 |
|
| Hobby Forum Index » Heraldry » Emblem/logo of Supreme Court... |
|
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| The Chief... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 9, 10:37 am, Graham <gra... at (no spam) gmilne.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: On 9 Oct, 16:17, The Chief <The_Chieft... at (no spam) att.net> wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:03 am, Graham <gra... at (no spam) gmilne.demon.co.uk> wrote:
. And
believe me, they may start with the little things, like replacing the
royal arms with a logo, but be in no doubt that their actual and
eventual target is the monarchy itself and all it stands for. We must
fight them on the beaches.... and on the (non) heraldic carpet if it
comes to that.
No wonder I voted for Labour!
Regards,
The Chief
No, tell us - why did you vote Labour?
This is getting a little off topic, but....
I am tempted to say Thatcher, Thatcher, Thatcher, but more seriously I
voted Labour because of:
1) Thatcher and her legacy,
2) Much better attitude towards Ireland and 6-county problem,
3) As you say, much, much more republican than the Tories,
4) Family tradition (or, rather, tradition of one side of the family,
other side was SF/FF)
Regards,
The Chief |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Turenne... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Graham wrote:
Quote: Seriously? My country is disintegrating before my very eyes, so of
course I take it seriously. After 12 years of the 'Labour project' (at
the centre of which was an attempt to undermine the social cohesion of
this country in terms of race, religion, morality and a sense of
shared history and culture) the damage done to this country morally,
socially and financially is incalculable and possibly beyond repair.
We have lived through the most dangerous and destructive government in
our history. Vast swathes of the 'establishment' are infected with a
'liberal elitism' (which is actually a form of tyranny) that delights
in this process and wishes to sweep away all traces of our past. And
believe me, they may start with the little things, like replacing the
royal arms with a logo, but be in no doubt that their actual and
eventual target is the monarchy itself and all it stands for. We must
fight them on the beaches.... and on the (non) heraldic carpet if it
comes to that.
Someone devises a rubbish logo and all of a sudden you start using
words like Labour project... damage done to this country
morally....liberal elite...eventual target is the monarchy....tyranny
etc. What is it about right wingers? Why can't you ever get some sense
of perspective? It's a rubbish logo...that's all! Scales and a sword
would have been much better, but to suggest that this confection of
flowers, thistles and leaves represents some sort of Socialist
Conspiracy is just plain daft. Get a grip!
Richard L |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 9, 1:02 pm, Turenne <rick.lich... at (no spam) virgin.net> wrote:
Quote: Graham wrote:
Seriously? My country is disintegrating before my very eyes, so of
course I take it seriously. After 12 years of the 'Labour project' (at
the centre of which was an attempt to undermine the social cohesion of
this country in terms of race, religion, morality and a sense of
shared history and culture) the damage done to this country morally,
socially and financially is incalculable and possibly beyond repair.
We have lived through the most dangerous and destructive government in
our history. Vast swathes of the 'establishment' are infected with a
'liberal elitism' (which is actually a form of tyranny) that delights
in this process and wishes to sweep away all traces of our past. And
believe me, they may start with the little things, like replacing the
royal arms with a logo, but be in no doubt that their actual and
eventual target is the monarchy itself and all it stands for. We must
fight them on the beaches.... and on the (non) heraldic carpet if it
comes to that.
Someone devises a rubbish logo and all of a sudden you start using
words like Labour project... damage done to this country
morally....liberal elite...eventual target is the monarchy....tyranny
etc. What is it about right wingers? Why can't you ever get some sense
of perspective? It's a rubbish logo...that's all! Scales and a sword
would have been much better, but to suggest that this confection of
flowers, thistles and leaves represents some sort of Socialist
Conspiracy is just plain daft. Get a grip!
Richard L
To get back on topic:
Why is it that multiple people seem to think that there is something
highly innovative in the use of these floral emblems?
There isn't, other than in the use of a flax to represent the 6-
counties - Britain seems to be unsure as to what symbol to use for its
remaining Irish colony.
The use of the rose, thistle and shamrock to represent England,
Scotland and Ireland is highly traditional and has been around for
centuries, so why there suddenly a big brouhaha about this (heraldic)
badge completely escapes me.
Regards,
The Chief |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Greg... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 9 Oct, 13:13, The Chief <The_Chieft... at (no spam) att.net> wrote:
Quote: On Oct 9, 1:02 pm, Turenne <rick.lich... at (no spam) virgin.net> wrote:
Graham wrote:
Seriously? My country is disintegrating before my very eyes, so of
course I take it seriously. After 12 years of the 'Labour project' (at
the centre of which was an attempt to undermine the social cohesion of
this country in terms of race, religion, morality and a sense of
shared history and culture) the damage done to this country morally,
socially and financially is incalculable and possibly beyond repair..
