 |
|
| Hobby Forum Index » Music - Classical » Captain Dave Saves the World Again!... |
|
Page 9 of 13 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
 Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:09 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Raving Loonie writes:
288> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
288> If the dyslexic engineers had consumed sufficient plonk, they
might
288> have avoided many boo-boos.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
288> Instead of calling the project the 'O'[silent h]'O'[silent !]'
that it
288> was, they craftily encoded it's name as 'O''S'[dyslexic mistaken
288> reversal of 2]'/'[error denoted by forward stroke]'2'[correction
made].
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:19 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Robert Teague writes:
2> Newsgroups:
sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks
2> David Tholen writes:
Who is "David Tholen", Teague? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.
2> Of course. Anyone with sufficient Usenet experience can tell that.
Glad you agree, Teague.
2> The onus to stop trolling is on them since you don't troll. But
2> that is missing the point I'm making.
But it's the point I'm making, Teague. As for the point you're
trying to make, I already dealt with that later in my posting.
2> I am well aware of the nature of trolls, and as long as you
2> continue to cooperate and react the way they want,
Classic erroneous presupposition.
2> they will get
2> the amusement they crave and deprive you of the peace you
2> want.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
2> You really should not assume I don't know some history.
No assumption was necessary, Teague. Your posted recommendation
demonstrates that you aren't aware of the history of your approach
failing, Teague.
2> For a tiny minority of the trolls.
Classic ambiguity.
2> Given human nature, it is doubtful
2> any course of action will be 100% effective.
Glad to see you admit that your recommendation wouldn't be
effective, Teague. So why did you make it in the first
place, Teague?
2> And it was beyond your strength of will to continue to ignore him.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, it was
beyond Malloy's strength of will to give up. Nearly two years
was enough to prove my point.
2> I read and posted from another newsgroup,
To an OS/2 newsgroup, Teague.
2> and for that reason it had nothing to do with OS/2. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Robert Teague... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:22 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
David Tholen writes:
Quote: Ah, so you admit that these antagonists are trolls, eh Teague?
Of course. Anyone with sufficient Usenet experience can tell that.
Quote: So why not do the correct thing and put the onus on them rather
than on me?
The onus to stop trolling is on them since you don't troll. But
that is missing the point I'm making.
I am well aware of the nature of trolls, and as long as you
continue to cooperate and react the way they want, they will get
the amusement they crave and deprive you of the peace you
want.
Quote: You really should learn some history
You really should not assume I don't know some history.
Quote: before making the same old tired recommendations
that have been demonstrated to NOT WORK, Teague.
For a tiny minority of the trolls. Given human nature, it is doubtful
any course of action will be 100% effective.
Quote: I already tried the experiment. I ignored Malloy for the better part
of TWO YEARS. I didn't respond to his postings.
And it was beyond your strength of will to continue to ignore him.
Quote: Now, what did any of your posting have to do with OS/2, Teague?
I read and posted from another newsgroup, and for that reason
it had nothing to do with OS/2.
--
Robert
There is nothing right in a world where Hay Lin isn't happy.
W.i.t.c.h. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Raving... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 24, 2:09 pm, "tho... at (no spam) antispam.ham" <tho... at (no spam) ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:
Quote: Raving Loonie writes:
288> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
288> If the dyslexic engineers had consumed sufficient plonk, they
might
288> have avoided many boo-boos.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
Quote:
288> Instead of calling the project the 'O'[silent h]'O'[silent !]'
that it
288> was, they craftily encoded it's name as 'O''S'[dyslexic mistaken
288> reversal of 2]'/'[error denoted by forward stroke]'2'[correction
made].
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Caveat emptor. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:40 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Raving Loonie writes:
289> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
289> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Non sequitur.
289> Caveat emptor.
Non sequitur. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Raving... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 24, 7:40 pm, "tho... at (no spam) antispam.ham" <tho... at (no spam) ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:
Quote: Raving Loonie writes:
289> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
289> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Non sequitur.
One and the same here, eh.
Quote:
289> Caveat emptor.
