| |
 |
|
|
Hobby Forum Index » Sport - Soccer » Debunking the spin about Spain vs Italy...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Bob... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:10 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I think almost all azzurri supporters have said something like the following
over the last couple of days: "Italian haters are hypocrytes because they
only mind when Italy plays defensive football. Proof; the Netherlands scored
on counters and you all loved it. "
Get your facts straight people: the Netherlands had more ball possession
than all of their opponents during this Euro. It isn't because the speed and
sense of positionning of dutch forwards especially came through on the
counter that they sat back and only waited for opponents to commit
themselves before attacking. By comparison, Italy hovered around 43% ball
possession against Spain because they sat back, absorbed the pressure and
tried to play the counter. Granted ball possession doesn't tell the entire
story but when there is a large disparity as there was between Spain and
Italy it is a good indication of the tactics employed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SMT... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 24, 2:10 am, "Bob" <B... at (no spam) nogibberish.com> wrote:
Quote: I think almost all azzurri supporters have said something like the following
over the last couple of days: "Italian haters are hypocrytes because they
only mind when Italy plays defensive football. Proof; the Netherlands scored
on counters and you all loved it. "
Very few azzurri supporters have said anything on this subject. You
can hardly speak about a spinning operation.
Quote: Granted ball possession doesn't tell the entire
story but when there is a large disparity as there was between Spain and
Italy it is a good indication of the tactics employed.
Nonsense.
Best,
SMT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SMT... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 24, 2:30 am, "Bob" <B... at (no spam) nogibberish.com> wrote:
Quote: Very few azzurri supporters have said anything on this subject. You
can hardly speak about a spinning operation.
BS. You almost all said it in one form or another including tjmagglio,
Benny, etc ..
I am not a supporter of the azzurri. I support Spain. In any case,
there is nothing to spin. Everybody saw the game. The reading of it is
pretty clear and uncontroversial.
Best,
SMT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SMT... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jun 24, 2:49 am, "Bob" <B... at (no spam) nogibberish.com> wrote:
Quote: Yes it is clear that Spain had nearly 60% ball possession (despite Benny
saying in his report they more or less split ball possession) which is
either an indication that Italy was totally outplayed or that the azzurri
sat back hoping to catch Spain on the counter, which is very different than
what the Netherlands did since they had a majority of ball possession during
all their matches.
If you had watched Spain's qualifiers for this Euro Cup, you would
notice that invariably Spain had the possession, but the results
weren't so hot. You would notice the same thing in many games. It's
what you do with the ball. The whining that "we dominated the entire
game and then they stuck a couple of goals into us" is very, very old.
Barcelona "dominated" MU at the Camp Nou, 65-35 in possession, yet MU
was comfortable, no great threat to them. I believe we also had more
possession in the return match, at which they fucked us. It's not an
indicator of playing well or of playing offensively. You can doodle
around with the ball, not getting anywhere. Many great teams have
conceded possession. It can be good tactic.
Best,
SMT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:30 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SMT wrote:
Quote: On Jun 24, 2:10 am, "Bob" <B... at (no spam) nogibberish.com> wrote:
I think almost all azzurri supporters have said something like the
following over the last couple of days: "Italian haters are
hypocrytes because they only mind when Italy plays defensive
football. Proof; the Netherlands scored on counters and you all
loved it. "
Very few azzurri supporters have said anything on this subject. You
can hardly speak about a spinning operation.
BS. You almost all said it in one form or another including tjmagglio,
Benny, etc ..
Quote: Granted ball possession doesn't tell the entire
story but when there is a large disparity as there was between Spain
and Italy it is a good indication of the tactics employed.
Nonsense.
What eloquence! Nice editing job too. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SMT wrote:
Quote: On Jun 24, 2:30 am, "Bob" <B... at (no spam) nogibberish.com> wrote:
Very few azzurri supporters have said anything on this subject. You
can hardly speak about a spinning operation.
BS. You almost all said it in one form or another including
tjmagglio, Benny, etc ..
I am not a supporter of the azzurri. I support Spain.
oh really, you could have fooled me ...
In any case,
Quote: there is nothing to spin. Everybody saw the game. The reading of it is
pretty clear and uncontroversial.
Yes it is clear that Spain had nearly 60% ball possession (despite Benny
saying in his report they more or less split ball possession) which is
either an indication that Italy was totally outplayed or that the azzurri
sat back hoping to catch Spain on the counter, which is very different than
what the Netherlands did since they had a majority of ball possession during
all their matches. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Futbolmetrix... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"7h at (no spam) ch" <essetm at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d74f3653-5d41-4156-b55c-af2f6236b885 at (no spam) k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Quote: While you're at it, can you also admit on the record that Juventus
have never won a European Cup fairly?  *duck*
Sen~or Torquemada,
I choose burning by the stake.
