Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Music - Classical  »  Does Lenny's Shost 7 CSO broadcast exist?...
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Does Lenny's Shost 7 CSO broadcast exist?...

Author Message
Eddie...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:32 pm
Guest
Bernstein's Shostokovich 7 withe the CSO is the one I keep returning
to. The closing moments in particular are unsurpassed for me. I'd love
to hear the original radio broadcast, if there in fact was one, or a
private recording perhaps, Can anyone confirm if in fact it was done
at any time in front of an audience? The audience response must have
been tremendous...

Eddie
 
JohnA...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:32 pm
Guest
On Oct 25, 1:32 pm, Eddie <zimickimo... at (no spam) optonline.net> wrote:
Quote:
Bernstein's Shostokovich 7 withe the CSO is the one I keep returning
to. The closing moments in particular are unsurpassed for me. I'd love
to hear the original radio broadcast, if there in fact was one, or a
private recording perhaps, Can anyone confirm if in fact it was done
at any time in front of an audience? The audience response must have
been tremendous...

Eddie

Well, in the booklet to my copy it says "Live Recording"...
 
...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:32 pm
Guest
On Oct 25, 1:32�pm, Eddie <zimickimo... at (no spam) optonline.net> wrote:
Quote:
Bernstein's Shostokovich 7 withe the CSO is the one I keep returning
to. The closing moments in particular are unsurpassed for me. I'd love
to hear the original radio broadcast, if there in fact was one, or a
private recording perhaps, Can anyone confirm if in fact it was done
at any time in front of an audience? The audience response must have
been tremendous...

Eddie

It was indeed done before an audience, several times, as usual for
the CSO series. There was a subsequent broadcast on WFMT, syndicated
by them as well. That would have been edited from the various
performances and rehearsals by Norman Pellegrini. The issued recording
on DG, made at the live performances, was a different production from
the broadcast. Someone, somewhere, probably has a recording of the
WFMT broadcast.

I was at the initial (Thursday night) performance. I remember the
audience response as very enthusiastic, although everyone I spoke to
said that they found Bernstein's slow tempi surprising and, for some,
hard to accept. (I confess that my friend and I were among them.) But
he got a tremendous reception regardless. Bernstein hadn't conducted
the CSO since 1950. I think people were thrilled to see and hear him
conduct in person -- and in person he radiated immense charisma. It
was just part of him, like Leopold Stokowski or Karajan. And there was
his colossal fame too, of course. Some of the enthusiasm might have
been for Bernstein himself.

Anyway, you might be able to find a tape of the broadcast somewhere.
Good luck with your quest.

Don Tait
 
OW...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:28 pm
Guest
Quote:
It was indeed done before an audience, several times, as usual for
the CSO series. There was a subsequent broadcast on WFMT, syndicated
by them as well. That would have been edited from the various
performances and rehearsals by Norman Pellegrini. The issued recording
on DG, made at the live performances, was a different production from
the broadcast. Someone, somewhere, probably has a recording of the
WFMT broadcast.


Wouldn't it be in the CSO archive?
 
...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:22 am
Guest
On Oct 26, 7:28�pm, OW <bjm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Quote:
� It was indeed done before an audience, several times, as usual for
the �CSO series. There was a subsequent broadcast on WFMT, syndicated
by them as well. That would have been edited from the various
performances and rehearsals by Norman Pellegrini. The issued recording
on DG, made at the live performances, was a different production from
the broadcast. Someone, somewhere, probably has a recording of the
WFMT broadcast.

�Wouldn't it be in the CSO archive?

Yes, it is. The WFMT tape used for the broadcast. I had the
impression that the original poster would enjoy having a copy of it. I
have not re-read the post, and could be mistaken. In any case, it's my
understanding that the CSO Archives will not duplicate recordings for
individuals.

Don Tait
 
OW...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:08 pm
Guest
Quote:


Yes, it is. The WFMT tape used for the broadcast. I had the
impression that the original poster would enjoy having a copy of it. I
have not re-read the post, and could be mistaken. In any case, it's my
understanding that the CSO Archives will not duplicate recordings for
individuals.