Non sequitur.
Also equivalent in this context. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Raving Loonie writes:
290> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
290> One and the same here, eh.
Who is "eh", Loonie? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
290> Also equivalent in this context.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim
have to do with OS/2, Loonie? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Raving... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 24, 8:50 pm, "tho... at (no spam) antispam.ham" <tho... at (no spam) ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:
Quote: Raving Loonie writes:
290> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
290> One and the same here, eh.
Who is "eh", Loonie? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loonie
I am a *CANADIAN* , eh
Here is the 'eh' part as it relates to Canadians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eh
Quote:
290> Also equivalent in this context.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim
have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
Truth doesn't sell well. Plonk helps. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Raving Loonie writes:
291> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
291> I am a *CANADIAN* ,
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
291> eh
Who is "eh", Loonie? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
291> Here is the 'eh' part as it relates to Canadians.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
291> Truth doesn't sell well.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
291> Plonk helps.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Raving... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 24, 11:50 pm, "tho... at (no spam) antispam.ham" <tho... at (no spam) ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:
Quote: Raving Loonie writes:
291> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
No, I didn't write that. It s part of the header which is hidden in my
Google Groups newsreader. You have deliberately emphasized it by
making it visible and using it at the beginning of your responses.
Quote: What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
Who is "eh", Loonie? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
Another emphasis of target adress. Similar to your opening comment.
Hmm.
Quote: What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
Gee. You seem to be telling me something here.
Yes, there is the overtly obvious ...
"What does that have to do with OS/2, (... and ... 'target') Loonie?"
... but 4 times here and a heck of a lot more times elsewhere.
Quandruple hmmm.
To be continued after removing 'comp.os.os2.advocacy' from the
distribution list. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Raving... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 10:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 25, 3:34 am, Raving <raving.loo... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 24, 11:50 pm, "tho... at (no spam) antispam.ham" <tho... at (no spam) ifa.hawaii.edu
wrote:
Raving Loonie writes:
291> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
No, I didn't write that. It s part of the header which is hidden in my
Google Groups newsreader. You have deliberately emphasized it by
making it visible and using it at the beginning of your responses.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
Who is "eh", Loonie? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
Another emphasis of target adress. Similar to your opening comment.
Hmm.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
Gee. You seem to be telling me something here.
Yes, there is the overtly obvious ...
"What does that have to do with OS/2, (... and ... 'target') Loonie?"
... but 4 times here and a heck of a lot more times elsewhere.
Quandruple hmmm.
To be continued after removing 'comp.os.os2.advocacy' from the
distribution list.
I am a one-trick-pony Tholen. That trick is to read minds.
I am struggling to read your mind *now* ...
Nawh, there is nothing magical or extraordinary about reading a
person's. It's more to do with what I mean by reading-a-mind.
I am a one-trick-pony. To be honest, every person is a one-trick-pony.
My trick is to discern the single 'trick' that is used.
For me, reading a person's mind means to figure out their point of
view.
I am trying to clue into to your point of view. ... I am trying to see
where you are coming from.
*Tonight* I feel that I am catching onto it.
It's not easy to pick out your point of view. You sure are hyper
focused. Some would unflattering call that 'relentless' or 'obsessed'
or heartless, etc, etc said so many times over in many places.
It's misleading
Quote: What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
Relentlessness?
Confrontational?
Bot?
Nawh ... It reminds me of an asteroid.
... An asteroid moving with inertia, free of perturbing influence.
A significant part of your point of view is ... as if it were moving,
undisturbed.
As things go, OS/2 has something of that quality ... carried into the
long goodnight with much inertia and little disruption.
I'm trying to pick out your point of view ... to see where you are
coming from ... and I have this sense .. this feel of a heavenly
body moving through space.
Much refinement is appropriate.
Quote: What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
It keeps coming and coming and coming ... unopposed, uninfluenced
Those headers ...
Those target addresses ...
.... the 'Non sequitur'
.... 'Classic erroneous presupposition.'
Doesn't touch. No perturbation. No friction. No connecting relevance.
