Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Skydiving  »  Snuffy's two big lies...
Page 2 of 4    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Snuffy's two big lies...

Author Message
Big Jim...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:16 am
Guest
Okay Mike, it is also my opinion that facts can be implied, they don't
necessarily have to be literally stated.

I have already provided my quote.

You are an intelligent man and therefore there is no need to walk you thru
this. The implication is obvious.
Snuffy's assertion is obvious. If you don't want to see it or acknowledge
that you see it, that's your call to make.

I don't know Mr. Smith and don't know anyone who does. I do know that the
primary persona that he plays on rec. since I have been around (since 1999)
is one that consistently posts boastful fabrications that are obvious and
often posts contradictory claims that indicate that one or both posts are
lies.
The examples are numerous and that is fact, not opinion.

So, Mike, what is your opinion ? Do the facts indicate that the Snuffy
persona that Mr. Smith most frequently plays here on rec. is the persona of
an honest man?


"Mike Spurgeon" <mike at (no spam) spurgeon.net> wrote in message
news:4AE4B27B.2040306 at (no spam) spurgeon.net...
Quote:
Big Jim wrote:
"Mike Spurgeon" <mike at (no spam) spurgeon.net> wrote in message
news:4AE3BAEA.6080303 at (no spam) spurgeon.net...
Big Jim wrote:

He is now:
1. Claiming he is not a liar.
How so. Give us a quote...

Okay Mike here it is

Another flaw you have besides fear is calling your seniors a liar. A
sure sign you are one yourself, thieves and liars most often accuse
others of the same behaviour...I've told a few sea stories in my time
but earned the right by long service in the far reaches of the world.
J. Smith 10/22/09

Typically, Mike, your denial takes the form of a hair splitting,
semantics based argument. My guess is that is the rebuttal, if any we
will see here.

You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

Give us a quote where he says he's not a liar, since it's your claim, and
apparently your opinion.
 
Big Jim...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:04 pm
Guest
So dingleberry, what is this outburst of immaturity that I owe Mike an
apology for?

Mike and I are having a discussion, that's all.
BTW the discussion is ABOUT you, not FOR you.
Surly, you are too ignorant to understand the difference, it's just a little
bit subtle.

Fact is, you are butting in with some irrelevant opinion.
Further fact is your opinion and $19.95, plus shipping, will get 25 barf
bags at www.barfbagstore.com


"the unknown flailer" <thuythu at (no spam) iwon.com> wrote in message
news:9329014b-3db9-4a5a-84cf-baa060702ac7 at (no spam) g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 12:18 pm, "Big Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
"Mike Spurgeon" <m... at (no spam) spurgeon.net> wrote in message

snip Biggy Jim's outburst of immaturity

The elder community is waiting to see if your going to be a man Biggy
Mouth and apologize to M.S. for being wrong and arguing about it with
a wiser man. Put aside your emotional hard on for me and do the right
thing---Apologize to the Lodi Wiz! I won't laugh, if I do I would be a
liar for saying I won't then doing it...Come on do the right thing
kid. MAN UP!!!!
0~WinkP
 
the unknown flailer...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:23 pm
Guest
On Oct 26, 4:34 pm, "Small Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
Winsor-

To come here and expect anything that is or won't soon become an encounter
with Snuffy is either naive or the act of a newby.
You are neither. As you so eloquently put it, this is Mr. S's personal
cesspool and will never be anything else. Different people have different
motivations for being involved with rec. But, if you are going to be
involved with it, involvement with J. Smith is inevitable. It has been shown
time and time again that kill files or other forms of ignoring him are
futile. He comes with the territory.
One could make a strong argument that he is the territory.

It's about obsolescence. The obsolete rule this obsolete portal in an
obsolete corner of the internet.

Love it or leave it.

