Main Page | Report this Page
 
Hobby Forum Index  »  Heraldry  »  Balthus aka Balthazar Klossowski de Rola...
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Balthus aka Balthazar Klossowski de Rola...

Author Message
fatso...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:50 am
Guest
I have expressed some doubt here some time ago about the genetic
provenance, allegedly aristocratic
of polish origin, of famous painter of that name. The chap has been
celebrated by such giants of french
culture as poet Rilke and writer and gaullist politician, Andre Malroix.
He has had "tout Paris" at his feet in the
60-ties of last Century. I think due to pedophile nature of his work
which I was able to see recently for the first
time in my life, in Chicago Museum of Art.
The thing is, Balthus was quite proud of his Coat of Arms which he
displayed on kimonos and everywhere.
I have checked with my polish Almanach:
the CoA Rola does exist and is ascribed to polish noble family
Klossowski, nobilitated in 1560.
And here the mystery deepens. Although the polish nobility has saved the
jewish race from extinction no way, any
representative of them would be admitted to the ranks of Szlachta, in
those times at least. For make no mistake: Balthus was
a proper Ashenazim Jew, witness the death of his son Fumio, aged 2, from
typical and only jewish hereditary disease
named after Tay-Sachs. As the Klossowski family originated in East
Prussia, the question remains: at which stage
the genetic continuity has been broken here.

CoA Rola is simple but beautiful: in the red shield a white rose bud,
something akin to Yorkshire rose. Surrounded by
3 sickles placed like the aircraft propeller, implements to shear the
crops in the field. The word Rola means Arable Land
in polish language so quite aproppiate.

fatso
 
Turenne...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:50 am
Guest
As you suggest, there is little or no chance that Balthus was related
in any way to the noble Klossowskis. It's a bit like the British ex-
Home Secretary Michael Howard, who is Jewish, calling himself 'Michael
Howard de Norfolk'. Just because Balthus' surname was Klossowski
doesn't mean he has any right to the Szlachta arms of Rola.

Richard Lichten
 
Turenne...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:25 am
Guest
fatso wrote:

Quote:
DO NOT constitute a particularly "noble" genre unless Marquis de Sade....

That makes more sense!

RL
 
fatso...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:21 am
Guest
Turenne wrote:
Quote:
As you suggest, there is little or no chance that Balthus was related
in any way to the noble Klossowskis. It's a bit like the British ex-
Home Secretary Michael Howard, who is Jewish, calling himself 'Michael
Howard de Norfolk'. Just because Balthus' surname was Klossowski
doesn't mean he has any right to the Szlachta arms of Rola.

Richard Lichten


Thank you. I think, you will agree with me that following images,

produced by Balthus
constitute a particularly "noble" genre unless Marquis de Sade and
consortes to be included here as well.
Incidentally the last picture is the one I have seen with my own eyes in
Chicago Museum of Arts.

http://www.sauer-thompson.com/junkforcode/archives/Balthuserotic2.jpg
http://www.studio-international.co.uk/studio-images/balthus_alice_355.jpg
http://sauer-thompson.com/conversations/archives/Balthus5.jpg



fatso
 
fatso...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:23 am
Guest
Turenne wrote:
Quote:
As you suggest, there is little or no chance that Balthus was related
in any way to the noble Klossowskis. It's a bit like the British ex-
Home Secretary Michael Howard, who is Jewish, calling himself 'Michael
Howard de Norfolk'. Just because Balthus' surname was Klossowski
doesn't mean he has any right to the Szlachta arms of Rola.

