| |
 |
|
| Hobby Forum Index » Sport - Cricket » Highest Score in 4's and 6's: An Aslam Question... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Suresh K S... |
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
What is the highest individual score in an ODI made through 4's and
6's alone? In other words, what is the highest score made in an ODI
where the batsman did not score any singles, 2's or 3's? I suppose 5's
should be allowed there as they may have resulted from a 4+1
combination (although more often that not they must have happened
because of overthrows on a 1 or 2 or 3 - but let us allow these so
that writing the data extraction query becomes easier).
What is the highest such score in Test Cricket?
Suresh |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Suresh K S... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 25, 8:18 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf... at (no spam) artifax.net> wrote:
Thanks for that list. This Pettini guy must be something. 114 raised
with only hits to the ropes. Never heard of him before this. Was it
one of the freak Cricketing incidents (like RJS hitting 6 sixers in an
over)? If not why are selectors not slavering over him?
Suresh |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| jzfredricks... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 26, 6:38 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf... at (no spam) artifax.net> wrote:
Quote: Mark Pettini is a useful county cricketer who now captains Essex but the
truth is the 114* was scored in contrived circumstances against
'declaration' bowling. He scored his runs off 29 balls as Essex reached
186/0 in 9.4 overs (DDJ Robinson 4.4-0-117-0). The entire innings occupied
24 minutes.
Still bloody impressive. It means he didn't miss hit one. Any idea why
this was "agreed" to? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| arahim... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 25, 3:16 pm, jzfredricks <jzfredri... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 26, 6:38 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf... at (no spam) artifax.net> wrote:
Mark Pettini is a useful county cricketer who now captains Essex but the
truth is the 114* was scored in contrived circumstances against
'declaration' bowling. He scored his runs off 29 balls as Essex reached
186/0 in 9.4 overs (DDJ Robinson 4.4-0-117-0). The entire innings occupied
24 minutes.
Still bloody impressive. It means he didn't miss hit one. Any idea why
this was "agreed" to?
Maybe he did but no one was stopping or catching anything. The bowler
is pretty impressive in his accuracy in feeding the ball otherwise.
Wonder how many other sports would allow a deliberate fix. Something
that is done routinely in fc cricket. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Suresh K S... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 25, 6:16 pm, jzfredricks <jzfredri... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Still bloody impressive. It means he didn't miss hit one. Any idea why
this was "agreed" to?
Good grief! Are you saying that it was fixed when you say "agreed to"?
What are the Bombay bookies doing in Essex?
Suresh |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Andrew Dunford... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Suresh K S" <sureshkarathinnai at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b53e1c4-bf55-44c9-aacb-3bf7976b402b at (no spam) 31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
Quote: On Oct 25, 8:18 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf... at (no spam) artifax.net> wrote:
Andrew
Thanks for that list. This Pettini guy must be something. 114 raised
with only hits to the ropes. Never heard of him before this. Was it
one of the freak Cricketing incidents (like RJS hitting 6 sixers in an
over)? If not why are selectors not slavering over him?
Suresh
Mark Pettini is a useful county cricketer who now captains Essex but the
truth is the 114* was scored in contrived circumstances against
'declaration' bowling. He scored his runs off 29 balls as Essex reached
186/0 in 9.4 overs (DDJ Robinson 4.4-0-117-0). The entire innings occupied
24 minutes.
Andrew |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mike Holmans... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:37:17 -0700 (PDT), Suresh K S
<sureshkarathinnai at (no spam) gmail.com> tapped the keyboard and brought forth:
Quote: On Oct 25, 6:16 pm, jzfredricks <jzfredri... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Still bloody impressive. It means he didn't miss hit one. Any idea why
this was "agreed" to?
Good grief! Are you saying that it was fixed when you say "agreed to"?
What are the Bombay bookies doing in Essex?
