"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:H-mdnYu2V5AtjRTVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888f4eb$0$20524$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in message news:d6WdncHJV8cKxhXVnZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888555b$0$20517$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in message news:K6-dna2HYtOR1RXVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888301d$0$20505$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote in message
news:zK2dnaiYHYrTJhrVnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48879b82$0$20525$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't think so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me here, that
were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you she
has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where did I
make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my claims.


so do it for once,

stop posting about it and just do it. Come on back up your allegations it
can't be to hard this thread isn't that long.

You certainly haven't back up your claim in your ad hominem rant below
that for the sake of brevity I have snipped

It's you that has the -incredibly- extensive history of being unable to
prove your cheap innuendos.

As for where you made the claim, it's both in quotations above,
and -repeated- by yourself below.

Jesus, are you STUPID.

As I have no idea when you started to post to this ng

Well, that's easy to check, unless you're STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

Your reputation for an inability to negotiate the simplest internet tasks
precedes you.

Maybe Mike will make you some 5th grade level URLs that you're too stupid
to understand again.

and the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng I wouldn't have made this claim because I have no basis to make it

Like your last exercise in futility, -you're- the one that brought this
up.

It's not my job to decipher your lies, delusions and schizophrenia.

Are you going to be on about this for a year before everyone's laughter
drowns you out again?

And I see you're up to your old snipping tricks.

Par for a Team Futile piece of shit like you.

It doesn't fool anybody, except, apparently, Greg Mossman.

But you never can remember what you say from post to post.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

Nice that you know all this about her, but not her name...

"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488920d2$0$20507$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:H-mdnYu2V5AtjRTVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888f4eb$0$20524$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in message news:d6WdncHJV8cKxhXVnZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888555b$0$20517$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote in message
news:K6-dna2HYtOR1RXVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888301d$0$20505$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote in message
news:zK2dnaiYHYrTJhrVnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48879b82$0$20525$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't think so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me here,
that were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you she
has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where did I
make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my claims.


so do it for once,

I already did, as usual, and, you already snipped part of it (for
"brevity", like anyone gives a shit).

"...
 What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

 Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovelyladyshe was to

so sad for you, such a long post and it destroys your argument. I never said
that thisladypredated you on this ng just that she said she was an
original or early poster, late 80s/ early 90s I think she said ( didn't know
this ng had been going so long ).

"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48893b7f$0$20502$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in

snipped 5 sets of headers

for "brevity"

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't think
so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me here,
that were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you she
has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where did I
make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my claims.


so do it for once,

I already did, as usual, and, you already snipped part of it (for
"brevity", like anyone gives a shit).

It is always a case of "I did it before ( cough cough bullshit ) but
can't reproduce it.

"Reproduced" (15 times or so, this time) below, for the third post.

I always reproduce it.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:QOSdnWFHfoeb4xTVnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48893b7f$0$20502$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in

snipped 5 sets of headers

for "brevity"

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't think
so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me here,
that were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you
she has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where did I
make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my claims.


so do it for once,

I already did, as usual, and, you already snipped part of it (for
"brevity", like anyone gives a shit).

It is always a case of "I did it before ( cough cough bullshit ) but
can't reproduce it.

"Reproduced" (15 times or so, this time) below, for the third post.

I always reproduce it.

15 times well done I am glad you can cut and paste, only one problem :-
where does it say this person predates you.

so sad for you, such a long post and it destroys your argument.

I never said that this lady predated you on this ng just that she said she
was an original or early poster, late 80s/ early 90s I think she said (
didn't know this ng had been going so long ).

So when did you start posting popeye

snip <---that's tooo funny.

Never claimed that the person I dived with predated you on this ng, hell
maybe you were the original poster on this ng. BTW when did you start
posting to this ng?

have you always posted as Popeye

stop posting about it and just do it. Come on back up your allegations it
can't be to hard this thread isn't that long.

You certainly haven't back up your claim in your ad hominem rant below
that for the sake of brevity I have snipped

It's not my claim.

It's your claim.

