Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Music - Hip Hop  »  ot alan grayson on maher......
Page 1 of 6    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

ot alan grayson on maher......

Author Message
bozak...
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:10 pm
Guest
republicans idea of health care reform is being able to take your gun to your
doctors office... (alan grayson)

lol... he is funnier than maher...

--
If Jesus existed, he would say fuck a public option, single payer for all you beyotches!!!

beauzaq
 
Rich...
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:01 pm
Guest
liberals idea of health care reform is to change something, anything just to
be changing it
They walk around all the time mumblin' "I'm gonna change something, damnit
.... I gotta leave my mark on something" .. and then ...

wiat for it ....
and then ...
YOU pay for my health care.

YOU, thats right, YOU

think of liberals as your wife gone STERIODS socialist with your checkbook
liberals love spending your money, and will make up shit as an excuse to get
it to spend.

Global Baloney anyone?

heh ...


there is one born every second.

Rich
 
bozak...
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:40 am
Guest
On Oct 17, 2:45 am, Blazer Fan Dan <blazerfan... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 16, 10:01 pm, "Rich" <r.d.gr... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:

think of liberals as your wife gone STERIODS socialist with your checkbook
liberals love spending your money, and will make up shit as an excuse to get
it to spend.
Rich

yah, liberals love spending money. kind of like going to war against a
country that had nothing to do with anything. Huge liberal spending
ploy right there.

in my best andy rooney voice:

you ever notice how these barbaric dickhead scumbag republikkkons do
not EVER respond to these posts???
 
Gary Collard...
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:47 pm
Guest
Rich wrote:
Quote:
liberals idea of health care reform is to change something, anything
just to be changing it

Disagree, it has a very specific goal, not just change for the sake of
change: to transfer a massive amount of wealth, as well as control over
the most (currently) personal set of decisions, from the people to the
federal government.

It's another front in the ongoing battle between freedom and government,
and such a huge potential loss of liberty would be a game-changing loss
for the people.

--
Gary Collard
SABR-L Moderator
gmcollard at yahoo dot com
http://twitter.com/LakerGMC
http://sarcastipundit.blogspot.com/

"We already pay farmers not to farm. Why can’t we pay legislators
not to legislate?” -- Bill Whittle
 
Rich...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:27 pm
Guest
Quote:
he could be all three stoooooooooooges...

was this BEFORE or AFTER I was "shitcanned" ? ... heh

Rich
 
Terraholm...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:29 pm
Guest
bozak wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 18, 2:47 pm, "Rich" <r.d.gr... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
As he uses 'liberal' as a buzzword...


ive got a word for you...

SHITCANNED!!! Smile

He did not understand that one.
 
Terraholm...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:37 pm
Guest
Rich wrote:
Quote:

"Terraholm" <terraholmSPAMNOT at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7k1841F38irsoU1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net...
Rich wrote:
As he uses 'liberal' as a buzzword...

heh, good one ... Democrat work for you?

Liberal or progressive works fine.

Then it's not a buzzword is it? what progress are you working toward?
define freedom ... ;)

.. liberal is acquiring quite a
nice reputation these days isn't it?

How is neo-con doing lately? =)

who invented neo-con and what does it mean? ... heh
careful now

elipsis marking the spot were the poster was overcome by non-originality

copying hundreds of other peoples words is not impressive

Showing it was not new... I was not around 90 years

Quote:
nor is it read.

Figures you would not read that. And likely proud of not reading the
history...your loss...and shit you could not attack that messenger...

Read it..will not hurt at all...argue it.

Theodore Roosevelt

My concern and regret are primarily for these men themselves. They could
do us good by joining with us, for it is earnestly to be wished that
this movement for social justice shall number among its leaders at least
a goodly proportion of men whose leadership is obviously disinterested,
who will themselves receive no material benefit from the changes which
as a matter of justice they advocate: Yet the good to the people would
be small compared to the good which these men would do to their own
class by casting in their lot with us as we battle for the rights of
humanity, as we battle for social and industrial justice, as we champion
the cause of those who most need champions and for whom champions have
been too few.