Yes, that's understandable, although it's too bad that there isn't
some convenient way to get at them, especially if the CSO is no longer
issuing their annual CDs of archival recordings. I can think of two
instances offhand of being slightly disappointed in a CSO CD release
(Solti Bruckner 4th, and the Abbado Symphonie Phantastique) because I
remembered the WFMT broadcast performance as being so much more
stunning. Perhaps being in concert gave the orchestra the kind of
swagger that allowed them to really tee off on the piece in a way that
could not be duplicated in a studio. Of course I didn't make a
recording of those particular broadcasts, so I don't have the
evidence, just my fading memory.
 
Steve de Mena...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:45 pm
Guest
OW wrote:
Quote:

Yes, it is. The WFMT tape used for the broadcast. I had the
impression that the original poster would enjoy having a copy of it. I
have not re-read the post, and could be mistaken. In any case, it's my
understanding that the CSO Archives will not duplicate recordings for
individuals.

Yes, that's understandable, although it's too bad that there isn't
some convenient way to get at them, especially if the CSO is no longer
issuing their annual CDs of archival recordings. I can think of two
instances offhand of being slightly disappointed in a CSO CD release
(Solti Bruckner 4th, and the Abbado Symphonie Phantastique) because I
remembered the WFMT broadcast performance as being so much more
stunning. Perhaps being in concert gave the orchestra the kind of
swagger that allowed them to really tee off on the piece in a way that
could not be duplicated in a studio. Of course I didn't make a
recording of those particular broadcasts, so I don't have the
evidence, just my fading memory.

But this Bernstein DG CD originated from live concerts, so not sure
why the OP was wanting a copy of an WFMT broadcast, unless he wanted
it for different micing or a different choice of edits (from multiple
performances) used.

Steve
 
jrsnfld...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:40 pm
Guest
On Oct 27, 5:45 pm, Steve de Mena <st... at (no spam) stevedemena.com> wrote:

Quote:
I can think of two
instances offhand of being slightly disappointed in a CSO CD release
(Solti Bruckner 4th, and the Abbado Symphonie Phantastique) because I
remembered the WFMT broadcast performance as being so much more
stunning. Perhaps being in concert gave the orchestra the kind of
swagger that allowed them to really tee off on the piece in a way that
could not be duplicated in a studio. Of course I didn't make a
recording of those particular broadcasts, so I don't have the
evidence, just my fading memory.

I remember recording the Berlioz, not the Bruckner, for some reason. I
agree the broadcasts tended to be considerably more compelling. I
think some of the difference is in the engineering. That was "early"
digital, which often left a rather nasty aftertaste. Actually the
Abbado Berlioz seemed a bit better sounding to me recently when I
finally bought it on CD last year. I remember being very disappointed
by the super-wide unlistenable dynamic range, fuzzy perspective,
brightness in the climaxes, and limp presence of the LP.

Quote:

But this Bernstein DG CD originated from live concerts, so not sure
why the OP was wanting a copy of an WFMT broadcast, unless he wanted
it for different micing or a different choice of edits (from multiple
performances) used.

Steve

I was wondering the same thing.

--Jeff
 
M forever...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:22 pm
Guest
On Oct 27, 8:08 pm, OW <bjm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Quote:
  Yes, it is. The WFMT tape used for the broadcast. I had the
impression that the original poster would enjoy having a copy of it. I
have not re-read the post, and could be mistaken. In any case, it's my
understanding that the CSO Archives will not duplicate recordings for
individuals.

Yes, that's understandable, although it's too bad that there isn't
some convenient way to get at them, especially if the CSO is no longer
issuing their annual CDs of archival recordings. I can think of two
instances offhand of being slightly disappointed in a CSO CD release
(Solti Bruckner 4th, and the Abbado Symphonie Phantastique) because I
remembered the WFMT broadcast performance as being so much more
stunning. Perhaps being in concert gave the orchestra the kind of
swagger that allowed them to really tee off on the piece in a way that
could not be duplicated in a studio. Of course I didn't make a
recording of those particular broadcasts, so I don't have the
evidence, just my fading memory.

