Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Sport - Cricket  »  Q for Mohan...
Page 1 of 1    

Q for Mohan...

Author Message
alvey...
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:06 pm
Guest
Do you think that the IPL are concerned about how badly their sides are
doing in this latest Thrashathon? Am thinking that it's going to be harder
to glam the IPL up to sell to the locals if its teams are patently second
rate. Perhaps more furriners will be allowed in the IPL's next iteration?




alvey
 
yeskay...
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:09 pm
Guest
On Oct 15, 3:06 pm, alvey <al... at (no spam) play.com> wrote:
Quote:
Do you think that the IPL are concerned about how badly their sides are
doing in this latest Thrashathon? Am thinking that it's going to be harder
to glam the IPL up to sell to the locals if its teams are patently second
rate. Perhaps more furriners will be allowed in the IPL's next iteration?

alvey  


The IPL standard is as much as the quality of Aussie Emerging 11 team.
 
Mohan...
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:57 pm
Guest
On Oct 16, 12:06 am, alvey <al... at (no spam) play.com> wrote:
Quote:
Do you think that the IPL are concerned about how badly their sides are
doing in this latest Thrashathon? Am thinking that it's going to be harder
to glam the IPL up to sell to the locals if its teams are patently second
rate. Perhaps more furriners will be allowed in the IPL's next iteration?

There is no change in the IPL teams' quality from the previous years.
If anything, this tournament has shown that there is lot of T20 talent
in the Australian and South African domestic circuit who did not have
a chance to play international cricket all these days. Now some of
that talent will be picked up by IPL too, to replace some of the aging
international players (Russow has been picked up by RCB, Holland has
got a call-up for the Australian odi side, etc).

Mohan
 
tendulkar.com...
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:36 pm
Guest
On Oct 15, 3:06 pm, alvey <al... at (no spam) play.com> wrote:
Quote:
Do you think that the IPL are concerned about how badly their sides are
doing in this latest Thrashathon? Am thinking that it's going to be harder
to glam the IPL up to sell to the locals if its teams are patently second
rate. Perhaps more furriners will be allowed in the IPL's next iteration?

alvey  

According to your brilliant logic, Indian cricket should have died in
the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s & 00s

But again, logic isn't exactly your forte...

GDP Growth * Economies of Scale * Monopoly
 
Andrew Dunford...
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:50 pm
Guest
"alvey" <alvey at (no spam) play.com> wrote in message
news:f88cv8afimp5.14pqum3ncwvm2.dlg at (no spam) 40tude.net...
Quote:
Do you think that the IPL are concerned about how badly their sides are
doing in this latest Thrashathon? Am thinking that it's going to be harder
to glam the IPL up to sell to the locals if its teams are patently second
rate. Perhaps more furriners will be allowed in the IPL's next iteration?

They don't need more - just to get rid of the clapped-out ones such as
Symonds and Styris.

Andrew
 
Calvin...
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:07 pm
Guest
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:50:08 +1000, Andrew Dunford <adunford at (no spam) artifax.net>
wrote:

Quote:


"alvey" <alvey at (no spam) play.com> wrote in message
news:f88cv8afimp5.14pqum3ncwvm2.dlg at (no spam) 40tude.net...
Do you think that the IPL are concerned about how badly their sides are
doing in this latest Thrashathon? Am thinking that it's going to be
harder
to glam the IPL up to sell to the locals if its teams are patently
second
rate. Perhaps more furriners will be allowed in the IPL's next
iteration?

They don't need more - just to get rid of the clapped-out ones such as
Symonds and Styris.

The aim of the IPL is to make money, not produce good cricket.

--

cheers,
calvin
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:02 am