Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Music - Beatles  »  Last time all 4 played together?...
Page 1 of 1    

Last time all 4 played together?...

Author Message
Jud McCranie...
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:34 pm
Guest
When was the last time all four Beatles played together in the studio?
Looks to me it was probably July 25, 69, recording Sun King/Mean Mr.
Mustard.
--
Replace you know what by j to email
 
Stapler...
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:04 pm
Guest
"Jud McCranie" <youknowwhat.mccranie at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote in message
news:frmt45d9hjh5gae0vnhbr4i53uku0t75qm at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Quote:
When was the last time all four Beatles played together in the studio?
Looks to me it was probably July 25, 69, recording Sun King/Mean Mr.
Mustard.
--
Replace you know what by j to email


Who cares????????? Bugger off, knobhead.
 
troglodog...
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:22 pm
Guest
On Jul 6, 7:35 am, BeatmeGirly <BeatmeGi... at (no spam) somehow.com> wrote:
Quote:
"RichL" <rpleav... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
BeatmeGirly <BeatmeGi... at (no spam) somehow.com> wrote:
Probably the only time all four Beatles played together,
simultaneously, in a studio was during the Let It Be sessions.

Abbey Road was recorded *after* Let It Be.

I said the "ONLY" time they played simultaneously, since I'm betting
very few if any songs before or after the Let It Be sessions were
recorded with all four playing simultaneously.  They may have been in
the studio together, but different parts of tracks were put down at
different times.  That was probably more true on Abbey Road sessions
than at any other time.

Don't ask me where I got this, but I had it down as 1969, and from the
instruments, haircuts and even clothes I'm pretty confident it's
during the recording of Abbey Road:

http://tinyurl.com/l9jppu

It looks very much like everyone playing together, and in one case,
telling someone else how to play(!)
 
brilton...
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:04 pm
Guest
richforman wrote:
Quote:
On Jul 7, 9:45 pm, brilton <notl... at (no spam) notlirb.yacht.net> wrote:

richforman wrote:


Paul played the kazoo solo on "You're Sixteen," but of course did not
write it, but he did contribute "Six O'Clock," one of my very least-
favorites of his 70's songs.

Yeah, I was thinking of the kazoo bit. I must have blotted "Six O'Clock"
out of my memory.




Paul and George later both contributed to Ringo's Vertical Man album,
Paul playing bass and singing backup on "What in the World," and
George playing a slide guitar solo on "King of Broken Hearts."

Well that's interesting. I don't have any awareness of McCartney or
Starr recordings post 1982 or so.


You're missing out on some good stuff in that case my friend - if you
have a taste for McCartn<snip

No. No no no no no. I stopped actively pursuing ex-Beatle music simply
for the sake of it being distantly related to *real* Beatle music some
25 years ago. I would rather plunge my hand into a pot of boiling water
than have to catch up with the back-catalogue of (especially) McCartney
and Starr. I really *do* have better things to listen to. And the only
reason I have the rest of George's catalogue is that my brother is a big
fan, and I acquired copies of his discs as a matter of course. With
Lennon it's different, as he never had the chance to slide into
repetitive mediocrity over subsequent decades. The only post-Beatles
release I have sought out to purchase since 1983 or so is the Lennon
Anthology. "Broad Street" and "Gone Troppo" in particular embarrassed me
away from ex-Beatles for good.

I had the misfortune to have to sit through a DVD of a 1993 McCartney
concert recently, and it is so embarrassing to see him grinding out the
old Beatles numbers. I imagine it must be much, much worse to see him 16
years on doing the same thing, but older. Every year I pray that he will
have the good sense to retire (but he won't because he's such a ham, an
applause junkie and an egomaniac). I really hope that David Frost's 1964
prediction of his retirement date will come to pass.
 
Jeff...
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:45 pm
Guest
On Jul 9, 12:04 am, brilton <notl... at (no spam) notlirb.yacht.net> wrote:
Quote:
richforman wrote:
On Jul 7, 9:45 pm, brilton <notl... at (no spam) notlirb.yacht.net> wrote:

richforman wrote:

Paul played the kazoo solo on "You're Sixteen," but of course did not
write it, but he did contribute "Six O'Clock," one of my very least-
favorites of his 70's songs.

Yeah, I was thinking of the kazoo bit. I must have blotted "Six O'Clock"
out of my memory.

Paul and George later both contributed to Ringo's Vertical Man album,
Paul playing bass and singing backup on "What in the World," and
George playing a slide guitar solo on "King of Broken Hearts."