Could be either way, but studio doesn't necessarily mean lack of
intensity or "swagger". Some of the best CSO recordings I know, e.g.
Mahler 9 and Schubert 4 with Giulini, are studio recordings.
 
Heck51...
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:26 am
Guest
On Oct 27, 8:08 pm, OW <bjm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:

Quote:
Yes, that's understandable, although it's too bad that there isn't
some convenient way to get at them, especially if the CSO is no longer
issuing their annual CDs of archival recordings.>>.

it is too bad the CSO is not releasing past broadcast/recorded
performances - I tped some superb concerts that I was hoping would
appear on archival release -

from '87 - Solti: Strauss - Ein Heldenleben - amazing performance,
recorded in excellent sound

from '95 - Mehta: Strauss - Symphonia Domestica - again, a superb
performance - unbelievable playing...recorded very well. single
performance, or composite?? who cares?? the performance is amazing.

Barenboim: Corigliano - Sym #1. I like the broadcast performance
better than the CD release - more presence, more dramatic...I read
[Donald Peck's book, IIRC] that the CD version was recorded by a
different recording engineer, or different team from the usual...I
wonder if that means the broadcast version is from different
engineering than the CD.
 
Peter T. Daniels...
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:54 am
Guest
On Oct 28, 11:44 am, Bob Harper <bob.har... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
Heck51 wrote:
On Oct 27, 8:08 pm, OW <bjm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:

Yes, that's understandable, although it's too bad that there isn't
some convenient way to get at them, especially if the CSO is no longer
issuing their annual CDs of archival recordings.>>.

it is too bad the CSO is not releasing past broadcast/recorded
performances - I tped some superb concerts that I was hoping would
appear on archival release -

from '87 - Solti: Strauss - Ein Heldenleben - amazing performance,
recorded in excellent sound

from '95 - Mehta: Strauss - Symphonia Domestica - again, a superb
performance - unbelievable playing...recorded very well. single
performance, or composite?? who cares?? the performance is amazing.

Barenboim: Corigliano - Sym #1. I like the broadcast performance
better than the CD release - more presence, more dramatic...I read
[Donald Peck's book, IIRC] that the CD version was recorded by a
different recording engineer, or different team from the usual...I
wonder if that means the broadcast version is from different
engineering than the CD.

Until a few years ago, CSO broadcasts were recorded by engineers from
WFMT. I know that is no longer the case, but I wonder whether the
engineers from the record companies during and after WFMT's involvement
in broadcasts talked with WFMT's people and learned from them how to get
the best sound out of Orchestra Hall. I suspect Don Tait might have
something to say about this, if he chooses to do so.

Remember Orchestra Hall was rebuilt (yet again) a few years ago, so
all the experience of WFMT's engineers might be for naught.
 
...
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:05 am
Guest
On Oct 28, 10:44�am, Bob Harper <bob.har... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:

[snip]

Quote:
Until a few years ago, CSO broadcasts were recorded by engineers from
WFMT. I know that is no longer the case, but I wonder whether the
engineers from the record companies during and after WFMT's involvement
in broadcasts talked with WFMT's people and learned from them how to get
the best sound out of Orchestra Hall. I suspect Don Tait might have
something to say about this, if he chooses to do so.

Bob Harper

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but although I announced the
broadcasts after 1996 I was never involved in WFMT's engineering and
didn't talk about this to our engineers who recorded the concerts. I'm
a bit surprised that I didn't, frankly. I'll try to ask one or two of
them and reply. This is an interesting question.

