| |
 |
|
|
Linux Forum Index » Linux Advocacy » The silly PDF forgery accusation that keep coming back...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Snit... |
 Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Here are the PDFs that are in contention:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandmancheck-html.pdf>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandmancheck-css.pdf>
And where I provided *every* single URL needed to verify them:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f0420f6675f60cbd>
Can anyone find a single example where I am wrong... one single example from
before the date of the PDFs where sandman.net had CSS or HTML that
validates?
The answer, of course, is: no.
Not a single one.
Since nobody can the claim was made that since the EXIF data shows Adobe
products then it must be a "forgery"... even if the data is 100% accurate
and thus proves Sandman is a liar. So here is where I provide a movie
proving that the EXIF data of the PDF can contain Adobe references that are
incorrect:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/fmpro-pdf.mov>
And where I show, with links, where Sandman changed his story about his CSS
claims:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55059e10b247c5c4>
Steve Carroll, Tim Adams, Wally, Sandman, Steve Mackay, Alan Baker, -hh and
Peter Köhlmann are all lying when they claim I forged the PDF with the data
that proves Sandman to be a liar. This is not a matter of opinion; if the
PDF data was forged it would be trivial to show where my data was
inaccurate.
And yet they will not find a single example. Not one. This is 100%
predictable.
So there we have it: I have provided absolute proof of my claims (unless you
think I have managed to have the WayBackMachine someone lie for me or I have
hacked them somehow).
Steve Carroll is a liar
Tim Adams is a liar
Wally is a liar
Sandman is a liar
Steve Mackay is a liar
Alan Baker is a liar
-hh is a liar
Peter Köhlmann is a liar
Proved.
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Peter Köhlmann... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The forger Michael Glasser (Snot) snotted:
Quote: Here are the PDFs that are in contention:
< snip Snot forgeries >
Pray tell, Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser, what has COLA to do with this
utter idiocy you pest newsgroups with?
Please forge your "evidence" wherever you want, and then keep ot there
--
Some people are incredibly witty AND intelligent AND sexy.
But enough about myself... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| thufir... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:04 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:57:50 -0700, Snit wrote:
Quote: Your insults, accusations, and utter rubbish does not even begin to
actually show where *anyone* has shown my proof to be anything other
than 100% accurate.
Nor am I trying to prove anything, moron, I'm simply stating that based on
the pattern, the MO, which you exhibit that you're full of shit on this, too.
-Thufir |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Snit... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"thufir" <hawat.thufir at (no spam) gmail.com> stated in post
9A7rk.23031$hx.15542 at (no spam) pd7urf3no on 8/20/08 11:04 PM:
Quote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:57:50 -0700, Snit wrote:
Your insults, accusations, and utter rubbish does not even begin to
actually show where *anyone* has shown my proof to be anything other
than 100% accurate.
Nor am I trying to prove anything, moron, I'm simply stating that based on
the pattern, the MO, which you exhibit that you're full of shit on this, too.
I quoted some of your fabrications about my views... and the best you can
respond with is *this*. Blah. You are not even a clever troll.
Thufir:
But, they can use the mac very well because it has this super
duper consistent interface.
Snit:
Wait: most of my students, at least my intro ones, use
Windows machines... so how the heck did you jump to the idea
of them being Mac users? You are just making things up as
you go.
Thufir:
Fuck, it's a paraphrase, I don't know every little detail
about your students. What I know, from your posts, is that
you advocate the mac for people who can't, somehow, defying
all the odds, figure out how to use a desktop GUI because the
mac is a "stepping stone".
Thufir:
Yup, your argument can be paraphrases as: "My students can't
figure out how to use a desktop. Somehow, they understand
the album to song relationship but fail to apply that
understanding to directories and files. But, they can use
the mac very well because it has this super duper consistent
interface. Linux should adopt the Mac interface. Hell, just
buy a Mac."
Thufir
You piece of shit, the fact that you leave out the
conclusion: "My students should just buy a fucking mac."
doesn't in any way mean that you're not advocating mac's --
you are.
Snit:
Your quotes are not mine. What the heck? Can't you actually
quote me doing as you say?
Thufir:
They're obviously paraphrases and not direct quotes, idiot.
Thufir:
Exactly, which is the logical extension of snit's arguments:
just use a mac. Not that snit would ever have the balls to
say that directly, of course.
--
But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price, who is not too
concerned about freedom, I don't think we can say the Linux desktop offers
the very best experience.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Snit... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"thufir" <hawat.thufir at (no spam) gmail.com> stated in post
mE7rk.23035$hx.8214 at (no spam) pd7urf3no on 8/20/08 11:09 PM:
Quote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:58:13 -0700, Snit wrote:
Exactly. I don't even know what this fucking PDF is about, nor do I
care to find out.