Small jim, leave Winsor and Mike alone....If you want to be bitch

slapped come over here to big daddy.
Winsor has control issues and Mike is too intelligent for you to deal
with, come to BIG DADDY, he's got some shit to teach you about manning
up!!! Hoowah 0~;-*
 
Big Jim...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:34 pm
Guest
Winsor-

To come here and expect anything that is or won't soon become an encounter
with Snuffy is either naive or the act of a newby.
You are neither. As you so eloquently put it, this is Mr. S's personal
cesspool and will never be anything else. Different people have different
motivations for being involved with rec. But, if you are going to be
involved with it, involvement with J. Smith is inevitable. It has been shown
time and time again that kill files or other forms of ignoring him are
futile. He comes with the territory.
One could make a strong argument that he is the territory.

It's about obsolescence. The obsolete rule this obsolete portal in an
obsolete corner of the internet.

Love it or leave it.

"Winsor Naugler" <dogyks at (no spam) ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:qbmdnVt_9PbfennXnZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d at (no spam) earthlink.com...
Quote:
I played my cards close to the vest though, knowing liars
never remember all their lies and get out of sync.>- J. Smith 10-23-09
The mirror speaks back.
A rainy Saturday here in Sunny South Fla.
Read some of Snuffy's latest drivel.
He is now:
1. Claiming he is not a liar.
How so. Give us a quote...

This could be good...Tom

Could be, but it will probably be all egos and interpretation, instead of
facts...

What I can not figure out for the life of me is why anyone even pretends
to care what that malevolent cripple has to say. It sucks that there is
nothing left to this newsgroup after one killfiles the cretin and his
detractors.

Frankly, if whatsismuzzle dropped off the scope forever, I guarantee I
would never enquire as to why we had such good fortune as to be rid of
him. There is no chance that this newsgroup will ever recover from having
been used as his personal cesspool for years, since too many people have
been nauseated by his incessant flow of excreta.

Please killfile the cretin and those who are dumb enough to engage him,
and talk about skydiving and related activities. All this fanciful dreck
of "the older I get, the better I was," and "there I was, just me and
Rambo, achieving Peace with Honor in Southeast Asia" and so forth got old
after the first iteration. Ignore him as befits the nobody he is.


BSBD,

Winsor
 
the unknown flailer...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:46 pm
Guest
On Oct 26, 5:40 pm, "Small Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
You been running your yap allot recently about "being a manly man" and
"manning up". I know you get your ideas of
manliness  from your days in the "old Navy", you know, the Navy that didn't
have any women around. There, your ideas of manliness
were  like the  prison systems concept of manliness. You know, like you and
your instructor in his bunk...  That kind of manliness is not my thing.
Small Jim

Nope from before that, the early, early 1950's before I went into the
Navy. The days of 20 cent a pack cigarettes, nickle coffee and nickle
coke's. Flat head Fords, fender skirts and moon caps, -- 28 or 30
cent gas, Duck tails and leather jackets. The Navy had a different set
of rules---They shaved our heads and kicked butt. Called it squaring
away-----BTW the Navy had women, they were called WAVES, none on Ships
or in Combat commands---Mostly clerks, dental technicians and
disbursing types. They joined the Navy hoping to meet a man I'm
thinking. Dunno I never had State side shore duty. Back coming out of
the 1940's when a handshake sealed most deals, you didn't need lawyers
unless you ran afoul of the law. Back when a man was only considered
as good as his word. I guess that leaves 99.9% of the USPA out. You
really need to apologize to Mike for being wrong and then being a
asshole about it, come on make the first step toward manning up punk!

Looks like your in the batters box....The other girly man went to
Ballunerfest and either fell in with rich skydivers he could mooch off
of for a while or got picked up by Federal Agents for cheating on his
tax's. Till he resurfaces, looks like you're the new bitch. Try not to
be so anal, it won't hurt as much that way. <eg>
 
Big Jim...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:40 pm
Guest
You been running your yap allot recently about "being a manly man" and
"manning up". I know you get your ideas of
manliness from your days in the "old Navy", you know, the Navy that didn't
have any women around. There, your ideas of manliness
were like the prison systems concept of manliness. You know, like you and
your instructor in his bunk... That kind of manliness is not my thing.