And you snipped it, in your usual total pussy fashion.

SNIPPED CONTENT REPLACED FOR THE SECOND TIME:

It's you that has the -incredibly- extensive history of being unable to
prove your cheap innuendos.

As for where you made the claim, it's both in quotations above,
and -repeated- by yourself below.

SNIPPED BY STUPID Dave:

"As for where you made the claim, it's both in quotations above,
and -repeated- by yourself below."


Jesus, are you STUPID.

As I have no idea when you started to post to this ng

Well, that's easy to check, unless you're STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

Your reputation for an inability to negotiate the simplest internet
tasks precedes you.

Maybe Mike will make you some 5th grade level URLs that you're too
stupid to understand again.

and the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng I wouldn't have made this claim because I have no basis to make
it


"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

Does this help, or do you need to wait for kennybenny to come along and
hold your hand?

Like your last exercise in futility, -you're- the one that brought this
up.

It's not my job to decipher your lies, delusions and schizophrenia.

Are you going to be on about this for a year before everyone's laughter
drowns you out again?

And I see you're up to your old snipping tricks.

Par for a Team Futile piece of shit like you.

It doesn't fool anybody, except, apparently, Greg Mossman.

But you never can remember what you say from post to post.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

Nice that you know all this about her, but not her name...


And the attack isn't ad hominem- your extreme STUPIDITY -continues- to be
a factor in the exchange.

"...
What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovelyladyshe was to

so sad for you, such a long post and it destroys your argument. I never
said
that thisladypredated you on this ng just that she said she was an
original or early poster, late 80s/ early 90s I think she said ( didn't
know
this ng had been going so long ).

  And it doesn't fool anyone, except, I guess, Greg Mossman.

  He doesn't have any problem with your lies, bombast and flummery.

"...
What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovelyladyshe was to

so sad for you, such a long post and it destroys your argument. I never
said
that thisladypredated you on this ng just that she said she was an
original or early poster, late 80s/ early 90s I think she said ( didn't
know
this ng had been going so long ).

"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48899e6f$0$20521$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:QOSdnWFHfoeb4xTVnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48893b7f$0$20502$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in

snipped 5 sets of headers

for "brevity"

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't think
so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me here,
that were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you
she has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where did
I make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my claims.


so do it for once,

I already did, as usual, and, you already snipped part of it (for
"brevity", like anyone gives a shit).

It is always a case of "I did it before ( cough cough bullshit ) but
can't reproduce it.

"Reproduced" (15 times or so, this time) below, for the third post.

I always reproduce it.

15 times well done I am glad you can cut and paste, only one problem :-
where does it say this person predates you.

In the 15 times.

"-hh" <recscuba_google at (no spam) huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:02fff718-e95d-439d-9fd9-0d1334cd62eb at (no spam) v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
"dechucka" <dechu... at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:
"...
What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovelyladyshe was to


so sad for you, such a long post and it destroys your argument. I never
said
that thisladypredated you on this ng just that she said she was an
original or early poster, late 80s/ early 90s I think she said ( didn't
know
this ng had been going so long ).


+That particular time period would merely make them an "early" poster
by today's standards, but still none the less Royalty if they were
respected and still active today. For the title of "original" (or
close enough), someone would IMO have to be the likes of Peter Yee.

Fair enough I will respect your greater wisdom on this matter. She is not
active for the reasons given when this was first raised and hasn't been
for well over at least a decade and a 1/2 from my understanding.


+But since you claim that you've been in apparently recent? contact
with a rec.scuba oldtimer, I'd personally appreciate hearing about who
it was, where they're at, how they're doing, if they're still diving,
etc, as well as to have contact info with which to return with my own
greetings. Things have changed ever so slightly on rec.scuba over the
past two decades. :-)

Online or Offline is fine ... it doesn't matter to me, although you
will have to make the effort to punch through a whitelisting filter
for this address if you try to email me offline.