Richard Lichten


Thank you. I think, you will agree with me that following images,

produced by Balthus
DO NOT constitute a particularly "noble" genre unless Marquis de Sade
and consortes to be included here as well.
Incidentally the last picture is the one I have seen with my own eyes in
Chicago Museum of Arts.

http://www.sauer-thompson.com/junkforcode/archives/Balthuserotic2.jpg
http://www.studio-international.co.uk/studio-images/balthus_alice_355.jpg
http://sauer-thompson.com/conversations/archives/Balthus5.jpg



fatso
 
Greg...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:19 pm
Guest
On 2 Nov, 02:50, fatso <fatso60... at (no spam) ntlworld.com> wrote:
Quote:
I have expressed some doubt here some time ago about the genetic
provenance, allegedly aristocratic
of polish origin, of famous painter of that name. The chap has been
celebrated by such giants of french
culture as poet Rilke and writer and gaullist politician, Andre Malroix.
He has had "tout Paris" at his feet in the
60-ties of last Century. I think due to pedophile nature of his work
which I was able to see recently for the first
time in my life, in Chicago Museum of Art.
The thing is, Balthus was quite proud of his Coat of Arms which he
displayed on kimonos  and everywhere.
I have checked with my polish Almanach:
the CoA Rola does exist and is ascribed to polish  noble family
Klossowski, nobilitated in 1560.
And here the mystery deepens. Although the polish nobility has saved the
jewish race from extinction no way, any
representative of them would be admitted to the ranks of Szlachta, in
those times at least. For make no mistake: Balthus was
a proper Ashenazim Jew, witness the death of his son Fumio, aged 2, from
typical and only jewish hereditary disease
named after Tay-Sachs.  As the Klossowski family originated in East
Prussia, the question remains: at which stage
the genetic continuity has been broken here.

CoA  Rola is simple but beautiful: in the red shield a white rose bud,
something akin to Yorkshire rose. Surrounded by
3 sickles placed like the aircraft propeller,  implements to shear the  
crops in the field. The word Rola means Arable Land
in polish language so quite aproppiate.

fatso

Are you then saying that this man is faking his connection? The
eastern Jews did a great deal of migrating, the Ashenazi being of
German origin if I'm not mistaken, and it is possible that that the
race slipped into the lineage. Of course it is also possible that
this man has just assumed these arms: I've seen them, and they are
quite striking.

What thesis are you offering?
 
Turenne...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:05 am
Guest
fatso wrote:

Quote:
Prince Czartoryski by virtue of History does have a first claim to the Throne of Poland.

No he hasn't. There has never been a Czartoryski King of Poland, and
there is no reason why there should ever be one.

Quote:
Prince Czartoryski does appear to be descended from the french Duc de Lauson

Evidence please; anyway I think you mean the Duc de Lauzun...

RL
 
fatso...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:05 am
Guest
Greg wrote:
Quote:

Are you then saying that this man is faking his connection? The
eastern Jews did a great deal of migrating, the Ashenazi being of
German origin if I'm not mistaken, and it is possible that that the
race slipped into the lineage. Of course it is also possible that
this man has just assumed these arms: I've seen them, and they are
quite striking.

What thesis are you offering?


From my research on-line the painter appearead to be genuinely
surprised, when confronted
with facts by interviewing person. My thesis therefore is a charitable
one: he is not a fake. He
does carry the noble lineage of Klossowski herbu Rola family. The
genetic lineage has been broken
by some enterprising Jew in the past, possibly many generation ago and
the said Ashkenazi,
i.e.Khazar, has improved the degenerate aristocratic stock by exchanging
a packet of sperm
with the lady of that name. Khazars are the most talented peoples on
Earth, vide a number
of Nobel Prizes awarded to them in the past.

Genetics and genealogy are two separate things.

Just an example, a most recent one: Prince Czartoryski from Canada has
agreed bravely to undergo
genetic testing. A brave decision as his predecessor on maternal side
200 yrs ago, Izabella nee Fleming
Czartoryski, used to practice a free love. Ugly rumours abounded that
the Noble Prince might be a descendant
of one Repnin, ambassador of Catherine the Great to Warsaw. If it were
to be confirmed the facts would
stand the Prince in the good stead, should he ever wish to prostitute
himself to the Russians. Repnin was a true
Rurikid, a descendant of Rurik, founder of Russia. But the problem
arises: Prince Czartoryski by virtue of History
does have a first claim to the Throne of Poland. After all his
forefather was uncrowned King while in exile in Paris
150 yrs ago. Poles would never accept a Russian on the Throne, after all
they have rebelled against so many in the past.
And now the result: Prince Czartoryski does appear to be descended from
the french Duc de Lauson(and many other names,
a marshal prince of France). The right choice for the bedchamber of
amorous Isabella just over 200 yrs ago. The donor of
a sperm packet, guillotined later in Paris during a French Revolution,
does enhance the standing of the noble modern Prince
Czartoryski in the eyes of the Poles. The sooner he grabs that Throne
the better as I cannot stand the paranoid dwarf
masquerading as president of that country today.


fatso
 
fatso...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:11 am
Guest
Turenne wrote:
Quote:
fatso wrote:


Prince Czartoryski by virtue of History does have a first claim to the Throne of Poland.