You want to "man me up" send around a good lookin' grand daughter.


"the unknown flailer" <thuythu at (no spam) iwon.com> wrote in message
news:19376b61-a633-4c19-9985-ef16b49c1bb9 at (no spam) a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:34 pm, "Small Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
Winsor-

To come here and expect anything that is or won't soon become an encounter
with Snuffy is either naive or the act of a newby.
You are neither. As you so eloquently put it, this is Mr. S's personal
cesspool and will never be anything else. Different people have different
motivations for being involved with rec. But, if you are going to be
involved with it, involvement with J. Smith is inevitable. It has been
shown
time and time again that kill files or other forms of ignoring him are
futile. He comes with the territory.
One could make a strong argument that he is the territory.

It's about obsolescence. The obsolete rule this obsolete portal in an
obsolete corner of the internet.

Love it or leave it.

Small jim, leave Winsor and Mike alone....If you want to be bitch

slapped come over here to big daddy.
Winsor has control issues and Mike is too intelligent for you to deal
with, come to BIG DADDY, he's got some shit to teach you about manning
up!!! Hoowah 0~;-*
 
the unknown flailer...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:08 pm
Guest
On Oct 26, 4:34 pm, "Big Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
Winsor-

To come here and expect anything that is or won't soon become an encounter
with Snuffy He comes with the territory.
One could make a strong argument that he is the territory.

In my own defense, if you move along and don't interfere with my right
to a opinion or become snotty. Its quite safe to post here
Quote:

It's about obsolescence. The obsolete rule this obsolete portal in an
obsolete corner of the internet.

Love it or leave it.

My sentiments exactly----let the wussies cut and run, we will stay and
duke it out.
Quote:

"Winsor Naugler" <dog... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com

And Winsor is part of the problem, he blames on me and my
punks.....UK.skydiving got their own board and skydiver dot com
started up along about the same time.....Winsor ran over there and
stuck his nose up somebody's ass for a moderator slot---Its now seems
to be part of his duty to come over here act onerous and run wreck
down adding nothing positive to it....Thats so USPAish tsk tsk tsk but
it does give me a woody and thats always good! 0~WinkP
 
the unknown flailer...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:32 am
Guest
On Oct 27, 9:11 am, "Small Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
You are a total dumbfuck. I bust you balls over how your "manly man" rant is
some sort of homo dominant fantasy and you prove my point by yapping about
bitches and how much it will hurt.

I told you it would hurt, quit bitching WinkP
 
the unknown flailer...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:42 am
Guest
On Oct 27, 9:20 am, "Big Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
To come here and expect anything that is or won't soon become an encounter
with Snuffy He comes with the territory.
One could make a strong argument that he is the territory.

"In my own defense, if you move along and don't interfere with my right
to a opinion or become snotty. Its quite safe to post here"

It's your right to have an opinion - its my right to point out how fucked up
your opinion is.
Safer than what- you gonna come hit with your purse ?



It's about obsolescence. The obsolete rule this obsolete portal in an
obsolete corner of the internet.

Love it or leave it.

"My sentiments exactly----let the wussies cut and run, we will stay and
duke it out."



Don't get the wrong idea. This latest flurry of attention is just a result
of my doing a lot of computer work.

No wonder you lack a sense of humor, you set on your ass all day &
that puts pressure on young brains.
 