Nor can I think of a reason why you should! Nor Peter!
Then STFU already about it.
You snipped the reason why I made any comment at all. How dishonest of
you!
You just bring your shit from one group to another, you're the cause.
Again you are wrong. Are you ever right about *anything*? I was asked
about Alan Baker and if I had any interaction with him. I replied that he
had put me in his KF (or claimed to) and gave the reason why. Tattoo
Vampire then responded with an absurd insult and then Tim Adams replied by
repeating ancient lies... and Peter Köhlmann jumped in to say he agreed with
the lies of Sandman. I proved my case. Why should anyone care - other,
perhaps, than to note the liars and let them know that such lying is
unacceptable?
--
Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid: humans are incredibly
slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond
imagination. - attributed to Albert Einstein, likely apocryphal |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Peter Köhlmann... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The liar Michael Glasser (Snot) snotted:
Quote: Here are the PDFs that are in contention:
< snip Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser bullshit >
Why do you think that anyone in COLA would be interested in your forging
of "evidence", Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser?
Nobody posting in COLA participated in that *two* *years* old thread in
CSMA, yet you dishonest lying twit feel the need to *again* repost it in
COLA
--
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| thufir... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:37:19 -0700, Snit wrote:
Quote: "thufir" <hawat.thufir at (no spam) gmail.com> stated in post
6Ujrk.101510$nD.81044 at (no spam) pd7urf1no on 8/21/08 1:05 PM:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:50:09 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
You, Peter, accused me of forging the PDF. And you did so recently.
Well, after all, you are a forger
When accused of altering quoted material he said it was to put the
context back -- a typical excuse from forgers. Not long after that he
went on to blackmail someone!
You sure make up a lot of stories about me!
Run along and file a complaint, now.
-Thufir |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Peter Köhlmann... |
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The liar and forger Michael Glasser (Snot) snotted:
Quote: "Peter Köhlmann" <peter.koehlmann at (no spam) arcor.de> stated in post
48adf4cd$0$11730$9b4e6d93 at (no spam) newsspool1.arcor-online.net on 8/21/08 4:05 PM:
Tattoo Vampire wrote:
Snit wrote:
You sure make up a lot of stories about me!
Do any of your "customers" know what a dishonest twat you are, Glxsser?
Maybe they should...
Well, he provides a list of "customers" (not that they would know of any
business relationship) he implies to deal with on his phony "web site"
I am sure that they would be pleased to hear of his "usenet endeavours"
A shame you you feel the need to spew such threats...
Why do you think that it would be a "threat" if people are talking about
your behaviour on usenet? Might it be because of your behaviour on usenet?
Quote: but given your
recent humiliation with OpenOffice and IP addressing blunders I suppose it
is not surprising you would not want to talk about *anything* dealing with
technology.
I will never talk to you about technology. I could as well talk to the next
stump instead. And it would know more about it than you will ever
--
It's sweet to be remembered, but it's often cheaper to be forgotten. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| thufir... |
| Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:26:17 -0700, Snit wrote:
Quote: "thufir" <hawat.thufir at (no spam) gmail.com> stated in post
DkJrk.208678$gc5.58941 at (no spam) pd7urf2no on 8/22/08 6:02 PM:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:37:13 -0700, Snit wrote:
A claim which you fail to "prove".
A claim which no sensible person has put into question - face it, the
circumstantial evidence is strong.
What a convent argument to avoid providing at least one cite.
Hey, read what you snipped!
LOL!
You are so silly.
Hey, where it says there "Thufir stated in post...," I never wrote that.
You're a forger. Now, you say "oh, well, I just put back what was
snipped" to add context, but altering quoted material is forgery.
You're a forger.
-Thufir |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Snit... |
| Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"thufir" <hawat.thufir at (no spam) gmail.com> stated in post
zDNrk.29831$hx.299 at (no spam) pd7urf3no on 8/22/08 10:55 PM:
Quote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:26:17 -0700, Snit wrote:
"thufir" <hawat.thufir at (no spam) gmail.com> stated in post
DkJrk.208678$gc5.58941 at (no spam) pd7urf2no on 8/22/08 6:02 PM:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:37:13 -0700, Snit wrote:
A claim which you fail to "prove".
A claim which no sensible person has put into question - face it, the
circumstantial evidence is strong.
What a convent argument to avoid providing at least one cite.
Hey, read what you snipped!
LOL!
You are so silly.
Hey, where it says there "Thufir stated in post...," I never wrote that.
You're a forger. Now, you say "oh, well, I just put back what was
snipped" to add context, but altering quoted material is forgery.
You're a forger.
Nope.
--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:45 pm
|
|