D |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
tjmaglio at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
Quote: On Jun 24, 11:07 am, "Bob" <B... at (no spam) nogibberish.com> wrote:
tjmag... at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
Why can't you get these basic points in your argument right?
Why are you cherry picking numbers from a news organization when the
official football body gives different numbers?
The BBC was the only site I ever looked at. I checked the stats after
the game and saw those numbers and when you quoted 60% (something that
I've yet to see posted anywhere) it didn't jive with what I'd seen
earlier. That's all. I'm not hunting for data to support my case and
I'm certainly not rounding anything up 10% like you did to try and
make a point.
So the fact that you didn't bother checking the official tournament site is
supposed to be my fault? Also, I gave both the UEFA number 43% for Italy and
the number from l'Equipe (60% for Spain) so I gave a range and you just
happened to cite 55% for Italy which is a full 12% more than the UEFA says
it is. To be quite honest, I find your response desingenious, which doesn't
bode well for the future of our exchanges.
And why would I bother shopping around? Anyone who saw
Quote: Italy-Netherlands cannot deny that the Dutch played a counterattacking
game, not some orgy of all-out attacking, "great for football" kind of
play. I'd say the Russians were the ones doing the bulk of attacking
in their game with the Dutch as well. Only difference between a team
like the Netherlands and a team like Italy is that Italy can defend
when they have to.
51 to 55% possession for NED throughout the group phase and 1/4 final isn't
defensive-counterattacking football and it certainly not equal to 43%
possession by Italy against Spain, despite the spin you want to put on it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SMT wrote:
Quote: Nothing is ailing football itself. We are in some kind of golden age.
Now, part of this is being fueled by money, investment money and sugar
daddy money, a lot of reckless spending, concentration of power in
fewer clubs, etc., but in the field, the sport is doing well. I don't
think football today is more defensive than in the past. In fact, the
opposite seems to be true, speaking very generally on something as
fuzzy as "defensive football". For example, when Ferguson dusted off
hardcore catenaccio against Barça, everybody complained immediately.
Years ago, nobody would have said anything.
The problem isn't catenaccio but physical football where offense is stiffled
through systematic tugging-grabbing-shoving-hacking-bumping. On how many of
Spain 8 corners do you think Grosso didn't fully hold Villa? a big fat ZERO. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Quote: "Bob" <Bob at (no spam) nogibberish.com> wrote in message
news:JfWdnfkE_fitivzVnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...
See how you had the opportunity to set the record straight and you
chose not
to do so?
It was a penalty. Happy now? Now will you let it go?
Sure in your case I will, although I'll be honest and add that I'll keep
wondering why it took you 2 years to say so. It'd also be nice if you
discussed the other dodgy calls during that match.
I assume your admission means you'd like to look at the issue of refereeing
objectively and you were also curious why Italy would have a lower foul
count than their opponent if as some say, they committed so many fouls,
right? Would you like us to attempt comparing foul counts for the
Italy-Spain match with the official foul count? I think it'd be very
enlightening. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Jmac wrote:
Quote: No real fan of the game is bothered by Italy's defensive play. I love
a good defensive match and I found it an interesting game to watch.
Would all defensive football be viable tactics if fouls were called as they
should?
Quote: What bothers me and I think most people is when Italy got away with
countless fouls inside and near the penalty area and when they faked
injuries to stop Spanish attacks 2 times during the game. That's not
good defense my friends, that's just simply cheating. Being good at
cheating is not a merit. I love Italy, I love Italians, I love the
food and the wine, but I hate cheating at any game. Please Italy, some
FAIR PLAY! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Benny" <Benny at (no spam) soccer-europe.com> wrote
Quote: Italy played attacking football
A blanket statement that masks a diverse record. Until you state posession
times during these matches it is only an unsubstantiated assertion.
Quote: and scored 13 goals in the last World
Cup.
Italy was 12th in FIFA ranking before WC2006 and played against Ghana
(28th), Czech Republic (10th), USA (31th), Australia (39th), Ukraine (13th),
Germany (6th) and France (4th) thus against 3 top 10 teams for a combined
131 fifa ranks (sum of fifa ranks of opponents). When accounting for Italy's
ranking we get: 12/131 or a raw score of 0.092
Quote: Greece played catenaccio and scored 7.
Greece was ~30 in FIFA ranking prior to Euro2004 and played Portugal (9),
Spain (5), Russia (32), France (2), Czech Republic (4) and Portugal (9) for
a second time, thus against 5 top 10 teams for a total of 61 FIFA ranks (sum
of FIFA ranks of opponents). When accoutning for Greece ranking we get:
30/61 or a raw score of 0.491 which is one order of magnitude greater than
Italy, therefore Italy scoring 13 goals with Greece scoring 7 doesn't mean
much since they faced opponents that were significantly weaker than what
Greece faced during euro2004.
Quote: If you can't even gets the
basics right piss off back to the Tennis newsgroup.
And in similar fashion where should you go to pay for your incompetence? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:29 pm
|
|