Big Jim...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:11 am
Guest
You are a total dumbfuck. I bust you balls over how your "manly man" rant is
some sort of homo dominant fantasy and you prove my point by yapping about
bitches and how much it will hurt.
You proved my point !
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu at (no spam) iwon.com> wrote in message
news:2e557fc8-32b4-441c-a940-a170dd0ab341 at (no spam) k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 5:40 pm, "Small Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
Quote:
You been running your yap allot recently about "being a manly man" and
"manning up". I know you get your ideas of
manliness from your days in the "old Navy", you know, the Navy that didn't
have any women around. There, your ideas of manliness
were like the prison systems concept of manliness. You know, like you and
your instructor in his bunk... That kind of manliness is not my thing.
Small Jim

Nope from before that, the early, early 1950's before I went into the
Navy. The days of 20 cent a pack cigarettes, nickle coffee and nickle
coke's. Flat head Fords, fender skirts and moon caps, -- 28 or 30
cent gas, Duck tails and leather jackets. The Navy had a different set
of rules---They shaved our heads and kicked butt. Called it squaring
away-----BTW the Navy had women, they were called WAVES, none on Ships
or in Combat commands---Mostly clerks, dental technicians and
disbursing types. They joined the Navy hoping to meet a man I'm
thinking. Dunno I never had State side shore duty. Back coming out of
the 1940's when a handshake sealed most deals, you didn't need lawyers
unless you ran afoul of the law. Back when a man was only considered
as good as his word. I guess that leaves 99.9% of the USPA out. You
really need to apologize to Mike for being wrong and then being a
asshole about it, come on make the first step toward manning up punk!

Looks like your in the batters box....The other girly man went to
Ballunerfest and either fell in with rich skydivers he could mooch off
of for a while or got picked up by Federal Agents for cheating on his
tax's. Till he resurfaces, looks like you're the new bitch. Try not to
be so anal, it won't hurt as much that way. <eg>
 
Big Jim...
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:20 am
Guest
Quote:

To come here and expect anything that is or won't soon become an encounter
with Snuffy He comes with the territory.
One could make a strong argument that he is the territory.

"In my own defense, if you move along and don't interfere with my right
to a opinion or become snotty. Its quite safe to post here"

It's your right to have an opinion - its my right to point out how fucked up
your opinion is.
Safer than what- you gonna come hit with your purse ?
Quote:

It's about obsolescence. The obsolete rule this obsolete portal in an
obsolete corner of the internet.

Love it or leave it.

"My sentiments exactly----let the wussies cut and run, we will stay and
duke it out."
Quote:


Don't get the wrong idea. This latest flurry of attention is just a result
of my doing a lot of computer work. On some of my mini breaks from it,
I come around here and fling some baseballs at your fat ass.
 
the unknown flailer...
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:07 pm
Guest
On Nov 19, 10:10 pm, Jerry K. <sky... at (no spam) pdq.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:21:15 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer





thuy... at (no spam) iwon.com> wrote:
On Oct 24, 9:41 pm, Mike Spurgeon <m... at (no spam) spurgeon.net> wrote:
Big Jim wrote:
I played my cards close to the vest though, knowing liars
never remember all their lies and get out of sync.>- J. Smith 10-23-09

The mirror speaks back.

A rainy Saturday here in Sunny South Fla.
Read some of Snuffy's latest drivel.

He is now:
1. Claiming he is not a liar.

How so.  Give us a quote...

They can't control their emotions Mike, the tears perhaps blur their
vision and lower reading comprehension.

What, emotional "control" like, "~We must have this creeps blood~" and
"blood must be spilled" ?   That what you mean, hypocrite?

...bsrp
...jlk- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well Well my darling little Punk is back....Small jim couldn't cut the
mustard, he lashed out at Mike. Mikes a detail
man, he will kill you on details so you have to have them right. Thats
the JM in him I guess, dunno it might be part of his normal
personality, he's been a JM so long its hard to tell. Got a streak of
honesty in him too so its best you punks
don't try pulling your crybaby & lying shit on him. I can see the
problem. I warp young minds, did it to Chuck, do it to you all the
time....Small jim? He's a computer geek, they might be good with
binary codes but other wise their pretty simple minded. I could make
him believe night was day with my Psyops training...Look, he's already
seeing shit that ain't there!