No he hasn't. There has never been a Czartoryski King of Poland, and
there is no reason why there should ever be one.


Prince Czartoryski does appear to be descended from the french Duc de Lauson

Evidence please; anyway I think you mean the Duc de Lauzun...

RL





I used to subscribe to specialist group involved with genetics of
nobility, hence information.
Have left it as it was too polish for me(expletives deleted)

f
 
fatso...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:19 am
Guest
Turenne wrote:
Quote:
fatso wrote:


Prince Czartoryski by virtue of History does have a first claim to the Throne of Poland.

No he hasn't. There has never been a Czartoryski King of Poland, and
there is no reason why there should ever be one.


Prince Czartoryski does appear to be descended from the french Duc de Lauson

Evidence please; anyway I think you mean the Duc de Lauzun...

RL





o yes, Prince Czartoryski, formerly the Foreing Affairs Minister to the
Tsar, Alexander, has defected
to the cause of Poland and has resided in Hotel Lambert in Paris. He was
regarded as an UNCROWNED
king and lauded as such by Chopin and Mickiewicz, the former the
romantic music composer, the latter
a poet of immense influence in Poland even today, a kind of Yates and
Garibaldi combined.
The rest of polish princes are a bunch of dwarves in comparison- so
Czartoryski will have to be the one.
And great-great grand-daddy the Duc de Lauzun, will do nicely. Yes, Sir.

fatso
 
Greg...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:01 pm
Guest
On 3 Nov, 02:05, fatso <fatso60... at (no spam) ntlworld.com> wrote:
Quote:
Greg wrote:

Are you then saying that this man is faking his connection?  The
eastern Jews did a great deal of migrating, the Ashenazi being of
German origin if I'm not mistaken, and it is possible that that the
race slipped into the lineage.  Of course it is also possible that
this man has just assumed these arms: I've seen them, and they are
quite striking.

What thesis are you offering?

 From my research on-line the painter appearead to be genuinely
surprised, when confronted
with facts by interviewing person. My thesis therefore is a charitable
one: he is not a fake. He
does carry the noble lineage of Klossowski herbu Rola family. The
genetic lineage has been broken
by some enterprising Jew in the past, possibly many generation ago and
the said Ashkenazi,
i.e.Khazar, has improved the degenerate aristocratic stock by exchanging
a packet of sperm
with the lady of that name. Khazars are the most talented peoples on
Earth, vide a number
of Nobel Prizes awarded to them in the past.

Genetics and  genealogy are two separate things.

Just an example, a most recent one: Prince Czartoryski from Canada has
agreed bravely to undergo
genetic testing. A brave decision as his predecessor on maternal side
200 yrs ago, Izabella nee Fleming
Czartoryski, used to practice a free love. Ugly rumours abounded that
the Noble Prince might be a descendant
of one Repnin, ambassador of Catherine the Great to Warsaw. If it were
to be confirmed the facts would
stand the Prince in the good stead, should he ever wish to prostitute
himself to the Russians. Repnin was a true
Rurikid, a descendant of  Rurik, founder of Russia. But the problem
arises: Prince Czartoryski by virtue of History
does have a first claim to the Throne of Poland. After all his
forefather was uncrowned King while in exile in Paris
150 yrs ago. Poles would never accept a Russian on the Throne, after all
they have rebelled against so many in the past.
And now the result: Prince Czartoryski does appear to be descended from
the french  Duc de Lauson(and many other names,
a marshal prince of France). The right choice for the bedchamber of  
amorous Isabella just over 200 yrs ago. The donor of
a sperm packet, guillotined later in Paris during a French Revolution,
does enhance the standing of the noble modern Prince
Czartoryski in the eyes of the Poles. The sooner he grabs that Throne
the better as I cannot stand the paranoid dwarf
masquerading as president of that country today.

fatso

Thanks for the explanation: I too mentioned that some that someone may
have slipped in . . .

