"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:OJadncMpHM45T-LVnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"ben bradlee" <NoWay at (no spam) Way.Bite.Me> wrote in message
news:VOGdnYTvF_ZrLuLVnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d at (no spam) centurytel.net...

Again, yah?


Well, you managed to fall off the rubber doll. That's maybe half way
there.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:OJadncMpHM45T-LVnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"ben bradlee" <NoWay at (no spam) Way.Bite.Me> wrote in message
news:VOGdnYTvF_ZrLuLVnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d at (no spam) centurytel.net...

Again, yah?


Well, you managed to fall off the rubber doll. That's maybe half way
there.

Lee used the example of 500 dead children to buttress his argument
that the victims should be armed. How would you arm 500 dead children
without arming them?

Greg Mossman wrote:
Lee used the example of 500 dead children to buttress his argument
that the victims should be armed. How would you arm 500 dead children
without arming them?

Not at all. They cited the newspaper: "Blagojevich said
there's been a child shot nearly every day"

Then Lee wrote: How about arming the most likely victims,

the law abiding citizens...

I don`t see your assumptions neither follow your "logic".

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:OJadncMpHM45T-LVnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"ben bradlee" <NoWay at (no spam) Way.Bite.Me> wrote in message
news:VOGdnYTvF_ZrLuLVnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d at (no spam) centurytel.net...

Again, yah?


Well, you managed to fall off the rubber doll. That's maybe half way there.

On Jul 18, 9:27 am, Joerg Hahn <d... at (no spam) notabstieg.de> wrote:
Greg Mossman wrote:
Lee used the example of 500 dead children to buttress his argument
that the victims should be armed. How would you arm 500 dead children
without arming them?
Not at all. They cited the newspaper: "Blagojevich said
there's been a child shot nearly every day"

Then Lee wrote: How about arming the most likely victims,

the law abiding citizens...

I don`t see your assumptions neither follow your "logic".

Again, what's logical about using shot children as the example of "the
law abiding citizen" victims who should be armed then not even arming
them?

Besides, how do we even know that all these shot children were law
abiding citizens? Some of them could have been illegals. Some of
them could have been criminals.

It was obviously a very poor example on Lee's part, we can agree on
that.

Greg is deploring the decease of one would be strawberry picker.

On Jul 19, 10:05 am, "mat.voss" <spammat.v... at (no spam) gmx.de> wrote:


To recap, you have exactly two ways of reading Lee's ramblings. (1)
Lee proposes arming as a response to shot children, i.e. arming the
children; or (2) Lee proposes arming someone else as a response to
shot children, which is a solution that doesn't have anything to do
with the problem and is just as nutty as (1). Take your pick.

What about arming parents.


Parents do enough harm to their kids as it is. Now you want them
shooting the brats?

Greg Mossman <mossman at (no spam) qnet.com> wrote in news:777c767c-3238-482e-b157-
4d27368ba7dc at (no spam) u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com:


It's bad enough now that the kids are armed.

"An Ark-La-Tex family is grieving over their four-year-old child's
death after they say he shot himself. 'He'll always be missed,
always, because that was our baby,' said Yvonne Morrison. A backpack
for the first day of pre-school, a bicycle rolled through dusty
driveways, and toy trucks smashed together during play time - all
triggers for instant memories of four-year-old Alexander Morrison who
deputies say accidentally shot himself in the head inside his
grandparent's kitchen."

"Alexander's grandmother Lettice was pulling clothes off the line
outside her Natchitoches Parish home. 'All the sudden I heard a pop
and I said oh Lord I hope that child didn't get that pistol,' she
said."

"The most recent statistics available show the number of children and
teens in America killed by guns in 2005 would fill 120 public school
classrooms of 25 students each."

Maybe we should arm the grandparents? Oh, wait...


http://arklatexhomepage.com/content/fulltext/?cid=23921

Does it really surprise anyone that this family is black?

If they had been Anglo, I'm sure Greg would have been making some
comments about inbred trailer trash white rednecks or something and how
they deserved it...

Obviously he was just imitating the gang banger rap crap 'artists' that
this screwed up culture seems to want to hold to such a high regard...

Darwinism in action...

"Greg Mossman" <mossman at (no spam) qnet.com> wrote in message
But you're not fooling anyone except ...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:TKydneCnwYBujB_VnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"Greg Mossman" <mossman at (no spam) qnet.com> wrote in message
But you're not fooling anyone except ...

I agree with Doug.

Lee talks out his ass. There is no sure way to know what Lee is saying in
any of his post. When Doug says "But that's not what he said," he is
probably correct. Lee didn't have an original thought. He copied some
shit from someplace without reading it or randomly pounded some shit and
posted it to rec.scuba. It's happened a thousand times already. Doug knows
Lee real well; they're best buddies. When Doug tells you Lee can't string
two thoughts together you should believe him. I do.

Greg Mossman wrote:
On Jul 19, 7:55 am, Cam in Toronto <cam.b... at (no spam) beer.com> wrote:
On Jul 17, 11:47 pm, Greg Mossman <moss... at (no spam) qnet.com> wrote:

Lee used the example of 500 dead children to buttress his argument
that the victims should be armed.  How would you arm 500 dead children
without arming them?
You can't arm the dead children. It might be possible to booby trap
them but even that won't be effective.

True, I misspoke.  The example was of 500 children shot.  Presumably,
some of them aren't dead and can still be armed or else Lee wouldn't
have suggested arming them.  He's not that kooky.

You misspoke?????

Maybe Lee did too???

Not to his logic but how he expressed it???

Well you have to admit shooting children hones the shootes skills,
they are smaller and generally faster on their feet, making them more
dificult to get you limit on.

from Full Metal Jacket:

On Jul 19, 7:55 am, Cam in Toronto <cam.b... at (no spam) beer.com> wrote:
On Jul 17, 11:47 pm, Greg Mossman <moss... at (no spam) qnet.com> wrote:



Lee used the example of 500 dead children to buttress his argument
that the victims should be armed. How would you arm 500 dead children
without arming them?
You can't arm the dead children. It might be possible to booby trap
them but even that won't be effective.

True, I misspoke. The example was of 500 children shot. Presumably,
some of them aren't dead and can still be armed or else Lee wouldn't
have suggested arming them. He's not that kooky.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:TKydneCnwYBujB_VnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"Greg Mossman" <mossman at (no spam) qnet.com> wrote in message
But you're not fooling anyone except ...

I agree with Doug. Lee talks out his ass. There is no sure way to know
what Lee is saying in any of his post. When Doug says "But that's not what
he said," he is probably correct. Lee didn't have an original thought. He
copied some shit from someplace without reading it or randomly pounded some
shit and posted it to rec.scuba. It's happened a thousand times already.
Doug knows Lee real well; they're best buddies. When Doug tells you Lee
can't string two thoughts together you should believe him. I do.