| Hobby Forum Index » Pyrotechnics » Interesting physics/chem problem. (Can you improve my... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Tom Biasi... |
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"michalchik" <michalchik at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:32a4cc82-6058-47fb-85b1-8dcd74e0f664 at (no spam) r2g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
Quote: I posted this originally on sci.chem and physics but it seems to
belong here too for different reasons. Is anybody else familiar with
this phenomena?
I was at a teacher training camp in materials science this last summer
and I saw something extraordinary in a science demo. What I saw seemed
to be a thermite reaction initiated by an impact. The trainer had two
large steel ball bearings, ~ 2 inch diameter, that were rusty. Here is
what I observed:
*** Snip some very interesting observations:
This is not what you are asking but maybe you will find this article
interesting.
http://www.mms.gov/tarprojects/405/Final%20Report-2002_1.pdf
Tom |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
What makes you think you need to figure energy converted to heat? Why
not just assume that at the molecular level it was simply kinetic
energy directly applied to a chemical rxn? More efficient in getting
over the hump than heat, I would think. The Al atoms are being rammed
straight into Fe2O3 molecules.
Robert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| michael michalchik... |
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 2, 1:58 pm, Bob <robg... at (no spam) bestweb.net> wrote:
Quote: What makes you think you need to figure energy converted to heat? Why
not just assume that at the molecular level it was simply kinetic
energy directly applied to a chemical rxn? More efficient in getting
over the hump than heat, I would think. The Al atoms are being rammed
straight into Fe2O3 molecules.
Robert
You are thinking along the lines I was thinking. Heat may not be the
best way to describe the initiation of the reaction, but I have never
seen a scientific treatment of impact triggered chemical reactions. Is
ramming molecules together en mass actually different from heating
them together? I really don't know. At first glance it would seem that
in either case you are talking about molecular collisions so heat
energy and kinetic energy would seem to be equivalent, but other
factors might come into play. Is a self reinforcing shock wave
generated at the point of contact? Are the bonds stretched in some
unusal way that makes them more suceptible to reactions, such as
concerntraing the enrgy in breaking the bonds of certain atoms? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| michael michalchik... |
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 2, 6:43 am, "Tom Biasi" <tombi... at (no spam) optonline.net> wrote:
Quote: "michalchik" <michalc... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:32a4cc82-6058-47fb-85b1-8dcd74e0f664 at (no spam) r2g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
I posted this originally on sci.chem and physics but it seems to
belong here too for different reasons. Is anybody else familiar with
this phenomena?
I was at a teacher training camp in materials science this last summer
and I saw something extraordinary in a science demo. What I saw seemed
to be a thermite reaction initiated by an impact. The trainer had two
large steel ball bearings, ~ 2 inch diameter, that were rusty. Here is
what I observed:
*** Snip some very interesting observations:
This is not what you are asking but maybe you will find this article
interesting.
http://www.mms.gov/tarprojects/405/Final%20Report-2002_1.pdf
Tom
Thanks Tom,
Not exactly the same but certainly relevant. This is closer than
anything I have found. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Lloyd E. Sponenburgh... |
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
michael michalchik <michalchik at (no spam) aol.com> fired this volley in
news:c181a9a5-3327-4935-9a4f-c480f58239b7
at (no spam) w41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:
Quote: You are thinking along the lines I was thinking. Heat may not be the
best way to describe the initiation of the reaction, but I have
never
seen a scientific treatment of impact triggered chemical reactions.
Is
ramming molecules together en mass actually different from heating
them together? I really don't know. At first glance it would seem
that
in either case you are talking about molecular collisions so heat
energy and kinetic energy would seem to be equivalent, but other
factors might come into play. Is a self reinforcing shock wave
generated at the point of contact? Are the bonds stretched in some
unusal way that makes them more suceptible to reactions, such as
concerntraing the enrgy in breaking the bonds of certain atoms?
Welding - which is really placing two or metals in solution with one-
another to form a new alloy - may be done by impact. That's how
modern US coins are laminated.
But there may be another phenomenon at work -- think "Diesel".
Tiny pockets of air trapped at the point of impact may be compression-
heated above the ignition temperature of the surrounding reactants.
LLoyd |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob... |
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 3, 1:25 am, michael michalchik <michalc... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Quote: What makes you think you need to figure energy converted to heat? Why
not just assume that at the molecular level it was simply kinetic
energy directly applied to a chemical rxn? More efficient in getting
over the hump than heat, I would think. The Al atoms are being rammed
straight into Fe2O3 molecules.
Robert
You are thinking along the lines I was thinking. Heat may not be the
best way to describe the initiation of the reaction, but I have never
seen a scientific treatment of impact triggered chemical reactions. Is
ramming molecules together en mass actually different from heating
them together? I really don't know. At first glance it would seem that
in either case you are talking about molecular collisions so heat
energy and kinetic energy would seem to be equivalent,
Heat includes motion of atoms in all directions; here they're pointed
directly at each other, not randomly. Heat also goes into potential
energy of atomic vibrations, meaning much of the energy is stored up
in stretching or bending or compressing of bonds rather than motion.
Robert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| michael michalchik... |
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 3, 6:03 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
<lloydspinsidemindspring.com> wrote:
Quote: michaelmichalchik<michalc... at (no spam) aol.com> fired this volley in
news:c181a9a5-3327-4935-9a4f-c480f58239b7
at (no spam) w41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:> You are thinking along the lines I was thinking. Heat may not be the
best way to describe the initiation of the reaction, but I have
never
seen a scientific treatment of impact triggered chemical reactions.
Is
ramming molecules together en mass actually different from heating
them together? I really don't know. At first glance it would seem
that
in either case you are talking about molecular collisions so heat
energy and kinetic energy would seem to be equivalent, but other
factors might come into play. Is a self reinforcing shock wave
generated at the point of contact? Are the bonds stretched in some
unusal way that makes them more suceptible to reactions, such as
concerntraing the enrgy in breaking the bonds of certain atoms?
Welding - which is really placing two or metals in solution with one-
another to form a new alloy - may be done by impact. That's how
modern US coins are laminated.
But there may be another phenomenon at work -- think "Diesel".
Tiny pockets of air trapped at the point of impact may be compression-
heated above the ignition temperature of the surrounding reactants.
LLoyd
Could be. How would we attempt to falsify such an idea and distinguish
it from alternate hypotheses. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Fairbrother... |
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
michalchik wrote:
Quote:
Feel free to improve on this calculation.
1) there are two balls, total energy is 1.2J not 0.6J
2) the compression will not be even, as the rust is gritty, and some
parts will get more than their fair share of energy
3) thermite may well have a lower ignition temperature when under
compression, though I don't know for sure.
-- Peter Fairbrother |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|