| Hobby Forum Index » Equestrian » Legal precedents re: registration papers vs. ownership... |
|
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Hunter Hampton... |
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:59:12 -0400, "Jane Saranac"
<jsalacious at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: Adding to my own post, mine own is a case in point: I have a bill of sale
which says that I own Harlee. But she is still "registered" to her former
owner because I haven't bothered to put in a change and pay the
complimentary fees therefor <g>.
HI Jane,
That's why I wrote unless a newer dated bill of sale was present.
Hunter |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cricket... |
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Hunter Hampton" <airstreamingypsy at (no spam) geemail.com> wrote in message
news:fb5dd51ak67ldm653adjvrsen205vuahv8 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:29:58 -0400, "Cricket" <cricketcole at (no spam) wmis.net
wrote:
I don't recall ever having a registered horse who's papers came directly
and
immediately from the last person shown on the papers...
All of mine have papers, the previous owners are listed before me.
When I bought each horse the previous owner sent the papers in with
the change to my name.
Hunter
That's how it's supposed to be done (or they sign them over and you send
them in), but I'm willing to bet the majority aren't done that way.
It's pretty much SOP to sign off but not date the papers of horses going
through sales and sold to dealers...often they go through two or three
owners before anyone signs back on and sends the papers in, if ever.
Cricket |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jane Saranac... |
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Lisa Wiser" <lawiser at (no spam) att.net> wrote in message
news:7jp1lfF36goq8U1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
Quote: redbranch wrote:
Problem is, the rescue has no idea of the current condition of the
horse...
Could that not be used to go for an emergency hearing (whatever it's
called) to ascertain the condition of the horse? Apparently you're in an
area that at least does something ... surely the courts would follow up?
There would be an opportunity through discovery to physically inspect the
horse. An application could be made to a court if the adoptee doesn't
permit that. But if the adoptee doesn't provided the required medical
records for the last two years, that issue is pretty irrelevant. The horse
could be in wonderful condition right now but if the literal terms of the
contract aren't complied with, she could still lose the horse. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Hunter Hampton... |
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:49:39 -0500, John Hasler <jhasler at (no spam) newsguy.com>
wrote:
Quote: Because he might have eventually gotten in a grade horse that met the
description...
That's what I figgered.
Hunter |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Hunter Hampton... |
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:26:52 GMT, Grizzly <NoOne at (no spam) nowhere.com> wrote:
Quote: Just did a little nosing around, and it is the same rescue and the horse
I was thinking of. I can understand that they need to enforce their
contracts or they wouldn't be worth the paper they are written on.
Chances are they will wind up getting the horse back from her if it is
still alive. They do have a contract that she signed after all.
I'm betting she has sold the horse....
Hunter |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jane Saranac... |
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Hunter Hampton" <airstreamingypsy at (no spam) geemail.com> wrote in message
news:7qued5hgam6gkc6pihjs1icoqd1r5b2ijf at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:26:52 GMT, Grizzly <NoOne at (no spam) nowhere.com> wrote:
Just did a little nosing around, and it is the same rescue and the horse
I was thinking of. I can understand that they need to enforce their
contracts or they wouldn't be worth the paper they are written on.
Chances are they will wind up getting the horse back from her if it is
still alive. They do have a contract that she signed after all.
I'm betting she has sold the horse....
Hunter
That's a very intelligent guess given all the fight she's putting up. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JC Dill... |
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Caelan wrote:
Quote: It makes me wonder if there's some ulterior motive involved for example,
she wants to sell the horses before they're legally hers.
Mary- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Makes me wonder what kind of shape the horses are in since this sleazy
adopter went through some trouble to get papers for the sole purpose
of NOT having to submit health reports and current pictures. Either
that, or she wants to can them or sell them and knows she can't if she
has to report in to the rescue for the term of the contract.
If the contract states she can't sell them within 5 years (because she
won't own them free-and-clear for 5 years), then odds are that she wants
to rehab, show, and sell them and not wait 5 years for them to be
saleable with their papers.
If she just wanted to can them she could sell them at auction and then
tell the rescue she "gave them away" or "they got loose and I can't find
them" or 1001 other excuses for why she no longer has them - she
wouldn't need papers for this purpose.
jc |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Una... |
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The business about the gelding lowering the horse's value makes me wonder if
this woman thinks that obtaining the registration papers means the ownership
of the horse goes from the prior holder of those papers directly to her. In
which case she may intend to sue the rescue to recover her "loss". Silly,
but sillier schemes have been tried.
Una |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| redbranch... |
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 15, 10:41 pm, u... at (no spam) att.net (Una) wrote:
Quote: The business about the gelding lowering the horse's value makes me wonder if
this woman thinks that obtaining the registration papers means the ownership
of the horse goes from the prior holder of those papers directly to her. In
which case she may intend to sue the rescue to recover her "loss". Silly,
but sillier schemes have been tried.