We have lived through the most dangerous and destructive government in
our history. Vast swathes of the 'establishment' are infected with a
'liberal elitism' (which is actually a form of tyranny) that delights
in this process and wishes to sweep away all traces of our past. And
believe me, they may start with the little things, like replacing the
royal arms with a logo, but be in no doubt that their actual and
eventual target is the monarchy itself and all it stands for. We must
fight them on the beaches.... and on the (non) heraldic carpet if it
comes to that.
Someone devises a rubbish logo and all of a sudden you start using
words like Labour project... damage done to this country
morally....liberal elite...eventual target is the monarchy....tyranny
etc. What is it about right wingers? Why can't you ever get some sense
of perspective? It's a rubbish logo...that's all! Scales and a sword
would have been much better, but to suggest that this confection of
flowers, thistles and leaves represents some sort of Socialist
Conspiracy is just plain daft. Get a grip!
Richard L
To get back on topic:
Why is it that multiple people seem to think that there is something
highly innovative in the use of these floral emblems?
There isn't, other than in the use of a flax to represent the 6-
counties - Britain seems to be unsure as to what symbol to use for its
remaining Irish colony.
The use of the rose, thistle and shamrock to represent England,
Scotland and Ireland is highly traditional and has been around for
centuries, so why there suddenly a big brouhaha about this (heraldic)
badge completely escapes me.
Regards,
The Chief- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't think you're payin attention: there is no shamrock. This
(badge) makes good use of Omega from the Greek alphabet. I still
don't know what the blue flower is, or could possibly represent. The
rose? Again, "eehhh" Who knows. There is something of a problem, in
that the COA allowed this "logo" to pass muster as heraldically
representative of a royal office, namely the Supreme Court.
What I find more interesting however is that the herladic
intelligencia that likes this forum have nothing to offer in the way
reasoned explanation or for that matter identifying anything about
this badge. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Graham... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 9 Oct, 21:02, Turenne <rick.lich... at (no spam) virgin.net> wrote:
Quote: Graham wrote:
Seriously? My country is disintegrating before my very eyes, so of
course I take it seriously. After 12 years of the 'Labour project' (at
the centre of which was an attempt to undermine the social cohesion of
this country in terms of race, religion, morality and a sense of
shared history and culture) the damage done to this country morally,
socially and financially is incalculable and possibly beyond repair.
We have lived through the most dangerous and destructive government in
our history. Vast swathes of the 'establishment' are infected with a
'liberal elitism' (which is actually a form of tyranny) that delights
in this process and wishes to sweep away all traces of our past. And
believe me, they may start with the little things, like replacing the
royal arms with a logo, but be in no doubt that their actual and
eventual target is the monarchy itself and all it stands for. We must
fight them on the beaches.... and on the (non) heraldic carpet if it
comes to that.
Someone devises a rubbish logo and all of a sudden you start using
words like Labour project... damage done to this country
morally....liberal elite...eventual target is the monarchy....tyranny
etc. What is it about right wingers? Why can't you ever get some sense
of perspective? It's a rubbish logo...that's all! Scales and a sword
would have been much better, but to suggest that this confection of
flowers, thistles and leaves represents some sort of Socialist
Conspiracy is just plain daft. Get a grip!
Richard L- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Removing the royal arms from the highest court of appeal in the land
is a serious matter and wasn't done by mistake or without an awareness
of its significance. And stop throwing stupid allegations about
conspiracies about. But if you are unaware of the concerted assault on
our liberties by this Labour government then you must be either blind
or stupid. Fortunately, people are waking up to what is going on -
even if you aren't. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 9, 4:07 pm, Graham <gra... at (no spam) gmilne.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: On 9 Oct, 21:02, Turenne <rick.lich... at (no spam) virgin.net> wrote:
Graham wrote:
Seriously? My country is disintegrating before my very eyes, so of
course I take it seriously. After 12 years of the 'Labour project' (at
the centre of which was an attempt to undermine the social cohesion of
this country in terms of race, religion, morality and a sense of
shared history and culture) the damage done to this country morally,
socially and financially is incalculable and possibly beyond repair..