The blood thing? I'm old school from the early part of last century
and believe in blood atonement. Think of me as a old
back wards Mafia don sticking by the old codes. I'm not Italian nor
have ever been a wise guy, unless you count
whacking enemy's of the State in war---Which I now regret. Nope its
the back woods way and no other for me--Now having said that, "squeal
like a pig for me boy!" heh heh I know you like it and I got plenty of
it you lying little punk! 0~WinkP
 
the unknown flailer...
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:23 pm
Guest
On Nov 19, 10:10 pm, Jerry K. <sky... at (no spam) pdq.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:37:41 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer





thuy... at (no spam) iwon.com> wrote:
On Oct 25, 12:18 pm, "Big Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
"Mike Spurgeon" <m... at (no spam) spurgeon.net> wrote in message

news:4AE3BAEA.6080303 at (no spam) spurgeon.net...

Big Jim wrote:
I played my cards close to the vest though, knowing liars
never remember all their lies and get out of sync.>- J. Smith 10-23-09

The mirror speaks back.

A rainy Saturday here in Sunny South Fla.
Read some of Snuffy's latest drivel.

He is now:
1. Claiming he is not a liar.

How so.  Give us a quote...

Okay Mike here it is

Another flaw you have besides fear is calling your seniors a liar. A
sure sign you are one yourself, thieves and liars most often accuse
others of the same behaviour...I've told a few sea stories in my time
but earned the right by long service in the far reaches of the world.>> J.
Smith 10/22/09

Typically, Mike, your denial takes the form of a hair splitting, semantics
based argument. My guess is that is the rebuttal, if any we will see here.

But, you asked, I answered.

You were not around when the events leading to my sea stories occurred
kid. Also you don't understand what a sea story is----They are always
based on truth, just dramatized a bit, its clear you have issues---
Mostly based on no sea
stories of your own tsk tsk tsk

Cut the crap, liar.  Where is the "truth" in your saying you started
skydiving in "89 or 90" when you also said it was two years before
1995? Blurring the difference between a big, fat lie and somethng else
by calling the big, fat lie something else doesn't make it any less a
big, fat lie.  big, fat lies.

...bsrp
...jlk- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dunno, I based the time line on how long it took me to get the D. 4 or
5 years I'm thinking. My logbook got gummed up in a white water
kayaking roll over...The pages are still stuck together...Made me sad
when it happened but now I see it as Gods blessing, I can stir the
punks into a frenzy trying to recollect the time line. Yep its kinda
fun, are you having fun yet kid? Let me see now...ummmm I remember
competing at the POPS Nationals in 1995 and doing a few other things
that required a D, oh yeah.....Did I tell you the 4-way team I was on
won a bronze that year? I was on kid not some kind of made up shit
like you pulled on your long dead ego page trying to steal former team
members medals tsk tsk tsk.
But the up side is me and the Chicago god frog shut that little Jerry
K scheme down HOOWAH HA HA HA
Oh well it was about time for some honesty in the sport and on wreck,
glad to point a double dealer like you out
punk. Just call me the enforcer! Yah Yah squeel like a pig for me boy!
0~;-*
 
Jerry K....
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:10 pm
Guest
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:35:36 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer
<thuythu at (no spam) iwon.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Oct 25, 12:18 pm, "Big Jim" <lisaj... at (no spam) the-beach.net> wrote:
"Mike Spurgeon" <m... at (no spam) spurgeon.net> wrote in message

news:4AE3BAEA.6080303 at (no spam) spurgeon.net...

Big Jim wrote:
I played my cards close to the vest though, knowing liars
never remember all their lies and get out of sync.>- J. Smith 10-23-09

The mirror speaks back.

A rainy Saturday here in Sunny South Fla.
Read some of Snuffy's latest drivel.

He is now:
1. Claiming he is not a liar.

How so.  Give us a quote...

Okay Mike here it is

Another flaw you have besides fear is calling your seniors a liar. A
sure sign you are one yourself, thieves and liars most often accuse
others of the same behaviour...I've told a few sea stories in my time
but earned the right by long service in the far reaches of the world.>> J.
Smith 10/22/09

Typically, Mike, your denial takes the form of a hair splitting, semantics
based argument. My guess is that is the rebuttal, if any we will see here.