I'll have a word with her not everybody like having personal details
splashed over the net

"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a418b$0$20519$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"-hh" <recscuba_google at (no spam) huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:02fff718-e95d-439d-9fd9-0d1334cd62eb at (no spam) v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
"dechucka" <dechu... at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:
"...
What's the name of this "original" poster of yours,
anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovelyladyshe was to


so sad for you, such a long post and it destroys your argument. I never
said
that thisladypredated you on this ng just that she said she was an
original or early poster, late 80s/ early 90s I think she said ( didn't
know
this ng had been going so long ).


+That particular time period would merely make them an "early" poster
by today's standards, but still none the less Royalty if they were
respected and still active today. For the title of "original" (or
close enough), someone would IMO have to be the likes of Peter Yee.

Fair enough I will respect your greater wisdom on this matter. She is not
active for the reasons given when this was first raised and hasn't been
for well over at least a decade and a 1/2 from my understanding.


+But since you claim that you've been in apparently recent? contact
with a rec.scuba oldtimer, I'd personally appreciate hearing about who
it was, where they're at, how they're doing, if they're still diving,
etc, as well as to have contact info with which to return with my own
greetings. Things have changed ever so slightly on rec.scuba over the
past two decades. :-)

Online or Offline is fine ... it doesn't matter to me, although you
will have to make the effort to punch through a whitelisting filter
for this address if you try to email me offline.

I'll have a word with her not everybody like having personal details
splashed over the net

So you were -lying- about knowing who she was?

Another -documented- STUPID David Frank lie.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:EfudnTe0ycBXuxfVnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48899e6f$0$20521$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in message news:QOSdnWFHfoeb4xTVnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48893b7f$0$20502$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in

snipped 5 sets of headers

for "brevity"

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours,
anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't think
so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me
here, that were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you
she has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where did
I make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my claims.


so do it for once,

I already did, as usual, and, you already snipped part of it (for
"brevity", like anyone gives a shit).

It is always a case of "I did it before ( cough cough bullshit ) but
can't reproduce it.

"Reproduced" (15 times or so, this time) below, for the third post.

I always reproduce it.

15 times well done I am glad you can cut and paste, only one problem :-
where does it say this person predates you.

In the 15 times.

Comprehension is a serious problem for you isn't it?

even though you have cut and pasted numerous times you don't understand
what you have posted. Lets have a look at what you have pasted so many
times
" the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" nowhere in these words is there a mention that this person
predates you on this ng.

As well as at the time of me originally posting this I had no idea when you
started posting to this ng ( remember I posted that as far afaik you may
be the original poster )

you can't even infer that I was suggesting that she predated you.

snip the ad hominem attack and the normal Popeye rant and bluster which

follows up him being shown to be wrong.

so sad for you, such a long post and it destroys your argument.

I never said that this lady predated you on this ng just that she said she
was an original or early poster, late 80s/ early 90s I think she said (
didn't know this ng had been going so long ).

So when did you start posting popeye

snip <---that's tooo funny.

Never claimed that the person I dived with predated you on this ng, hell
maybe you were the original poster on this ng. BTW when did you start
posting to this ng?

have you always posted as Popeye

stop posting about it and just do it. Come on back up your allegations it
can't be to hard this thread isn't that long.

You certainly haven't back up your claim in your ad hominem rant below
that for the sake of brevity I have snipped

It's not my claim.

It's your claim.

And you snipped it, in your usual total pussy fashion.

SNIPPED CONTENT REPLACED FOR THE SECOND TIME:

It's you that has the -incredibly- extensive history of being unable to
prove your cheap innuendos.

As for where you made the claim, it's both in quotations above,
and -repeated- by yourself below.

SNIPPED BY STUPID Dave:

"As for where you made the claim, it's both in quotations above,
and -repeated- by yourself below."


Jesus, are you STUPID.

As I have no idea when you started to post to this ng

Well, that's easy to check, unless you're STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

Your reputation for an inability to negotiate the simplest internet
tasks precedes you.

Maybe Mike will make you some 5th grade level URLs that you're too
stupid to understand again.

and the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng I wouldn't have made this claim because I have no basis to make
it


"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

"the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" -STUPID Dave

Does this help, or do you need to wait for kennybenny to come along and
hold your hand?

