 |
|
| Linux Forum Index » Linux Hardware » ATI or Nvidia?... |
|
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Henrik Carlqvist... |
 Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: The NV driver has been replaced by the Nouveau driver which can do some
3D,
It would be interesting to see some noveau results at http://free3d.org/
regards Henrik
--
The address in the header is only to prevent spam. My real address is:
hc3(at)poolhem.se Examples of addresses which go to spammers:
root at (no spam) localhost postmaster at (no spam) localhost |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Baho Utot... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:06:17 +0000, Dan C wrote:
Quote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:59:02 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Nvidia Linux driver: Closed source makes open source unsafe
Bullshit.
Bullshit yourself
Quote:
In the realm of good news, ATI has agreed to release open source
drivers for Linux, just like Intel did years ago. Yay! In the realm of
bad news, Nvidia still has not. We want to put pressure on Nvidia to
rise to ATI's and Intel's challenge, do we not?
No. We want drivers and hardware that *work*. Like Nvidia does. ATI
and Intel (LOL!) are not nearly as good.
Yes they are, you don't know what your talking about and you are here
just to parrot what you've heard
Quote: ATI is not second-rate.
Yes, they are. They always have been, and there's no reason to think
that will change because of the "openness" of their crappy drivers.
Well I guess since ATI doesn't work I am not typing this or
communicationg on this news group.
I wonder how my all AMD/ATI computer functions.
--
GNU/Linux runs on IBM mainframes and on the world's fastest supercomputers
Windows supercomputers on the other hand are called botnets. <grin> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dan C... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:44:51 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Quote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:06:17 +0000, Dan C wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:59:02 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Nvidia Linux driver: Closed source makes open source unsafe
Bullshit.
Bullshit yourself
Oh, great comeback!
Quote:
In the realm of good news, ATI has agreed to release open source
drivers for Linux, just like Intel did years ago. Yay! In the realm of
bad news, Nvidia still has not. We want to put pressure on Nvidia to
rise to ATI's and Intel's challenge, do we not?
No. We want drivers and hardware that *work*. Like Nvidia does. ATI
and Intel (LOL!) are not nearly as good.
Yes they are, you don't know what your talking about and you are here
just to parrot what you've heard
LOL! Nope. I've had (and have) all the above video cards, and my
statements are all based on personal experience. ATI sucks, and badly.
Quote:
ATI is not second-rate.
Yes, they are. They always have been, and there's no reason to think
that will change because of the "openness" of their crappy drivers.
Well I guess since ATI doesn't work I am not typing this or
communicationg on this news group.
I wonder how my all AMD/ATI computer functions.
Very poorly, I'm sure.
--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he garotted another passing Liberal.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Baho Utot... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:08:52 +0000, Dan C wrote:
Quote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:44:51 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:06:17 +0000, Dan C wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:59:02 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Nvidia Linux driver: Closed source makes open source unsafe
Bullshit.
Bullshit yourself
Oh, great comeback!
In the realm of good news, ATI has agreed to release open source
drivers for Linux, just like Intel did years ago. Yay! In the realm
of bad news, Nvidia still has not. We want to put pressure on Nvidia
to rise to ATI's and Intel's challenge, do we not?
No. We want drivers and hardware that *work*. Like Nvidia does. ATI
and Intel (LOL!) are not nearly as good.
Yes they are, you don't know what your talking about and you are here
just to parrot what you've heard
LOL! Nope. I've had (and have) all the above video cards, and my
statements are all based on personal experience. ATI sucks, and badly.
ATI is not second-rate.
Yes, they are. They always have been, and there's no reason to think
that will change because of the "openness" of their crappy drivers.
Well I guess since ATI doesn't work I am not typing this or
communicationg on this news group.
I wonder how my all AMD/ATI computer functions.
Very poorly, I'm sure.
Ok share for this group the output of glxgears as run on my computer,
since you know how my computer functions. Please what is my frame rate.
While your at it also tell them how well compiz works.
--
GNU/Linux runs on IBM mainframes and on the world's fastest supercomputers
Windows supercomputers on the other hand are called botnets. <grin> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dan C... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:41 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:36:14 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Quote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:08:52 +0000, Dan C wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:44:51 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:06:17 +0000, Dan C wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:59:02 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Nvidia Linux driver: Closed source makes open source unsafe
Bullshit.
Bullshit yourself
Oh, great comeback!
In the realm of good news, ATI has agreed to release open source
drivers for Linux, just like Intel did years ago. Yay! In the realm
of bad news, Nvidia still has not. We want to put pressure on Nvidia
to rise to ATI's and Intel's challenge, do we not?
No. We want drivers and hardware that *work*. Like Nvidia does.
ATI and Intel (LOL!) are not nearly as good.
Yes they are, you don't know what your talking about and you are here
just to parrot what you've heard
LOL! Nope. I've had (and have) all the above video cards, and my
statements are all based on personal experience. ATI sucks, and badly.
ATI is not second-rate.
Yes, they are. They always have been, and there's no reason to think
that will change because of the "openness" of their crappy drivers.
Well I guess since ATI doesn't work I am not typing this or
communicationg on this news group.
I wonder how my all AMD/ATI computer functions.
Very poorly, I'm sure.
Ok share for this group the output of glxgears as run on my computer,
since you know how my computer functions. Please what is my frame rate.
Damn, you're dumber than I thought. No way to provide that information,
since I don't know the specifics of your crap hardware. The point is
that the framerate will be lower than that of an equivalent Nvidia card.
Quote: While your at it also tell them how well compiz works.
It sucks ass.
--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he garotted another passing Liberal.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:26 am
|
|