Una
Funny thing about that is that the horses were gelded prior to their
adoption...if she didn't want a gelding, she shouldn't have adopted
him. She knew what she was getting. And she also knew he'd been
locked in a stall for thirteen years, being turned out once a week for
maybe ten minutes while his stall was "cleaned" by chasing him out of
his stall and into a small paddock via a chute, and had never been
halter broke or had his feet trimmed.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Splash... |
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 16, 9:11 pm, Grizzly <No... at (no spam) nowhere.com> wrote:
Quote: John Hasler wrote:
Grizzly writes:
Over the past couple of years at some of the sales they have sold for
between $50 and $400 depending on whether or not they were ridden in the
auction ring. Some were registered, some were not papered but obviously
arabs. To me $400 qualifies as a few hundred.
I was exclaiming at the possibility of getting _anything_ for such horses.
I kind of figured you meant that, but to the person thinking it was a
flip this horse for cash situation it was meant to be a dose of reality.
Untrained and aged unless it has a valuable pedigree and is broodstock/
either a fertile stallion or mare equals worthless. In the case of those
two stallions that the rescue took, they went away for the cost of
gelding them. I think they got $100 plus a signed contract. Sometimes
even animals with great bloodlines that are breeding sound wind up as
give aways in the current market, especially if they have no training.
It is different elswhere. Hate to burst your bubble but horses a
still something of a "rich man's game" here. No one is giving away
stock and reasonably trained "trail" horses are still commanding $2500
plus.
That said, I am concerned that those in the know here seem to feel
that the current owner "could" lose the horse because of faulty
(deliberate or not) paper keeping.
The very idea that someone could surrender a horse to rescue only to
be able to legally "pick it up" at a later date after having other's
care for it and fatten it up is OBSCENE.
Not for one instance that do I feel it's legally impossible. Sadly,
it probably is. It doesn't make it any less digusting.
Splash |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Grizzly... |
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
John Hasler wrote:
Quote: Grizzly writes:
Over the past couple of years at some of the sales they have sold for
between $50 and $400 depending on whether or not they were ridden in the
auction ring. Some were registered, some were not papered but obviously
arabs. To me $400 qualifies as a few hundred.
I was exclaiming at the possibility of getting _anything_ for such horses.
I kind of figured you meant that, but to the person thinking it was a
flip this horse for cash situation it was meant to be a dose of reality.
Untrained and aged unless it has a valuable pedigree and is broodstock/
either a fertile stallion or mare equals worthless. In the case of those
two stallions that the rescue took, they went away for the cost of
gelding them. I think they got $100 plus a signed contract. Sometimes
even animals with great bloodlines that are breeding sound wind up as
give aways in the current market, especially if they have no training. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Grizzly... |
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Splash wrote:
Quote: On Oct 16, 9:11 pm, Grizzly <No... at (no spam) nowhere.com> wrote:
John Hasler wrote:
Grizzly writes:
Over the past couple of years at some of the sales they have sold for
between $50 and $400 depending on whether or not they were ridden in the
auction ring. Some were registered, some were not papered but obviously
arabs. To me $400 qualifies as a few hundred.
I was exclaiming at the possibility of getting _anything_ for such horses.
I kind of figured you meant that, but to the person thinking it was a
flip this horse for cash situation it was meant to be a dose of reality.
Untrained and aged unless it has a valuable pedigree and is broodstock/
either a fertile stallion or mare equals worthless. In the case of those
two stallions that the rescue took, they went away for the cost of
gelding them. I think they got $100 plus a signed contract. Sometimes
even animals with great bloodlines that are breeding sound wind up as
give aways in the current market, especially if they have no training.
It is different elswhere. Hate to burst your bubble but horses a
still something of a "rich man's game" here. No one is giving away
stock and reasonably trained "trail" horses are still commanding $2500
plus.
Maybe by you they are but they certainly aren't here in Wisconsin.
Quote:
That said, I am concerned that those in the know here seem to feel
that the current owner "could" lose the horse because of faulty
(deliberate or not) paper keeping.
Yes she could, she signed a contract which lays out annual vaccinations
and a vet exam as mandatory including photos of the horse. If she
doesn't have the vet out and send in the paperwork she defaults the
contract and the rescue can repossess the animal.
Quote:
The very idea that someone could surrender a horse to rescue only to
be able to legally "pick it up" at a later date after having other's
care for it and fatten it up is OBSCENE.
This is not the case here. She "adopted" the horse from the rescue, and
had defaulted on her agreement with them. The breeder/previous owner of
the horse didn't want it back. He gave her the papers for it. He wasn't
willing to give the papers to the rescue.
Quote:
Not for one instance that do I feel it's legally impossible. Sadly,
it probably is. It doesn't make it any less digusting.
Splash |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|