Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Hobby Forum Index  »  Equestrian  »  radiographic evidence of barefoot trim fixing a...
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
cindi...
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:12 pm
Guest
I've read most of Pete Ramey's site but just found this today:

http://hoofrehab.com/jessica.htm

Since somebody recently said this can't be fixed... The section on
attaching frog support with a shoe and how that doesn't continue to
provide frog support for very long is exactly what I've said on this
group about what happened to Rain.

"If you attach perfect P3 support to the hoof walls today, by tomorrow
your support has crept away a tiny bit. Four weeks later, the support
may have moved distally 1/4 inch or more and in an already compromised
situation P3 is free to migrate right on down with the "fixed support"
and the growing walls."

cindi
Ponai Mahone...
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:08 pm
Guest
Cindi typed

Quote:
I've read most of Pete Ramey's site but just found this today:

http://hoofrehab.com/jessica.htm

Um, I think the point here, is good trim. Farriers who apply shoes to horses
also trim before applying the forementioned. Some of them do a great trim
and some not so much. Same goes for bare foot trimmers.

Anyway, I must have way too much time on my hands.

http://good-times.webshots.com/album/564042630GFfKOW

HRH Wallace The Wonder Horse rads. He foundered in February 06, he had his
deep flexor tendons cut in March. The last six rads are the result.
On the 28th of May, 2007 he gave my daughter one last ride, the first time
he had carried a person since Feburary 2006. He coliced the next day.

Deb
cindi...
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:41 pm
Guest
On Jul 9, 6:29 am, green_kni... at (no spam) greenknight.org.uk.invalid (Catja
Pafort) wrote:
Quote:
cindi wrote:
I've read most of Pete Ramey's site but just found this today:

http://hoofrehab.com/jessica.htm

Since somebody recently said this can't be fixed... The section on
attaching frog support with a shoe and how that doesn't continue to
provide frog support for very long is exactly what I've said on this
group about what happened to Rain.

Interesting. I also note that he says

"Let the horse be the judge and use the pads and boots for any situation
that causes discomfort or possible bruising."

which is a lot closer to my position than to that of rabid barefoot
advocates: you do not leave a horse in discomfort.

Barefooters are very happy to use boots with pads and use them like
crazy. That is way preferable to metal shoes. And the point of the
pads is that they prevent peripheral loading, which makes the "sinker"
worse. Unlike the metal nailed to the wall with frog support, because
as the wall grows out, it moves the support away from the structures
it's supposed to be supporting.

That is the whole point - the trim has to be good, of course, but you
can't nail something on the wall and expect the horse to have the
pressure on the laminae relieved. It won't be; it will be made worse.

cindi
cindi...
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:54 pm
Guest
On Jul 8, 8:08 pm, "Ponai Mahone" <lu... at (no spam) home.pasture> wrote:
Quote:
Cindi typed

I've read most of Pete Ramey's site but just found this today:

http://hoofrehab.com/jessica.htm

Um, I think the point here, is good trim. Farriers who apply shoes to horses
also trim before applying the forementioned. Some of them do a great trim
and some not so much. Same goes for bare foot trimmers.

Of course a good trim is needed in any case. But actually, the point
of this article is that a nailed on shoe cannot relieve the
compromised laminae of the stress because shoes cause the walls to
bear most of the weight - known as peripheral loading - and in a
sinker, the walls are not attached very well and should be relieved by
allowing the horse to use other structures for weight bearing.

That's the whole pull the shoes, put them in a sand pen idea. It
works much better if the trim is such that the walls are relieved, and
if there is nothing nailed on the walls making them bear weight.

cindi

cindi
Ponai Mahone...
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:50 pm
Guest
Cindi typed


Quote:
Of course a good trim is needed in any case. But actually, the point
of this article is that a nailed on shoe cannot relieve the
compromised laminae of the stress because shoes cause the walls to
bear most of the weight - known as peripheral loading - and in a
sinker, the walls are not attached very well and should be relieved by
allowing the horse to use other structures for weight bearing.