The question I have then, is, since the man appears to be a legitimate
member of the family, why would his sprorting these arms cause you
concern?

If, on the other hand you are asserting that he carries the name only
and was not perhaps legitimized as an heir that could claim the arms,
then I can see your point perhaps, but with the modern world being
what it is, it seems that all's fair. So could perhaps narrow down
your point?
 
fatso...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:44 am
Guest
Greg wrote:
Quote:

The question I have then, is, since the man appears to be a legitimate
member of the family, why would his sprorting these arms cause you
concern?


I thought, initially, that our Balthus was a total fake. Now, having
read about him, I just think him
to be a genuine Klossowski de Rola, with interesting genetical makeup-
hence his many talents.

fatso
 
David E. Cohen...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:22 am
Guest
Genetic studies have shown that the Khazar component in the ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews is very
minor. Bringing it back on topic, it would have been interesting, heraldically speaking, if the
Khaganate of Khazaria had survived a few more centuries, since heraldry there would have developed
in a Jewish milieu, rather than a Christian one.


"fatso" <fatso60347 at (no spam) ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:LfTHm.26850$Ah3.8477 at (no spam) newsfe01.ams2...[edited]
Quote:
From my research on-line the painter appearead to be genuinely surprised, when confronted
with facts by interviewing person. My thesis therefore is a charitable one: he is not a fake. He
does carry the noble lineage of Klossowski herbu Rola family. The genetic lineage has been broken
by some enterprising Jew in the past, possibly many generation ago and the said Ashkenazi,
i.e.Khazar, has improved the degenerate aristocratic stock by exchanging a packet of sperm
with the lady of that name. Khazars are the most talented peoples on Earth, vide a number
of Nobel Prizes awarded to them in the past.
 
Greg...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:52 am
Guest
On 3 Nov, 23:44, fatso <fatso60... at (no spam) ntlworld.com> wrote:
Quote:
Greg wrote:

The question I have then, is, since the man appears to be a legitimate
member of the family, why would his sprorting these arms cause you
concern?

I thought, initially, that our Balthus was a total fake. Now, having
read about him, I just think him
to be a genuine Klossowski de Rola, with interesting genetical makeup-
hence his many talents.

fatso

Got it. Thanks very much.
 
fatso...
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:31 am
Guest
David E. Cohen wrote:
Quote:
Genetic studies have shown that the Khazar component in the ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews is very
minor. Bringing it back on topic, it would have been interesting, heraldically speaking, if the
Khaganate of Khazaria had survived a few more centuries, since heraldry there would have developed
in a Jewish milieu, rather than a Christian one.


I beg to differ, Sir. I came to believe that Khazar component, as you
name it, has made Ashkenazim a chosen people, a special lot
endowed with certain superior qualities in mental faculties. I base
myself not on some jewish book from the bronze era but on physiology
of human brain. But that is the moot point, we are here to discuss the
armorials.

It so happens that I have studied at some lenght jewish armorials os
spanich origin. Have become fascinated by another puzzle, you see:
Who was the lucky owner of the set of 12 silver plates, graced with
this CoA: http://tiny.cc/NamXQ
This armorial is noted for one rare element, the Duck, symbol of
industriousness and perseverance, I believe. Besides, it is much more
complicated that my own, Ogonczyk(Powala) given for reference here:
http://tiny.cc/NamXQ

So I have looked up the people who might pride themselves more in the
above mentioned virtues then blood and gore, as my lot visibly did, and
have come across
those sephardic in origin jewish spanish armorials. No ducks here. Is it
a forbidden food for Jews(like pork, hare, blood etc)?

I came to believe eventually that it was a property of a Brasilian
Emperor POedro II, or one of his ilk, before it fell into my rapacious lap.
Any ideas?

fatso
 
 
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:06 am