Iceberg wrote:
"wenquan lee" <wenquanten... at (no spam) yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:7bd1ce52-a0a0-465f-a929-e1b6f1236f62 at (no spam) u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com....
very brief, and i suppose you might say quite pc and "standard".
however, his defence of nadal was interesting, not least because it
seems to be a question he is often asked.
http://www.ajc.com/sports/sampras-on-tennis-life-180682.html
Q: Is it possible there's a player on tour using performance-enhancing
drugs?
A: Across the board now, there might be an isolated incident here or
there. I don't think it's a regular thing in the sport. I don't think
it's anything to be too concerned about.
But people always ask me, ¡[Rafael] Nadal's got to be on the juice.'
There's no way the kid's on the juice. He's too good a guy. That's one
person people always ask me about because of his energy. I just think
he comes from a good background and isn't someone who would have to
cheat to be successful.
all the best,
this one's clearly a flame post / serious troll - the number of Fedfans that
will be riled by this will be off the scale :-)
I have a good idea they should abandon dope testing and just let Sampras
decide whether or not you are a good guy.