I think if you observed the rads I posted, you will note it was not the trim
(which matched Ramey's protocols) that stopped the coffin bone from sinking
(Wally's shoes were pulled shortly after the first rads were taken). In fact
the coffin bone kept on sinking, dispite the fact pads were applied (with
duct tape and vetwrap) to influence the horse's balance and "spread the
load", so he didn't apply his weight in such a way to contribute to the
downward movement of the coffin bone. What saved the horse, and the point I
was making, was the cutting of the deep flexor tendons, which dramatically
improved the location on the bone in the hoof capsule.

Deb
cindi...
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:30 pm
Guest
On Jul 10, 10:56 am, "Ponai Mahone" <lu... at (no spam) home.pasture> wrote:

Quote:
Bare foot trimming may save some horses, applying shoes many have saved
others. My horse was saved by having his tendons cut. He needed immediate
action if he was to keep living. His shoes were pulled because the vet
recommended applying styro foam pads to relieve the pressure on the hoofwall
and the coffin bone. Trimming alone didn't cut it for him. In each
individual horse it depends the degrees of rotation and the sinking of the
coffin bone.

I don't want to say anything mean or hurtful, but didn't he then
colic? And does that mean colic and die? More and more people are
deciding that the whole health of the horse is related to those feet
functioning properly. I am very sorry for your loss (if that's what
happened) and there is no way I'd want to minimize it or make light of
it -it's awful, period.

Quote:
No, he rotated and was sinking, I think it is pretty clear from the Feb to
March films. At the time the March rads were taken, the vet felt the horse
was 2mm from becoming a true "sinker" ie, the coffin bone piercing the sole
of the hoof.

My horse was sinking straight down with no rotation. The DDFT is
thought to be what's pulling the coffin bone away from the hoof wall,
from the tip, back.


Quote:
Everybody else in the world would prefer not to cut tendons. It is a salvage
procedure. It works in some instances. If I had waited to see if a barefoot
trim would work, the horse's coffin bone would have pierced the sole of his
hoof, and it would have been all over.

I'm not sure you can predict that for sure, or with a different
(better?) trim, but all that aside, coffin bone penetration is no
longer a death sentence. All the big name barefoot folks have cured
many, many cases of that, each. Most even turn the horse out on many
acres of land and let them run around "naturally" with their coffin
bones penetrated. The movement speeds the healing. You can find case
after case of coffin bone penetration with no pain, because the two
conditions (trim, removal of the causative circumstances). I am pretty
sure we will one day find out that we can tell if the trim is right
and if the initial insult is removed simply from whether or not the
rotation stops. Since your horse's rotation did not stop, I would say
one or both conditions were not met. A lot of barefoot folk agree
with me; I do know it's still a fringe statement.

Quote:
I don't regret having the tendons
cut, in fact given the same set of circumstances (rotating and sinking), I
would still have it done. As far as pain management, the release of the
tendon on the bone was amazing. The horse didn't have the need to shuffle
from one foot to the other, as is the case for many horses with hoof pain..

A good trim will do that too. You can read about Rain, my sinker,
after her first "barefoot trim":
http://www.allisonacres.org/rainfeet.html
She trotted for the first time in a year after that trim, and I mean
right after, and cantered the next day.

Quote:
PS His heels were appropriate for his foot size.

Cadaver study after cadaver study, as well as study of live animals,
have shown that appropriate heel height does not vary more than a tiny
tiny bit, among any breed, draft to pony. The heel height dictates
the angle of the coffin bone with the ground, and ALL horses,
regardless of how big their feet are, need coffin bones that are
almost ground parallel, or that are ground parallel. In a larger
foot, the structures are all larger, but the appropriate angles are no
different.

cindi
cindi...
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:22 pm
Guest
On Jul 10, 8:08 pm, Ocean of Nuance <lizzardwomanRM... at (no spam) nc.rr.com>
wrote:

Quote:
When you say "almost ground parallel," you need to specify on the
positive side.  I don't think any horse is going to be comfortable or
sound forever with even a slight negative angle, something that is being
called "reverse founder" apparently due to the increased recognition of
how common it is I guess.

