| |
 |
|
|
Hobby Forum Index » Music - Compose » Cancelling Sul Ponticello...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Fiona Abrahami... |
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Trivial question:
This doesn't seem to appear in any of my theory books, and when I asked my
teacher, I just got a blank look and a nervous cough I want the cellist
in a string quartet to play over the bridge for a short section in a piece
and then return to normal bowing position, but what is the term that cancels
a Sul Ponticello?
Fiona |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*... |
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Fiona Abrahami <fiona at (no spam) NO_SPAM.intxtdoc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: Trivial question:
This doesn't seem to appear in any of my theory books, and when I asked my
teacher, I just got a blank look and a nervous cough  I want the cellist
in a string quartet to play over the bridge for a short section in a piece
and then return to normal bowing position, but what is the term that cancels
a Sul Ponticello?
"ord" or "nat" are the most common abbreviations. I use "ord" myself,
but both are correct, and you'll see that major publishers of new music
often use both (presumably based on composers' peferences?)- though
using them interchangeably in the same piece wouldn't be a good idea.
It's hard for me to give an exact statistic, but I encounter "ord" more
in new published scores- but that's just based on the sample of scores I
see, or own.
--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Fiona Abrahami... |
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)" <d4g4h4 at (no spam) yahoo.co.uk> wrote
Quote: Fiona Abrahami <fiona at (no spam) NO_SPAM.intxtdoc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Trivial question:
This doesn't seem to appear in any of my theory books, and when I asked
my
teacher, I just got a blank look and a nervous cough  I want the
cellist
in a string quartet to play over the bridge for a short section in a
piece
and then return to normal bowing position, but what is the term that
cancels
a Sul Ponticello?
"ord" or "nat" are the most common abbreviations. I use "ord" myself,
but both are correct, and you'll see that major publishers of new music
often use both (presumably based on composers' peferences?)- though
using them interchangeably in the same piece wouldn't be a good idea.
It's hard for me to give an exact statistic, but I encounter "ord" more
in new published scores- but that's just based on the sample of scores I
see, or own.
Thanks, I guess there's no point in worrying about "ord" being a different
language to Sul Pont :-)
Fiona |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*... |
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Fiona Abrahami <fiona at (no spam) NO_SPAM.intxtdoc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: "David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)" <d4g4h4 at (no spam) yahoo.co.uk> wrote
Fiona Abrahami <fiona at (no spam) NO_SPAM.intxtdoc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Trivial question:
This doesn't seem to appear in any of my theory books, and when I asked
my
teacher, I just got a blank look and a nervous cough  I want the
cellist
in a string quartet to play over the bridge for a short section in a
piece
and then return to normal bowing position, but what is the term that
cancels
a Sul Ponticello?
"ord" or "nat" are the most common abbreviations. I use "ord" myself,
but both are correct, and you'll see that major publishers of new music
often use both (presumably based on composers' peferences?)- though
using them interchangeably in the same piece wouldn't be a good idea.
It's hard for me to give an exact statistic, but I encounter "ord" more
in new published scores- but that's just based on the sample of scores I
see, or own.
Thanks, I guess there's no point in worrying about "ord" being a different
language to Sul Pont
It's not- it's the same thing in Italian- i.e. ordinario- and naturale
for that matter.
--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Fiona Abrahami... |
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)" <d4g4h4 at (no spam) yahoo.co.uk> wrote
Quote: Fiona Abrahami <fiona at (no spam) NO_SPAM.intxtdoc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
"David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)" <d4g4h4 at (no spam) yahoo.co.uk> wrote
Fiona Abrahami <fiona at (no spam) NO_SPAM.intxtdoc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Trivial question:
This doesn't seem to appear in any of my theory books, and when I
asked
my
teacher, I just got a blank look and a nervous cough  I want the
cellist
in a string quartet to play over the bridge for a short section in a
piece
and then return to normal bowing position, but what is the term that
cancels
a Sul Ponticello?
"ord" or "nat" are the most common abbreviations. I use "ord" myself,
but both are correct, and you'll see that major publishers of new music
often use both (presumably based on composers' peferences?)- though
using them interchangeably in the same piece wouldn't be a good idea.
It's hard for me to give an exact statistic, but I encounter "ord" more
in new published scores- but that's just based on the sample of scores
I
see, or own.
Thanks, I guess there's no point in worrying about "ord" being a
different
language to Sul Pont :-)
It's not- it's the same thing in Italian- i.e. ordinario- and naturale
for that matter.
Duh, see what assumptions can do, I assumed English ordinary :-)
Fiona |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:08 pm
|
|