Nothing to do with Bombay bookies. Everything to do with arranged
declarations in the last stages of a county championship match. It's
clear that the side batting third won't reach a declaration target
until there is far too little time to have a chance of bowling the
other side out, so the game will peter out into a draw. Unless the
captains agree that 350 in 75 overs is a resonable target, which means
that the team batting third would need another 100 in 13 overs so they
are served up donkeydrops and long hops to smash around to reach the
agreed total. That way both sides get to chase the win bonus, which is
reasonably hefty in points terms.
It is, of course, a travesty, but it's meant a lot more results and
many more interesting last days of matches than would otherwise have
been the case. It has no doubt gone on for a lot longer than anyone
cares to admit: I think it highly likely that the odd amateur captain
said something or other over lunch to his opposite number about how
sporting a declaration would be at a certain score and that a nod was
as good as a wink to a blind bat.
Cheers,
Mike
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Suresh K S... |
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:41 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 27, 1:24 pm, Sreeram <sreeram.b.i... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: As of 2001, the record was Guy Whittall's 22 (4x4, 1x6) inhttp://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/66218.html , but they have
played a thousand ODIs since then.
The HS in Tests is supposedly 32 (8x4) by Alex Tudor in 1999 and
Sanath Jayasuriya in 1997. Tudor scored 99* in the other innings of
that match, Jayasuriya scored 199.
Thanks Sreeram. Those numbers are lower than I expected. Especially in
ODIs. I'd have thought a Gilchrist somewhere would have blazed to a 50
or thereabouts in hits to the fence. May be somebody has exceeded that
mark in the last few years.
I had a vague recollection (before this post) of Roy Fredricks having
hit the highest in 4s and 6s. His innings at Perth many years ago -
when he took on Lillian-Thomson? - was spoken of in hushed tones at
home (IIRC WI won that test easily but were beaten rather badly in the
series by Aussies under Ian Chappell (?)).
Suresh |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| prabhu... |
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 27, 11:41 am, Suresh K S <sureshkarathin... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 27, 1:24 pm, Sreeram <sreeram.b.i... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As of 2001, the record was Guy Whittall's 22 (4x4, 1x6) inhttp://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/66218.html , but they have
played a thousand ODIs since then.
The HS in Tests is supposedly 32 (8x4) by Alex Tudor in 1999 and
Sanath Jayasuriya in 1997. Tudor scored 99* in the other innings of
that match, Jayasuriya scored 199.
Thanks Sreeram. Those numbers are lower than I expected. Especially in
ODIs. I'd have thought a Gilchrist somewhere would have blazed to a 50
or thereabouts in hits to the fence. May be somebody has exceeded that
mark in the last few years.
Could be reasons for this atleast in tests. Once a batsman decides to
go hell for leather(especially with the tail for company), the natural
response would be to move fielders to the fence, encouraging the
single.
Interestingly, both Jayasuriya and Tudor's essays were not really biff
and whack stuff, Sanath having 30 dots. Tudor came in at 45-7 and had
54 dots. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| prabhu... |
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 9:44 am, dodo <dodo... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 27, 2:41 pm, Suresh K S <sureshkarathin... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 1:24 pm, Sreeram <sreeram.b.i... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As of 2001, the record was Guy Whittall's 22 (4x4, 1x6) inhttp://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/66218.html , but they have
played a thousand ODIs since then.
The HS in Tests is supposedly 32 (8x4) by Alex Tudor in 1999 and
Sanath Jayasuriya in 1997. Tudor scored 99* in the other innings of
that match, Jayasuriya scored 199.
Thanks Sreeram. Those numbers are lower than I expected. Especially in
ODIs. I'd have thought a Gilchrist somewhere would have blazed to a 50
or thereabouts in hits to the fence. May be somebody has exceeded that
mark in the last few years.
I had a vague recollection (before this post) of Roy Fredricks having
hit the highest in 4s and 6s. His innings at Perth many years ago -
when he took on Lillian-Thomson? - was spoken of in hushed tones at
home (IIRC WI won that test easily but were beaten rather badly in the
series by Aussies under Ian Chappell (?)).
Suresh
I believe GR Viswanath had 25 fours in his debut 137 (in the 2nd
innings).
