First, nobody can learn to sail on a sailing vessel for an hour or two
and learn anything at all about sailing.

hhc314 <hhc314 at (no spam) yahoo.com> fired this volley in news:3bea46c6-214c-
4244-b610-8d8b36940357 at (no spam) t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com:

Ok, 'nuff steam releasted. Lloyd, email me a copy of NFPA and I
will
give you my very harshest comments, as well as the positives.



I'll go you one even better, Harry. You can have it NOW.

Here's a copy of the 2000 edition. It's been updated since then, but
at least some of it will cover materials you're familiar with.

www.minhbao.vn/userfiles/file/A_NFPA1123.pdf

------

And here's a copy of 1126, in case you're the expert on close-prox, too.

www.nfpa.org/assets/files/pdf/1126.PDF

I look forward to your comments. Please cite chapter and verse. I
might even agree with you on some points.
-------

LLoyd

hhc314 <hhc... at (no spam) yahoo.com> fired this volley in news:f03a7dae-b5fb-412d-
ae70-d1760052d... at (no spam) z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:

Dummy anonymous poster (Joe Williams aka Joe Smith), Yahoo Mail does
not have a spell checker.

Harry, there are several spell-checkers that run as browser extensions.

Any text typed in a browser window is capable of being spell-checked by one
of these.

LLoyd

hhc314 <hhc... at (no spam) yahoo.com> fired this volley in news:cf587e6c-0f28-4860-
8144-34122e9ca... at (no spam) m38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:

First, nobody can learn to sail on a sailing vessel for an hour or two
and learn anything at all about sailing.

I agree, you couldn't have, and did not.

Now... AGAIN, so you cannot claim falsely that you've missed it:

-------------------------

Harry, you're lying; again.

Below is what I replied to you on August 22, merely a day after you asked
me to illegally scan and duplicate copyrighted material.  You chose
deliberately to ignore it. I suppose it was because if you did, you could
claim no one did anything to advance this cause.

You also chose to ignore my post concerning your lying about the
Santores.  All of them categorically deny your having EVER had anything
to do with their organization (excepting that they did admit that if you
were hired at below minimum wage by one of their shooters as casual
grunt-labor, they'd have never known -- or cared.)

So, you either were a pipe-toting grunt, AND you are lying outright about
your relationship with the family, or you're just lying.

Now... everyone else, including Joe Smith can download exactly the
information you have available.  Why not comment on the material, rather
than lying about motivations?

Here is the August 22 post.  I just checked (today, September 2nd), and
both files are still available at the links listed.

-------------------
"Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" <lloydspinsidemindspring.com> fired this volley innews:Xns9C6FCE6E651D9lloydspmindspringcom at (no spam) 216.168.3.70:







hhc314 <hhc... at (no spam) yahoo.com> fired this volley in news:3bea46c6-214c-
4244-b610-8d8b36940... at (no spam) t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com:

Ok, 'nuff steam releasted.  Lloyd, email me a copy of NFPA and I
will
give you my very harshest comments, as well as the positives.

I'll go you one even better, Harry.  You can have it NOW.

Here's a copy of the 2000 edition.  It's been updated since then, but
at least some of it will cover materials you're familiar with.

www.minhbao.vn/userfiles/file/A_NFPA1123.pdf

------

And here's a copy of 1126, in case you're the expert on close-prox, too.
www.nfpa.org/assets/files/pdf/1126.PDF
I look forward to your comments.  Please cite chapter and verse.  I
might even agree with you on some points.

-------





LLoyd- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -