my post about Snit feigning to be a new user with a problem,
and then being first to answer? I wouldn't mind if someone would respond
so that Kier can see the Google evidence, as he says he killfiled me.

I dont't think it will do any good. It seems Kier is happy to let
Snit do anything he wants as long as it doesn't impact Kier.

You want to speak to me, Rick? Do it directly.

And do not ever put words in my mouth.

Maybe you'd like to ask your friend Elizabot why she nymshifted?

You want to speak to me, Rick? Do it directly. And do not ever put words
in my mouth.

You have a problem, Kier. You have been defending a guy who is *very*
well known for putting words into the mouths of others... now, here you
are complaining that someone is doing it to you (which, of course, Rick
didn't actually do).

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:20:03 -0500, Rick wrote:

Elizabot v2.0.2 wrote:
(snip)
Did you see my post about Snit feigning to be a new user with a problem,
and then being first to answer? I wouldn't mind if someone would respond
so that Kier can see the Google evidence, as he says he killfiled me.

I dont't think it will do any good. It seems Kier is happy to let
Snit do anything he wants as long as it doesn't impact Kier.

You want to speak to me, Rick? Do it directly.

And do not ever put words
in my mouth.

I'm rather more interested in who reposted this stuff in the first place.

"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-6E14BA.16204817032005@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 3/17/05 4:20 PM:

You want to speak to me, Rick? Do it directly. And do not ever put words
in my mouth.

You have a problem, Kier. You have been defending a guy who is *very*
well known for putting words into the mouths of others... now, here you
are complaining that someone is doing it to you (which, of course, Rick
didn't actually do).

Do you have an example of your accusation, Steve?

Here, I have a clear and
recent one for you:

stop forcing me to confront truths I can't deal with.

A quote you authored and yet you tried to *repeatedly* attribute it to me.
When caught, you at first denied it - as though the Google record was
unknown to you. Then when you finally admitted to it, you claimed you were
merely getting revenge for some ancient wrong you allege I did to you - but
can find no evidence of.