| |
 |
|
|
Hobby Forum Index » Games - Board » How about a game where one or more sides determine...
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| Harald Korneliussen... |
 Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 7, 11:48 pm, Rich Hutnik <richardhut... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Jul 7, 8:37 am, Harald Korneliussen <vinterm... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
If the goal is finding the person in the audience with the most skill,
I think you need to take into account how many people are on the side
switched to. If everyone has defected to white except one, and that
one wins, he should win the meta-game as well.
As I see it, if one person is left and he wins, then he should be the
winner, if he didn't defect.
Well, that's what I said :-)
Quote: For the sake of balancing purpose, I am considering having an added
costs to switching to a side with more players on it.
I wouldn't try to balance it before I've tried it a bit. In the
scoring system I've proposed, the balance should come from
1. If you need to defect, you should do it as early as possible, to
get your share of the reward for all the later defectors.
2. If you're caught off guard and many team members leave your side
because of what you missed, you may be better off trying to make the
best out of it. If you should succeed in luring some of them back, you
will get a larger share of the reward.
Quote: There is an issue regarding if the position would likely be a draw
that needs to be dealt with.
Then the natural thing to do is to leave the point scores of the
individual audience members as they are. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Rich Hutnik... |
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 8, 5:20 pm, Harald Korneliussen <vinterm... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Jul 7, 11:48 pm, Rich Hutnik <richardhut... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 7, 8:37 am, Harald Korneliussen <vinterm... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
If the goal is finding the person in the audience with the most skill,
I think you need to take into account how many people are on the side
switched to. If everyone has defected to white except one, and that
one wins, he should win the meta-game as well.
As I see it, if one person is left and he wins, then he should be the
winner, if he didn't defect.
Well, that's what I said :-)
For the sake of balancing purpose, I am considering having an added
costs to switching to a side with more players on it.
I wouldn't try to balance it before I've tried it a bit. In the
scoring system I've proposed, the balance should come from
I do agree, this needs to be tried. Anyone here want to work to
getting something up?
- Rich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Harald Korneliussen... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 10, 1:14 am, Rich Hutnik <richardhut... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: I do agree, this needs to be tried. Anyone here want to work to
getting something up?
We could do it play-by-mail. I'm in if we reach 10 people. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Rich Hutnik... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 10, 8:39 am, Harald Korneliussen <vinterm... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Jul 10, 1:14 am, Rich Hutnik <richardhut... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
I do agree, this needs to be tried. Anyone here want to work to
getting something up?
We could do it play-by-mail. I'm in if we reach 10 people.
Do you want to have someone manually tally everything?
An idea possibly would be to get a forum, have a board displayed, and
have people post their entries on a forum for their turn. Second side
goes, then everyone would send the moderator what side they are on.
One could use email to record moves.
What we could do now is 3-5 a side and try it without the side
switching and see how it goes. I am up for having it on the
abstractgamers site or the chessvariants site. We could actually do
both, communicate via the abstractgamers site (the forum allows for
sending private messages to people), and enter the moves on the CV
site.
Anyone else game? If I hear some yes here, I will go ahead and set up
something on abstractgamers.org site.
- Rich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Harald Korneliussen... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 10, 6:36 pm, Rich Hutnik <richardhut... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Anyone else game? If I hear some yes here, I will go ahead and set up
something on abstractgamers.org site.
I'd prefer it if we did it all there, instead of across many sites. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Rich Hutnik... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 11, 6:11 am, Harald Korneliussen <vinterm... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Jul 10, 6:36 pm, Rich Hutnik <richardhut... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone else game? If I hear some yes here, I will go ahead and set up
something on abstractgamers.org site.
I'd prefer it if we did it all there, instead of across many sites.
It is now up on the CV website for discussion:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/msdisplay.php?itemid=MSvoxpopulichess
- Rich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:13 am
|
|