| |
 |
|
| Hobby Forum Index » Pyrotechnics » chlorate vs. perchlorate in CaSO4 pink stars... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Bob... |
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Interesting that among a bunch of formulas for colored stars in
Weingart calling for KClO3, there's a pink box star compo calling for
KClO4. It's shellac fueled, uses plaster of Paris to impart color,
and is dampened with alcohol. Since it's specifically a box star
compo among a bunch of recipes for cut (or unspecified form) stars, it
would be expected to be difficult to ignite and dampened with just
sufficient alcohol to allow the light pressing typical of box stars,
with their thin, lance-like casing. However, I did succeed with it in
round stars with plenty of hot silicon-containing primer coat, and it
did give a nice shell break.
What I wondered was whether, like other shellac-fueled compos, it
could benefit from KClO3 as the oxidizer, specifically for ease of
ignition; or whether the CaSO4, like other sulfates, required the
hotter fire of perchlorate to impart color. Might some compromise
chlorate-perchlorate mixture be suitable?
I'm also wondering whether I could get it to tail with Al flitters
without killing the pink in the head. And yes, I know I can get pink
with a mixture of conventional red & white compos, or an over-fueled
Al red.
Robert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| mikes2653... |
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
There is no reason why you could not or should not use potassium
chlorate. The difference in combustion temperature between mixtures of
potassium chlorate/shellac as opposed to potassium perchlorate/shellac
is not significant enough to make a difference in color emission.
Amongst the various pieces of misinformation I've seen about the
hazards of chlorates is the assertion that the chlorate/sulphur hazard
extends to mixtures of chlorates and sulphates. This is not generally
the case, because the sulphur in sulphates is already completely
oxidized. It is true that copper sulphate should not be mixed with
potassium chlorate, because it is water-soluble and the solution has a
decidedly acidic pH. However, calcium, strontium, and barium
sulphates are stable neutral salts, and pose no hazard when mixed with
chlorate.
On p. 19 of the 1947 edition of Weingart, that author states: "The
tendency of potassium chlorate to explode is very strong in the
presence of sulfur, sulfides, and sulfates which sometimes release
minute quantities of sulfuric acid." I think the reason for Weingart's
specification of perchlorate in the pink box star you mention is that
he erroneously believed that it would be hazardous to use chlorate
with calcium sulphate.
On Oct 12, 1:17 pm, Bob <robg... at (no spam) bestweb.net> wrote:
Quote: Interesting that among a bunch of formulas for colored stars in
Weingart calling for KClO3, there's a pink box star compo calling for
KClO4. It's shellac fueled, uses plaster of Paris to impart color,
and is dampened with alcohol. Since it's specifically a box star
compo among a bunch of recipes for cut (or unspecified form) stars, it
would be expected to be difficult to ignite and dampened with just
sufficient alcohol to allow the light pressing typical of box stars,
with their thin, lance-like casing. However, I did succeed with it in
round stars with plenty of hot silicon-containing primer coat, and it
did give a nice shell break.
What I wondered was whether, like other shellac-fueled compos, it
could benefit from KClO3 as the oxidizer, specifically for ease of
ignition; or whether the CaSO4, like other sulfates, required the
hotter fire of perchlorate to impart color. Might some compromise
chlorate-perchlorate mixture be suitable?
I'm also wondering whether I could get it to tail with Al flitters
without killing the pink in the head. And yes, I know I can get pink
with a mixture of conventional red & white compos, or an over-fueled
Al red.
Robert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Reilly... |
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 12, 1:17 pm, Bob <robg... at (no spam) bestweb.net> wrote:
Quote: Interesting that among a bunch of formulas for colored stars in
Weingart calling for KClO3, there's a pink box star compo calling for
KClO4. It's shellac fueled, uses plaster of Paris to impart color,
and is dampened with alcohol. Since it's specifically a box star
compo among a bunch of recipes for cut (or unspecified form) stars, it
would be expected to be difficult to ignite and dampened with just
sufficient alcohol to allow the light pressing typical of box stars,
with their thin, lance-like casing. However, I did succeed with it in
round stars with plenty of hot silicon-containing primer coat, and it
did give a nice shell break.