Negative angles are no good, which is why I say almost ground parallel
or ground parallel but do not say less than ground parallel. :-)

Quote:
Also, I am told there are some horses who are not comfotable at parallel
and must be maintained at a small positive angle to be comfortable in
the work.  Trial and error.

I think they all might eventually get there, with the right
management, but the ultimate idea is to respect the live sole plane,
and Ramey says that sometimes the live sole plane is not where he'd
"like" it to be, given his ideas about where the heels should be and
the angle of the coffin bone wrt the ground. But he respects the live
sole plane and trims to that, and then eventually it moves - like
driving up the quick - and he's able to take the heels the rest of the
way down.

cindi
Ocean of Nuance...
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:08 pm
Guest
cindi wrote:

(snip)

Quote:
The heel height dictates
the angle of the coffin bone with the ground, and ALL horses,
regardless of how big their feet are, need coffin bones that are
almost ground parallel, or that are ground parallel.

When you say "almost ground parallel," you need to specify on the
positive side. I don't think any horse is going to be comfortable or
sound forever with even a slight negative angle, something that is being
called "reverse founder" apparently due to the increased recognition of
how common it is I guess.

Also, I am told there are some horses who are not comfotable at parallel
and must be maintained at a small positive angle to be comfortable in
the work. Trial and error.

sharon
Ponai Mahone...
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:34 am
Guest
Cindi typed


Quote:
Bare foot trimming may save some horses, applying shoes many have saved
others. My horse was saved by having his tendons cut. He needed immediate
action if he was to keep living. His shoes were pulled because the vet
recommended applying styro foam pads to relieve the pressure on the
hoofwall
and the coffin bone. Trimming alone didn't cut it for him. In each
individual horse it depends the degrees of rotation and the sinking of
the
coffin bone.

I don't want to say anything mean or hurtful, but didn't he then
colic? And does that mean colic and die?

Yes, it means he colics, and he died on the operating table. This occured 16
months after he foundered.
The attending surgeon assured me there was no connection between the two
events, and personally,
I tend to agree with him. The type colic was Strangulating lipoma, if you
can somehow tie that to foundering 16 months previously, you can probably
make a million bucks with the information.

Quote:
More and more people are
deciding that the whole health of the horse is related to those feet
functioning properly. I am very sorry for your loss (if that's what
happened) and there is no way I'd want to minimize it or make light of
i>t -it's awful, period.


The horse was functioning "properly" at the time of his death. His insulin
levels and glucose levels functioned in the desired range. He metabolic
system had been function thus for the previous 15 months. He could walk,
trot and canter in pasture. He hadn't worn shoes since February of 2006. I
had a Strassite neighbor, who was famous hereabouts for riding his dead
lame, barefoot horse at a canter down the middle of the road, tell me the
horse had foundered because he had been shod. Your implication of His
Wallaceness' colic relating to him foundering is just as preposterous.

Quote:
No, he rotated and was sinking, I think it is pretty clear from the Feb
to
March films. At the time the March rads were taken, the vet felt the
horse
was 2mm from becoming a true "sinker" ie, the coffin bone piercing the
sole
of the hoof.

My horse was sinking straight down with no rotation. The DDFT is
thought to be what's pulling the coffin bone away from the hoof wall,
from the tip, back.

The your horse wouldn't have been a good candidate for cutting tendons.
Horses that rotate and sink are generally successful candidates.

Quote:
Everybody else in the world would prefer not to cut tendons. It is a
salvage
procedure. It works in some instances. If I had waited to see if a
barefoot
trim would work, the horse's coffin bone would have pierced the sole of
his
hoof, and it would have been all over.