This now leads to the question, what test score has the highest
percentage of boundaries. (Seem to recollect a discussion like this on
rsc a few years ago ... )- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
From some of the numbers I played with(scores < 200), a few surprises
besides the usual suspects.
Gilmour 101 20x4 1x6
Gibbs 147 28x4 2x6
Dippenaar 100 21x4
Laxman 124 25x4 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| jzfredricks... |
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 26, 11:01 am, Mike Holmans <m... at (no spam) jackalope.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: It is, of course, a travesty, but it's meant a lot more results and
many more interesting last days of matches than would otherwise have
been the case.
I'm personally not sure if it is a travesty. As a captain there have
been times when I've BEGGED the oppo captain to declare early and give
us an "impossible" chase, often "to make a game of it, there's no way
we'll get those runs".
From MY p.o.v, the oppo declaring is the ONLY way my team can win.
From HIS p.o.v, he increases his chance of losing (as we may score
those runs), but he also increases his chance of an outright win. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Andrew Dunford... |
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"prabhu" <prabrangs at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e1ea3c17-4ecc-4f88-8b8f-03711df9269f at (no spam) e34g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
Quote: On Oct 28, 9:44 am, dodo <dodo... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 2:41 pm, Suresh K S <sureshkarathin... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 1:24 pm, Sreeram <sreeram.b.i... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As of 2001, the record was Guy Whittall's 22 (4x4, 1x6)
inhttp://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/66218.html , but they have
played a thousand ODIs since then.
The HS in Tests is supposedly 32 (8x4) by Alex Tudor in 1999 and
Sanath Jayasuriya in 1997. Tudor scored 99* in the other innings of
that match, Jayasuriya scored 199.
Thanks Sreeram. Those numbers are lower than I expected. Especially in
ODIs. I'd have thought a Gilchrist somewhere would have blazed to a 50
or thereabouts in hits to the fence. May be somebody has exceeded that
mark in the last few years.
I had a vague recollection (before this post) of Roy Fredricks having
hit the highest in 4s and 6s. His innings at Perth many years ago -
when he took on Lillian-Thomson? - was spoken of in hushed tones at
home (IIRC WI won that test easily but were beaten rather badly in the
series by Aussies under Ian Chappell (?)).
Suresh
I believe GR Viswanath had 25 fours in his debut 137 (in the 2nd
innings).
This now leads to the question, what test score has the highest
percentage of boundaries. (Seem to recollect a discussion like this on
rsc a few years ago ... )- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
From some of the numbers I played with(scores < 200), a few surprises
besides the usual suspects.
Gilmour 101 20x4 1x6
Gibbs 147 28x4 2x6
Dippenaar 100 21x4
Laxman 124 25x4
Playing around with some smaller scores...
Lowest score to contain 10 fours:
43 GS Sobers WI v Aus at Bridgetown 1954/55
44 N Hussain Eng v NZ at Birmingham 1999
Note that Hussain's 44 was scored in the same match as Tudor's 32* (8x4) and
99* (21x4) double.
Lowest score to contain 15 fours:
66 CH Gayle WI v Pak at Sharjah 2001/02
Lowest score to contain 20 fours:
98 AB de Villiers SAf v Zim at Cape Town 2004/05
99* (21x4) AJ Tudor Eng v NZ at Birmingham 1999
Lowest score to contain 25 fours:
124* VVS Laxman Ind v NZ at Napier 2008/09
132* (26x4) RS Kaluwitharana Sl v Aus at Colombo 1992
Lowest score to contain 3 sixes:
18* CA Walsh WI v Eng at Bridgetown 1993/94
Lowest score to contain 5 sixes:
54 JH Kallis SAf v Zim at Cape Town 2004/05
Lowest score to contain 8 sixes:
77 (9x6) TG Southee NZ v Eng at Napier 2007/08
(the next lowest score is 120)
Lowest score to contain 10 sixes:
222 (11x6) NJ Astle NZ v Eng at Christchurch 2001/02
Andrew |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:44 am
|
|