There is much about your point of view that I am missing, that
confuses me, that is not familiar to me.
Hmm. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Raving Loonie writes:
292> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
292> No, I didn't write that.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> It s part of the header which is hidden in my
292> Google Groups newsreader.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> You have deliberately emphasized it by
292> making it visible and using it at the beginning of your
responses.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim
have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> Another emphasis of target adress.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim
have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> Similar to your opening comment.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim
have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> Hmm.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> Gee.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> You seem to be telling me something here.
What seems to you is irrelevant, Loonie.
292> Yes, there is the overtly obvious ...
292> "What does that have to do with OS/2, (... and ... 'target')
Loonie?"
I see that you didn't answer the question, Loonie. No
surprise there, really. It's "overtly obvious" that you
didn't answer the question, Loonie.
292> ... but 4 times here and a heck of a lot more times elsewhere.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> Quandruple hmmm.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Loonie?
292> To be continued after removing 'comp.os.os2.advocacy' from the
292> distribution list.
Why, Loonie? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Raving Loonie writes:
293> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical
Message-ID: <53e8294c-ec24-43af-
abb5-107b390b088d at (no spam) d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
293> I am a one-trick-pony Tholen.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> That trick is to read minds.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> I am struggling to read your mind *now* ...
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Nawh, there is nothing magical or extraordinary about reading a
293> person's.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> It's more to do with what I mean by reading-a-mind.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> I am a one-trick-pony.
What does your repetition have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> To be honest, every person is a one-trick-pony.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> My trick is to discern the single 'trick' that is used.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> For me, reading a person's mind means to figure out their point
of
293> view.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> I am trying to clue into to your point of view.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> ... I am trying to see where you are coming from.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> *Tonight* I feel that I am catching onto it.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> It's not easy to pick out your point of view.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> You sure are hyper focused.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Some would unflattering call that 'relentless' or 'obsessed'
293> or heartless, etc, etc said so many times over in many places.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> It's misleading
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Relentlessness?
What does your question have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Confrontational?
What does your question have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Bot?
What does your ridiculous question have to do with classical music,
Loonie?
293> Nawh ... It reminds me of an asteroid.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> ... An asteroid moving with inertia, free of perturbing
influence.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> A significant part of your point of view is ... as if it were
moving,
293> undisturbed.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> As things go, OS/2 has something of that quality ... carried into
the
293> long goodnight with much inertia and little disruption.
Amazing; you remove comp.os.os2.advocacy from the distribution
and then start to talk about OS/2.
293> I'm trying to pick out your point of view ... to see where you
are
293> coming from ... and I have this sense .. this feel of a
heavenly
293> body moving through space.
What does your repetition have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Much refinement is appropriate.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> It keeps coming and coming and coming ... unopposed, uninfluenced
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Those headers ...
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Those target addresses ...
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> .... the 'Non sequitur'
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> .... 'Classic erroneous presupposition.'
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Doesn't touch.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> No perturbation.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> No friction.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> No connecting relevance.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> There is much about your point of view that I am missing, that
293> confuses me, that is not familiar to me.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?
293> Hmm.
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Double-A... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 24, 8:50 pm, "tho... at (no spam) antispam.ham" <tho... at (no spam) ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:
Quote: Raving Loonie writes:
291> Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,sci.astro,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
291> I am a *CANADIAN* ,
I am a Wisconsinite!
And you, Tholen, are a Minnesotan!
Been back to do a little ice fising lately? Eat a little Lutefisk?
Double-A |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tholen at (no spam) antispam.ham... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Double-A writes:
658> I am a Wisconsinite!
"I do nothing but ask OS/2 questions here"
--Double-A
Yeah, right.
658> And you, Tholen, are a Minnesotan!
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have
to do with OS/2, Double-A?
658> Been back to do a little ice fising lately?
"I do nothing but ask OS/2 questions here"
--Double-A
Yeah, right.
658> Eat a little Lutefisk?
"I do nothing but ask OS/2 questions here"
--Double-A
Yeah, right. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:01 pm
|
|