We have lived through the most dangerous and destructive government in
our history. Vast swathes of the 'establishment' are infected with a
'liberal elitism' (which is actually a form of tyranny) that delights
in this process and wishes to sweep away all traces of our past. And
believe me, they may start with the little things, like replacing the
royal arms with a logo, but be in no doubt that their actual and
eventual target is the monarchy itself and all it stands for. We must
fight them on the beaches.... and on the (non) heraldic carpet if it
comes to that.
Someone devises a rubbish logo and all of a sudden you start using
words like Labour project... damage done to this country
morally....liberal elite...eventual target is the monarchy....tyranny
etc. What is it about right wingers? Why can't you ever get some sense
of perspective? It's a rubbish logo...that's all! Scales and a sword
would have been much better, but to suggest that this confection of
flowers, thistles and leaves represents some sort of Socialist
Conspiracy is just plain daft. Get a grip!
Richard L- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Removing the royal arms from the highest court of appeal in the land
is a serious matter and wasn't done by mistake or without an awareness
of its significance. And stop throwing stupid allegations about
conspiracies about. But if you are unaware of the concerted assault on
our liberties by this Labour government then you must be either blind
or stupid. Fortunately, people are waking up to what is going on -
even if you aren't.
Graham,
You don't seem to appreciate that what you complain of is in
accordance with tradition! The change can be justified on two very
different grounds:
(1) Organisations granted arms/badges are expected to use them. Use of
the "royal" arms is for governmental organisations that don't have
arms or badges of their own. Previously the courts did not possess
arms or badges, but now the British Supreme Court does, and as such it
is fully in accord with tradition and precedent that it should use its
own new badge instead of the "royal" arms.
(2) One of the changes in the occupied 6-counties consequent to the
Belfast agreements is that the "royal" arms are no longer to be used
there in new or refurbished courts. As the British Supreme Court is
also (unfortunately) the current supreme court for the 6-counties, it
is in accord with the agreement that the new courts don't have the
royal arms.
Regards,
The Chief |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 8, 4:48 pm, Joseph McMillan <mcmillan... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: The discussion seems to focus on the latter
issue, but the court could have the best designed, most heraldic badge
in the history of heraldry and the absence of the royal arms from the
courtroom would still be an issue, no?
Joseph McMillan
Joseph,
Just to repeat the points I made to some others: while the
absence of the "royal" arms may be a change, the change is in line
with tradition and precedent. The "royal" arms were displayed when the
court had no arms or badge of its own. That has changed, and now that
the British Supreme Court has a badge of its own, it is appropriate
and "correct" that they should use it rather than the generic arms.
In addition, elimination of the arms has the secondary benefit of
bringing usage into line with policy for courts in the six-counties.
Regards,
The Chief |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Constantine... |
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The Chief wrote:
Quote: Why is it that multiple people seem to think that there is something
highly innovative in the use of these floral emblems?
There isn't, other than in the use of a flax to represent the 6-
counties
This is hardly a recent innovation. Flax appeared on (pre-decimal
cuurency) postage stamps issued in Northern Ireland from 1963-71. It
appears on UK £1 coins minted in 1986 and 1991 and in the logo of the
Northern Ireland assembly.
To me, the use of flax as a symbol in UK heraldry seems to make a lot
more sense than the use of the shamrock or the harp (...surely that will
disappear from the Royal Arms if/when George VII takes the throne?)
x
http://www.collectgbstamps.co.uk/images/gb/1968/1968_3350_l.jpg |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Greg... |
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 10 Oct, 03:21, constant... at (no spam) xsublime.demon.co.uk (Peter Constantine)
wrote:
Quote: The Chief wrote:
Why is it that multiple people seem to think that there is something
highly innovative in the use of these floral emblems?
There isn't, other than in the use of a flax to represent the 6-
counties
This is hardly a recent innovation. Flax appeared on (pre-decimal
cuurency) postage stamps issued in Northern Ireland from 1963-71. It
appears on UK £1 coins minted in 1986 and 1991 and in the logo of the
Northern Ireland assembly.
To me, the use of flax as a symbol in UK heraldry seems to make a lot
more sense than the use of the shamrock or the harp (...surely that will
disappear from the Royal Arms if/when George VII takes the throne?)
x
http://www.collectgbstamps.co.uk/images/gb/1968/1968_3350_l.jpg
Plants do make interesting geographical images and add life to a
design. I'm with Graham on this however and my question would be,
don't you think that this badge design for the court is rather a weak
image for such a strong set of offices? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief... |
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 10, 3:21 am, constant... at (no spam) xsublime.demon.co.uk (Peter
Constantine) wrote:
Quote: The Chief wrote:
Why is it that multiple people seem to think that there is something
highly innovative in the use of these floral emblems?
