Main Page | Report this Page
Hobby Forum Index  »  Arts - Animation  »  A century of movie fx--in 5 minutes...
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2

A century of movie fx--in 5 minutes...

Author Message
Derek Janssen...
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:14 am
Guest
Bill Anderson wrote:
Quote:
Actually, I was trying to jump on Ken's point about Buster being the
Jackie Chan of his day, or pre-mainstream Jackie being the Buster of
his, either one.
On a "Greatest Stunts" recap, maybe, but such uses of special effects
were rare enough outside of Melies.


It was a great stunt indeed.

Last night I couldn't find much of anything on "Sherlock, Jr." and
just now I found the whole thing. The clip I was looking for starts
at about 16:40 and basically runs for the rest of the movie, which is
probably why I didn't find it in the form of a clip. It's easy to
slide the slider thingy to 16:40:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8074699069179823154

Although more editing-related, I prefer the even more iconic proto-"Duck
Amuck" inspiration immediately afterwards, at 19:20

Derek Janssen (and on this farm, he had an...igloo?)
ejanss1 at (no spam) verizon.net
 
Ken from Chicago...
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:33 pm
Guest
"Tom" <drsoong at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:6c3e3540-6e65-4b1d-a0fd-46828ec7d652 at (no spam) d21g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 1, 3:13 am, "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nos... at (no spam) comcast.net>
wrote:
Quote:
"Tom" <drso... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message

news:980a4ac8-f1e9-480b-bce1-007c524c424e at (no spam) o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 31, 9:31 pm, Bill Anderson <billanderson... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:





nick wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:00 pm, Tom <drso... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
On Aug 31, 5:59 pm, RichA <rander3... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

Ken from Chicago wrote:
For your viewing pleasure, why wait for the Oscars to do a montage
of
special fx when it can be done online--and not make you wait for
the
Best
Picture Oscar?
Without further ado, movie effects--from 1900 to 2008:
http://scifiwire.com/2009/08/watch-the-history-of-sci-.php
-- Ken from Chicago (who likes the first one directly showing the
initial
drawing leading up to the effect--a nice reminder that fx are
ultimate made
by people using devices not merely by the devices themselves)
They going to show how they peaked around 1990 and went downhill
from
there?
A normal person would watch it first and then comment.

Tom

A history of visual effects without this?

http://cache.io9.com/assets/resources/2008/02/trip_to_the_moon.jpg

Or this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsyRhRR5Iu4

--
Bill Anderson

I am the Mighty Favog

~Buster Keaton was brilliant and very, very brave.

~Tom

Kinda like Jackie Chan.

-- Ken from Chicago- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

~Wouldn't it be the other way around?

~Jackie Chan is kinda like Buster Keaton?

~Keaton did, after all, preceed Chan.

~Tom

True, tho Chan got to study all of Keaton's injuries--and still did his own
stunts.

-- Ken from Chicago
 
M.L....
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:41 pm
Guest
Quote:
And there was no Terminator
stuff, although I don't think any of that was original by the time the films
were made.

Terminator stuff was shown as the guy morphed through the jail bars.
IIRC, it was original for a mainstream movie.
 
moviePig...
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:39 am
Guest
On Sep 2, 10:41 pm, M.L. <m... at (no spam) privacy.invalid> wrote:
Quote:
And there was no Terminator
stuff, although I don't think any of that was original by the time the films
were made.

Terminator stuff was shown as the guy morphed through the jail bars.
IIRC, it was original for a mainstream movie.

....to say the least.

--

- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com
 
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:17 pm