Peter Hucker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:16:05 +0100, marc <initial.surname@btinternet.com
wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:02:34 +0100, marc
initial.surname@btinternet.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:48:55 +0100, marc
initial.surname@btinternet.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
As many as you want, if I can be bothered I may answer some, or
none.
What's the opposite of acute?
Why do you consider a jumble to be worse than a list? A list must by
definition require an order, that choice of order may then influence
the
perception of the opinion or idea, pre-judging the issue. That is
in
management speak a "trap", traps are not good things when it comes
to
ideas or opinions
A list does not require an order. You could have simply written them
down as you find them, with no input to the list from yourself.
Ie ordered by time.
Time is not a subjective input and will not influence the perception of
the opinion or idea as you suggested above.
Incorrect. A waiting list is a list, the nearer the top an item is the
longer it has been on the list and the sooner it will be addressed.
But unless people are inserted at subjective points in the list (perhaps
a heart transplant is more serious than a sore thumb), then the list does
not influence the perception of the opinion or idea as you suggested
above.
- you have the memory of a goldfish.
You have the clarity of communication of an ass.
You are American.
No.
Then why did you choose an "ass" as they love to?
It's an animal, one that brays noisily, but is ineffective in
communicating with humans
There are many hundreds that fall into that description.
I don't think there are many hundreds of animals that bray.
Yes, as I said, Botness is in the eye of the beholder, you can't get
more subjective than that.
You either are or you aren't.
That's not subjective that's objective.
Oops. I meant objective.
Of course you did.
Sarcasm is the lowest form of botdom.
You're now projecting.
The use of the word "projecting" suggests that you are a sock of Bruce,
or at the very least, one of his subroutines.
I woudn't know what or who "Bruce" is if it/he came and bit me, but if you
have been accused of projecting in the past perhaps you need to work out
what the common factor is?
No.
Then I refuse to believe you know what they are.
Fine, but being smacked over the head whilst closing your eyes doesn't
mean it hurts any less, no matter what you believe.
Closing my eyes does not prevent the signal from the nerve endings on
my skin. Try a better analogy.
And you refusing to believe doesn't prevent me from knowing what BNP
policies are and yet refusing to list any.
It suggest beyond all reasonable doubt that you don't actually have the
data you claim to.
It suggests nothing of the sort, unless your very suggestable; however the
73 policies that the BNP list use only 3 full stops, suggesting that
someone in the BNP is barely literate?
