The reason for the following post in this forum is because in at least
one of the other topics I saw that there was a debate on sub-
continental bowlers ability to bowl doosra versus Caucasians. I read
that some guys posted saying that the fairer Indians are Caucasians
and the darker Indians are Dravidians obviously because they have been
taught this LIE in their History classes in school.

For all the people who still believe India was invaded by a nomadic
Caucasian peoples who were responsible for the great Indian
Civilization, well your bubble was burst long time back. The Aryan
Invasion Theory (AIT) was nothing but a project concocted by the
European Indologists (Max Mueller, et al). These buggers were
supposedly scholars in the Sanskrit language but were neither
Historians nor Archaeologists. They were paid like 4 shillings per
page for transliterating the Vedic texts in English. And who were they
paid by? The bloody Missionaries. What was the objective? To make
Indians in the 18th and 19th centuries believe that all their
civilizational glories came about because of a Caucasian nomadic tribe
that invaded the country. And then misrepresent, misquote,
misinterpret the Vedas and other texts as nothing but gleanings of
Barbaric minds.

There is not a single piece of evidence since the theory was floated
that could give any credibility to the theory. I mean just think about
how they arrived at the dates for the invasion..1500 BC...those
buggers believed in the Christian historical crap that the Earth was
just 6000 years old and then from there they figured Adam and Eve must
have been around 2500 BC and hence the invasion must be around 1500
BCE.

For more information go to these links -http://www.tri-murti.com/ancientindia/aryan0.html#a1http://www.gosai.com/chaitanya/saranagati/html/vedic-upanisads/aryan-...

Other links -http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/aid.html

Videos refuting scientifically the stupid AIT -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY4Q2xx7BTchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2vhCPBjqcAhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMlisMg4VPo

Finally, my intent here is not to start a war of words and hate-
postings from the members of this forum. My intent is to only show
that it is high time we through this theory away into the trash can.
Most of the Western Historians and Archaeologists today have accepted
the falsity of AIT but a few still cling to it probably because they
are racist by nature, who knows.

Just imagine if the AIT was not concocted by the European Missionaries
in their mission of first humiliating Indians, then showing them that
their religion (Christianity) is better, and then convert them, and of
course all this while conquering the land itself. If AIT was not
floated, we would not have had an idiot who believed the crap and
perpetrated the Holocaust. We wouldn't have had so many idiots hiding
behind their masks calling themselves KKK.

For the people who do not know Hindi or any other Indian language, the
word "Arya" in Sanskrit means "gentleman, righteous, benevolent,
respectable kinda man" much like the title "Sir" used by the British.
That is its only meaning...it has no connotation of a race, or place,
or a language.

I mean just imagine if Caucasians truly invaded India and made the
Vedic religion then why the f*** would they have their MOST IMPORTANT
GODS as dark-skinned people???????????? I am referring to Krishna,
Shiva, etc.

Let this topic not turn into a hate-post fight. In case anybody feels
that the AIT is true or has some truth value in it, let us debate with
scientific facts and logical, rational arguments.

There was never ever a race called "Aryan" race that existed in the
history of the world. The only reference it has is of its invasion of
India and then spread to Iran, and Europe. That theory itself has been
scientifically proven to have zero accuracy. So, where else do we hear
about Aryans then? An Aryan RACE never existed. Period.

The reason for the following post in this forum is because in at least
one of the other topics I saw that there was a debate on sub-
continental bowlers ability to bowl doosra versus Caucasians. I read
that some guys posted saying that the fairer Indians are Caucasians
and the darker Indians are Dravidians obviously because they have been
taught this LIE in their History classes in school.

For all the people who still believe India was invaded by a nomadic
Caucasian peoples who were responsible for the great Indian
Civilization, well your bubble was burst long time back. The Aryan
Invasion Theory (AIT) was nothing but a project concocted by the
European Indologists (Max Mueller, et al). These buggers were
supposedly scholars in the Sanskrit language but were neither
Historians nor Archaeologists. They were paid like 4 shillings per
page for transliterating the Vedic texts in English. And who were they
paid by? The bloody Missionaries. What was the objective? To make
Indians in the 18th and 19th centuries believe that all their
civilizational glories came about because of a Caucasian nomadic tribe
that invaded the country. And then misrepresent, misquote,
misinterpret the Vedas and other texts as nothing but gleanings of
Barbaric minds.