Like your last exercise in futility, -you're- the one that brought this
up.

It's not my job to decipher your lies, delusions and schizophrenia.

Are you going to be on about this for a year before everyone's laughter
drowns you out again?

And I see you're up to your old snipping tricks.

Par for a Team Futile piece of shit like you.

It doesn't fool anybody, except, apparently, Greg Mossman.

But you never can remember what you say from post to post.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

Nice that you know all this about her, but not her name...


And the attack isn't ad hominem- your extreme STUPIDITY -continues- to be
a factor in the exchange.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:M6adncGa4NBAePHVnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"John Van Ostrand" <john.van.ostrand at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1e8fba49-2534-427b-9ed3-aad90941499c at (no spam) z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 2, 3:02 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
Pop... at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
It does look like there's a good case for using a gun control group
or
political group since those would cover most of the OT messages.

We like it just the way it is.

I'm sure it scares off people who are really interested in diving but
unwilling to filter the noise. I'd personally rather see more diving
related talk and I think that means more subscribers and a greater
variety of them.

It's not like anybody's -withholding- scuba material.

And someone here once said, "if I had feathers up my ass, I'd be a
chicken...".

Be nice if we had that much scuba content, but with what there is, this
place would be far deader than it is, like the virtually defunct
Australian.Sport.Scuba (ASS).

People who are "scared off", and there have been a number, are free to
suffer their own fears.

People come here looking for advice, we've got it.

We've talked virtually everty aspect of diving to death, to the point
where we ooh and ahhh kennybenny's mudhole pictures of negative-viz
diving.

Still I find myself compelled to read.

Then it must not be that bad.

Well I don't read it all. When it gets pretty thick and has reduced to
popeye vs. dechucka I might chuckle, shake my head and then tune out.
How long has that been going on?

I've been here for 11 years now.

There's always a "Popeye vs." -someone-, and I can assure you their
adversarial quality has diminished to a virtual intellect vacuum
(speaking of David) over the years.

After I cite them lying a few dozen times, and force them to scurry,
then it just becomes rote maintenance work like defragging, gun cleaning,
or sweeping leaves off the back deck.

I don't complain or agonize about the leaves falling, I just make short
work of the simple task.

The one that killed himself was pretty fun, and the "anonymous" one we
started calling at home and work fled in terror.

Futile John Francis has had a virtual breakdown.

Pedo carl nisrael is so scared of me, he won't even post what -province-
of Canada he lives in. ;-)

Heirophantphish hides behind a sockpuppet, having been previously
eviscerated here, ashamed even to be identified as her true self.

The rest hide similarly, or have an ocean to protect them.

They're al different, and they're all the same.

It's just petty entertainment for me.

Popeye you are a legend in the vacuum that is your mind

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:z9-dnWl7y_vy0BfVnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a418b$0$20519$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"-hh" <recscuba_google at (no spam) huntzinger.com> wrote in message

Online or Offline is fine ... it doesn't matter to me, although you
will have to make the effort to punch through a whitelisting filter
for this address if you try to email me offline.

I'll have a word with her not everybody like having personal details
splashed over the net

So you were -lying- about knowing who she was?

"Is" Popeye "IS" very much alive when I saw her last at Hamilton Is.
Airport

Another -documented- STUPID David Frank lie.

Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:I-Sdnc5MvfAqiBrVnZ2dnUVZ_oTinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4886cee2$0$20505$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Grumman-581" <grumman581+usenet-2008 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9AE47E121004grumman581usenet2008 at (no spam) 85.214.90.236...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in
news:4886bbde$0$20556$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:

this one is fine by me which is why I keep posting. Just so that the
OP realises it really isn't a SCUBA ng mowt of the time

You like it, you just have trouble admitting it...

I admit it, this is light relief from work on the computer and
occasionally ( very occasionally ) I learn something

Like I've often said- you get out of Rec.scuba what you put into it.

and I get a lot of fun out of it, amazing how some of the septics are so
sensative


What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.