Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Sport - Tennis  »  Neil Harman doesn't like Agassi very much ......
Page 1 of 1    

Neil Harman doesn't like Agassi very much ......

Author Message
gregorawe at (no spam) hotmail.com...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:45 pm
Guest
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/tennis/article6896097.ece

I found his views disappointing, actually (what, because Sampras never
bowed to the crowd then Agassi shouldn't do it?). Never had much time
for Harman's writing though.
 
wenquan lee...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:12 pm
Guest
On Nov 2, 12:45 am, "gregor... at (no spam) hotmail.com" <gregor... at (no spam) hotmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/tennis/article6896097.ece

I found his views disappointing, actually (what, because Sampras never
bowed to the crowd then Agassi shouldn't do it?). Never had much time
for Harman's writing though.



i find them refreshing - nice to know some people could see through
certain things. seems like he was a bit more observant than many of
his peers. pretty much all the english people i know admire agassi for
his comeback, but have always been sceptical of his "act". that struck
me as about right, but hardly any journalists seemed to be the same,
so nice to find one who is!

to balance that view, of course, there is always the charge that
people with an agenda are putting the boot in (having waited a while
to do so), and that's not great, as is any suggestion of "holier than
thou" writing. then again to be fair, since agassi himself took money
to say, "image is everything", so he built his own pedestal, and so
sympathy for the tearing down (which andre is doing himself, and to
himself, pretty much single handledly) should arguably be limited.

agassi was, and hopefully remains, a great champion - i think this
must have been a cathartic exercise for him. really would have been
better if he didn't make money from lies (if he was really brave and
courageous, then he should have admitted the meth and speed at the
time) but hopefully some good for tennis should come of it.

all the best,

wenquan lee
 
wenquan lee...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:07 pm
Guest
On Nov 2, 1:52 pm, "gregor... at (no spam) hotmail.com" <gregor... at (no spam) hotmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
i guess i was still surprised to read anything anti-agassi in the
english press. which correspondents do you rate? i think the late john
parsons was quite well regarded. john roberts? stephen bierley? maybe
i will check out their articles. i don't have a very high opinion of
many of the tv commentators (e.g. john lloyd, chris bailey - both
pretty bad in my opinion), but i think our printed press has a bit
more quality, even if i need to look for it.

John Parsons was very highly rated, John Roberts pretty good as well.
Stephen Bierley is not really a tennis writer is he, more general
sports with some tennis stuff? Barry Flatman seems fairly average. Who
else is there?

Simon Barnes writes some good articles in his role as Chief Sports
Writer for the Times, but they don't appear very often, usually only
after big matches or unusual happenings (he's written a bit today
about the Agassi storyhttp://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/simon_barnes/articl...)

Mark Petchey is by far the best British TV commentator around (except
when he is doing Andy Murray matches). I actually like John Lloyd - he
knows the game and makes good points. Don't like Chris Bailey at all
(thankfully he has moved to Australia). Barry Cowan gets more annoying
all the time. Annabel Croft - aargh!I I used to hate Greg Rusedski,
but now he's actually quite entertaining, only because he seems
determined to argue with everyone, sometimes in quite a childish
fashion.



many thanks for this. i like simon barnes' writing too.

all the best,

wenquan lee
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:55 pm