I'm not sure you can predict that for sure, or with a different
(better?) trim, but all that aside, coffin bone penetration is no
longer a death sentence.

I'm curious how you perceive the horse didn't have an effective trim for his
hooves.

Quote:
All the big name barefoot folks have cured
many, many cases of that, each. Most even turn the horse out on many
acres of land and let them run around "naturally" with their coffin
bones penetrated. The movement speeds the healing. You can find case
after case of coffin bone penetration with no pain, because the two
conditions (trim, removal of the causative circumstances). I am pretty
sure we will one day find out that we can tell if the trim is right
and if the initial insult is removed simply from whether or not the
rotation stops. Since your horse's rotation did not stop, I would say
one or both conditions were not met. A lot of barefoot folk agree
with me; I do know it's still a fringe statement.

How was pain managed in many, many cases the big name barefoot folks have
"cured"? Did they give bute for the months needed to the hooves to heal
themselves while nerve endings were exposed?
After having spend time with a particularly stoic horse and seeing his
experience, I'm given to thinking many, many horses spend many, many months
in pain, while their soles regrow. How do the barefoot folks manage pain?
From my perspective, the cycle of pain, resulting from foundering, was
relieved by cutting the tendons. I think you have missed the point. Avoiding
having the coffin bone pierce the sole of the hoof is better than any other
option available.

Quote:
I don't regret having the tendons
cut, in fact given the same set of circumstances (rotating and sinking),
I
would still have it done. As far as pain management, the release of the
tendon on the bone was amazing. The horse didn't have the need to shuffle
from one foot to the other, as is the case for many horses with hoof
pain.

A good trim will do that too. You can read about Rain, my sinker,
after her first "barefoot trim":
http://www.allisonacres.org/rainfeet.html
She trotted for the first time in a year after that trim, and I mean
right after, and cantered the next day.

Well, good for Rain. A barefoot trim that worked. Not all are so successful.
Recently, The Big Red Horse sure didn't have a joyous experience without
shoes. His white line spread, the hoof walls flared. The Ramey trained
trimmer left the heels and toes much longer than any farrier before or
since. He shortened his stride on gravel, and was dead lame on logging
roads. Boots didn't fit effectively and would have been a safety hazard,
given the riding we do. He is wearing shoes again. He can trot and canter
again.

Quote:
PS His heels were appropriate for his foot size.

Cadaver study after cadaver study, as well as study of live animals,
have shown that appropriate heel height does not vary more than a tiny
tiny bit, among any breed, draft to pony. The heel height dictates
the angle of the coffin bone with the ground, and ALL horses,
regardless of how big their feet are, need coffin bones that are
almost ground parallel, or that are ground parallel. In a larger
foot, the structures are all larger, but the appropriate angles are no
different.

If his heels had been any closer to level with the ground, he would have
been walking on his heel bulbs. I doubt that would have been a roaring
success.

Deb
JC Dill...
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:52 am
Guest
Just going based on the subject line here.

Yes, even a sinker can sometimes be rehabilitated so that the bones are
restored to a normal position within the hoof capsule. However, the
horse will never be "fixed" as if it never foundered, because the
laminae will never be as strong as before the horse developed laminitis.

After laminits:
<http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11204/11204-h/images/image101.jpg>
vs healthy laminae:
<http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11204/11204-h/images/image032.jpg>

Even after the horse has been rehabilitated and the hoof and bones have
returned to "normal" some horses will have laminae that are so badly
damaged that the connective bond between the hoof wall and the bone is
not strong enough to resist the pull from the DDFT and the horse will
founder again (rotate or sink) if the horse is asked to do anything
other than be a pasture pet. However, with the support of a properly
fitting heart bar shoe (reset every 3-4 weeks) to provide additional
support to the coffin bone and resist the pull of the DDFT, many such
horses can remain sound, and useful. This is just one instance where
shoes help, and barefoot can't do the job.

jc
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:41 am