What I wondered was whether, like other shellac-fueled compos, it
could benefit from KClO3 as the oxidizer, specifically for ease of
ignition; or whether the CaSO4, like other sulfates, required the
hotter fire of perchlorate to impart color. Might some compromise
chlorate-perchlorate mixture be suitable?
I'm also wondering whether I could get it to tail with Al flitters
without killing the pink in the head. And yes, I know I can get pink
with a mixture of conventional red & white compos, or an over-fueled
Al red.
Robert
I haven't tried the Weingart composition you spoke of but in general,
shellac alone as a fuel doesn't burn as well with potassium/ammonium
perchlorate as it does with potassium chlorate. For this reason,
shellac is often used as an accessory fuel alomg with red gum, rosin
or vinsol in non metallic color compositions. Shellac seems to give a
more pure color in blue and yellow stars or lance than red gum, which
burns very well with chlorates and perchlorates. Red gum can fuel a
very good red or green color (even with 2% charcoal or lampblack for
aid in perchlorate star ignition) and I always use it for chlorate
stars in those two colors. Shellac burns more slowly than red gum and
so isn't a good fuel for chrysanthemum or peony shells where very fast
burning is necessary.
As for pink, many people who have tried non metal red stars complain
that their stars burn pink rather than red. Impure strontium salts
are the usual culprit in this case. My guess is that adding bright
aluminum to the pink formula would provide a tail at the expense of
color. It would probably pale the hue toward white but there are red
aluminum ("electric") star compositions with some fine dark aluminum
along with the bright which seem to deepen the red a bit, so it's hard
to say. Rather than aluminum deepening the red, it may be an illusion
of intensity/color perception. Perchlorate does burn at a higher
temperature than chlorate (one reason that chlorate blues are so nice)
but whether using chlorate as part of the oxidizer in the pink
perchlorate star you're using would change the color or not, I doubt
it but don't know. Maybe the reason old George specified KClO4 in
that mix was a concern over sulfates with chlorates. One thing is
certain, it will smoke a lot!
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 12, 3:21 pm, mikes2653 <ekim2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Amongst the various pieces of misinformation I've seen about the
hazards of chlorates is the assertion that the chlorate/sulphur hazard
extends to mixtures of chlorates and sulphates. This is not generally
the case, because the sulphur in sulphates is already completely
oxidized. It is true that copper sulphate should not be mixed with
potassium chlorate, because it is water-soluble and the solution has a
decidedly acidic pH. However, calcium, strontium, and barium
sulphates are stable neutral salts, and pose no hazard when mixed with
chlorate.
Reminds me of how diets designed by semi-educated sources to inhibit
yeast infection extended their limitation of fermentable foods (mostly
sugar) to PRODUCTS of fermentation, and even to other fungi such as
mushrooms!
Quote: On p. 19 of the 1947 edition of Weingart, that author states: "The
tendency of potassium chlorate to explode is very strong in the
presence of sulfur, sulfides, and sulfates which sometimes release
minute quantities of sulfuric acid." I think the reason for Weingart's
specification of perchlorate in the pink box star you mention is that
he erroneously believed that it would be hazardous to use chlorate
with calcium sulphate.
I never would've thought of that, thanks.
Robert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Reilly... |
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 13, 1:01 am, Bob <robg... at (no spam) bestweb.net> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 12, 3:54 pm, John Reilly <strb... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I haven't tried the Weingart composition you spoke of but in general,
shellac alone as a fuel doesn't burn as well with potassium/ammonium
perchlorate as it does with potassium chlorate.
That's why I raised the issue.
One thing is certain, it will smoke a lot!
They do. Maybe an illuminated smoke trail will have to do instead of
a spark tail! Actually the time I used the Weingart formula, it was
in color changing stars where the other layer was a "granite", so it
was smoking all the way, including the Si-containing layer of primer.
Robert
Robert, that beautiful effect is well known by Japanese firework
manuacturers as "moon in willow"; a nightime smoke effect. The shell
traditionally opens with a willow break of realgar smoke stars and
also lights a short burning yellow illuminating flare on a parachute,
so the willow shaped yellow smoke pattern suddenly appears from the
darkness.
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:19 am
|
|