Well that's interesting. I don't have any awareness of McCartney or
Starr recordings post 1982 or so.

You're missing out on some good stuff in that case my friend - if you
have a taste for McCartn<snip

No. No no no no no. I stopped actively pursuing ex-Beatle music simply
for the sake of it being distantly related to *real* Beatle music some
25 years ago. I would rather plunge my hand into a pot of boiling water
than have to catch up with the back-catalogue of (especially) McCartney
and Starr. I really *do* have better things to listen to. And the only
reason I have the rest of George's catalogue is that my brother is a big
fan, and I acquired copies of his discs as a matter of course. With
Lennon it's different, as he never had the chance to slide into
repetitive mediocrity over subsequent decades. The only post-Beatles
release I have sought out to purchase since 1983 or so is the Lennon
Anthology. "Broad Street" and "Gone Troppo" in particular embarrassed me
away from ex-Beatles for good.

I had the misfortune to have to sit through a DVD of a 1993 McCartney
concert recently, and it is so embarrassing to see him grinding out the
old Beatles numbers. I imagine it must be much, much worse to see him 16
years on doing the same thing, but older. Every year I pray that he will
have the good sense to retire (but he won't because he's such a ham, an
applause junkie and an egomaniac). I really hope that David Frost's 1964
prediction of his retirement date will come to pass.

Why do you care so much that Paul retires? He would have to
have an effect on your life, which I doubt he does. I'm not
just trying to be a smart ass. I really want to know the answer.
Thank you.
 
JBGood...
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:16 pm
Guest
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:22:17 -0700 (PDT), troglodog
<troglodog at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Jul 6, 7:35=A0am, BeatmeGirly <BeatmeGi... at (no spam) somehow.com> wrote:
"RichL" <rpleav... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
BeatmeGirly <BeatmeGi... at (no spam) somehow.com> wrote:
Probably the only time all four Beatles played together,
simultaneously, in a studio was during the Let It Be sessions.

Abbey Road was recorded *after* Let It Be.

I said the "ONLY" time they played simultaneously, since I'm betting
very few if any songs before or after the Let It Be sessions were
recorded with all four playing simultaneously. =A0They may have been in
the studio together, but different parts of tracks were put down at
different times. =A0That was probably more true on Abbey Road sessions
than at any other time.

Don't ask me where I got this, but I had it down as 1969, and from the
instruments, haircuts and even clothes I'm pretty confident it's
during the recording of Abbey Road:

http://tinyurl.com/l9jppu

It looks very much like everyone playing together, and in one case,
telling someone else how to play(!)


Yep. You're the greatest drummer in the world, Ringo..... provided
you do what I say.
 
brilton...
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:27 pm
Guest
Jeff wrote:
Quote:
On Jul 10, 8:41 pm, brilton <notl... at (no spam) notlirb.yacht.net> wrote:


He just embarrasses me.


I'm sorry, I really don't understand. What other people do,
does not effect me, or embarrass me. That's "their" problem,
not mine. Thanks for your polite response.



No worries. After all, this is a Beatles discussion forum, where people
discuss the Beatles.
 
brilton...
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:28 pm
Guest
Nil wrote:
Quote:
On 10 Jul 2009, brilton <notlirb at (no spam) notlirb.yacht.net> wrote in
rec.music.beatles:


He just embarrasses me.


I feel sorry for you if that's true.

Paul McCartney inspires me.



I'm happy for you. But please don't feel sorry for me!
 
brilton...
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:30 pm
Guest
BeatmeGirly wrote:
Quote:
brilton <notlirb at (no spam) notlirb.yacht.net> wrote:





He just embarrasses me.


How can the actions of another embarrass YOU? You might be embarrassed to
be his fan, but that doesn't sound like the case.



I am a fan of the Beatles. This does not mean that I automatically have
to enjoy McCartney's solo work, of be a fan of his.
 
BeatmeGirly...
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:38 pm
Guest
brilton <notlirb at (no spam) notlirb.yacht.net> wrote:

Quote:
I find your semantic distinction to be a pointless exercise in
hair-splitting, and in no way relevant.

You were the one who made the assertion.
You now realize you were wrong.
Paul McCartney does not embarrass you. You are embarrassed that you
were once his fan. Sad that.
 
brilton...
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:23 pm
Guest
Jeff, I want you to find a wooden table. Do this now. I want you to go
over to the wooden table, and bang your forehead on it repeatedly.
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Dec 12, 2009 2:02 am