Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Running  »  American names...
Page 1 of 1    

American names...

Author Message
Michelle...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:57 pm
Guest
"Meb" is as much an American name as is "Barak", "James", "Abraham,
"George, "John", or "Michelle". Fact is that there is no such thing as an
"American" name because there is no such thing as an American language.

--
26.2 Because I can
 
Edward Edmonds...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:57 pm
Guest
On Nov 1, 8:57 pm, Michelle <miche... at (no spam) michelle.org> wrote:
Quote:
"Meb" is as much an American name as is "Barak", "James", "Abraham,
"George, "John", or "Michelle".  Fact is that there is no such thing as an
"American" name because there is no such thing as an American language.

--
26.2  Because I can

I know a girl named Precious, I'm pretty sure that one originated in
America. Smile
 
pithydoug...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:58 pm
Guest
On Nov 1, 2:57 pm, Michelle <miche... at (no spam) michelle.org> wrote:
Quote:
"Meb" is as much an American name as is "Barak", "James", "Abraham,
"George, "John", or "Michelle".  Fact is that there is no such thing as an
"American" name because there is no such thing as an American language.

I'll bet there are some American Indians that might not agree.

-D
 
Michelle...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:14 pm
Guest
In article
<5c227074-d023-4b96-987b-09fca3a4eadb at (no spam) g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Edward Edmonds <edward.edmonds at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
I know a girl named Precious, I'm pretty sure that one originated in
America. Smile

Well, isn't that just...

-- Michelle

--
26.2 Because I can
 
Dot...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:46 am
Guest
pithydoug wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 1, 2:57 pm, Michelle <miche... at (no spam) michelle.org> wrote:

"Meb" is as much an American name as is "Barak", "James", "Abraham,
"George, "John", or "Michelle". Fact is that there is no such thing as an
"American" name because there is no such thing as an American language.


I'll bet there are some American Indians that might not agree.

-D

Did you know there are 94 languages spoken in homes of students in the
Anchorage school district? Student population is about half (49.9%)
caucasian and half "minority."

http://www.asdk12.org/aboutasd/languages.asp
http://www.asdk12.org/aboutasd/

I think 5 of those (maybe more) are native languages, but even they
probably came over one of the land bridge openings or by boat from
eastern Asia.

Dot

--
"You’ll never hear me say I beat the Peak. I’ve run up there pretty
fast, and that mountain doesn’t care. I’ll never conquer the Peak." -
Matt Carpenter
 
Don Kirkman...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:06 pm
Guest
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Michelle wrote in article
<michelle-8E7993.08250902112009 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>:

Quote:
In article
6400524b-8686-472c-8425-8e716f9444b1 at (no spam) g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
pithydoug <dfreese at (no spam) hvc.rr.com> wrote:

"Meb" is as much an American name as is "Barak", "James", "Abraham,
"George, "John", or "Michelle".  Fact is that there is no such thing as an
"American" name because there is no such thing as an American language.

I'll bet there are some American Indians that might not agree.

I doubt that they call themselves "American Indians".

They call themselves "Indians" in their casino advertising and
political movements in California. Of course we have Indian
Americans, too, here in Little India in southern California.
--
Don Kirkman
donsno2 at (no spam) charter.net
 
pithydoug...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:35 pm
Guest
On Nov 3, 5:58 pm, Mark Cleary <mclear... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
pithydoug wrote:
On Nov 2, 1:46 am, Dot <AKTrailRun at (no spam) #gmail.com> wrote:
pithydoug wrote:



Quote:
Science and the bible are not at odds in anyway, shape, or form.

Call it what you like but creationism and evolution are being debated
quite "loudly." My ears say they are "at odds."

-D
 
Michelle...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:38 am
Guest
In article
<31b2050d-5f8d-4e51-83b9-d7fc0732f3cf at (no spam) f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
pithydoug <dfreese at (no spam) hvc.rr.com> wrote:

Quote:
Science and the bible are not at odds in anyway, shape, or form.

Call it what you like but creationism and evolution are being debated
quite "loudly." My ears say they are "at odds."

No; their proponents are at odds.

--
26.2 Because I can
 
Mark Cleary...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:01 pm
Guest
pithydoug wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 3, 5:58 pm, Mark Cleary <mclear... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
pithydoug wrote:
On Nov 2, 1:46 am, Dot <AKTrailRun at (no spam) #gmail.com> wrote:
pithydoug wrote:



Science and the bible are not at odds in anyway, shape, or form.

Call it what you like but creationism and evolution are being debated
quite "loudly." My ears say they are "at odds."

-D


That would explain your situation you have very little understanding of

what creation is, and what evolution is. Evolution assumes that all
evolved from simple to complex life. Nothing wrong with this at all, but
something had to start it all in the first place. In other words,
something had to make the " big bang go bang."

Think of the 5 ways of Thomas Aquinas and basically it begins with a
first cause, something has to be the first cause of all. That my friend
is creation but after that it us subject to a discussion that is long
away from what I can do justice to in this newsgroup.

Put in another way, " prove to me that God does not exist?"


--
Deacon Mark Cleary
Epiphany Roman Catholic Church
 
Michelle...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:13 pm
Guest
In article <hctf75$765$1 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org>,
Mark Cleary <mcleary08 at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:
Put in another way, " prove to me that God does not exist?"

Why bother? There's no evidence to prove that God exists. It is strictly
a matter of faith.

--
26.2 Because I can
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:34 pm