There is not a single piece of evidence since the theory was floated
that could give any credibility to the theory. I mean just think about
how they arrived at the dates for the invasion..1500 BC...those
buggers believed in the Christian historical crap that the Earth was
just 6000 years old and then from there they figured Adam and Eve must
have been around 2500 BC and hence the invasion must be around 1500
BCE.

For more information go to these links -http://www.tri-murti.com/ancientindia/aryan0.html#a1http://www.gosai.com/chaitanya/saranagati/html/vedic-upanisads/aryan-...

Other links -http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/aid.html

Videos refuting scientifically the stupid AIT -
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=56E61239F732FB62&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&v=qsectlsNnU8

Finally, my intent here is not to start a war of words and hate-
postings from the members of this forum. My intent is to only show
that it is high time we through this theory away into the trash can.
Most of the Western Historians and Archaeologists today have accepted
the falsity of AIT but a few still cling to it probably because they
are racist by nature, who knows.

Just imagine if the AIT was not concocted by the European Missionaries
in their mission of first humiliating Indians, then showing them that
their religion (Christianity) is better, and then convert them, and of
course all this while conquering the land itself. If AIT was not
floated, we would not have had an idiot who believed the crap and
perpetrated the Holocaust. We wouldn't have had so many idiots hiding
behind their masks calling themselves KKK.

For the people who do not know Hindi or any other Indian language, the
word "Arya" in Sanskrit means "gentleman, righteous, benevolent,
respectable kinda man" much like the title "Sir" used by the British.
That is its only meaning...it has no connotation of a race, or place,
or a language.

I mean just imagine if Caucasians truly invaded India and made the
Vedic religion then why the f*** would they have their MOST IMPORTANT
GODS as dark-skinned people???????????? I am referring to Krishna,
Shiva, etc.

Let this topic not turn into a hate-post fight. In case anybody feels
that the AIT is true or has some truth value in it, let us debate with
scientific facts and logical, rational arguments.

There was never ever a race called "Aryan" race that existed in the
history of the world. The only reference it has is of its invasion of
India and then spread to Iran, and Europe. That theory itself has been
scientifically proven to have zero accuracy. So, where else do we hear
about Aryans then? An Aryan RACE never existed. Period.

On Jun 1, 7:03 pm, eusebius <eusebiu... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 1, 4:42 pm, rsc_pos... at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:



On Jun 1, 9:50 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf... at (no spam) artifax.net> wrote:

Viz.Sha... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message

news:612d556f-265c-4bf1-9799-7925d6b51875 at (no spam) f16g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...

The reason for the following post in this forum is because in at
least
one of the other topics I saw that there was a debate on sub-
continental bowlers ability to bowl doosra versus Caucasians. I
read
that some guys posted saying that the fairer Indians are Caucasians
and the darker Indians are Dravidians obviously because they have
been
taught this LIE in their History classes in school.

That thread was cross-posted to more than one newsgroup. The poster
you are
referring to - one Robert Henderson - does not read nor contribute to
rec.sport.cricket thus you have missed your target by posting here.
You
will find him at uk.sport.cricket.

The UK in uk.sport.cricket stands for "unrestricted knowledge-
sharing". It is the designated area within Usenet for
penetrating insights into racial matters and other such topics. The OP
and others like him should be directed to such fora where they would
be most valued, rather than have cast their pearls before the swine in
rsc.

Regards,
Jayen-

True-rsc is just for posts about 'white Christian racist Australian
racist attacks on Indians'

With utmost sincerity and humility, I would like to request each of
the individuals in this forum to refrain from making or encouraging,
or if already made then reacting to, racial slurs and abuse.

I want to be able to refer this group as one where cricket lovers
especially children can come to understand the nuances of the game and
of course to read and perceive different viewpoints. It does not mean
that we accept any taunts or anything said, it just means that when we
respond let us respond in a civilized, educated manner. As is the
essence of almost all natural processes, as we sow, so shall we reap.

Let us respect one another...it does not mean we have to agree with
their opinions or perspectives. Of course opinions need not be
respected, they need to be critiqued but let us not disrespect the
individual while criticizing their opinions/perspectives.

Again, the question is, are we willing to direct our children to
rec.sport.cricket when they ask us, "dad/mom/mate/dude/..., which
place on the web is the best to get varied opinions from fans of
cricket?"