Don Tait
 
...
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:23 am
Guest
On Oct 28, 12:54�pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma... at (no spam) verizon.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 28, 11:44�am, Bob Harper <bob.har... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:

Until a few years ago, CSO broadcasts were recorded by engineers from
WFMT. I know that is no longer the case, but I wonder whether the
engineers from the record companies during and after WFMT's involvement
in broadcasts talked with WFMT's people and learned from them how to get
the best sound out of Orchestra Hall. I suspect Don Tait might have
something to say about this, if he chooses to do so.

Remember Orchestra Hall was rebuilt (yet again) a few years ago, so
all the experience of WFMT's engineers might be for naught.

Orchestra Hall's last renovation was in mid-1997. WFMT went on
recording the concerts for broadcast until funding for the broadcasts
was lost in autumn 2001. I was told by our main engineer about the
different microphone placements he used and finally settled upon to
adjust to the altered acoustics in the years after autumn 1997.

Recording performances live for release was begun by companies during
the 1980s (the Bernstein Shostakovich symphonies date from 1987). In
any case, I had the impression that Bob Harper's question concerned
the fifteen or so years when WFMT's and the companies' engineers were
both working live. Again, I'll try to ask some questions and reply.

Don Tait
 
Bob Harper...
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:44 am
Guest
Heck51 wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 27, 8:08 pm, OW <bjm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:

Yes, that's understandable, although it's too bad that there isn't
some convenient way to get at them, especially if the CSO is no longer
issuing their annual CDs of archival recordings.>>.

it is too bad the CSO is not releasing past broadcast/recorded
performances - I tped some superb concerts that I was hoping would
appear on archival release -

from '87 - Solti: Strauss - Ein Heldenleben - amazing performance,
recorded in excellent sound

from '95 - Mehta: Strauss - Symphonia Domestica - again, a superb
performance - unbelievable playing...recorded very well. single
performance, or composite?? who cares?? the performance is amazing.

Barenboim: Corigliano - Sym #1. I like the broadcast performance
better than the CD release - more presence, more dramatic...I read
[Donald Peck's book, IIRC] that the CD version was recorded by a
different recording engineer, or different team from the usual...I
wonder if that means the broadcast version is from different
engineering than the CD.

Until a few years ago, CSO broadcasts were recorded by engineers from
WFMT. I know that is no longer the case, but I wonder whether the
engineers from the record companies during and after WFMT's involvement
in broadcasts talked with WFMT's people and learned from them how to get
the best sound out of Orchestra Hall. I suspect Don Tait might have
something to say about this, if he chooses to do so.

Bob Harper
 
Peter T. Daniels...
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:32 am
Guest
On Oct 28, 2:23 pm, Dontaitchic... at (no spam) aol.com wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 28, 12:54 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma... at (no spam) verizon.net> wrote:

On Oct 28, 11:44 am, Bob Harper <bob.har... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:

Until a few years ago, CSO broadcasts were recorded by engineers from
WFMT. I know that is no longer the case, but I wonder whether the
engineers from the record companies during and after WFMT's involvement
in broadcasts talked with WFMT's people and learned from them how to get
the best sound out of Orchestra Hall. I suspect Don Tait might have
something to say about this, if he chooses to do so.

Remember Orchestra Hall was rebuilt (yet again) a few years ago, so
all the experience of WFMT's engineers might be for naught.

  Orchestra Hall's last renovation was in mid-1997. WFMT went on
recording the concerts for broadcast until funding for the broadcasts
was lost in autumn 2001. I was told by our main engineer about the
different microphone placements he used and finally settled upon to
adjust to the altered acoustics in the years after autumn 1997.

So it took "years" to "settle on" a solution. Do the broadcasts (or
apparently, the performance tapes) now sound as good as the broadcasts
before?

Quote:
 Recording performances live for release was begun by companies during
the 1980s (the Bernstein Shostakovich symphonies date from 1987). In
any case, I had the impression that Bob Harper's question concerned
the fifteen or so years when WFMT's and the companies' engineers were
both working live. Again, I'll try to ask some questions and reply.

  Don Tait
 
 
Page 1 of 3    Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 30, 2009 12:43 am