There isn't, other than in the use of a flax to represent the 6-
counties
This is hardly a recent innovation. Flax appeared on (pre-decimal
cuurency) postage stamps issued in Northern Ireland from 1963-71. It
appears on UK £1 coins minted in 1986 and 1991 and in the logo of the
Northern Ireland assembly.
To me, the use of flax as a symbol in UK heraldry seems to make a lot
more sense than the use of the shamrock or the harp (...surely that will
disappear from the Royal Arms if/when George VII takes the throne?)
x
http://www.collectgbstamps.co.uk/images/gb/1968/1968_3350_l.jpg
You are correct on the lineage of the flax emblem, but:
1) This is all "recent" in my view,
2) All sorts of weird and wonderful stuff appear on the coinage and
stamps...
3) Most importantly, none of your examples, including the 6-county
assembly, are at the level of officially approved formal heraldic
badge, as in the case of the Supreme court.
Finally, any change in the British state arms requires legislation.
Regards,
The Chief |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Turenne... |
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The Chief wrote:
Quote: Britain does not occupy all of Ulster...
Britain doesn't 'occupy' any of Ulster.
RL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Graham... |
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 10 Oct, 19:38, constant... at (no spam) xsublime.demon.co.uk (Peter Constantine)
wrote:
Quote: Greg wrote:
Plants do make interesting geographical images and add life to a
design. I'm with Graham on this however and my question would be,
don't you think that this badge design for the court is rather a weak
image for such a strong set of offices?
Yes... I'd agree with that. I was surprised when I read that this badge
was the work of the CoA. For me, it's really not a great piece of
heraldic art.
x
'Not a great piece of heraldic art'. It is childish rubbish; the sort
of thing a class of 5 year-olds would dream up. OK for 5 year-olds;
not OK for the highest court in the land. It lacks maturity, gravitas,
dignity, grandeur - all the things that are actually required for a
court of law. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Constantine... |
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Greg wrote:
Quote: Plants do make interesting geographical images and add life to a
design. I'm with Graham on this however and my question would be,
don't you think that this badge design for the court is rather a weak
image for such a strong set of offices?
Yes... I'd agree with that. I was surprised when I read that this badge
was the work of the CoA. For me, it's really not a great piece of
heraldic art.
x |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 10, 9:58 pm, Turenne <rick.lich... at (no spam) virgin.net> wrote:
Quote: Michael Merrigan:
Maybe with the excellent political relationship now between Dublin and
London that the British authorities would consider dropping the
heraldic claim to sovereignty over Ireland as represented in the
current British Royal Arms. It certainly would be nice neighbourly
gesture - don't you think?
I suppose your suggestion makes sense. It took 250 years after we lost
Calais for George III to renounce his claims to the French throne and
drop the fleurs-de-lys. Are you suggesting the harp should be replaced
by the Red Hand of Ulster?
Richard L
Richard, a Chara,
I wouldn't suggest utilising the Red Hand as it would simply compound
the problem, therefore, I would suggest replacing the Harp with
something representing the modern Northern Ireland - the one of the
shared future rather than the one of the fractious past.
Indeed, why not 'flax it' again like the emblem of the UK Supreme
Court. Whilst, the use of flax would also represent a post-plantation
Ulster - it seems to have been embraced as a 'neutral symbol' and
therein we possibly have a solution.
I would certainly advocate that any change to the current [British]
Royal Arms should involve a greater inclusivity in its heraldic
representation of the four parts of the United Kingdom - England,
Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales/Cymru. Maybe this should have
been done when the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly were
established. (re-established, I suppose for the former)
I mean - let's not forget our Celtic cousins in Wales/Cymru.
Regards
Michael Merrigan
General Secretary
Genealogical Society of Ireland
www.familyhistory.ie |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Constantine... |
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Michael wrote:
Quote: I would certainly advocate that any change to the current [British]
Royal Arms should involve a greater inclusivity in its heraldic
representation of the four parts of the United Kingdom - England,
Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales/Cymru. Maybe this should have
been done when the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly were
established. (re-established, I suppose for the former)
I mean - let's not forget our Celtic cousins in Wales/Cymru.
....or indeed those in Cornwall/Kernow.
Wouldn't the 'heraldic' answer to the removal of the harp from the Royal
Arms be to simply quarter 'England' and 'Scotland'?
x
[Wales is present in the arms of her Prince] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:31 am
|
|