But, you asked, I answered.

I believe the post was mostly about a Jerry K post with quotes that
proved he lied years earlier.

What "lie," what "quotes," what proof?

Quote:
Every body lies
sooner or later, its a human carateristic.

While this is as may be, recognizing this "carateristic" does nothing
to take away the fact that you are a liar nor does it establish that
anyone other than yourself is or has been lying about their skydiving.

Quote:
...Read the post again all I
said about myself was "I tell sea stories"

And now you're lamely attempting to blur the sharp difference between
telling flat out lies and embellishing a story - as if such would make
your lies any less lies.

Quote:
Which I haven't done in
years because it upset some one hitch boots.

That's a load of crap and in of it self, a lie - or would you like to
cast this latest stinking pile of yours as another "sea story," too,
dumbass?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/620cab7050588705

<Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:22:35 -0700 (PDT)>

"I got a sea story about that boot shit. About 8 years
into my service me..."

* * *

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/5ad62cc0e083d6cc

<Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:17:58 -0700 (PDT)>

"I have a sea story on the M.I. only thing, got the shit beat out of
myself up at A.P. Hill because I..."

* * *

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/ddfd9c1cec4599e1

<Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 00:02:37 -0700 (PDT)>

"I got a sea story about a retired Master Chief, that won't talk to me
anymore Here goes: Stopped at a yard sale a few years ago..."

* * *

"Haven't done in years" ? Simply pathetic. Just the same, there's a
huge gulf between embellishing a story and flat out lies - you, of
course, do both while trying to cast the lies - especially when you
get busted for those lies - as simply "sea stories" and it's
transparent as hell.


Quote:
One USN, the other USMC.
So you are wrong Biggy butt and Mike is right, no where it that post
did I specifically claim "I was not a liar" as you stated.

While you did not specifically claim in "that post" "(you were) not a
liar," this does specifically illustrate just what an enormous
hypocrite you are as you, without citation, assert others are lying
when they 1) haven't, and 2) have in the past presented- and can
present again clear examples of you indeed lying - as opposed to you
simply telling a "sea story."


Quote:
You kids
need
reading comprehension class's

This from the same assclown who for whatever reason called Mike a punk
when Mike asserted where he works is likethe bar business - recession
proof. Reading comprehension? Either you meant Mike was a punk or
you couldn't comprehend who you were responding to - which are you
going to man up and admit to, princess? This newsgroup is littered
with examples of you "reading" something and getting it wrong.

Quote:
and some PROZAC suppository's or else to
quit reading what I have to say about
snot nosed punks and while your at it apologize to Mike you little
punk!

Let's be clear here - are you calling the BigE a punk or Mike?" The
criteria for such a label has been somewhat nebulous in the past, at
least when you're throwing it around.

Quote:
Jesus they must push these kids through
school-----None of them know how to read-

1800skydive or 1800skyride, hypocrite?


Quote:
---One other item you and
Jerry girl might remember. DZ politics don't
work on wreck.....So quit trying to make shit up

This from the same assclown whose bread and butter is "trying to make
shit up." Try again, hypocrite.

....bsrp
....jlk
 
Jerry K....
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:10 pm
Guest
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:21:15 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer
<thuythu at (no spam) iwon.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Oct 24, 9:41 pm, Mike Spurgeon <m... at (no spam) spurgeon.net> wrote:
Big Jim wrote:
I played my cards close to the vest though, knowing liars
never remember all their lies and get out of sync.>- J. Smith 10-23-09

The mirror speaks back.

A rainy Saturday here in Sunny South Fla.
Read some of Snuffy's latest drivel.

He is now:
1. Claiming he is not a liar.

How so.  Give us a quote...

They can't control their emotions Mike, the tears perhaps blur their
vision and lower reading comprehension.

