Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Hobby Forum Index  »  Music - Hip Hop  »  tiger woods, billionaire......
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
bozak...
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:56 pm
Guest
Terraholm wrote:
Quote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:
bozak wrote:
brink wrote:
" bozak" <_____bozak1 at (no spam) gmail.com_____> wrote in message
news:g58hld$9f$1 at (no spam) registered.motzarella.org...
forbes reports he will go over the billion dollar mark in 2010...

could a white kid just as good as tiger made as much money as
tiger has and will???

i dont think so... its pretty obvious why...

Actually I don't think it's obvious but I think you're onto
something. What's your theory?

a white tiger woods wouldnt bring races of all kinds to the game...

How much has vj Singh made from general public aimed endorsements?

sorry not an american hero... try again...

What do you have against Fiji? =)
Was not a try, I know the several reasons and answered my own question.

And Tiger out-earns everyone worldwide too. Even people like Beckham who was
wildly popular in the rest of the world.
And in all sports Mickelson is the #3 in the world for earnings on and off
the course.

Before it was tiger it was Jordan, not like he did not have plenty of black
american competition.
Mickelson remains well behind Tiger in endorsement income. But he still
makes as much as LeBron and Shaq combined.

mikelson isnt even scottie pippenish compared to tiger...
bozak...
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:27 pm
Guest
Terraholm wrote:
Quote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:


mikelson isnt even scottie pippenish compared to tiger...

No one is. There are a billion people playing sports that are not tiger...
want to make a case for all of them?

dont need too, you brought up ground...
Terraholm...
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:30 pm
Guest
bozak wrote:
Quote:
Terraholm wrote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:
bozak wrote:


i probably shouldve asked you why you get so long winded about
nothing at all, ]

So why did you start this thread with a question? And why not
answer mine?

because yours was silly...

More to you are not willing to answer it honestly I think.

nope... silly...

So you ask a question and asking why is silly...i see...was a pretty silly
question...there was and is no white tiger woods


--
Laurel T
"New Jersey is completely different from
Utah. 'Brother' in Utah and 'brother' in
New Jersey are entirely different concepts."
Rick Majerus on Van Horn being drafted by the Nets
Terraholm...
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:50 pm
Guest
BradC wrote:
Quote:
"Terraholm" <TerraholmSPAMNOT at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6e21daF4tr8dU1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
KJ Collins wrote:
On Jul 13, 2:18 am, "Eldog" <el... at (no spam) tpg.com.au> wrote:


Prize money (at grand slams at least) is equal these days...


If I remember correctly it's been that way for several decades
largely thanks to Billie Jean King.

2007 was when it became equal...

Not the US Open. Been equal for a long time.

Has been decades for the US open. But that does not cover 'grand slams'.
Most important one is Wimbleton and they and the French just got there last
year.


--
Laurel T
"I told him,'Son, what is it with you. Is it ignorance or apathy?'
He said, 'Coach, I don't know and I don't care."
Frank Layden
bozak...
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:01 pm
Guest
Terraholm wrote:
Quote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:


mikelson isnt even scottie pippenish compared to tiger...

No one is. There are a billion people playing sports that are not
tiger... want to make a case for all of them?

dont need too, you brought up ground...

Mikelson makes more than Jordan did.

no relevance to what youre talking about...
bozak...
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:29 pm
Guest
Terraholm wrote:
Quote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:


no relevance to what youre talking about...

What are you talking about?

didn't you say this???

Before it was tiger it was Jordan, not like he did not have plenty of black
american competition.
Mickelson remains well behind Tiger in endorsement income. But he still
makes as much as LeBron and Shaq combined.

*************************************************************************************

and then i said...

mikelson isnt even scottie pippenish compared to tiger...

which meant mikelson is no where close to the level tiger is on...

and then you said this for koresh knows why...

No one is. There are a billion people playing sports that are not tiger...
want to make a case for all of them?
******************************************************************************************

and then i said this...

dont need too, you brought up ground... *****************

because you yourself said before that ground>everybody... so why did i
need to make a case for those people...

i probably shouldve asked you why you get so long winded about nothing
at all, but then i think i know the answer... plenty of time on your hands...
KJ Collins...
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:56 am
Guest
On Jul 13, 2:18 am, "Eldog" <el... at (no spam) tpg.com.au> wrote:

Quote:

Prize money (at grand slams at least) is equal these days...


If I remember correctly it's been that way for several decades largely
thanks to Billie Jean King.
bozak...
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:36 pm
Guest
Terraholm wrote:
Quote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:
bozak wrote:


i probably shouldve asked you why you get so long winded about
nothing at all, ]

So why did you start this thread with a question? And why not answer
mine?

because yours was silly...

More to you are not willing to answer it honestly I think.

nope... silly...
bozak...
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:45 pm
Guest
Terraholm wrote:
Quote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:
bozak wrote:
Terraholm wrote:
bozak wrote:


i probably shouldve asked you why you get so long winded about
nothing at all, ]

So why did you start this thread with a question? And why not
answer mine?

because yours was silly...

More to you are not willing to answer it honestly I think.

nope... silly...

So you ask a question and asking why is silly...i see...was a pretty silly
question...there was and is no white tiger woods

show me where i said there is one...
BradC...
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:36 pm
Guest
"Terraholm" <TerraholmSPAMNOT at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6e21daF4tr8dU1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
Quote:
KJ Collins wrote:
On Jul 13, 2:18 am, "Eldog" <el... at (no spam) tpg.com.au> wrote:


Prize money (at grand slams at least) is equal these days...


If I remember correctly it's been that way for several decades largely
thanks to Billie Jean King.

2007 was when it became equal...

Not the US Open. Been equal for a long time.


Quote:


--
Laurel T
"If you can't say anything nice, sit next to me."
Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
KJ Collins...
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:44 am
Guest
On Jul 13, 5:50 pm, "Terraholm" <TerraholmSPAM... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
BradC wrote:
"Terraholm" <TerraholmSPAM... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6e21daF4tr8dU1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
KJ Collins wrote:
On Jul 13, 2:18 am, "Eldog" <el... at (no spam) tpg.com.au> wrote:

Prize money (at grand slams at least) is equal these days...

If I remember correctly it's been that way for several decades
largely thanks to Billie Jean King.

2007 was when it became equal...

Not the US Open.  Been equal for a long time.

Has been decades for the US open. But that does not cover 'grand slams'.
Most important one is  Wimbleton and they and the French just got there last
year.


Ok, so that's what I kind of remembered.
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:32 pm