| Hobby Forum Index » Sport - Tennis » how many slams for Kill Shot Tennis in 2010?... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Scott... |
 Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Kill Shot Tennis: hitting the living shit out of the ball, making dull-
to-watch winners.
notable practitioners: Del Potro, Isner, Roddick, Karlo
slams in 2009: 1 (Del Potro).
slams in 2010?
(no, i'm not putting Federer on the list because even though he won W
by zoning on his serve, he isn't dull to watch.)
* * * *
i think Kill Shot Tennis is going to bring about empty stadiums and
low ratings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ivan \"Maximus\" Lendl... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 19, 5:56 pm, Scott <scott... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: Kill Shot Tennis: hitting the living shit out of the ball, making dull-
to-watch winners.
notable practitioners: Del Potro, Isner, Roddick, Karlo
slams in 2009: 1 (Del Potro).
I dont think Del Potro is dull to watch. He has good groundstrokes and
a powerful forehand. But he is overall a good baseliner with good
court sense.
But Isner/Roddick/Karlo are ace bombers with an awful baseline game
and completely boring to watch... just like Sampras/Ivanisevic/
Rupedski of the 90s.
Quote: slams in 2010?
(no, i'm not putting Federer on the list because even though he won W
by zoning on his serve, he isn't dull to watch.)
* * * *
i think Kill Shot Tennis is going to bring about empty stadiums and
low ratings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Scott... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Ivan Maximus Lendl wrote:
Quote: On Oct 19, 5:56 pm, Scott <scott... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Kill Shot Tennis: hitting the living shit out of the ball, making dull-
to-watch winners.
notable practitioners: Del Potro, Isner, Roddick, Karlo
slams in 2009: 1 (Del Potro).
I dont think Del Potro is dull to watch. He has good groundstrokes and
a powerful forehand. But he is overall a good baseliner with good
court sense.
Del Potro today compared to Connors/Lendl/Mac is boring, imo.
Although, Del Potro might have done well in that era. i think he has
potential at the net. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Scott... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Vrai Cinico wrote:
Quote: Scott wrote:
Kill Shot Tennis
sdem ru ekat !kst !kst
--
!?ereh tsop ot uoy rof yenom erom snaem TSK |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ivan \"Maximus\" Lendl... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 19, 7:18 pm, Scott <scott... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: Ivan Maximus Lendl wrote:
On Oct 19, 5:56 pm, Scott <scott... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Kill Shot Tennis: hitting the living shit out of the ball, making dull-
to-watch winners.
notable practitioners: Del Potro, Isner, Roddick, Karlo
slams in 2009: 1 (Del Potro).
I dont think Del Potro is dull to watch. He has good groundstrokes and
a powerful forehand. But he is overall a good baseliner with good
court sense.
Del Potro today compared to Connors/Lendl/Mac is boring, imo.
Although, Del Potro might have done well in that era. i think he has
potential at the net.
he is too lanky and clumsy. Fed lost because he played into his
hands. Fed doesnt play very smart. Connors/Mac/Lendl/Wilander were
great thinkers on court. They would have messed with Potro's mind. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Vrai Cinico... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Scott wrote:
sdem ru ekat !kst !kst
--
Cheers,
vc |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| CloudsRest... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 19, 8:08 pm, "Ivan \"Maximus\" Lendl" <zepflo... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote: On Oct 19, 7:18 pm, Scott <scott... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Ivan Maximus Lendl wrote:
On Oct 19, 5:56 pm, Scott <scott... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Kill Shot Tennis: hitting the living shit out of the ball, making dull-
to-watch winners.
notable practitioners: Del Potro, Isner, Roddick, Karlo
slams in 2009: 1 (Del Potro).
I dont think Del Potro is dull to watch. He has good groundstrokes and
a powerful forehand. But he is overall a good baseliner with good
court sense.
Del Potro today compared to Connors/Lendl/Mac is boring, imo.
Although, Del Potro might have done well in that era. i think he has
potential at the net.
he is too lanky and clumsy. Fed lost because he played into his
hands. Fed doesnt play very smart. Connors/Mac/Lendl/Wilander were
great thinkers on court. They would have messed with Potro's mind.
Federer had a bit of an off-day. It happens. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| jdeluise... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 20-Oct-2009, Whisper <beaver999 at (no spam) ozemail.com.au> wrote:
Quote: This is a joke right? Fed only ever has 1 game plan - move ball around
from baseline & after 3 or 4 shots the clown can't keep it going. Dull
to watch & explains empty stadiums around the world. I grieve for this
once great game.
You're all mouth and trousers. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