What, emotional "control" like, "~We must have this creeps blood~" and
"blood must be spilled" ? That what you mean, hypocrite?


Quote:
I clearly called Jerry K a liar and provided the particular quote he
was being called on

That you suggested I had lied somewhere or when, you did that - the
whole "Thieves and liars often accuse other people of their own
weaknes" copout - but "clearly?" That's another load of crap. Quote?
There was no quote, "particular" or otherwise. As a matter of fact,
the closest you got to a "particular quote" - and it's not close at
all - was some asinine idea regarding a dubious connection of Mike to
the word, "punk" on my part - nevermind that it was ~you~ who first
made that connection - you flat out called him one - I've just been
shoving your low forehead and slack jaw into it whenever it shines the
very telling light offering remarkable perspective on what you might
be gassing on about at the moment. Great stuff like how you call a
"spade a spade," and the like. Clearly, you're out of your league.

Here's what you said:

"Well, that makes what you said before a lie, which I knew it was
because the sport is so transient, new people
coming in old leaving or moving on....Taking into consideration if you
haven't jumped with them lately, your forgotten.
I used to see it all the time, folks who had other things to do or
could only afford to come out every few months.
Nobody knew who the fuck they were----They were ignored, even treated
with suspicion. You were dragging up names of
people who just about had to be retired by now or at least slacked off
or moved on. I played my cards close to the vest though, knowing liars
never remember all their lies and get out of sync. And now you have
busted yourself. Brings to mind my psych profile of motive.....Because
you are always calling me a liar-----Remember: "Thieves and liars
often accuse other people of their own weakness?" This also brings to
mind how many times you have connected Mike to the
word punk by constantly dragging something up, I apologized for years
ago. tsk tsk tsk Book Him Danno!"

* * *

Nothing in there which anyone who wasn't an intellectually dishonest
assclown could honestly describe as a "particular quote" illustrating
a lie on another's part. No reference to what was said before which
constituted some "lie," and as a matter of fact, in the course of this
latest load of crap of yours, and not surprisingly, another lie from
you in the form of your assertion that you "apologized" to Mike for
calling him a punk "years ago" - nevermind that you called Mike a punk
in July of 2008 which was ... how many "years ago," princess?

Quote:
The only admission made was to telling sea stories, a art learned from
over a decade of Naval service.
I doubt anyone without USN or USMC service understands what a sea
story is and immediately perceive
them as lies.

There's tall tales and then there's just flat lying - you're lamely
trying to blur the stark difference between the two.

Quote:
As you probably know having been a Jar head they are
like fish stories-built on a kernel of
truth but becoming larger as time passé's.

Oh, so like when you said the biggest formation you ever saw you
watched from the ground later gets mentioned by you in terms of you
were actually on this formation, there in is the "fish story" with the
"kernel of truth" being there once was this formation. Call it what
you want - it's still lying about your skydiving. Not even a good
try, princess.


Quote:
Meant mainly as
entertainment, they often drew laughs and
took minds off all those hours standing in line, bad chow, boring
tours of duty at the ass end of the world
These kids have little sense of humor and it makes them easy marks for
old men. They take their selves
far too serious

Ah, so when you were talking about starting skydiving in "89 or 90,"
after saying it was a two years prior to 1995, it was a "sea story" -
a joke - "meant mainly as entertainment." Got to admit, I'm still
laughing - at you, not with you. Telling "sea stories" about your
supposed service (mr." left UDT") is one thing, banal that it is on a
skydiving newsgroup on the usenet, but telling lies about your
skydiving - undeniable, flat out, and no "kernel of truth" lies to
skydivers and calling them "sea stories," as if changing the name
dismisses the lie - well, slight regard and contempt for your puerile,
little act is only fitting. At the dz it'd be sitsuit solos and
wedgies for lying posers like you.

....bsrp
....jlk
 
 
Page 2 of 4    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Nov 27, 2009 3:09 pm