| |
 |
|
|
Hobby Forum Index » Motorcycles » NASA photo of water on Mars...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| S'mee... |
 Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David T. Ashley... |
| Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"S'mee" <stevenkeith2 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:662f88d1-5371-49c6-8bba-38cf60469a14 at (no spam) f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Well, the problem with "life" is that there is no absolute standard for
complexity. I remember reading somewhere that a simple bacteria has around
900 feedback paths from the chemical environment to how the DNA is
transcribed. To a control systems engineer, 6 feedback paths is already too
many. 900 is ... way too complex.
How complex is "complex"? 900? 6? More? Less?
By some standard of complexity, the evolution of something like man on earth
may be no more remarkable than water boiling is for us.
The people who believe that there can only be life on earth and that God
created it directly ... um ... I don't think so. Life is probably no more
special than water boiling, just at a higher order of complexity. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| S'mee... |
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 9, 7:46 am, Jack Hunt <jhun... at (no spam) tds.net> wrote:
Quote: On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:11:05 -0400, "David T. Ashley" <d... at (no spam) e3ft.com> wrote:
"Jack Hunt" <jhun... at (no spam) tds.net> wrote in message
news:839974lhar3idocpo6qdds53kee15neeq8 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 00:54:11 -0400, "David T. Ashley" <d... at (no spam) e3ft.com> wrote:
Well, the problem with "life" is that there is no absolute standard for
complexity
You didn't check the link, did you? That link shows absolute proof of
water on
Mars, and also shows irrefutable proof of intelligent design.
I did now. Ha. Ha.
Sometimes they just jump in the boat. ;^)
--
Jack
Best part is I didn't even use real worms! Just good ol' purple worms
wit' a weed rig and a slipper weight... heh, sometimes you just get it
raht.
--
keith |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| S'mee... |
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 9, 8:22 am, Chuck Rhode <CRh... at (no spam) LacusVeris.com> wrote:
Quote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:26:39 -0700, S'mee wrote:
Take that you doubting Thomas's and religious fanatics that say
earth is the only possible place for life...
Look, it's people like you what cause unrest.
Not true! I do not "Cause" unrest...because I don't snore that loud.
8^) I do otoh cause chaos, panic and disorder as you well know
--
Keith |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeff... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
AlFire <spamgrinder.trylater at (no spam) ggmail.com> wrote in
news:487565D2.1070103 at (no spam) ggmail.com:
Quote: Jack Hunt wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 00:54:11 -0400, "David T. Ashley" <dta at (no spam) e3ft.com
wrote:
Well, the problem with "life" is that there is no absolute standard
for complexity
You didn't check the link, did you? That link shows absolute proof
of water on Mars,
the proof is not quite correct as there are two Marses (look
carefully, someone pointed it out to me too). we still need to see on
a single Mars
There could be a second Mars that we can't see, just like that second Earth
that is on the directly opposite side of the Sun. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:32 pm
|
|