I have been puzzled at the attitude of the men in question. They are
often the men who in the past have been very severe in their
condemnation of corruption, in their condemnation of bossism, and in
railing at injustice and demanding higher ideals of public service and
private life. Yet when the supreme test comes they prove false to all
their professions of the past.

They fear the people so intensely that they pardon and uphold every
species of political and business crookedness in the panic-struck hope
of strengthening the boss and special privilege and thereby raising a
powerful shield to protect their own soft personalities from the public.

They are foolish creatures; the people would never harm them; yet they
still dread the people. They stand with servile acquiescence behind the
worst representatives of crooked business and crooked politics in the
country, and by speech or by silence they now encourage or condone the
efforts of our opponents to steal from the people the victory they have
won and to substitute boss rule for popular rule. Some of these men have
in the past assumed to be teachers of their fellow men in political
matters. Never again can they speak in favor of a high ideal of honesty
and decency in political life, or of the duty to oppose political
corruption and business wrong-doing; for to do so would expose them to
the derision of all who abhor hypocrisy and who condemn fine words that
are not translated into honorable deeds.

Apparently these men are influenced by a class consciousness which I had
not supposed existed in any such strength. They live softly.
Circumstances for which they are not responsible have removed their
lives from the fears and anxieties of the ordinary men who toil. When a
movement is undertaken to make life a little easier, a little better,
for the ordinary man, to give him a better chance, these men of soft
life seem cast into panic lest something that is not rightly theirs may
be taken from them. In unmanly fear they stand against all change, no
matter how urgent such change may be. They not only come far short of
their duty when they thus act, but they show a lamentable short-sightedness.
 
Terraholm...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:39 pm
Guest
Rich wrote:
Quote:

he could be all three stoooooooooooges...

was this BEFORE or AFTER I was "shitcanned" ? ... heh


You can not grasp he is answering my posts?
 
Terraholm...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:18 pm
Guest
bozak wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 18, 3:20 pm, Terraholm <terraholmSPAM... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:


Quote:

Apparently these men are influenced by a class consciousness which I had
not supposed existed in any such strength. They live softly.
Circumstances for which they are not responsible have removed their
lives from the fears and anxieties of the ordinary men who toil. When a
movement is undertaken to make life a little easier, a little better,
for the ordinary man, to give him a better chance, these men of soft
life seem cast into panic lest something that is not rightly theirs may
be taken from them. In unmanly fear they stand against all change, no
matter how urgent such change may be. They not only come far short of
their duty when they thus act, but they show a lamentable short-sightedness.

that is some of the most righteous shit i have ever seen... wow... to
bad these brickheaded wingnut fucks dont understand it... Sad

They have never understood it. Greed buries it.

That was an excerpt from the open letter to the GOP when Teddy split and
formed the Progressive Party.


Ike got it too.

--
Laurel T

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired
signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not
fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not
spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the
genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way
of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it
is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.
Dwight D. Eisenhower, April 16, 1953
 
Rich...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:56 pm
Guest
ego IS thinking you GET IT and almost no one else does ....

very few understand this ... :)

Rich
 
Rich...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:56 pm
Guest
and?


Rich
 
Rich...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:58 pm
Guest
Quote:
He did not understand that one.

.... more to the point will HE do what HE says?
track record says .. nope


Rich
 
Rich...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:59 pm
Guest
Quote:
You can not grasp he is answering my posts?

perhaps you don't grasp that I DO grasp .. :Smile
grasp that


Rich
 
bozak...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:00 pm
Guest
Terraholm wrote:
Quote:
Rich wrote:

he could be all three stoooooooooooges...

was this BEFORE or AFTER I was "shitcanned" ? ... heh


You can not grasp he is answering my posts?

lol at (no spam) wingnuts... Smile
 
Terraholm...
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:53 pm
Guest
Rich wrote:
Quote:
ego IS thinking you GET IT and almost no one else does ....

very few understand this ... Smile


As in...did not really kill file ME!
 
 
Page 1 of 6    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:04 am